Maddy summaryThis bill amends the Food Security Act of 1985 to change how conservation programs accept private funding. It removes references to "public-private partnerships" and restricts non-Federal funds to specific conservation programs under subtitle D, requiring these funds to be deposited into dedicated sub-accounts for each program. The bill deletes previous provisions that allowed broader use of such contributions. It directly affects conservation programs administered by the Secretary, altering the mechanism for handling private donations. The change simplifies the process by limiting where and how these funds can be used within conservation initiatives.
Rep. Harriet M. Hageman
Sponsored bills
Maddy summaryThis bill requires in-person interviews with consular officers for certain non-citizens seeking visas who are currently unlawfully present in the United States. It amends immigration law to explicitly include these individuals under the category requiring such interviews. The key mechanism adds a new provision (subparagraph G) to the existing interview requirement, specifying that applicants who are inadmissible due to prior violations (under sections 212(a)(6) or (9)) must attend an in-person interview. This directly affects non-citizens who entered or remained in the U.S. without authorization and are applying for visas. The bill does not create new inadmissibility grounds but modifies the interview process for this specific group.
Maddy summaryHR 9969 requires the Secretaries of the Interior and Energy to create a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Work Group. This MOU must address how a recent environmental decision (the 2024 Glen Canyon Dam Record of Decision) could impact the Upper Colorado River Basin Fund, which finances dam operations and infrastructure. The plan must specifically examine effects on routine fund obligations, hydropower production costs at Glen Canyon Dam, and potential impacts on endangered species. The bill focuses on establishing a process for coordination, not implementing new policies.
Maddy summaryHR 8706, the "Dismantle DEI Act of 2024," would prohibit federal agencies from maintaining diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) offices, programs, or training by requiring the closure of existing DEI offices within 90 days and banning federal funding for DEI-related activities. The bill defines "prohibited diversity, equity, and inclusion practices" as those that discriminate based on race, color, ethnicity, religion, biological sex, or national origin, or require training that asserts a particular group is inherently superior or inferior. It would rescind several executive orders related to racial equity and gender inclusion, and prohibit the use of federal funds for DEI-related activities across all federal agencies, contractors, and grant recipients. The bill contains limited exceptions for Equal Employment Opportunity offices and disability rights enforcement offices as historically organized and operated.
Maddy summaryThe Expedited Appeals Review Act (EARA) requires the Board of Land Appeals to issue a final decision on appeals of specific Department of the Interior decisions within 6 months of a party’s request for expedited review, but not before 18 months have passed since the appeal was initially filed. If the Board misses this deadline, the Department’s decision is treated as final for judicial review, and courts must review it without giving special weight to the agency’s original decision. This law applies to appeals pending when the Act takes effect or filed afterward.
Maddy summaryThis bill requires the U.S. Department of Agriculture to create a strategy expanding the use of livestock grazing on federal lands to reduce wildfire risks. It specifically directs the Secretary of Agriculture to develop plans for using grazing during droughts or wildfires, implementing targeted grazing, issuing temporary permits for fuel reduction, and incorporating grazing into postfire recovery efforts. The strategy would apply to livestock permit holders on federal lands and aim to leverage grazing as a tool for managing vegetation that fuels wildfires. The bill does not mandate specific actions but sets a requirement for the agency to develop these approaches using existing legal authorities.
Maddy summaryThis bill renames Wyoming's National Historic Trails Interpretive Center in Casper as the "Barbara L. Cubin National Historic Trails Interpretive Center" to honor the late Wyoming Congresswoman Barbara L. Cubin. It updates all federal references (including laws, maps, and documents) to use the new name and amends existing law to reflect this change. The bill has no policy or funding impact - it is purely a naming designation.
Maddy summary# Summary of Proposed Higher Education Act Amendments This document outlines significant proposed amendments to the Higher Education Act of 1965, primarily as part of the "College Cost Reduction Act." The key elements include: ## Accreditation Reform - Major overhaul of accreditation standards, requiring accrediting agencies to demonstrate independence from trade associations - New requirements for accrediting agencies to assess student achievement outcomes, including median value-added earnings relative to median total price charged - Introduction of an "Alternative Quality Assurance Experimental Site Initiative" to test non-accredited institutions - Protections for religious institutions, including a new process for appealing accreditation decisions related to religious mission - Removal of "litmus tests" that would require institutions to support specific political viewpoints ## Student Success Initiatives - Establishment of "Postsecondary Student Success Grants" to increase participation, retention, and completion rates for high-need students - Focus on evidence-based practices, with tiered requirements (tier 1, 2, and 3 reforms) - Mandatory inclusion of high-need student populations (low-income, first-generation, military-connected, etc.) - Requirements for institutions to report on completion rates, retention rates, and student demographics ## Regulatory Changes - Repeal of numerous existing regulations including: * Closed school discharges * Borrower defense to repayment * Pre-dispute arbitration * False certification requirements * Ability-to-benefit rules * Financial responsibility regulations - New restrictions on incentive compensation for recruiters - Changes to third-party servicer definitions and regulations ## Transfer and Credit Policies - New requirement that institutions cannot deny transfer credit based solely on the source of accreditation - Requirements for transparent transfer policies - Changes to reverse transfer policies ## Other Key Provisions - Modifications to the National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity (NACIQI) - New definitions for "total price" and "value-added earnings" - Changes to the process for institutions to change accrediting agencies - New requirements for institutions to report on student outcomes The overall focus of these proposed amendments is to reduce regulatory burden on institutions, promote transparency, improve student outcomes (particularly for high-need students), modernize accreditation processes, and protect religious institutions' rights in accreditation decisions.
Maddy summaryHRES 1566 is a symbolic House resolution honoring all U.S. veterans on Veterans Day 2024. It recognizes the service and sacrifice of the estimated 15.8 million veterans living in the U.S. as of 2023, including those who served in conflicts from World War II to post-9/11. The resolution calls on the American public to observe Veterans Day to acknowledge veterans' role in preserving national freedom. As a non-binding resolution, it has no direct policy impact but formally expresses congressional recognition of veterans' contributions.
Maddy summaryHR 10042, the PASTURES Act, prevents federal penalties against livestock owners for grazing on specific public lands where no fence exists to block grazing. It directly affects ranchers who graze cattle, bison, horses, sheep, or goats on National Forest System lands, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service lands, or public lands that border private property - where grazing was previously permitted but later banned. The bill requires federal agencies (like the Agriculture or Interior Departments) to cover all costs for constructing or maintaining fences meant to prevent grazing on these lands. This changes the financial responsibility from ranchers to the government, focusing on lands with existing grazing permits that were later prohibited.