Behavioral health.
Summary
Existing law, the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act, provides for the involuntary commitment and treatment of a person who is a danger to themselves or others or who is gravely disabled. Existing law, for purposes of involuntary commitment, defines "gravely disabled" as either a condition in which a person, as a result of a mental health disorder, is unable to provide for their basic personal needs for food, clothing, or shelter or has been found mentally incompetent, as specified. This bill expands the definition of "gravely disabled" to also include a condition in which a person, as a result of a severe substance use disorder, or a co-occurring mental health disorder and a severe substance use disorder, is, in addition to the basic personal needs described above, unable to provide for their personal safety or necessary medical care, as defined. The bill would also expand the definition of "gravely disabled," as it applies to specified sections, to include, in addition to the basic needs described above, the inability for a person to provide for their personal safety or necessary medical care as a result of chronic alcoholism. The bill would authorize counties to defer implementation of these provisions to January 1, 2026, as specified. The bill would make conforming changes. To the extent that this change increases the level of service required of county mental health departments, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law also authorizes the appointment of a conservator, in the County of Los Angeles, the County of San Diego, or the City and County of San Francisco, for a person who is incapable of caring for the person's own health and well-being due to a serious mental illness and substance use disorder. Existing law establishes the hearsay rule, under which evidence of a statement is generally inadmissible if it was made other than by a witness while testifying at a hearing and is offered to prove the truth of the matter stated. Existing law sets forth exceptions to the hearsay rule to permit the admission of specified kinds of evidence. Under this bill, for purposes of an opinion offered by an expert witness in any proceeding relating to the appointment or reappointment of a conservator pursuant to the above-described provisions, the statements of specified health practitioners or a licensed clinical social worker included in the medical record would not be made inadmissible by the hearsay rule under specified conditions. The bill would authorize the court to grant a reasonable continuance if an expert witness in a proceeding relied on the medical record and the medical record has not been provided to the parties or their counsel. Existing law requires the State Department of Health Care Services to collect data quarterly and publish, on or before May 1 of each year, a specified report that includes, among other things, the number of persons for whom temporary conservatorship are established in each county and an analysis and evaluation of the efficacy of mental health assessments, detentions, treatments, and supportive services provided, as specified. This bill would, beginning with the report due May 1, 2024, require the report to also include the number of persons admitted or detained, as specified, for conditions that include, among others, grave disability due to a mental health disorder, severe substance use disorder, or both a mental health disorder and a severe substance use disorder. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2022
Committee Review
Aug 2023
Senate Passage
May 2023
Assembly Passage
Sep 2023
Signed into Law
Oct 2023
Introduced Dec 5, 2022
Signed Oct 10, 2023
Floor votes · Senate May 26, 2023 · Assembly Sep 14, 2023
How they voted
37–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 40
May 26, 2023
D
Democratic31
90% Yea
R
Republican9
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
38
Key actions
19
Committee
6
Amendments
14
Oct 10, 2023
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 14, 2023
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2822.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 14, 2023
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Sep 14, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 3524.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Sep 8, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended.
lower
Sep 5, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
lower
Sep 5, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (September 1).
lower
Aug 16, 2023
Lower · Passed
August 16 hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Jul 13, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 12, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (July 11).
lower
Jun 30, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jun 28, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (June 27). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jun 8, 2023
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and JUD.
lower
May 26, 2023
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 1328.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 18, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 1158.) (May 18).
upper
Apr 27, 2023
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 26, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 892.) (April 25).
upper
Apr 17, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Mar 30, 2023
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Mar 29, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 12. Noes 0. Page 574.) (March 29).
upper
Mar 8, 2023
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on HEALTH and JUD.
upper
Feb 28, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jan 18, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Dec 5, 2022
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 22 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Susan Eggman
DDemocratic
Co
Ben Allen
DDemocratic
Co
Bill Dodd
DDemocratic
Co
Blanca Pacheco
DDemocratic
Co
Buffy Wicks
DDemocratic
Co
Caroline Menjivar
DDemocratic
Co
Chris Holden
DDemocratic
Co
Diane Dixon
RRepublican
Co
Diane Papan
DDemocratic
Co
Henry Stern
DDemocratic
Co
James Gallagher
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 43
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 43. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline