Rep. Oscar De Los Santos

Maddy summaryHB 2821, titled the "Pregnant Workers Protection Act," requires Arizona employers with 15 or more employees to provide reasonable accommodations for pregnant workers without imposing undue hardship. It mandates specific accommodations like modified equipment, more frequent breaks, schedule changes, assistance with manual labor, private breastfeeding areas, and flexibility for prenatal appointments. Employers cannot force pregnant employees to use vacation or sick leave when accommodations are possible and must post notices about the policy in employee handbooks and provide written notice to new hires, current employees, and pregnant employees within 10 days of pregnancy disclosure. The bill directly affects pregnant employees and their employers in qualifying businesses.

Maddy summaryHB 2583 primarily updates fingerprinting requirements for education professionals in Arizona. It mandates that teachers, student teachers, charter school staff, and tutoring contractors submit identity-verified fingerprints through the Department of Public Safety for background checks. Key provisions include standardizing the fingerprint submission process, allowing school districts to contract with third parties for fingerprinting services, and creating a digital archive to avoid duplicate submissions for renewals. The bill also includes a separate section (Section 2) about Arizona empowerment scholarship accounts, which is unrelated to the fingerprinting requirements.

Maddy summaryHCR 2006 proposes adding a new constitutional right to Arizona's state constitution, establishing that all residents have an inherent right to a clean and healthy environment, including clean air and water. It declares public natural resources (like parks, water, and wildlife) as common property belonging to all Arizonans, including future generations, and requires the state to act as a trustee to conserve and maintain these resources. This amendment does not create immediate new laws but would require voter approval at the next general election to take effect. If approved, it would fundamentally change Arizona's constitutional framework regarding environmental protection and resource management.

Maddy summaryHB 2503 amends Arizona's campaign finance law (ARS § 16-921) to explicitly allow candidate committees to use campaign funds for direct childcare costs for the candidate's dependents, such as a child or other individual the candidate cares for. This change directly affects candidates with caregiving responsibilities who previously faced ambiguity about using campaign money for these essential expenses. The bill clarifies that such childcare costs are now a lawful expenditure under the law, without requiring separate fundraising. It does not alter existing exemptions for volunteer services, news coverage, or other campaign-related expenses. The legislature states this is a clarifying update, not a substantive change to campaign finance rules.

Maddy summaryHB 2507 makes specific actions related to voting illegal by adding new misdemeanor offenses under Arizona law. It prohibits behaviors like electioneering near polling places or early voting locations, interfering with voting machines, showing another voter's ballot, or failing to return a ballot after voting. The bill directly affects voters and election workers by clarifying what constitutes voter intimidation or ballot interference during in-person voting. Key provisions include banning the display of completed ballots (except when a voter posts their own ballot online, which is deemed consent to share), and making it illegal to harass people delivering voted ballots.

Maddy summaryArizona's HB 2508 requires ballot measures to include clear, plain-language descriptions of their effects. Specifically, it mandates that each measure's ballot summary must state exactly what a "yes" vote would do and what a "no" vote would do, using brief phrases approved by the attorney general. This applies to all state ballot measures, including initiatives and referendums, and replaces vague titles with direct explanations of outcomes. The bill ensures voters understand the practical impact of each measure before casting their ballot, as required by law.

Maddy summaryHB 2705 restricts corporations and limited liability companies (LLCs) from purchasing single-family homes in Arizona without meeting new transparency requirements. It requires these entities to register with the Corporation Commission, include specific language on deeds stating the home is not a primary residence, and submit registration documents to county recorders for deed recording. County recorders must report monthly to the Corporation Commission on all such purchases, with an exception for entities owning fewer than 10 homes statewide. The law also imposes a 5% ownership limit per neighborhood area for corporate buyers, aiming to limit large-scale corporate ownership of residential properties.

Maddy summaryHB 2577 requires Arizona's state board of education to implement statewide assessments in reading, writing, and math for students in at least four grades, ensuring tests are uniform, objective, and free from partisan viewpoints. It mandates the collection and public posting of specific nontest data (such as graduation and dropout rates by ethnicity) and sets strict deadlines for schools to receive test scores (May 15 for 3rd grade reading, May 25 for other subjects). The bill also allows students to use scores from nationally recognized assessments to opt out of the state test, with those scores then recorded for school records, and requires the state board to provide intervention strategies for underperforming schools.

Maddy summaryHB 2509 restricts direct corporate and labor organization contributions to candidate committees while creating new rules for their political activity. It allows corporations, LLCs, and labor organizations to establish separate segregated funds (SSFs) for employee, member, and affiliate contributions, but requires these SSFs to register as political action committees. The bill mandates strict reporting: corporations must notify election officials within one day of exceeding $5,000 in statewide races, $2,500 in legislative races, or $1,000 in local races, providing details like contributor names, amounts, and candidate support/opposition. This directly affects corporations, their employees/members (who can contribute to SSFs), and political committees receiving funds. Violations carry civil penalties up to three times the contribution amount.

Maddy summaryHB 2506 allows Arizona county boards of supervisors to establish voting centers - physical locations where any voter in the county can cast a ballot on election day - instead of or in addition to traditional precinct-specific polling places. The bill requires county boards to approve these centers via a specific resolution before each election, ensuring they comply with election district boundaries. Voters benefit from greater location flexibility, as voting centers can also serve as early voting drop-off points and ballot replacement sites. This change directly affects county election officials, who gain authority to adjust polling place structures while maintaining voter access.