Issue · Labor & Employment

Labor & Employment

Every labor & employment bill, vote, and legislator stance in New Hampshire, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
9
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Mark Warden
67% support rate
Top opponent
Marjorie Smith
30% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving labor & employment in New Hampshire

Legislators moving labor & employment in New Hampshire
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Mark Warden
Mark Warden House · District Hillsborough 39
R
Support
67% 46
Michael Vose
Michael Vose House · District Rockingham 5
R
Support
64% 73
Mike Bordes
Mike Bordes House · District Belknap 5
R
Support
62% 43
Sheri Minor
Sheri Minor House · District Belknap 5
R
Support
62% 44
Jodi Nelson
Jodi Nelson House · District Rockingham 13
R
Support
62% 60
Marjorie Smith
Marjorie Smith House · District Strafford 10
D
Oppose
30% 62
Kevin Verville
Kevin Verville House · District Rockingham 2
R
Oppose
33% 47
Molly Howard
Molly Howard House · District Hillsborough 31
D
Oppose
33% 43
Dennis Mannion
Dennis Mannion House · District Rockingham 25
R
Oppose
33% 77
Marc Plamondon
Marc Plamondon House · District Hillsborough 3
D
Oppose
33% 61
Showing 9 of 9 bills

All labor & employment bills

passed both · New Hampshire · House May 28, 2026

HB 1515: repealing the requirement that the department of health and human services' biennial budget request include funding for certain child care workforce programs.

HB 1515 repeals the child care grant program that provided recruitment and retention grants to New Hampshire child care employers through the Department of Health and Human Services. The bill removes the $7.5 million annual appropriation (from federal TANF funds) that was intended to support these grants, though the program was already unworkable due to federal restrictions. This change directly affects child care providers who previously could have accessed these grants. The repeal has no fiscal impact as the program could not operate under federal guidelines, and no new funding or changes to services are enacted.
passed · New Hampshire · House Apr 10, 2026

HB 1788: holding state contracts with DEI provisions to be void as a matter of law and establishing a right of action for citizens where public entities or state agencies engage with contracts with DEI provisions.

HB 1788 prohibits state agencies and public schools from entering contracts with diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) requirements, such as mandating DEI programs, training, or reporting. It defines DEI as initiatives classifying individuals by certain characteristics to achieve demographic outcomes (excluding health services, ADA compliance, and student organizations), making any contract violating this automatically void. Taxpayers could then sue public entities for entering such contracts, seeking court orders to cancel the contracts and recover legal fees. The bill applies to all state contracts and public school agreements, directly affecting government entities and their contractors.
failed · New Hampshire · House Mar 5, 2026

HB 1564: removing all references of gender identity in New Hampshire statutes.

HB 1564 removes the phrase "gender identity" from multiple New Hampshire statutes that currently include it as a protected characteristic in discrimination laws. This affects provisions related to equal employment (RSA 21-I:42), classified employment protections (RSA 21-I:52), cable TV service access (RSA 53-C:3-g), hate crime reporting (RSA 106-B:14-c), police training (RSA 106-L:2), racial profiling definitions (RSA 106-O:1), and mental health services (RSA 135-C:13). The bill deletes all instances of "gender identity" except in RSA 332-M:2, III-a. It does not create new policies but eliminates existing language from these statutes. The direct effect is removing gender identity as a specified protected category in these legal provisions.
vetoed · New Hampshire · House Aug 19, 2026

HB 1072: relative to employer notice of department of labor investigations.

HB 1072 requires New Hampshire's Department of Labor to provide employers with at least 30 days' written notice before conducting inspections or requesting documents/interviews. The notice must specify the inspection's purpose, whether it relates to a complaint, and any alleged labor law violations. Employers would then have 30 days to respond to such requests, regardless of whether a complaint was filed. Exceptions allowing shorter notice require attorney general approval only for recent violations (within 36 months), imminent health/safety risks, or evidence destruction concerns.
Sub-Topics Labor Standards
signed · New Hampshire · House Jul 21, 2026

HB 1168: relative to employer documentation requirements.

HB 1168 extends the time employers have to respond to wage claims from 10 days to 30 days after receiving notice. This change directly affects employers who receive claims from employees alleging unpaid wages. The bill modifies RSA 275:51 by updating the deadline for employers to file written objections to such claims. If employers don't respond within the new 30-day window, the commissioner may order payment without further delay. This is a procedural adjustment to the existing wage enforcement process.
Sub-Topics Labor Standards
failed · New Hampshire · House Feb 5, 2026

HB 1250: relative to notice, documentation, and job reinstatement requirements under leave of absence for childbirth, postpartum, and pediatric medical appointments.

HB 1250 requires employees in New Hampshire to give employers at least 15 days' notice before taking unpaid leave for childbirth, postpartum care, or pediatric medical appointments for their child. It limits this leave to 25 hours total within the first year of the child’s birth or adoption and allows employers to deny job reinstatement if returning would cause major operational disruption. The bill applies to employers with 20 or more employees and permits employees to substitute accrued paid leave for the unpaid time. Employers may request documentation to verify the leave’s purpose. This changes existing rules by clarifying notice requirements and reinstatement conditions.
passed both · New Hampshire · House May 7, 2026

HB 1043: relative to employer discretion in offering minimum payment options to employees.

HB 1043 allows employers to create their own pay policies for employees who report to work at the employer's request, making the existing statutory minimum pay requirement (2 hours' pay at regular rate) apply only if the employer has no alternative policy. It directly affects most private-sector employees who report to work, excluding county/municipal employees and ski resort instructors who receive equivalent alternative compensation. The bill does not change the minimum pay standard but gives employers flexibility to set higher or different policies that meet or exceed the baseline. Employers who make a good-faith effort to notify employees not to report to work are not liable for pay under this section. The bill amends RSA 275:43-a and takes effect 60 days after passage.
died · New Hampshire · House Mar 12, 2026

HB 1704: permitting public employees to bargain individually with public employers without any intervention.

HB 1704, the "Public Employee Choice Act," would allow most state and local government workers in New Hampshire to negotiate wages, hours, and working conditions directly with their employers without union representation. It specifically exempts law enforcement officers, firefighters (with specific certification requirements), emergency medical personnel, and corrections officers, who would remain under existing collective bargaining rules. The bill defines "independent bargaining" as direct negotiation and prohibits employers from forcing eligible employees to use a union. Violations of these new rights would be subject to penalties under the law.
failed · New Hampshire · House Mar 11, 2026

HB 1471: relative to changes to the state retirement system.

HB 1471 updates the retirement benefit calculation for New Hampshire police and fire personnel (Group II members) who began service before July 1, 2011, and were not vested by January 1, 2012. It aligns their "average final compensation" formula with the method established in HB 2 (2025), limiting how extra pay (like overtime) is included in retirement calculations. Specifically, it caps the inclusion of special duty pay in the highest 5 years of service to match the average over the member’s last 5 years of service after January 1, 2012. This change has no new fiscal impact, as it implements an existing calculation method already approved in 2025.