Rep. Aaron Marquez

Maddy summaryHB 2821, titled the "Pregnant Workers Protection Act," requires Arizona employers with 15 or more employees to provide reasonable accommodations for pregnant workers without imposing undue hardship. It mandates specific accommodations like modified equipment, more frequent breaks, schedule changes, assistance with manual labor, private breastfeeding areas, and flexibility for prenatal appointments. Employers cannot force pregnant employees to use vacation or sick leave when accommodations are possible and must post notices about the policy in employee handbooks and provide written notice to new hires, current employees, and pregnant employees within 10 days of pregnancy disclosure. The bill directly affects pregnant employees and their employers in qualifying businesses.

Maddy summaryHB 2799 amends Arizona's contractor licensing law to enhance safety for workers in excavation projects. It requires contractors whose work includes excavation to ensure the "competent person" (the individual responsible for identifying hazards and taking corrective action) and all employees entering trenches complete and renew trench safety training every two years. The bill also mandates that new license applicants successfully complete a state-approved trench safety training course as part of the licensing process. These changes apply directly to all contractors seeking or renewing a license in Arizona, with the goal of reducing trench-related accidents.

Maddy summaryHB 2583 primarily updates fingerprinting requirements for education professionals in Arizona. It mandates that teachers, student teachers, charter school staff, and tutoring contractors submit identity-verified fingerprints through the Department of Public Safety for background checks. Key provisions include standardizing the fingerprint submission process, allowing school districts to contract with third parties for fingerprinting services, and creating a digital archive to avoid duplicate submissions for renewals. The bill also includes a separate section (Section 2) about Arizona empowerment scholarship accounts, which is unrelated to the fingerprinting requirements.

Maddy summaryHB 2580 defines key terms for Arizona's education scholarship programs, primarily affecting students and micro-schools. It establishes eligibility criteria for "qualified students" (including those with disabilities, from low-performing schools, military families, or Indigenous communities) and defines "micro-schools" as tuition-charging entities employing instructors for specific subjects. The bill sets requirements for annual education plans, curriculum standards, and enrollment rules for scholarship programs. It does not create new funding but clarifies program mechanics for existing scholarship accounts. This definitional work prepares the framework for how Arizona's education savings accounts will operate.

Maddy summaryArizona's HB 2707 allows private employers and state agencies to voluntarily adopt a military spouse preference employment policy. This policy enables them to give hiring, promotion, or retention preference to military spouses over other qualified candidates, provided the employer has a written policy applied uniformly. Employers may require military spouses to provide documentation proving their status (such as a DD-214 form). The bill does not mandate these preferences but provides a framework for voluntary adoption by private businesses and state entities. It directly affects military spouses seeking employment and the private employers or state agencies choosing to implement this policy.

Maddy summaryHCR 2034 is a proposed resolution (requiring voter approval) that would replace Arizona's current rules for English language learners (ELLs) in public schools. It mandates schools to identify students' primary languages, assess their English proficiency, and enroll non-proficient students in structured English immersion programs requiring 120 minutes daily for K-5 and 100 minutes daily for grades 6-12. The bill also creates a budget framework for schools to cover additional costs of these programs using state funds, while requiring the state board to approve research-based instructional models. This directly affects all Arizona public schools and English language learners.

Maddy summaryHB 2572 modifies Arizona law to expand in-state tuition eligibility for certain students. It allows nonimmigrant aliens (excluding those covered under 8 U.S. Code § 1101(a)(15)) who attended Arizona high school for two years and graduated locally (including homeschoolers) to qualify for in-state rates at Arizona public universities and community colleges. This includes students without lawful immigration status who meet the residency requirements. The bill requires a three-fourths legislative vote for enactment under Arizona's Constitution.

Maddy summaryHB 2635 sets standards for Arizona online schools and course providers, focusing on curriculum quality, student safety, and teacher qualifications - not full-day kindergarten as the title suggests. It requires online schools to meet specific criteria (like filtered internet access, virtual learning tools, and partnerships with educational institutions) and mandates probationary status for new programs until academic improvements are proven. The bill also establishes rules for calculating average daily membership (ADM) and funding: full-time online students receive 95% of standard funding, while part-time students receive 85%, with strict limits on how attendance hours can be counted across traditional and online programs. These provisions directly affect Arizona public schools, charter schools, and online education providers participating in the state’s virtual learning programs.

Maddy summaryHB 2803 repeals Arizona Revised Statute 15-911 and amends ARS 15-1285 to exempt school districts and career technical education districts from state budgetary spending limits. Specifically, funds received by these districts under the relevant chapter are not counted as local revenue for constitutional budget calculations and cannot be restricted by existing expenditure caps. This allows school districts to use state-provided funds without being constrained by the usual spending limits that apply to local revenue. The bill also includes related adjustments to expenditure limitation calculations for counties but focuses primarily on increasing school district financial flexibility.

Maddy summaryHB 2637 updates Arizona's method for calculating annual spending limits for cities, counties, and other local governments (not school districts, as the title suggests). It requires the state commission to determine each jurisdiction's expenditure limit using a formula based on population changes since 1979 and inflation adjustments (GDP price deflator), with annual reports to local governing boards. The bill includes specific rules for adjusting limits when jurisdictions annex new areas, split, or form new cities or counties. This directly affects all Arizona political subdivisions subject to the state's constitutional spending cap, ensuring their annual budgets reflect population growth and inflation. The changes apply to how these limits are calculated and reported each year.