Stop Politicians Profiting from War Act of 2024 This bill prohibits Members of Congress, their spouses, and their dependent children from owning or trading stocks, bonds, commodities, futures, or any other form of security from a defense contractor or which are significantly based upon defense contractors. Each current Member must divest within 120 days after the bill is enacted and each new Member must divest within 120 days after becoming a Member. However, Members and their spouses have 180 days to divest from specified complex investment vehicles. Placing assets into qualified blind trusts does not qualify as divestment. The bill does not apply to certain investments, such as investments in widely held investment funds that are diversified and do not present a conflict of interest and investments held in government employee retirement plans. A Member or spouse who violates the bill may be subject to a fine of up to $50,000 for each violation. The bill permits a Member, spouse, or dependent child who is required to divest property under the bill to avoid recognizing gain for income tax purposes from the sale of that property to the extent that the Member or spouse purchases permitted bonds or diversified investment funds within 60 days of the divestiture.
Sponsored bills
Maddy summaryThe Shrinkflation Reduction Act requires manufacturers to label consumer products when they reduce product size without proportionally lowering the price (shrinkflation). This directly affects manufacturers of consumer goods (defined under federal law) and informs consumers about size reductions. The bill mandates the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to create labeling rules within one year, treating non-compliance as an unfair business practice under existing FTC enforcement. Violations would face penalties under the FTC Act, with $1 million authorized to implement these rules.
Maddy summaryThe NO BAN Act (HR 9244) prohibits U.S. immigration authorities from denying visas or entry based on national origin, religion, or sex. It amends immigration law to explicitly ban such discrimination in visa decisions and tightens restrictions on the president’s power to suspend entry of certain groups under Section 212(f). The bill requires specific evidence, narrow tailoring, time limits, and congressional notification for any entry restriction, while mandating public reports on visa denials and waivers. It directly affects nonimmigrant visa applicants (e.g., students, workers) and federal agencies administering immigration policy.
Maddy summaryHR 9253, the National Gun Violence Research Act, repeals longstanding restrictions that blocked federal funding for gun violence research, including the 1996 Dickey Amendment. It establishes a National Gun Violence Research Program to support scientific studies on gun-related injury and death, with $200 million authorized over six years (2025-2030). The program directs agencies like the CDC, NIH, and National Institute of Justice to fund research, train researchers, develop safety standards, and share gun trace data with researchers through new protocols. This bill directly affects federal research institutions and public health agencies by enabling evidence-based study of gun violence causes and prevention strategies.
Maddy summary# Summary of Proposed Workplace Discrimination and Harassment Prevention Bill This comprehensive legislative proposal aims to strengthen protections against workplace discrimination and harassment through multiple interconnected provisions: 1. **Expanded Protections**: Broadens coverage to include sexual orientation, gender identity, and other protected categories in workplace discrimination laws. 2. **Nondisclosure Agreement Restrictions**: Prohibits employers from requiring nondisclosure or nondisparagement clauses that would prevent workers from reporting harassment or discrimination, with limited exceptions for settlement agreements meeting specific requirements. 3. **Arbitration Prohibition**: Bans mandatory pre-dispute arbitration agreements for work-related disputes and imposes strict requirements for post-dispute agreements. 4. **Federal Contractor Requirements**: Mandates that federal contractors disclose labor and civil rights violations from the previous three years and requires corrective actions for violations. 5. **Grant Programs**: - National grants to prevent and address workplace discrimination through education, outreach, and complaint assistance - Grants for legal assistance to low-income workers facing employment discrimination - State-level advocacy systems with funding allotments to support worker rights protection 6. **Enforcement Mechanisms**: Establishes clear enforcement procedures, with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) having authority to enforce these provisions with powers similar to those under existing civil rights laws. The bill also includes definitions, implementation details, and provisions for state and federal coordination to create a comprehensive system for preventing and addressing workplace discrimination and harassment across all sectors of employment.
Maddy summaryThis bill establishes the Destination Reception Services Program to provide medium-term support to certain immigrants in the U.S., including those granted parole, placed in removal proceedings, or with pending asylum applications. It authorizes $3 billion annually (2025-2028) to fund services like housing assistance, healthcare, job training, legal aid for work authorization/asylum, childcare, and transportation through local government and nonprofit organizations. The program is managed by a federal Board and local community boards that identify high-need areas and allocate funds based on criteria like immigrant population density and service gaps. It explicitly states the program is not an "alternatives to detention" initiative and prioritizes services to help new arrivals achieve self-sufficiency.
Maddy summaryH.J. Res. 193 proposes a constitutional amendment to eliminate legal immunity for federal officials, including the President, from criminal prosecution for actions taken while performing official duties. It also prohibits the President from granting a pardon to themselves. The amendment would apply to all federal officers (such as the President, Vice President, and members of Congress) except for Congress members acting in their legislative role as defined in the Constitution. If ratified by 38 states, this change would become part of the U.S. Constitution, requiring no further congressional action.
Maddy summaryHR 9104, the Access to Birth Control Act, requires pharmacies that normally stock contraception to provide birth control or related medications without delay if in stock, or immediately offer alternatives like referrals to other pharmacies or expedited orders if unavailable. It prohibits pharmacists from intimidating customers, misrepresenting availability, breaching confidentiality, or refusing to fill valid prescriptions for birth control. Pharmacies violating these rules face civil penalties up to $1,000 per day or private lawsuits. The law specifically applies to pharmacies that routinely carry contraception and excludes cases where a valid prescription is missing or payment cannot be made. It aims to address documented refusals to dispense birth control, particularly following the Dobbs decision.
Maddy summaryHRES 1353 is a resolution introduced by House members to impeach Supreme Court Associate Justice Clarence Thomas. The resolution outlines three articles of impeachment alleging Thomas failed to disclose gifts and financial transactions with donor Harlan Crow over 15 years, refused to recuse from cases involving his spouse's financial interests, and participated in cases concerning the 2020 election results despite his spouse's involvement in efforts to overturn them. These allegations claim Thomas violated federal ethics laws requiring judicial disclosure and recusal to maintain impartiality. The resolution would be referred to the Senate for trial if passed by the House, but it is not a law that would directly affect anyone beyond the impeachment process.
Maddy summaryThis resolution (HRES 1354) is a formal House of Representatives impeachment action against Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, introduced by multiple Democratic representatives on July 10, 2024. It alleges two violations: (1) Alito failed to recuse himself from three election-related cases (Trump v. United States, Fischer v. United States, and Trump v. Anderson) despite flying flags associated with the 2020 election denial movement outside his homes, which the resolution claims demonstrated bias; and (2) Alito allegedly failed to disclose luxury travel gifts from donors, violating financial disclosure laws. The resolution argues these actions breached his judicial oaths and federal recusal statutes (28 U.S.C. § 455) and financial disclosure requirements (5 U.S.C. §§ 13103-13104). As a procedural resolution, it initiates impeachment proceedings but does not change law or policy; the Senate would need to hold a trial for removal.