Photo of Mary E. Miller
R United States House · District 15 · Illinois On the 2026 ballot

Rep. Mary E. Miller

Compare
Total votes
2,837
all sessions
Attendance
95%
130 missed
Near the chamber average
With party
87%
of cast votes
Lower than 93% of chamber peers
Bipartisan score
6%
crosses aisle rarely
Higher than 92% of chamber peers
Sponsored
1,359
bills & resolutions
Near the chamber average
Committees
11
assignments
1,359 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
1,359
Primary
67
Co-sponsor
1,292
This page
1,359
matching current filters
Co-sponsor HR 329
In committee Jan 12, 2023 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor HR 297
In committee · United States House · Co-sponsor
To direct the Secretary concerned to reinstate a member involuntarily separated from the Armed Forces solely on the basis of the refusal of such member to receive a vaccination against COVID-19.

Maddy summaryHR 297 requires the military Secretary to reinstate service members who were involuntarily separated solely for refusing a COVID-19 vaccine. It applies specifically to those separated only due to vaccine refusal, not other reasons. If a covered member chooses reinstatement, they must be returned to their previous rank and branch of service. The bill mandates this action without requiring the member to receive the vaccine.

In committee Jan 11, 2023 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor HRES 18
In committee · United States House · Co-sponsor
Less is More Resolution

Maddy summaryThe Less is More Resolution (HRES 18) amends House rules to require that any bill funding a new federal program must include reductions in funding for at least two existing programs (each reduction equal to or greater than the new program's funding). It mandates that the introducing member submit a written certification confirming this offset, which must be made public. This procedural rule applies to all House members and aims to enforce budgetary offsets for new spending proposals without creating new fiscal obligations.

In committee Jan 10, 2023 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor HR 233
In committee · United States House · Co-sponsor
Qualified Immunity Act of 2023

Qualified Immunity Act of 2023 This bill provides statutory authority for qualified immunity for law enforcement officers in civil cases involving constitutional violations. Current law provides a statutory civil cause of action against state and local government actors (e.g., law enforcement officers) for violations of constitutional rights, also known as Section 1983 lawsuits. The Supreme Court has also found an implied cause of action against federal law enforcement officers in certain situations (e.g., Fourth Amendment violations), also known as Bivens lawsuits. However, under the judicial doctrine of qualified immunity, government officials performing discretionary duties are generally shielded from civil liability, unless their actions violate clearly established rights of which a reasonable person would have known. The bill provides statutory authority for these principles with respect to law enforcement officers. Specifically, under the bill, law enforcement officers are entitled to qualified immunity if (1) at the time of the alleged violation, the constitutional right at issue was not clearly established or the state of the law was not sufficiently clear for every reasonable officer to know that the conduct was unconstitutional; or (2) a court has held that the specific conduct at issue is constitutional. The bill applies to federal, state, and local law enforcement officers. It also specifies that law enforcement agencies and local governments may not be held liable if their officers are entitled to qualified immunity.

In committee Jan 10, 2023 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor HR 261
In committee · United States House · Co-sponsor
Article I Regulatory Budget Act

Maddy summaryThis bill establishes a "regulatory budget" system requiring federal agencies to estimate and report the costs of regulations on businesses, especially small businesses. It mandates the President to submit annual projections of regulatory costs for proposed rules, and creates a process for Congress to set limits on how much regulatory costs can grow. The Congressional Budget Office would analyze regulatory cost impacts of proposed legislation, while agencies would need to conduct cost-benefit analyses for significant regulations. The bill aims to increase transparency around regulatory costs and provide Congress with tools to monitor and control regulatory burdens on businesses.

In committee Jan 10, 2023 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor HR 231
In committee · United States House · Co-sponsor
Terminate TikTok on Campus Act of 2023

Maddy summaryThis bill requires colleges and universities receiving federal funding to ban TikTok (and related ByteDance apps) on all school-owned electronic devices - including computers, tablets, and smartphones - within 90 days of enactment. It prohibits federal funding for institutions that fail to implement such a ban, with an exception for research related to national security, law enforcement, or cybersecurity. The policy directly affects all public and private higher education institutions that accept federal funds, including grants and student aid programs. It does not restrict TikTok use on personal devices or apply to non-federal funding sources.

In committee Jan 10, 2023 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor HJRES 8
In committee · United States House · Co-sponsor
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to require that the Supreme Court of the United States be composed of nine justices.

Maddy summaryHJRES 8 proposes a constitutional amendment to permanently set the Supreme Court's size at nine justices. The bill would require any future changes to the Court's composition to follow this specific number, locking in the current structure. It does not alter the existing Court size (which has been nine since 1869) but aims to prevent future adjustments through legislative action. The amendment must be ratified by three-fourths of state legislatures within seven years to take effect. This is a procedural proposal focused on constitutional structure, not a direct policy affecting citizens or programs.

In committee Jan 9, 2023 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor HRES 8
In committee · United States House · Co-sponsor
Impeaching Alejandro Nicholas Mayorkas, Secretary of Homeland Security, for high crimes and misdemeanors.

Maddy summaryHRES 8 is a formal resolution introduced by the U.S. House of Representatives in January 2023 to impeach Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas. The resolution alleges three specific violations: (1) failing to maintain border security, citing record migrant encounters and fentanyl seizures under his leadership; (2) providing false testimony to Congress about border security; and (3) spreading false claims about Border Patrol agents whipping migrants during a 2021 incident. It claims these actions violated his constitutional duties and federal law. As an impeachment resolution, it does not enact policy but seeks to refer the case to the Senate for trial.

In committee Jan 9, 2023 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor HR 106
In committee · United States House · Co-sponsor
Abortion Is Not Health Care Act of 2023

Maddy summaryThis bill amends the tax code to prevent abortion expenses from being counted as deductible medical costs. It directly affects taxpayers who pay for abortions, as they can no longer include these expenses when calculating their medical deduction on federal tax returns. The key provision adds a new rule to the Internal Revenue Code stating that "amounts paid for abortion shall not be taken into account" under medical expense deductions. This change applies to tax years beginning after the bill's enactment date.

In committee Jan 9, 2023 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor HR 86
In committee · United States House · Co-sponsor
Ending Catch and Release Act of 2023

Ending Catch and Release Act of 2023 This bill changes the treatment of certain non-U.S. nationals ( aliens under federal law) without lawful immigration status, including by prohibiting the release of asylum seekers into the United States while their cases are pending. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) may not (with some exceptions) release an individual who is not clearly entitled to admission into the United States while the individual's case is pending, even if the individual is an asylum seeker. DHS may instead detain the individual or return the individual to a neighboring country in certain situations. The bill also expands expedited removal from the United States (i.e., removal without further hearing or review) to include individuals present in the United States without being admitted, with certain exceptions. Under current law, individuals are subject to expedited removal if they lack proper documentation or obtained an immigration benefit through fraud; such individuals are still subject to expedited removal under the bill. The bill also modifies the standard for establishing a credible fear of persecution to avoid expedited removal. Generally, an asylum seeker may avoid expedited removal if an asylum officer finds such a credible fear. Under this bill, an officer may find credible fear if it is more likely than not the individual can establish their eligibility for asylum, whereas under current law, the officer may find credible fear if there is a significant possibility that the individual can establish their eligibility.

In committee Jan 9, 2023 1 co-sponsor
Showing 891 to 900 of 1,359 bills
Previous 1 … 89 90 91 … 136 Next