(1) Under existing law, a person between the ages of 6 and 18 years who is not exempted by law is subject to compulsory full-time education. Existing law excludes a child under 6 years of age from the public schools, subject to specified exceptions. Existing law requires a school district maintaining a kindergarten to admit a child who will have their 5th birthday on or before September 1 of the school year. Existing law also requires a child who will have their 6th birthday on or before September 1 of the school year to be admitted to the first grade of an elementary school. Existing law authorizes a child who has been lawfully admitted to a public school kindergarten or a private school kindergarten in California and who is judged by the administration of the school district to be ready for first-grade work to be admitted to the first grade, as specified. This bill, beginning with the 2024–25 school year, would require a child to have completed one year of kindergarten before that child may be admitted to the first grade at a public elementary school, except for a child who has been lawfully admitted to a public school kindergarten or a private school kindergarten in California, but has not yet completed one school year, and is judged to be ready for first-grade work, as specified, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Sponsored bills
(1) Existing law authorizes the chief fiscal officer of a campus of the California State University, upon approval of the Trustees of the California State University, to invest certain money received by the California State University in mutual funds subject to registration by, and under the regulatory authority of, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or in United States registered real estate investment trusts. This bill would limit the real estate investment trusts that could be invested in to those that are publicly traded and registered with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. The bill would authorize the chief fiscal officer of a campus of the California State University, upon approval of the trustees, to also invest that money in institutional commingled funds, as specified, offered by investment advisors registered with, and under the regulatory authority of, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or in exchange-traded funds subject to registration by, and under the regulatory authority of, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. (2) Existing law establishes the California State University Special Projects Fund, which consists of grants, revenues, and funds of any nature received by the trustees for research, workshops, conferences, institutes, and special projects from the state, federal government, local government, or private persons. Existing law continuously appropriates all grants, revenues, and funds deposited in the fund to the trustees for the operation, support, and development of research, workshops, conferences, institutes, and special projects in the California State University. Existing law authorizes the Treasurer or the chief fiscal officer of a campus of the California State University, upon approval of the trustees, to invest money from the fund in mutual funds subject to registration by, and under the regulatory authority of, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or in United States registered real estate investment trusts. This bill would limit the real estate investment trusts that could be invested in to those that are publicly traded and registered with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. The bill would authorize the Treasurer or chief fiscal officer of a campus of the California State University, upon approval of the trustees, to also invest that money in institutional commingled funds, as specified, offered by investment advisors registered with, and under the regulatory authority of, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or in exchange-traded funds subject to registration by, and under the regulatory authority of, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. By authorizing the expenditure of moneys from a continuously appropriated fund for new purposes, the bill would make an appropriation. (3) Commencing with the 2019–20 fiscal year, existing law limits the total amount that may be invested in those mutual funds and real estate investment trusts, as described in paragraphs (1) and (2) , to up to 30% of that money. Commencing with the 2022–23 fiscal year, this bill would increase the limit on the total amount that may be invested in those mutual funds, real estate investments trusts, institutional commingled funds, and exchange-traded funds, as described in paragraphs (1) and (2) , to up to 65% of that money.
Existing law establishes the Adult Education Program under the administration of the Chancellor of the California Community Colleges and the Superintendent of Public Instruction. Existing law requires the chancellor and the Superintendent, with the advice of the executive director of the State Board of Education, to divide the state into adult education regions and approve one adult education consortium in each of those regions. Existing law authorizes a community college district, school district, or county office of education, or a combination of these entities in a joint powers authority, to be members of an adult education consortium. Existing law requires, as a condition of receipt of an apportionment from the program, that an adult education consortium have a consortium-approved 3-year adult education plan, and approve a distribution schedule for apportionment to members of the consortium. Existing law requires that the amount distributed to a member of the consortium not be reduced, except as provided, unless the consortium makes specified findings related to the member for which the distribution would be reduced, including that the member has been consistently ineffective in providing services that address the needs identified in the adult education plan. This bill would authorize a consortium to reduce a member's allocation by no more than the amount of the member's carryover, as defined, if the consortium makes a finding by a majority vote, based on the member having excessive carryover for at least 2 consecutive fiscal years beginning with the 2022–23 fiscal year, that the member has been consistently ineffective in providing services that address the needs identified in the adult education plan. The bill would require a consortium with carryover from one or more prior fiscal years exceeding 20% to submit a written expenditure plan, as specified, to the chancellor and the Superintendent, and would require the chancellor and the Superintendent to prescribe and assign technical assistance to that consortium to ensure that adequate adult education services are provided to the region in proportion to the region's available funding.
Existing law requires a school district maintaining a kindergarten to admit a child who will have their 5th birthday on or before September 1 of the school year. Existing law authorizes, under certain circumstances, school districts offering kindergarten to maintain kindergarten classes at different schoolsites for different lengths of time. This bill would require, from the 2027–28 to the 2029–30 school year, inclusive, a school district or charter school that has an enrolled unduplicated pupil percentage of 50% or more and offers a kindergarten program, to provide, at each schoolsite that offers a kindergarten program, a minimum of one class that offers a minimum schoolday for the kindergarten day that is at least equivalent to the minimum schoolday provided for grades 1 to 3, inclusive. The bill would impose the same requirement on a school district or charter school, commencing with the 2030–31 school year, regardless of the enrolled unduplicated pupil percentage. The bill would provide that these provisions do not apply to transitional kindergarten. By imposing new duties on a school district or charter school the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Existing law establishes the California Community Colleges under the administration of the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges. Existing law also authorizes the establishment of community college districts, and further authorizes the operation, by these districts, of community college campuses that offer instructional services throughout the state. Existing law authorizes community college districts to admit nonresident students, and requires community college districts to charge a tuition fee to nonresident students, with specified exceptions. This bill would add an exception to the requirement for payment of nonresident tuition for the tuition fee for credit English as a second language courses for specified nonresident students enrolled in those courses. To the extent that this provision would impose new duties on community college districts, it would constitute a state-mandated local program. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 76140 of the Education Code proposed by AB 1998 to be operative only if this bill and AB 1998 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Existing law provides for the establishment of California American Indian education centers by any tribal group or incorporated American Indian association to meet specified objectives, and further provides for the administration of grants, upon application, by the State Department of Education for those purposes in accordance with specified provisions. Existing law requires each center to annually submit specified data to the department that reflects each center's ability to meet its stated objectives and any other objectives chosen by the center. Existing law requires the department to enter into a contract with a county office of education or a consortium of county offices of education for the purpose of developing model curriculum related to Native American studies, as provided. This bill would establish the California Indian Education Act and encourage school districts, county offices of education, and charter schools to form California Indian Education Task Forces with California tribes local to their regions or tribes historically located in the region. The bill would encourage task force participants to discuss issues of mutual concern and to undertake certain work. The bill would require California Indian Education Task Forces to submit, within one year of formation and annually thereafter, a report of findings to the department, as provided. The bill would require the department to submit, within one year of receiving task force reports and annually thereafter, a report to certain education committees of both houses of the Legislature regarding the narrowing of the achievement gap and the adoption of curriculum, as provided. The bill would authorize California Indian Education Task Forces to submit curricular materials to the county office of education, or consortium of county offices of education, that contracted to develop the model curricula related to Native American studies. The bill would require the contracted county office of education, or consortium of county offices of education, to consider these submitted materials for inclusion in the model curriculum. To the extent that this bill imposes new duties on the county office of education, or consortium of county offices of education, that contracted to develop the model curriculum, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Existing law establishes the Department of General Services (DGS) in the Government Operations Agency for purposes of, among other things, planning, acquiring, constructing, and maintaining state buildings and property. Under existing law, by executive order, the DGS was required to, among other things, create a digitized inventory of all excess state land, create screening tools for prioritizing affordable housing development on excess state land, and issue requests for proposals for and select affordable housing developments on excess state land, as described. Specifically, Executive Order No. N-06-19 (E.O. N-06-19) required the DGS to create a digitized inventory of excess state land no later than April 30, 2019, and required the DGS, the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) , and the California Housing Finance Agency to collaborate to develop 2 new screening tools for prioritizing affordable housing development on excess state land no later than March 29, 2019. This bill would require the DGS to develop, in consultation with the HCD, no later than September 1, 2023, a set of criteria to consistently evaluate state-owned parcels for suitability as affordable housing sites. The bill would also require, on or before July 1, 2024, and every 4 years thereafter, the DGS to, among other things, conduct a review of all state-owned property and identify state-owned parcels that are potentially viable for affordable housing based on those criteria. The bill would require the DGS to update the digitized inventory created pursuant to E.O. N-06-19 of all excess state land, as defined, suitable for affordable housing identified by its review. The bill would require the DGS and the HCD to evaluate and update the 2 screening tools created pursuant to E.O. N-06-19. This bill would require the DGS, in consultation with the HCD, to pursue the development of affordable housing on excess state properties.The bill would require all state agencies to respond to requests for information from the DGS, as described, and to consider exchanging excess state land with local governments for other parcels for purposes of affordable housing development and preservation. The bill would also require all state agencies to use all existing legal and financial authority to expedite and prioritize developments accepted pursuant to the request for proposal process described in the bill, as specified. The bill would require the DGS to report to the Legislature on or before January 1, 2024, and annually thereafter, on the status of the excess state properties identified, as specified.
Existing law establishes in the state government, in the Government Operations Agency, the Department of General Services and provides that the department is under the control of an executive officer known as the Director of General Services. Existing law requires each state agency annually to review certain proprietary state lands over which it has jurisdiction to determine what land, if any, is in excess of its foreseeable needs and report this in writing to the department. Existing law requires the department to create a database of information on lands identified by a local government as suitable and available for residential development and information regarding the state lands determined or declared excess, as specified. Existing law requires the department to report to the Legislature annually the land declared excess and to request authorization to dispose of the land by sale or otherwise. Existing law authorizes the department to dispose of real property declared surplus by the Legislature, as specified. This bill would require, by January 1, 2024, the department to prepare and report to the Legislature a streamlined plan to transition underutilized multistory state buildings into housing for the purpose of expanding affordable housing development and adaptive reuse opportunities.
(1) The Charter Schools Act of 1992 provides for the establishment and operation of charter schools. Existing law requires a petition for the establishment of a charter school to contain comprehensive descriptions of various matters and procedures, including procedures by which pupils can be suspended or expelled from the charter school for disciplinary reasons or otherwise involuntarily removed for any reason. Existing law requires these procedures to contain a clear statement that no pupil shall be involuntarily removed by the charter school for any reason unless the parent or guardian of the pupil has been provided written notice of the intent to remove the pupil no less than 5 schooldays before the effective date of the action. Existing law requires the written notice to inform the pupil, the pupil's parent or guardian, or the pupil's educational rights holder of the right to initiate a hearing adjudicated by a neutral officer before the pupil may be involuntarily removed by the charter school. This bill would require the written notice to be provided to and inform the foster child's educational rights holder, attorney, and county social worker and, if applicable, the Indian child's tribal social worker and, if applicable, county social worker of the right to initiate a hearing adjudicated by a neutral officer before the foster child or, if applicable, Indian child may be involuntarily removed by the charter school. The bill would give a foster child's educational rights holder, attorney, and county social worker and an Indian child's tribal social worker and, if applicable, county social worker the same rights a parent or guardian of a child has to receive a suspension notice, expulsion notice, manifestation determination notice, involuntary transfer notice, and other documents and related information. (2) Existing law requires the governing board of each high school or unified school district that assigns pupils to continuation schools to adopt rules and regulations governing procedures for the involuntary transfer of pupils to continuation schools. Existing law requires these rules and regulations to provide that written notice be given to the pupil and the pupil's parent or guardian informing them of the opportunity to request a meeting with a designee of the district superintendent of schools before the transfer. At the meeting, existing law requires the pupil or the pupil's parent or guardian to be informed of the specific facts and reasons for the proposed transfer and to have the opportunity to inspect all documents relied upon, question any evidence and witnesses presented, and present evidence on the pupil's behalf. This bill would require those rules and regulations, for the involuntary transfer of pupils to continuation schools, to provide written notice of the opportunity to request a meeting with a designee of the district superintendent of schools before the transfer, if the pupil is a foster child, to the foster child's educational rights holder, attorney, and county social worker, and, if the pupil is an Indian child, as defined, the Indian child's tribal social worker and, if applicable, county social worker. The bill would require the foster child's educational rights holder, attorney, and county social worker and the Indian child's tribal social worker and, if applicable, county social worker to have the same rights that a parent of a pupil has at the meeting. Because the bill would impose additional duties on local educational agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) Existing law requires each local educational agency, as defined, to designate a staff person as the educational liaison for foster children, as defined. If the education liaison is designated by the superintendent of the local educational agency, existing law requires the educational liaison to notify a foster child's attorney and the appropriate representative of the county child welfare agency of pending expulsion proceedings if the decision to recommend expulsion is a discretionary act, and pending proceedings to extend a suspension until an expulsion decision is rendered if the decision to recommend expulsion is a discretionary act. This bill would instead require the foster child's educational rights holder, attorney, and county social worker and an Indian child's, as defined, tribal social worker and, if applicable, county social worker to have the same rights a parent or guardian of a child has to receive a suspension notice, expulsion notice, manifestation determination notice, involuntary transfer notice, and other documents and related information. Because the bill would impose additional duties on local educational agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (4) Existing law authorizes the principal of the school, the principal's designee, or the district superintendent of schools to suspend a pupil from the school for any of specified reasons for no more than 5 consecutive schooldays. Existing law requires the suspension to be preceded by an informal conference, as specified. If a pupil is suspended without a conference before suspension, existing law requires the parent and the pupil to be notified of the pupil's right to a conference and the pupil's right to return to school for the purpose of a conference. Existing law requires, at the time of suspension, a school employee to make a reasonable effort to notify the pupil's parent or guardian in person or by telephone of the suspension. In a case where expulsion from a school or suspension for the balance of the semester from a continuation school is being processed by the governing board of school district, existing law requires, if the pupil is a foster child, the district superintendent of schools or the district superintendent's designee to invite the pupil's attorney and an appropriate representative of the county child welfare agency to participate in the meeting, as provided. This bill would require, if a foster child or Indian child, as defined, is suspended without a conference before suspension, the foster child's educational rights holder, attorney, and county social worker, or, if applicable, the Indian child's tribal social worker and, if applicable, county social worker to be notified of the child's right to a conference and the child's right to return to school for the purpose of the conference. The bill would require, at the time of suspension of a foster child or Indian child, a school employee to make a reasonable effort to contact the foster child's educational rights holder, attorney, and county social worker, or, if applicable, the Indian child's tribal social worker and, if applicable, county social worker. The bill would authorize notification at the time of a suspension to a parent, guardian, foster child's educational rights holder, attorney, and county social worker, and Indian child's tribal social worker and, if applicable, county social worker to occur by email. The bill would require the district superintendent of schools or the district superintendent's designee to invite the foster child's county social worker, instead of an appropriate representative of the county child welfare agency, or, if applicable, the Indian child's tribal social worker and, if applicable, county social worker to participate in the meeting on a foster child's or, if applicable, an Indian child's expulsion from a school or suspension for the balance of the semester from a continuation school. Because the bill would impose additional duties on local educational agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (5) Existing law requires at the time a pupil is assigned to a supervised suspension classroom, a school employee to notify, in person or by telephone, the pupil's parent or guardian, as specified. This bill would require, if the pupil assigned to a supervised suspension classroom is a foster child or Indian child, as defined, a school employee to notify the foster child's educational rights holder, attorney, and county social worker or the Indian child's tribal social worker and, if applicable, county social worker. The bill would authorize notification of assignment to a supervised suspension classroom to a parent, guardian, foster child's educational rights holder, foster child's attorney, foster child's county social worker, and an Indian child's tribal social worker and, if applicable, county social worker to occur by email. Because the bill would impose additional duties on local educational agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (6) If an individual with exceptional needs is a foster child and the local educational agency has proposed a change of placement due to an act for which a decision to recommend expulsion is at the discretion of the principal or the district superintendent of schools, existing law requires the attorney for the individual with exceptional needs and an appropriate representative of the county child welfare agency to be invited to participate in the individualized education program team meeting that makes a manifestation determination on expulsion pursuant to federal law. This bill would require the county social worker for the individual with exceptional needs who is a foster child, instead of an appropriate representative of the county child welfare agency, to be invited to participate in the individualized education program team meeting that makes a manifestation determination. The bill would require the local educational agency to invite the educational rights holder, attorney, and county social worker for the pupil if the local educational agency has proposed a change of placement due to an act for which a decision to recommend expulsion is mandatory. The bill would require the tribal social worker and, if applicable, county social worker for an individual with exceptional needs who is an Indian child, as defined, to participate in the individualized education program team meeting that makes a manifestation determination. The bill would require the local educational agency to invite the tribal social worker and, if applicable, county social worker for the Indian child if the local educational agency has proposed a change of placement due to an act for which a decision to recommend expulsion is mandatory. Because the bill would impose additional duties on local educational agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (7) If the decision to recommend expulsion is a discretionary act and the pupil is a foster child, existing law requires the governing board of the school district to provide notice of the expulsion hearing to the pupil's attorney and an appropriate representative of the county child welfare agency at least 10 calendar days before the date of the hearing. This bill would require the governing board of the school district to provide that notice to the pupil's county social worker, instead of an appropriate representative of the county child welfare agency. The bill would require the governing board of the school district to provide that notice to the pupil's educational rights holder, attorney, or county social worker if a recommendation of expulsion is required. The bill would require the governing board of the school district to provide the above-described notice to the tribal social worker and, if applicable, county social worker of a pupil who is an Indian child. The bill would require the governing board of the school district to provide that notice to the Indian child's tribal social worker or, if applicable, county social worker if a recommendation of expulsion is required. Because the bill would impose additional duties on local educational agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (8) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Existing law, the Speech-Language Pathologists and Audiologists and Hearing Aid Dispensers Licensure Act, until January 1, 2023, establishes the Speech-Language Pathology Audiology and Hearing Aid Dispensers Board within the Department of Consumer Affairs for the licensure and regulation of speech-language pathologists, speech-language pathology aides, speech language pathology assistants, audiologists, dispensing audiologists, and hearing aid dispensers. Existing law provides for the appointment of members of the board by specified appointing authorities, and, until January 1, 2023, authorizes the board to appoint an executive officer. Existing law authorizes an appointing authority to remove from office at any time any member of a board appointed by the appointing authority for continued neglect of duties, incompetence, or unprofessional or dishonorable conduct. Existing law makes a violation of the act a misdemeanor. This bill would extend the operation of the board and the authorization to appoint an executive officer until January 1, 2027, and would authorize an appointing authority to remove from office at any time any member of the board appointed by that appointing authority. The bill would specify that, in addition to the enforcement and administration of the act, the board is vested with other regulatory duties of the act. The bill would require an applicant, registrant, or licensee under the act who has an email address to provide it to the board no later than July 1, 2023. By expanding the scope of a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law establishes the Hearing Aid Dispensing Committee, comprised of 5 members, within the jurisdiction of the board. This bill would abolish the committee. Existing law defines "audiology aide" to mean any person meeting the minimum requirements established by the board. Existing law prohibits an audiology aide from performing any function that constitutes the practice of audiology unless they are under the supervision of an audiologist. This bill would delete that prohibition and would instead define "audiology aide" to mean any person meeting the minimum requirements established by the board who works directly under the supervision of an audiologist. Existing law requires speech-language pathologists and audiologists supervising speech-language pathology or audiology aides to register with the board the name of each person working under their supervision. This bill would make speech-language pathology and audiology aide registrations expire every 2 years and would require the board to establish a renewal fee in an amount not to exceed $30. The bill would require the speech-language pathologist or audiologist supervising the speech-language pathology or audiology aide to, at the time of renewal, update the board on the duties the aide performs and the training program and assessment methods the supervisor is using. Existing law requires an applicant for licensure as an audiologist to submit evidence of satisfactory completion of supervised clinical practice under the direction of an educational institution approved by the board and satisfactory completion of supervised professional experience following completion of the didactic and clinical rotation requirements of an audiology doctoral program. This bill would require the clinical practice to be under the direction of an audiology doctoral program at an educational institution approved by the board, and would delete the requirement that supervised professional experience follow completion of the didactic and clinical rotation requirements of the audiology doctoral program. Existing law requires the board to deem a person who holds a Certificate of Clinical Competence in Speech-Language Pathology issued by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association's Council for Clinical Certification to have met specified educational and experience requirements for licensure as a speech-language pathologist or audiologist. This bill would make that requirement applicable only to licensure as a speech-language-pathologist and effective only until January 1, 2027, and would instead require the board, until January 1, 2027, to deem a person who holds either a valid Certification of Clinical Competence in Audiology issued by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association's Council for Clinical Certification or a valid American Board of Audiology certificate issued by the American Academy of Audiology to have met specified educational and experience requirements for licensure as an audiologist. Existing law lists various reasons for which the board is authorized to suspend, revoke, or impose terms and conditions upon the license of any licensee, including incompetence, gross negligence, or repeated negligent acts. This bill would add specified reasons for which the board is authorized to suspend, revoke, or impose terms and conditions upon a license, including for a disciplinary action taken by any public agency in any state or territory for any act substantially related to the practice of speech-language pathology, audiology, or hearing aid dispensing. The bill would authorize a person whose license has been revoked, suspended, or who has been placed on probation to petition the board for reinstatement or modification of penalty after a specified minimum period of time has elapsed from the effective date of the decision ordering that disciplinary action in accordance with specified procedural and other requirements. Existing law provides that a plea or verdict of guilty or a conviction following a plea of nolo contendere made to a charge substantially related to the qualifications, functions, and duties of a speech-language pathologist or audiologist is deemed to be a conviction for specified provisions of the act. This bill would also make that provision applicable to hearing aid dispensers. The bill would also make various other conforming and technical changes to the act, including updating cross-references and deleting an obsolete provision. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 2530.2 of the Business and Professions Code proposed by SB 1453 to be operative only if this bill and SB 1453 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.