Existing law, the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act, provides for the involuntary commitment and treatment of a person who is a danger to themselves or others or who is gravely disabled. Existing law, for purposes of involuntary commitment, defines "gravely disabled" as either a condition in which a person, as a result of a mental health disorder, is unable to provide for their basic personal needs for food, clothing, or shelter or has been found mentally incompetent, as specified. This bill expands the definition of "gravely disabled" to also include a condition in which a person, as a result of a severe substance use disorder, or a co-occurring mental health disorder and a severe substance use disorder, is, in addition to the basic personal needs described above, unable to provide for their personal safety or necessary medical care, as defined. The bill would also expand the definition of "gravely disabled," as it applies to specified sections, to include, in addition to the basic needs described above, the inability for a person to provide for their personal safety or necessary medical care as a result of chronic alcoholism. The bill would authorize counties to defer implementation of these provisions to January 1, 2026, as specified. The bill would make conforming changes. To the extent that this change increases the level of service required of county mental health departments, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law also authorizes the appointment of a conservator, in the County of Los Angeles, the County of San Diego, or the City and County of San Francisco, for a person who is incapable of caring for the person's own health and well-being due to a serious mental illness and substance use disorder. Existing law establishes the hearsay rule, under which evidence of a statement is generally inadmissible if it was made other than by a witness while testifying at a hearing and is offered to prove the truth of the matter stated. Existing law sets forth exceptions to the hearsay rule to permit the admission of specified kinds of evidence. Under this bill, for purposes of an opinion offered by an expert witness in any proceeding relating to the appointment or reappointment of a conservator pursuant to the above-described provisions, the statements of specified health practitioners or a licensed clinical social worker included in the medical record would not be made inadmissible by the hearsay rule under specified conditions. The bill would authorize the court to grant a reasonable continuance if an expert witness in a proceeding relied on the medical record and the medical record has not been provided to the parties or their counsel. Existing law requires the State Department of Health Care Services to collect data quarterly and publish, on or before May 1 of each year, a specified report that includes, among other things, the number of persons for whom temporary conservatorship are established in each county and an analysis and evaluation of the efficacy of mental health assessments, detentions, treatments, and supportive services provided, as specified. This bill would, beginning with the report due May 1, 2024, require the report to also include the number of persons admitted or detained, as specified, for conditions that include, among others, grave disability due to a mental health disorder, severe substance use disorder, or both a mental health disorder and a severe substance use disorder. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Sponsored bills
Existing law, the Contractors State License Law, defines and regulates the activities of contractors and provides for their licensure, regulation, and discipline by the Contractors State License Board within the Department of Consumer Affairs. Existing law classifies the contracting business to include general engineering contracting, general building contracting, residential remodeling contracting, and specialty contracting. Existing law authorizes the issuance of contractors' licenses to individual owners, partnerships, corporations, and limited liability companies, and authorizes those persons and entities to qualify for a license by the appearance of specified individuals. Existing law prohibits contractors from performing specified acts and provides that a violation of those acts may constitute a cause for disciplinary action. This bill would prohibit a specialty contractor, as defined, from entering into a contract for the performance of work on the same single project or undertaking with more than one subcontractor in the same license classification unless the subcontractor employs persons who are classified as employees to perform work in that license classification on the single project or undertaking or the specialty contractor is a signatory to a bona fide collective bargaining agreement, as specified. The bill would provide that a violation of this provision constitutes a cause for disciplinary action.
The California Internet Consumer Protection and Net Neutrality Act of 2018 prohibits fixed and mobile internet service providers, as defined, that provide broadband internet access service, as defined, from engaging in specified actions concerning the treatment of internet traffic. The act also prohibits fixed and mobile internet service providers from offering or providing services other than broadband internet access service that are delivered over the same last-mile connection as the broadband internet access service, if those services have the purpose or effect of evading the above-described prohibitions or negatively affect the performance of broadband internet access service. This bill, the Digital Equity Bill of Rights, would state that it is the principle of the state, to ensure digital equity for all residents of the state, that residents shall have access to broadband that meets specific requirements, and that it is the policy of the state that, to the extent technically feasible, broadband internet subscribers benefit from equal access to broadband internet service within the service area of a broadband provider, as those terms are defined. The bill would also state that it does not create an obligation for the state to enforce that principle or policy and does not create a private right of action against the state to enforce the bill. The bill would make related legislative findings and declarations.
Existing law, upon change in control of a grocery establishment, requires an incumbent grocery employer, within 15 days after the execution of the transfer document, to provide to the successor grocery employer a list of eligible grocery workers, as specified, and requires the successor grocery employer to maintain a preferential hiring list of eligible grocery workers, to hire from that list for 90 days after the grocery establishment is fully operational and open to the public under the successor grocery employer, and to retain each eligible grocery worker hired for at least 90 days after their commencement date, except as specified. Existing law defines "grocery establishment" for purposes of these provisions as a retail store that is over 15,000 square feet that meets specified requirements, and excludes from the definition a retail store that has ceased operations for 6 months or more. This bill would instead exclude a retail store that has ceased operations for 12 months or more, and would include distribution centers that meet specified requirements within the definition of "grocery establishment," regardless of square footage. The bill would require an incumbent grocery employer to also provide the list of eligible grocery workers to any collective bargaining representatives, and would revise the employee information an incumbent grocery employer is required to provide to the successor grocery employer. The bill would authorize a successor grocery employer to obtain the list of eligible grocery workers from a collective bargaining representative if the incumbent grocery employer does not provide the information within 15 days. The bill would prohibit an employer from taking adverse action against an employee for seeking to enforce their rights. The bill would authorize an employee or employee representative to bring an action in the superior court and would specify remedies in that regard, including front pay or back pay and punitive damages, and would authorize the court to award reasonable attorney's fees and costs to the employee or employee representative who prevails in an enforcement action. The bill would authorize the Labor Commissioner to enforce the provisions and would establish remedies in that regard. The bill would make an employer, agent of any employer, or other person who violates or causes to be violated the provisions, subject to civil penalties and liquidated damages, and would require the liquidated damages to be deposited into the Labor and Workforce Development Fund and paid to the employee as compensatory damages. Existing law specifies that parties may, by collective bargaining agreement, provide that the agreement supersedes the provisions described above providing for employment protections for grocery workers. This bill would require the agreement to explicitly set forth the requirements that are superseded. This bill would also exempt certain incumbent grocery employers and successor grocery employers, based upon their total nationwide employment, from all of the above-described requirements.
Existing law vests the Department of Transportation with full possession and control of all state highways. Existing law describes the authorized routes in the state highway system, including that for Route 210. Existing law requires the department to keep and repair all objects or markers adjacent to a state highway that have been erected to mark registered historical places. This bill would require the department, through the erection of highway signs and appropriate markers, to provide recognition of the historical and cultural importance of the California tribes local to, or historically located in, the Counties of Los Angeles and San Bernardino. The bill would require the department to work with certain entities, including, but not limited to, California tribes local to, or historically located along, Route 210, to name Route 210 and to identify appropriate locations for signs to recognize tribal lands along Route 210 in the Counties of Los Angeles and San Bernardino. The bill would require the department to erect those signs and other appropriate markers at the appropriate locations on Route 210, as part of the department's regularly scheduled replacement, modification, and maintenance of highway signs. The bill would specify that Route 210 shall be known and designated as the Southern California Native American Freeway or by the name developed by the department with the specified entities.
Existing law, the Bronzan-McCorquodale Act, contains provisions governing the operation and financing of community mental health services in every county through locally administered and locally controlled community mental health programs. Existing law, the Mental Health Services Act, an initiative measure enacted by the voters as Proposition 63 in the November 2, 2004, statewide general election, establishes the Mental Health Services Fund to fund various county mental health programs. The act may be amended by the Legislature only by a 23 vote of both houses and only so long as the amendment is consistent with and furthers the intent of the act. The Legislature may clarify procedures and terms of the act by majority vote. Existing law establishes the Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission and requires counties to prepare and submit a 3-year program and expenditure plan, and annual updates, as specified, to the commission and the State Department of Health Care Services. Existing law requires the plan to be developed with specified local stakeholders, along with other important interests. This bill would require stakeholders to include sufficient participation of individuals representing diverse viewpoints, including representatives from youth from historically marginalized communities, representatives from organizations specializing in working with underserved racially and ethnically diverse communities, and representatives from LGBTQ+ communities. By requiring counties to consult with additional stakeholders, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
(1) Existing law, the Private Investigator Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of private investigators by the Director of Consumer Affairs, and establishes the Bureau of Security and Investigative Services in the Department of Consumer Affairs to provide licensure and regulatory oversight under the act. Existing law makes a violation of the act a misdemeanor. Existing law requires the business of a licensee under the act to be operated under the direction, control, charge, or management of the licensee, if they are qualified, or the person who is qualified to act as the qualified manager, and establishes requirements for a qualified manager, including obtaining a qualification certificate from the bureau. This bill, on and after January 1, 2025, would require the holder of a qualified manager certificate who wishes to be associated with more than their own private investigator license to apply to the bureau for a qualified manager license, would require any person acting as a qualified manager of an additional private investigator license to hold a qualified manager license issued by the bureau, and would require the bureau to issue a qualified manager license to an applicant upon satisfaction of specified requirements. The bill would require the bureau to issue an enhanced photo identification card to a licensee who holds a qualified manager license upon the issuance, and with each biennial renewal, of a license. The bill would require the holder of a qualified manager certificate to post the certificate in a specified manner, would provide that a qualified manager license expires 2 years following the date of issuance, and would specify requirements for the renewal of a suspended qualified manager certificate and fees for reinstatement of a revoked qualified manager certificate. The bill would establish fees for the issuance and renewal of a qualified manager license, which would be deposited in the Private Security Services Fund. Existing law prohibits a licensee or qualified manager of a licensee from carrying or using a firearm unless the person has met specified requirements and possesses a valid firearms qualification card. Existing law establishes certain procedural requirements for the denial of a firearms qualification card on the basis of the results of an assessment, including requiring appeals of those denials to be in accordance with specified administrative adjudication procedures generally applicable to state agencies. This bill would delete those procedural requirements. Existing law requires the bureau to issue a firearms permit to an applicant who is a licensed private investigator or a qualified manager of a licensed private investigator and the firearms permit is associated with a qualified manager of a licensed private investigator, subject to specified conditions. This bill, on and after January 1, 2025, would also authorize the bureau to issue a firearms permit to a licensed private investigator or a qualified manager of a licensed private investigator if the firearms permit is associated with a qualified manager license. Existing law prohibits the bureau from issuing a firearms permit to a licensed private investigator or qualified manager of a licensed private investigator who, within the past 12 months, has been assessed and found incapable of exercising appropriate judgment, restraint, and self-control, as specified. This bill would delete that provision. Existing law authorizes an applicant who is denied a firearm permit renewal because the applicant is prohibited from possessing, receiving, purchasing, or owning a firearm permit to reapply for the permit after the prohibition expires, and requires the bureau to treat it as an initial application, as specified. This bill would delete that provision. Existing law requires the bureau to revoke a firearms permit if the Department of Justice notifies the bureau that the holder of the firearms permit is prohibited from possessing, receiving, or purchasing a firearm. Existing law requires the bureau to seek an emergency order against the holder of a firearms permit if the bureau determines the holder presents an undue hazard to public safety, as specified. This bill would instead authorize the bureau to revoke a firearms permit or seek an emergency order pursuant to those provisions. (2) Existing law, the Private Security Services Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of private patrol operators by the Director of Consumer Affairs, and provides for licensure and regulatory oversight of the act by the bureau. Existing law makes a violation of the act a misdemeanor. Existing law requires the business of each licensee to be operated under the direction of the licensee, if they are qualified, or the person who is qualified to act as the licensee's manager, if the licensee is not qualified. Existing law establishes prescribed requirements for a qualified manager, including demonstrating their qualifications by examination, if required by the director. This bill, on and after January 1, 2025, would require the director to issue a qualified manager certificate to a person who meets those qualifications. The bill would establish requirements for posting a qualified manager certificate, would provide that a qualified manager certificate expires 2 years from the date of issuance, and would establish requirements for renewal of a qualified manager certificate and fees for reinstatement of a revoked qualified manager certificate. The bill would establish initial application, examination, renewal, and delinquency fees for a qualified manager certificate, which would be deposited in the Private Security Services Fund. Existing law requires an applicant for a license as a private patrol operator or their manager to have at least one year of experience as a patrolperson, guard, or watchman, or the equivalent, as specified. This bill would instead require an applicant or their manager to have at least 2 years of experience as a patrolperson, guard, or watchman, or equivalent, as specified, and one year, as specified, as a manager or in an administrative position with a licensed and current private patrol operator. This bill would make other related and conforming changes. (3) Because the bill would expand the scope of a crime under the Private Investigator Act and the Private Security Services Act, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Existing law authorizes the governing board of a community college district to enter into a College and Career Access Pathways (CCAP) partnership with the governing board of a school district or a county office of education, or the governing body of a charter school for the purpose of offering or expanding dual enrollment opportunities for pupils who may not already be college bound or who are underrepresented in higher education, with the goal of developing seamless pathways from high school to community college for career technical education or preparation for transfer, improving high school graduation rates, or helping high school pupils achieve college and career readiness. Existing law requires the CCAP partnership agreement to outline the terms of the CCAP partnership, as specified, and to establish protocols for information sharing, joint facilities use, and parental consent for high school pupils to enroll in community college courses. Existing law authorizes a community college district participating in a CCAP partnership to assign priority for enrollment and course registration to a pupil seeking to enroll in a community college course that is required for the pupil's CCAP partnership program, as specified. Existing law requires the governing board of a community college district participating in a CCAP partnership to exempt special part-time students from certain fee requirements. This bill would specify groups of students who may be considered "underrepresented in higher education" for these purposes. The bill would require the governing board of a community college district participating in a CCAP partnership to enroll high school pupils in any course that is part of a CCAP partnership offered at a community college campus, and would expressly authorize courses to be offered at the community college campus or the participating high school campus. The bill would require a community college district to assign priority for enrollment and course registration to a pupil seeking to enroll in a community college course that is required for the pupil's CCAP partnership program. The bill would also exempt all pupils seeking to enroll in a community college course that is required for the pupil's CCAP partnership program from specified fee requirements. Existing law requires, for each CCAP partnership agreement, the affected community college district and school district or county office of education to report annually to the office of the Chancellor of the California Community Colleges specified information. This bill would require, on or before May 1 of each year, the chancellor to aggregate that information and submit a report of that information to the Legislature, the Director of Finance, and the Superintendent of Public Instruction.
The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 requires the State Air Resources Board to ensure that statewide greenhouse gas emissions are reduced to at least 40% below the 1990 level by 2030. Under the act, a violation of a rule, regulation, order, emission limitation, emission reduction measure, or other measure adopted by the state board under the act is a crime. Existing law requires the state board, by December 31, 2026, to develop, in consultation with specified stakeholders, a framework for measuring and then reducing the average carbon intensity of the materials used in the construction of new buildings, including those for residential uses. Existing law requires the state board to develop, by December 31, 2028, a comprehensive strategy for the state's building sector to achieve a 40% net reduction in greenhouse gas emissions of building materials, as determined from a baseline calculated using a certain 2026 report, if that report is adequate, or as specified. Existing law requires that strategy to achieve this target as soon as possible, but no later than December 31, 2035, provides for an interim target of 20% net reduction by December 31, 2030, authorizes the state board to adjust the interim target, as provided, and requires the established targets to begin no sooner than January 1, 2027. Existing law also requires the state board to form and maintain a technical advisory committee, as described. This bill would, among other changes, eliminate the interim target of 20% net reduction. The bill would require the baseline described above to be established based on either an industry average of environmental product declarations reported for the 2026 calendar year or on the most relevant, up-to-date information available, as determined by the state board. The bill would also require the established targets to begin to apply no sooner than January 1, 2027, and 2 years after the baseline is established. The bill would delete the requirement that the state board form and maintain a technical advisory committee, and would instead require the state board to consult experts to advise the state board on methods to reduce the carbon intensity of building materials and covered projects, as specified. The bill would also exempt violations of these requirements from criminal penalties and authorize the imposition of specified civil penalties for those violations. The bill would express the intent of the Legislature regarding the applicable civil penalties. Existing law requires the state board, by July 1, 2023, to develop a comprehensive strategy for the state's cement sector to achieve net-zero emissions of greenhouse gases associated with cement used within the state as soon as possible, but no later than December 31, 2045. This bill would authorize the state board to establish an embodied carbon trading system, as defined and as provided. The bill would authorize the state board to integrate the embodied carbon trading system into the framework for measuring the average carbon intensity of the materials used in the construction of new buildings, as described above, on or before December 31, 2026, and to implement the system on and after January 1, 2029. The bill would authorize the state board to adopt rules and regulations for the credit allocation approach, the anticipated carbon price in the scheme, and trading periods. The bill would also require the state board to periodically review and update its emission reporting and compliance standard requirements, as necessary.
Existing law, the Ralph C. Dills Act (Dills Act) , governs collective bargaining between the state and recognized state public employee organizations. Existing law excludes certain employees from coverage under the Dills Act, including, among others, managerial employees, supervisory employees, and confidential employees, as defined. Existing law creates the Public Employment Relations Board and authorizes it, among other things, to determine appropriate state employee bargaining units, as specified. This bill would enact the Legislature Employer-Employee Relations Act, to provide employees of the Legislature, except certain specified categories of excluded employees, the right to form, join, and participate in the activities of employee organizations of their own choosing for the purpose of representation on all matters of employer-employee relations. The bill would prescribe rights, duties, and prohibitions in this context that parallel those in the Dills Act. For the purposes of bargaining or meeting and conferring in good faith, the bill would define "employer" to mean the Assembly Committee on Rules or the Senate Committee on Rules. The bill would require the employer to meet and confer with representatives of recognized employee organizations regarding matters within the scope of representation. The bill would exclude certain matters from the scope of representation, as specified. The bill would grant exclusive jurisdiction to the Public Employment Relations Board to make an initial determination as to whether charges of unfair practices are justified, and, if so, the necessary remedy, as specified. However, the bill would prohibit the board from issuing a decision or order that intrudes upon or interferes with the Legislature's core function of efficient and effective lawmaking or the essential operation of the Legislature. The bill would require the board to determine appropriate bargaining units, and would prohibit the board from including employees in a bargaining unit that includes employees other than those of the employer. The bill would prohibit the board from including within a bargaining unit employees from both the Assembly and Senate. This bill would make it a misdemeanor for any person to willfully resist, prevent, impede, or interfere with any member of the board, or any of its agents, in the performance of duties pursuant to its provisions. By expanding the definition of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would provide that the provisions of the Legislature Employer-Employee Relations Act are severable. The bill would become operative on July 1, 2026. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would additionally exempt from public inspection records related to activities governed by the Legislature Employer-Employee Relations Act that reveal the employer's deliberative processes, impressions, evaluations, opinions, recommendations, meeting minutes, research, work product, theories, or strategy, or that provide instruction, advice, or training to employees who do not have full collective bargaining and representation rights under the Legislature Employer-Employee Relations Act. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.