Rep. Peter Herzberg

Maddy summaryHB 5330 requires Michigan public entities (like government agencies) and their contractors to meet strict cybersecurity and data protection standards for small drones (under 55 pounds). It mandates that all collected data (including videos, photos, and personal information) must be stored within the U.S., encrypted with AES-256, and automatically deleted after 45 days unless law enforcement needs it. The bill also requires annual security audits using NIST, ISO 27001, and SOC 2 standards, plus real-time monitoring for cyber threats. The State Police will create regulations to enforce these rules, including network security controls and operator training.

Maddy summaryHB 5324 standardizes "No Drone Zone" signage across Michigan by requiring the state Department of Transportation to adopt a sign based on the FAA's existing design. The sign must display "No Drone Zone" at the top, include a drone image with a red circle slash, state that drone takeoffs/landings are prohibited, and leave space for the specific local ordinance or law enforcing the restriction. This bill directly affects property owners, businesses, and local governments that currently post drone restrictions, providing a uniform format to clarify existing local drone prohibitions without creating new restrictions. The Department of Transportation will publish guidance for using the sign, which must align with current local rules governing drone operations.

Maddy summaryHB 5327 amends Michigan's drone law to prohibit specific drone uses that violate privacy or safety. It bans operating drones to harass people (as defined by existing harassment laws), capture private images in violation of privacy expectations, follow or photograph individuals (especially for sex offenders under registration requirements), or disturb quiet enjoyment of private homes. The bill directly affects all drone operators, with additional restrictions for sex offenders. Key mechanisms include expanding existing drone restrictions to cover harassment, privacy invasions, and proximity to restraining orders. The law takes effect 90 days after enactment.

Maddy summaryHB 5325 allows police officers and private security personnel at critical infrastructure sites (like power plants or bridges) to disable or destroy drones flying in violation of existing laws protecting those sites. It directly affects drone operators who fly near protected infrastructure without authorization. The key provision grants immunity from liability for property damage to the drone when officers act under this law, but only if federal law does not preempt it. This bill creates a specific legal mechanism for responding to unauthorized drone activity at critical infrastructure locations.

Maddy summaryHB 5323 authorizes Michigan state agencies to install technology that detects or blocks unauthorized drones near state-owned buildings and critical infrastructure like power plants or water facilities. The bill allows for two key mechanisms: (1) devices to detect drones flying overhead, and (2) systems to prevent drones from entering restricted airspace. It also requires coordination with the state transportation department to include these locations in a statewide geofencing database. The law explicitly states it does not override federal drone regulations.

Maddy summaryHB 5332 requires Michigan public agencies (like police departments and fire departments) to register all drones they operate, including details about operators, aircraft identification, and intended use. It mandates an annual report to the legislature on drone usage and prohibits public agencies from purchasing or using drones from specific foreign countries or entities listed by federal authorities (such as the U.S. Defense Department's restricted list). Agencies may only buy such drones if they guarantee all collected data stays stored exclusively within the U.S. and complies with federal laws. The bill does not apply to small drones used in compliance with existing safety rules.

Maddy summaryHB 5326 would allow Michigan police officers to intercept, disable, or destroy drones flying in violation of federal aviation rules or posing public safety risks. It directly affects drone operators whose flights breach FAA guidelines and provides officers immunity from liability for damage to the drones. The bill’s key provision requires that federal law first be amended to permit such actions before the state law takes effect. This bill is currently in committee review and does not change existing federal drone regulations.

Maddy summaryThis bill, known as the Commercial Advertising Loudness Mitigation Act, would require video streaming services in Michigan to ensure that commercial advertisements are not louder than the accompanying video content. Starting July 1, 2027, these services must regulate audio levels so that ads do not exceed the volume of the programs or videos they interrupt. The law applies to internet-based streaming platforms but excludes traditional television stations, cable operators, and services that do not include ads. Violations of this rule could result in a civil fine of up to $10,000 for each instance, which would be collected by the state attorney general and deposited into the general fund.

Maddy summaryHB 5558 creates a new licensing system for businesses providing "earned wage access services" (EWAS), which allow workers to access part of their earned but unpaid wages before payday. It requires all EWAS providers (excluding banks, payroll services, and employers offering early pay) to obtain a state license, pay annual fees based on business volume, and submit detailed application information. The law defines key terms like "earned but unpaid income" (wages earned but not yet paid by an employer) and outlines penalties for unlicensed operation. This directly affects EWAS providers operating in Michigan, imposing regulatory requirements while exempting certain financial institutions and employer-provided early wage options.

Maddy summaryHB 5568 amends Michigan's 1966 interest rate law (MCL 438.31) to explicitly exempt "earned wage access services" from the 7% annual interest cap. This means providers of early paycheck access services (like apps or employer programs that let workers withdraw earned wages before payday) can charge rates outside the standard limit. The bill directly affects workers who use these services and the companies offering them. It clarifies an existing exemption under the law without changing the 7% cap for other loans.