Photo of Anthony Portantino
D California Senate · District 25

Sen. Anthony Portantino

Contact Email
Compare
Total votes
35,772
all sessions
Attendance
96%
931 missed
Near the chamber average
With party
99%
of cast votes
Near the chamber average
Bipartisan score
0%
crosses aisle rarely
Near the chamber average
Sponsored
387
bills & resolutions
Near the chamber average
Committees
0
assignments
387 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
387
Primary
140
Co-sponsor
247
This page
387
matching current filters
Co-sponsor SB 1466
In committee · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Affordable Housing and Community Development Investment Program.

Existing property tax law requires the county auditor, in each fiscal year, to allocate property tax revenue to local jurisdictions in accordance with specified formulas and procedures, subject to certain modifications. Existing law requires an annual reallocation of property tax revenue from local agencies in each county to the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund (ERAF) in that county for allocation to specified educational entities. Existing law authorizes certain local agencies to form an enhanced infrastructure financing district, affordable housing authority, transit village development district, or community revitalization and investment authority for purposes of, among other things, infrastructure, affordable housing, and economic revitalization. This bill would establish in state government the Affordable Housing and Community Development Investment Program, which would be administered by the Affordable Housing and Community Development Investment Committee. The bill would authorize a city, county, city and county, joint powers agency, enhanced infrastructure financing district, affordable housing authority, community revitalization and investment authority, transit village development district, or a combination of those entities, to apply to the Affordable Housing and Community Development Investment Committee to participate in the program and would authorize the committee to approve or deny plans for projects meeting specific criteria. The bill would also authorize certain local agencies to establish an affordable housing and community development investment agency and authorize an agency to apply for funding under the program and issue bonds, as provided, to carry out a project under the program. The bill would require the Affordable Housing and Community Development Investment Committee to adopt guidelines for plans. Subject to the Legislature enacting a budget bill for the applicable fiscal year that specifies the amount for the committee to allocate pursuant to the program, the bill would require the committee to approve no more than $200,000,000 per year from July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2029, and $250,000,000 per year from July 1, 2029, to June 30, 2033, in transfers from a county's ERAF for applicants for plans approved pursuant to this program. This bill would provide that eligible projects include, among other things, the predevelopment, development, acquisition, rehabilitation, and preservation of workforce and affordable housing, certain transit-oriented development, and projects promoting strong neighborhoods. The bill would require the Affordable Housing and Community Development Investment Committee, upon approval of a plan and subject to specified conditions, to issue an order directing the county auditor to transfer an amount of ad valorem property tax revenue that is equal to the affordable housing and community development investment amount approved by the committee, except as provided, from the county's ERAF. The bill would require the county auditor to either deposit that amount into the Affordable Housing and Community Development Investment Fund, which this bill would create in the treasury of each county, or, if the applicant is a specified type of authority or special district to transfer to the city or county that created the authority or district an amount of property tax revenue equal to the amount approved by the Affordable Housing and Community Development Investment Committee for that authority or district. The bill would require the city or county that created the district to, upon receipt, transfer those funds to the authority or district in an amount equal to the affordable housing and community development investment amount for that authority or district. By imposing additional duties on local officials, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would authorize applicants to use approved amounts to incur debt or issue bonds or other financing to support an approved project. The bill also would require each applicant that has received funding to submit annual reports, as specified, and would require the Affordable Housing and Community Development Investment Committee to provide a report to the Joint Legislative Budget Committee, if it approves funding under the program, that includes certain project information. Section 8 of Article XVI of the California Constitution sets forth a formula for computing the minimum amount of revenues that the state is required to appropriate for the support of school districts and community college districts for each fiscal year. This bill would require the Director of Finance to adjust the percentage of General Fund revenues appropriated for school districts and community college districts for these purposes in a manner that ensures that the transfers from a county's ERAF pursuant to the Affordable Housing and Community Development Investment Program have no net fiscal impact upon the total amount of the General Fund revenue and local property tax revenue allocated to school districts and community college districts pursuant to Section 8 of Article XVI of the California Constitution, as specified. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

In committee Mar 10, 2022 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor ACR 93
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to Childhood Cancer Awareness Month.

This measure would proclaim the month of September 2021 as Childhood Cancer Awareness Month in California and state the commitment of the Legislature to support efforts to find cures for, and achieve prevention of, childhood cancer.

Signed into law Feb 22, 2022 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SB 285
died · California Senate · Co-sponsor
California Tourism Recovery Act.

Existing law, the California Tourism and Marketing Act, establishes a nonprofit mutual benefit corporation named the California Travel and Tourism Commission under the direction of a board of commissioners composed of 37 members, including the Director of the Governor's Office of Business and Economic Development. This bill, the California Tourism Recovery Act, would require the commission to, upon a determination by the State Department of Public Health that it is safe to resume travel in California, implement a strategic media and jobs recovery campaign known as the "Calling All Californians" program for the purpose of reversing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the travel and tourism industry in California, as specified. The bill would require the commission to report to the Legislature, on or before January 1, 2024, regarding the cost of the program and the impact of the program on the tourism industry in California. The bill would require, only upon appropriation by the Legislature, the Controller to transfer $45,000,000 to the commission for the purpose of implementing the "Calling All Californians" program.

died Feb 1, 2022 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SB 228
died · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Public postsecondary education: support services for foster youth: Cooperating Agencies Foster Youth Educational Support Program.

(1) Existing law establishes the California State University, the California Community Colleges, and the University of California as the 3 segments of public postsecondary education in this state. Existing law requires the California State University and each community college district, and requests the University of California, with respect to each campus in their respective jurisdictions that administers a priority enrollment system, to grant priority in that system to certain foster youth or former foster youth whose dependency was established or continued by the court on or after the youth's 16th birthday and to certain homeless youth and former homeless youth. This bill would extend this requirement and request for enrollment priority for certain foster youth or former foster youth to those whose dependency was established or continued by a court of competent jurisdiction, including a tribal court, on or after the youth's 13th birthday. The bill would authorize a representative of a tribe or tribal organization to verify the homeless status of an American Indian student who is a homeless youth or former homeless youth, as specified. To the extent that the bill would impose duties on community college districts, it would constitute a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law, the Cooperating Agencies Foster Youth Educational Support Program, authorizes the Office of the Chancellor of the California Community Colleges to enter into agreements with up to 20 community college districts to provide additional funds for services in support of postsecondary education for foster youth. Existing law provides that these services include, when appropriate, but are not necessarily limited to, outreach and recruitment, consultation and eligibility verification, consultation and referrals for students deemed ineligible, service coordination, counseling, book and supply grants, tutoring, independent living and financial literacy skills support, frequent in-person contact, career guidance, transfer counseling, childcare and transportation assistance, and referrals to health services, mental health services, housing assistance, and other related services. This bill would authorize the program to provide all of these services, and direct financial support, to enrolled students who meet all eligibility requirements but whose courses have not yet commenced, and who have completed required matriculation activities as described, if those services are deemed necessary to enable the student to be successful upon the commencement of the academic term. (3) Existing law requires a student participant in the Cooperating Agencies Foster Youth Educational Support Program to be a current or former foster youth in California whose dependency was established or continued by the court on or after the youth's 16th birthday. This bill would instead require a student participant in the program to be a current or former foster youth in California whose dependency was established or continued by a court of competent jurisdiction, including a tribal court, on or after the youth's 13th birthday. (4) Existing law requires the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges, in consultation with the State Department of Social Services, to adopt regulations for the program and to be responsible for the administration of funds for the program. This bill would further require regulations adopted by the board of governors to ensure that program application and enrollment processes implemented by community college districts are streamlined, do not impose barriers to entry, and allow programs to exercise professional judgment to waive any income criteria specified in the regulations as a condition of eligibility, as specified. (5) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

died Feb 1, 2022 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SB 805
Vetoed · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Small nonprofit performing arts organizations: payroll and paymaster services: grants.

Existing law, the Dixon-Zenovich-Maddy California Arts Act of 1975, establishes the Arts Council, consisting of 11 appointed members. Existing law specifies the duties of the council, including, among others, encouraging artistic awareness, participation, and expression, helping independent local groups develop their own art programs, promoting the employment of artists and those skilled in crafts in both the public and private sector, awarding prizes or directing grants to individuals or organizations, as specified, and establishing grant application criteria and procedure. This bill would, upon appropriation by the Legislature, require the council to establish and administer the California Nonprofit Performing Arts Paymaster program. The bill would require the council to issue a request for proposals and award contracts to be a California nonprofit performing arts paymaster on a competitive basis to 2 or more nonprofit contractors to provide payroll and paymaster services to small nonprofit performing arts organizations, as defined. The bill would require the council to establish a criteria to rate and rank applicants and establish necessary contract terms. The bill would, upon appropriation, require the council to provide a nonprofit contractor selected to provide payroll services with a grant award in an amount necessary to fund the initial startup costs. This bill would authorize a nonprofit contractor providing services to charge a fee to a nonprofit performing arts organization that receives payroll or paymaster services, provided that the fee does not exceed the cost of providing the services. The bill would require a nonprofit contractor that provides services under these provisions to submit an annual report to the council by July 31 of each year that provides specified information from the prior fiscal year, including, among other things, a detailed accounting of all fees charged and collected.

Vetoed Jan 27, 2022 1 co-sponsor
Primary SB 269
Signed into law · California Senate · Lead sponsor
Credit unions.

The California Credit Union Law (CCUL) provides for the licensure and regulation of credit unions by the Commissioner of Financial Protection and Innovation and makes a willful violation of that law a crime. The law prohibits a member of the board of directors, supervisory committee, or credit committee from receiving compensation for services as a member of the board of directors or those committees, subject to an exception for reasonable health, accident, and similar insurance and specified expense reimbursement. Existing law requires credit unions to obtain a bond or insurance coverage for each director, officer, supervisory committee member, and employee, among others, of the credit union. This bill would prohibit a member of the audit committee from receiving compensation for services as a member of those committees. The bill would require credit unions to obtain a bond or insurance coverage for an audit committee member. The Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation Law prohibits a credit union from expelling a member without providing that member a fair and reasonable process, as specified. The CCUL authorizes the board of directors of a credit union to expel a member for specified causes, including conviction for a criminal offense involving moral turpitude, unless the bylaws of the credit union expressly reserve that duty to members and entitles an expelled member to appeal the expulsion to the members, as specified. Existing law authorizes the board of directors to delegate the power to expel members to the chairperson of a membership committee or an executive committee, as specified. This bill would authorize the board of directors to expel a member for abusive, threatening, or harassing behavior toward credit union staff, volunteers, or members, or the abuse of credit union systems or property and would authorize that expulsion to take effect immediately and without advance notice or an opportunity to be heard, if the board of directors or its designee determines that immediate expulsion is reasonably necessary for the protection of the credit union or its staff, volunteers, or members. The bill would require a member expelled in that manner be provided written notice within 5 days after the effective date of that expulsion and would entitle the member, and a member expelled by the board of directors for any of the other specified causes, to appeal that expulsion to the board of directors pursuant to reasonable procedures adopted by the board that meet a certain minimum standard. The bill would define a membership committee for purposes of acting on applications for new membership and expelling members for cause. The bill would provide that this process is fair and reasonable for purposes of the Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporation Law. Existing law authorizes the board of directors of a credit union to establish an audit committee in lieu of a supervisory committee, and an audit committee that meets specified requirements is deemed to satisfy certain provisions relating to a supervisory committee. Existing law prescribes procedural requirements for the establishment of an audit committee, prescribes requirements for its membership, and requires that an audit committee carry out specified responsibilities. This bill would prescribe the means by which a membership vote for establishing an audit committee may be satisfied and additional requirements for the subsequent dissolution of a supervisory committee. The bill would authorize an audit committee member to be appointed or removed by the board of directors, as specified, and would authorize the Commissioner of Financial Protection and Innovation to direct removal of audit committee members, as specified. The bill would identify additional responsibilities for an audit committee. The CCUL authorizes a credit union to purchase a promissory note upon which a member is the primary obligor, authorizes a credit union to issue shares to specified entities, and prohibits a credit union from entering into any loan or approved line of credit, including both used and unused portions, on which the official is a borrower, coborrower, cosigner, endorser, or guarantor with an official, as defined, of the credit union. This bill would revise and recast those provisions, including by repealing the authorization to purchase a promissory note upon which a member is the primary obligor and would authorize a credit union to issue shares to a member or nonmember state or federal credit union. The CCUL authorizes a member to withdraw from membership in the credit union at any time, as specified, and authorizes a credit union to transfer a member who has no outstanding obligations with the credit union and whose share account is below the amount established by the bylaws to inactive status. This bill would authorize a credit union to deem an inactive member to have withdrawn from membership, subject to specified notice and other conditions. By expanding the scope of the crime of willfully violating the provisions of the CCUL, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Signed into law Oct 9, 2021 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor SB 98
Signed into law · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Public peace: media access.

Existing law makes every person who willfully resists, delays, or obstructs any public officer, peace officer, or an emergency medical technician, as defined, in the discharge or attempt to discharge any duty of the office or employment, when no other punishment is prescribed, guilty of a misdemeanor. Existing law also authorizes specified peace officers to close an area where a menace to the public health or safety is created by a calamity and to close the immediate area surrounding any emergency field command post or other command post activated for the purpose of abating a calamity, riot, or other civil disturbance, as specified. Existing law makes any unauthorized person who willfully and knowingly enters those areas and who remains in the area after receiving notice to evacuate or leave guilty of a misdemeanor. Existing law exempts a duly authorized representative of any news service, newspaper, or radio or television station or network from the provisions prohibiting entry into the closed areas, as specified. This bill would, if peace officers close the immediate area surrounding any emergency field command post or any other command post, or establish a police line, or rolling closure at a demonstration, march, protest, or rally where individuals are engaged primarily in constitutionally protected activity, as described, require that a duly authorized representative of any news service, online news service, newspaper, or radio or television station or network, as described, be allowed to enter those closed areas and would prohibit a peace officer or other law enforcement officer from intentionally assaulting, interfering with, or obstructing a duly authorized representative who is gathering, receiving, or processing information for communication to the public. The bill would also prohibit a duly authorized representative who is in a closed area and gathering, receiving, or processing information from being cited for the failure to disperse, a violation of a curfew, or a violation of other, specified law. The bill would require that if a representative is detained by a peace officer or other law enforcement officer, the representative be permitted to contact a supervisory officer immediately for the purpose of challenging the detention. The bill would not impose criminal liability. The bill would state the Legislature's intention to achieve parity in the access and protections in these circumstances as those established pursuant to a specified law.

Signed into law Oct 9, 2021 1 co-sponsor
Primary SB 224
Signed into law · California Senate · Lead sponsor
Pupil instruction: mental health education.

Existing law requires, during the next revision of the publication "Health Framework for California Public Schools," the Instructional Quality Commission to consider developing, and recommending for adoption by the State Board of Education, a distinct category on mental health instruction to educate pupils about all aspects of mental health. Existing law requires mental health instruction for these purposes to include, but not be limited to, specified elements, including reasonably designed and age-appropriate instruction on the overarching themes and core principles of mental health. This bill would require each school district, county office of education, state special school, and charter school that offers one or more courses in health education to pupils in middle school or high school to include in those courses instruction in mental health that meets the requirements of the bill, as specified. The bill would require that instruction to include, among other things, reasonably designed instruction on the overarching themes and core principles of mental health. The bill would require that instruction and related materials to, among other things, be appropriate for use with pupils of all races, genders, sexual orientations, and ethnic and cultural backgrounds, pupils with disabilities, and English learners. The bill would require the State Department of Education to develop a plan to expand mental health instruction in California public schools on or before January 1, 2024.

Signed into law Oct 8, 2021 0 co-sponsors
Primary SB 255
Signed into law · California Senate · Lead sponsor
Health care coverage: employer associations.

(1) Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, requires the Department of Managed Health Care to license and regulate health care service plans and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law also requires the Department of Insurance to regulate health insurers. Existing law regulates individual, small employer, and large employer health care service plan contracts and health insurance policies, as defined. Existing federal law, the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) , authorizes multiple employer welfare arrangements (MEWAs) in which two or more employers join together to provide health care coverage for employees or to their beneficiaries. Under existing state law, the status of each distinct member of an association determines whether that member's association coverage is individual, small group, or large group health coverage. This bill would authorize an association of employers to offer a large group health care service plan contract or large group health insurance policy consistent with ERISA if certain requirements are met, including that the association is headquartered in this state, is a MEWA as defined under ERISA, and was established as a MEWA prior to March 23, 2010, and has been in continuous existence since that date. The bill would also require the large group health care service plan contract or health insurance policy to have provided a specified level of coverage as of January 1, 2019, and to include coverage for employees, and their dependents, who are employed in designated job categories on a project-by-project basis for one or more participating employers, with no single project exceeding 6 months in duration, and who, in the course of that employment, are not covered by another group health care service plan contract or group health insurance policy in which the employer participates. The bill would also require the MEWA and participating employers to have a genuine organizational relationship unrelated to the provision of health care benefits and would require the participating employers to have a commonality of interests from being in the same line of business, as specified. This bill would require the MEWA, on or before June 1, 2022, to file an application for registration with the Department of Managed Health Care or the Department of Insurance, as applicable, and to annually file evidence of ongoing compliance with the bill's requirements with the applicable department. The bill would prohibit a health care service plan or health insurer, on or after June 1, 2022, from marketing, issuing, amending, renewing, or delivering large employer health care coverage or large employer health insurance coverage to a MEWA that provides benefits to a resident in this state unless the MEWA is registered and is in compliance with the bill or unless the MEWA filed an application for registration and the application is pending before the applicable department. Because a violation of the bill by a health care service plan would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 1357.503 of the Health and Safety Code and Section 10753.05 of the Insurance Code proposed by SB 326 and SB 718 to be operative only if this bill and SB 326, SB 718, or both are enacted and this bill is enacted last. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Signed into law Oct 8, 2021 0 co-sponsors
Showing 231 to 240 of 387 bills
Previous 1 … 23 24 25 … 39 Next