Sen. Ray Seigfried

This Act institutes a State nontidal wetlands program to include additional wetlands that are no longer regulated at the federal level. The State wetlands program will cover both tidal and nontidal wetlands, and in that manner fill in gaps in federal jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act and mitigate the uncertainty surrounding the limits to federal jurisdiction and improve efficiencies in the wetland permitting processes. Section 1 of the Act makes a number of changes to Chapter 66 of Title 7 of the Delaware Code: Section 1 adds definitions to § 6603 of Title 7, including for "aquatic habitat functions and services"; "Community Water Access Structure"; "Delaware Wetland Screening Tool," which is a screening tool o be developed in regulations to determine whether an area has the potential to qualify as a wetland; "Exceptional Value Wetlands", which are wetlands that are unique or high functioning, that support flora or fauna that are endangered or threatened, that are located in public water supply Source Water Protection Areas, or located within designated natural areas; "foot bridge"; "linear utility infrastructure projects"; "mitigation"; "normal residential gardening and lawn and landscape maintenance"; "pilings"; "unique wetlands," meaning wetlands that are categorized by the Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC) as Coastal Plain seasonal ponds, inner-dune depression meadows, peatland fens, Piedmont stream valley wetlands, bald cypress swamps, Atlantic white cedar swamps, or black ash seepage swamps; "voluntary wetland habitat restoration project"; and "wetland walkway". In addition, the definition of "wetlands" is revised to include all tidal and nontidal wetlands in the State, and will be further clarified in regulations adopted by DNREC. Section 1 also amends § 6604 of Title 7 to provide that an applicant for a wetlands permit has the burden of proving whether a proposed activity is within tidal or nontidal wetlands. In addition, Section 1 amends § 660 of Title 7, concerning activities that are exempt from permit requirements under Chapter 66 of Title 7. Under the Act, the following activities are exempt: farming, provided certain requirements are met, including that farming or an intent to farm has been conducted on the land in the prior 10 years on a rolling basis; silvicultural activities permitted by the Department of Agriculture; conservation practices on lands that are engaged in programs through certain federal or state governmental agencies; hunting, fishing, trapping, and duck blinds; wildlife nesting structures; mosquito control activities authorized by the DNREC; construction of certain drainage ditches, tax ditches, swales, and other drainage features; artificial ponds and borrow pits; construction of directional aids to navigation; placing of boundary stakes; foot bridges; normal residential gardening and lawn and landscape maintenance. In addition, other activities are conditionally exempt: certain activities that would be allowed under a nationwide permit issued by the United States Army Corps of Engineers; nontidal wetlands equal to or less than a contiguous 0.50 acres, provided certain criteria are met; work performed by a state, county, or municipal government or conservation district, or such an entity's designated contractor, on nontidal wetlands in the Delaware Atlantic Coastal Plains Province with a contributing drainage area of less than 800 acres; maintenance, reconstruction, or retrofitting work performed by or with the assistance of any state, county, or municipal government or conservation district in nontidal wetlands; certain work in agricultural drainage ditches; the creation or maintenance of certain ponds constructed in uplands; and wetland walkways, under certain conditions. Section 1 also amends § 6607 of Title 7, concerning the procedures, regulations, and application fees associated with permit applications. The Act provides that initial regulations promulgated under Chapter 66 will establish the Delaware Wetland Screening Tool. Further, in addition to the regulations the Secretary of DNREC is already directed to adopt, the Secretary is instructed to adopt regulations affording additional protections to Exceptional Value Wetlands; reducing duplication with the permitting requirements of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; improving the State's ability to account for impacts from wetlands permitting actions; promulgating mitigation strategies to facilitate no overall net loss in wetland acreage and function and to protect the State's resilience to the impacts of climate change; and establishing general permits for common and environmentally beneficial activities with minimal environmental impact. Section 1 further amends § 6607 concerning the timeline for DNREC issuing a decision regarding a permit application Section 1 creates a new § 6621, establishing the Wetlands Regulatory Advisory Committee. The Committee is directed to assist DNREC in developing the initial regulations required under Chapter 66 of Title 7 and to evaluate the permitting processes for activities regulated by state and federal agencies. The Committee is to be made up of 23 members, including the County Administrator or County Executive, or the County Administrator's or County Executive's designee; representatives from the Delaware Farm Bureau, the conservation districts, various environmental advocacy groups, an environmental justice organization, the Home Builders Association of Delaware, the Delaware Association of Realtors, the American Council of Engineering Companies of Delaware, the Delmarva Chicken Association, a general business group, a private wetlands consultant certified by the Society of Wetlands Scientists, and members from higher education institutions with specialization in wetlands science, agricultural economics, and with knowledge of forestry or soil conservation. The Committee is directed to review DNREC's implementation of the initial regulations required by Chapter 66 and provide a final report recommending legislative or regulatory improvements. Section 2 of the Act deletes Chapter 66A of Title 7 of the Delaware Code, "Nontidal Wetland Standards," which had created a Wetlands Advisory Committee to assist the Secretary of the Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control in developing wetland protection priorities for the State and identifying a comprehensive approach for improving nontidal wetland conservation, restoration, and education to recommend to the General Assembly, and to evaluate the permitting process for activities regulated by state and federal agencies. Section 3 of the Act provides that activities in private nontidal subaqueous lands authorized under a nationwide permit issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and in effect in the state are exempt from any requirements under Chapter 72 of Titel 7 of the Delaware Code, if a water quality certification has been received from the Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, where necessary. Section 4 of the Act provides that §§ 6621 and 6622 of Section 1 of the Act, and Section 2 of the Act, are effective upon enactment; Section 3 of the Act is effective 60 days after enactment; and the remaining provisions of the Act are effective upon the adoption of initial regulations by the Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control.

This Act protects Delaware’s nonprofit acute care hospitals from acquisition by entities other than charities or not-for-profit entities during a moratorium period. It also permanently subjects the sale or encumbrance of primary facility real estate of a nonprofit acute care hospital to the Attorney General notice and review requirements of the Conversion Act. Section 1 makes two primary changes to the definitions in § 2531 of Title 29. First, it clarifies that a "not-for-profit healthcare conversion transaction" includes those undertaken "directly or indirectly through one or more affiliates." This ensures that the Attorney General’s oversight cannot be circumvented by structuring transactions through shell entities or intermediaries. It provides a new, permanent category of conversion transaction: the sale, transfer, conveyance or lease of a hospital's "primary facility real estate" to a for-profit entity. This change ensures that arrangements involving the land and buildings of an acute care hospital are subject to the same notice and review requirements as a change in corporate control. Finally, Section 1 defines for "acute care hospital" and "primary facility real estate.” Section 2 requires the Attorney General to transmit copies of any Conversion Act notice involving an acute care hospital to the Governor and the Secretary of the Department of Health and Social Services within 10 days of receipt. Section 3 prohibits any person or entity, other than a charity or not-for-profit entity, from entering into a "change of control transaction" involving acquisition of a nonprofit acute care hospital. It defines a "change of control transaction" as the acquisition of the power to direct the hospital's management, policies, or clinical practices, whether through ownership of voting securities, changes in board composition, or by contract. Any transaction of this nature is void and has no legal effect. The prohibition expressly captures incremental acquisition scenarios, including minority stakes, sub-majority governance rights, board appointment rights, and executive officer appointment rights. Section 4 amends § 9304 of Title 16 to prohibit any entity or person other than a charity or not-for-profit entity from submitting, and the Health Resources Board from accepting or processing, an application for a Certificate of Public Review for the construction, development, establishment, or acquisition of an acute care hospital. Any such application is void and of no legal effect. Section 5 provides that Sections 2 through 4 are effective until July 1, 2028, unless terminated sooner or extended by the General Assembly.

This Act amends Titles 16, 18, 29, and 31 of the Delaware Code and Chapter 237, Volume 83 of the Laws of Delaware relating to primary care insurance. Among other things, the Act does the following: Section 1 of the Act amends § 9903 of Title 16 of the Delaware Code to provide that the Health Care Commission, in coordination with the Primary Care Reform Collaborative, will monitor compliance of primary care providers with value-based care delivery models established under the Office of Value-Based Health Care Delivery (OVBHCD). Section 2 of the Act amends § 9904A of Title 16 to remove a time frame limitation for the period during which the Health Care Commission is authorized to request written reports by health insurers regarding progress in adopting and implementing value-based payment models. Under the Act, the PCRC may continue to request such reporting going forward. Section 3 of the Act amends § 329 of Title 18 to provide that administrative penalties for violations of §2503(a)(12), §2503(a)(15), § 3342B, and § 3556A of Title 18 may be equivalent to the amount of the violation, and that penalties imposed for such violations are to be deposited into a Primary Care Fund, which will be used by the Statewide Benefits Office and the Division of Medicaid and Medical Assistance. Section 4 of the Act amends § 334 of Title 18 to clarify that the OVBHCD has the ability to promulgate regulations necessary to accomplish the stated goals of reducing health-care costs by increasing the availability of high quality, cost-efficient health insurance products that have stable, predictable, and affordable rates. Section 5 of the Act amends § 2503 of Title 18 to extend current cost containment calculations to rate filing year 2027. Given their relative size and patient populations within Delaware's health care market, Delaware's two smallest hospitals and lone free-standing children's hospital are exempt from that extension. In rate filing year 2028 and thereafter, the Act specifies that costs per service for health benefit plans may not exceed certain Medicare Reference-Based Pricing Targets, which are based on the “Full Medicare rate,” meaning the applicable wage-adjusted base Medicare rate for different services, the Free-Standing Children’s Hospital Medicare outpatient payment rate, or the TEFRA Rate, meaning the target amount under the federal Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA) Waiver Program applicable to Free-Standing Children's Hospitals, unless certain exemptions apply. Those exemptions are for Delaware's two smallest hospitals and, if making progress with value-based care, for a Delaware hospital in a high-growth, high-Medicare population region. Carriers issuing plans in the commercial market for 2 consecutive years and that cover more than 5,000 members must meet minimum percentages of alternative payment model contracting, as specified. Section 6 of the Act amends § 3342B of Title 18 concerning primary care coverage offered by individual insurance plans. Under the Act, starting in 2026, carriers must spend at least 11.5% of their total cost of medical care on primary care, at least 5% of which must be via prospective primary care management payments. Carriers must offer value-based care programs and may not deny contracted providers the opportunity to participate in an offered value-based care program. In addition, the Commissioner is required to issue regulations regarding the calculation of total cost of care. Section 7 of the Act applies the same changes as Section 6 of the Act to § 3556A of Title 18, concerning primary care coverage offered by group insurance plans. Section 8 of the Act deletes a sunsetting clause contained in Section 14, Chapter 237, Volume 83 of the Laws of Delaware, which would have repealed § 2503(a)(12)a., § 3442B(b)(3), and § 3556A(b)(3) of title 18, effective January 1, 2027. Section 9 of the Act amends § 5204 of Title 29 to provide that health-insurance coverage for public officers and employees shall be provided by a carrier whose cost per service may not exceed certain Medicare Reference-Based Pricing Targets, which are based on the Full Medicare rate, the Free-Standing Children's Hospital Medicare outpatient payment rate, or the TEFRA Rate, unless certain exemptions apply. Those exemptions are for Delaware's two smallest hospitals and, if making progress with value-based care, for a Delaware hospital in a high-growth, high-Medicare population region. In addition, Section 9 of the Act specifies that coverage shall be provided by a carrier offering value-based care programs equivalent to the commercial market requirements. Section 10 of the Act amends §5224 of Title 29 concerning primary care coverage of insurance coverage for public officers and employees, to require plans to report data to the OVBHCD on the percentage of primary care spending as a percentage of total medical costs for plan years 2027 and 2028 and to increase spending on primary care by 1% per year thereafter until primary care spending reaches 11.5% of total medical costs. Section 11 of the Act creates §539 of Title 31, concerning state public assistance, to require entities providing health insurance under § 505(3) to report data on the percentage of primary care spending as a percentage of total medical costs for 2 plan years and, in subsequent years, increase primary care spending by 1% until primary care spending reaches 11.5% of total medical costs. Section 12 of the Act provides that the Department of Insurance shall promulgate regulations pursuant to the Act within 18 months of enactment, but shall promulgate regulations on or before January 1, 2027 establishing a methodology to determine any appropriate annual inflationary or other applicable adjustments to a hospital's Full Medicare Rate. Like Senate Substitute No. 1 for Senate Bill No. 1, this Act differs from Senate Bill No. 1 in that it bases the limits for costs per service for health benefit plans on Medicare Reference-Based Pricing Targets, which may differ based on whether the services are outpatient services, inpatient hospital services, or emergency department services, and on whether the services are being provided by a Free-Standing Children's Hospital; under Senate Bill No. 1, the limits for cost-per-service were based on a percentage of Medicare reimbursement for comparable services. In addition, this Act provides more guidance regarding the application of exemptions from those limits. In addition, Senate Substitute No. 2 for Senate Bill No. 1 differs from Senate Bill No. 1 in that it makes technical edits to definitions and it provides that the Department of Insurance and the State Employee Benefits Office shall lead a process, in consultation with Delaware hospitals, to recommend an appropriate methodology to determine and apply any inflationary or other applicable adjustments to a hospital's Full Medicare Rate not otherwise captured in a hospital's annual Medicare rate update by January 1, 2027. Senate Substitute No. 2 for Senate Bill No. 1 also adds an exemption from the aggregate unit price growth limits in § 2503(a)(12)a.3. of Title 18 for a hospital that is a Free-Standing Children's Hospital, a hospital that qualifies as a Medicare-Dependent Rural Hospital on the grounds that it meets the definition of a Medicare-dependent hospital under 42 C.F.R. § 412.108 for at least 3 of the 5 years immediately preceding the applicable rate filing year, or an Urban Medicaid DSH Hospital.

This Act is a Substitute for House Bill No. 450. Like House Bill No. 450, this Substitute Act is to be known as the Reforming Opportunities and Accelerated Development for Delaware Act (“ROAD-DE Act”) and will make significant changes to Delaware’s land use permitting process by building on Governor Meyer’s Executive Order No. 18, which created the Permitting Accelerator to reform policies, processes, and procedures that have accumulated over decades and are holding back jobs, housing, and other critical infrastructure statewide. In 2019, a study of Delaware’s permitting process was undertaken. The study concluded that Delaware’s permitting process was significantly longer and more challenging than those of surrounding states in the region. In 2025, this State began digitizing permitting processes. During the initial stages of that effort, more than 52 hours of interviews with 57 stakeholders were conducted across state agencies, local governments, developers, and technical experts. Those interviews revealed that statewide delays are not driven by isolated performance issues. Rather, they stem from structural misalignment, sequential review processes, incentive distortions, and capacity constraints that compound across agencies. Delaware’s permitting process can stretch beyond 24 months, placing this State at a distinct economic development disadvantage when it comes to attracting and growing businesses. In the region, Delaware’s competitors, including Maryland and Pennsylvania, can achieve substantially faster permit approvals, making them more attractive locations for economic development and affordable housing. The 2019 and 2025 studies resulted in recommendations that the permitting process be streamlined and modified to improve accountability and eliminate redundancies within various government agencies, particularly within the Delaware Department of Transportation (“DelDOT”). To implement these recommendations, this Substitute Act, like House Bill No. 450, does all of the following: (1) Section 1 of this Substitute Act requires DelDOT to base the threshold for determining if a traffic impact study is required on peak-hour trips, not vehicle trips per day, and set the minimum peak hour trips threshold at 500 peak-hour trips for residential developments and 500 peak-hour trips, excluding pass-by trips, for all other development types. (2) Sections 2, 4, 6, and 8 of this Substitute Act require the counties and municipalities to base their threshold for determining if a traffic impact study is required on the same requirements as required for DelDOT in Section 1 of this Act. (3) Sections 3, 5, 7, and 8 of this Substitute Act provide for certain residential density requirements. (4) Section 9 of this Substitute Act requires DelDOT to deploy, operate, and maintain technological systems for the automated monitoring, analysis, and management of transportation infrastructure and traffic operations. (5) Section 10 of this Substitute Act provides that engineering studies or traffic investigations conducted by DelDOT may include automated or continuous data collection systems, remote sensing technologies, digital imaging, algorithmic analysis of traffic patterns, and other technological methods used to evaluate roadway safety, traffic operations, and infrastructure conditions. (6) Section 11 of this Substitute Act requires DelDOT to establish and collect transportation impact fees throughout this State and to use the moneys collected to fund off-site improvements to bring existing transportation infrastructure up to current State standards. Additionally, this Section requires DelDOT to use the moneys collected in the county in which the transportation impact fee was collected unless the county or the municipalities within the county fail to adopt the traffic impact study and residential density requirements under Sections 2 through 8 of this Act. This Substitute Act differs from House Bill No. 450 as follows: (1) Changes the residential density requirements provision contained in Sections 3, 5, 7, and 8 of this Substitute Act for the original Act. (2) Requires DelDOT to consult with the applicable municipal government on how to spend the money collected from the transportation impact fee. (3) Increases the amount of the surcharge DelDOT must assess on the transportation impact fee from 1% to 2%. (4) Adds the Brownfield Development Program as 1 of the programs to receive money from the surcharge assessed on the transportation impact fee by DelDOT. This Substitute Act requires a greater than majority vote for passage because § 1 of Article IX of the Delaware Constitution requires the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the members elected to each house of the General Assembly to amend a municipal charter, whether directly, by amendment to a specific municipality’s charter, or, as in this Act, indirectly, by a general law. This Substitute Act also makes technical corrections to conform existing law to the standards of the Delaware Legislative Drafting Manual.

This bill builds on the customer protections created in Senate Bill 60 in 2025, as follows: 1. Increases transparency in rates and communications by public utilities. 2. Requires regular management audits of certain public utilities and regulatory accounting reviews with each rate case proceeding. 3. Provides greater consistency in the data used by public utilities in rate case proceedings. 4. Limits how much utilities can collect in interim rates before the Commission has ruled on a rate increase request. 5. Prohibits public utilities from recovering certain expenses from ratepayers. 6. Requires the Commission to provide rationale for its decisions in accepting settlement agreements. 7. Puts limits on Delmarva Power’s infrastructure spending, which is a major driver of rate increases. Delmarva Power is operating its electric distribution system at a level far in excess of reliability standards set by the Commission. In support of its parent company’s strategic goal to increase earnings by increasing rate base, Delmarva Power’s annual capital spending leads to frequent rate increase requests to the Commission. Part of Delmarva Power’s capital spending includes “non-mandatory projects,” which by definition are projects that are not required to maintain system reliability. This bill limits the amount of non-mandatory capital expenses the company may recover from ratepayers in rates and is indexed to the company’s rate base, i.e. the value of all its capital assets. Limiting non-mandatory cost recovery will in no way impact Delmarva Power’s ability to restore service after storms nor impact its vegetation management (tree trimming) program.

This Act aims to increase this State’s supply of housing. Despite rapid development, Delaware is facing a significant and growing shortage of affordable housing. Senate Joint Resolution No. 8 of the 1st session of the 153rd General Assembly created a pilot program designed to encourage local zoning reform efforts that would help increase affordable housing. While several local jurisdictions have taken advantage of the assistance offered by Senate Joint Resolution 8, the scope of the problem is statewide, and it will take more than isolated local reform to scale up housing production, particularly affordable housing production, to the degree necessary to meet this State’s needs. This Act seeks to address those needs by increasing access to housing for all income levels while allowing local jurisdictions the flexibility to develop their own strategies for doing so. This Act is a second Senate substitute for Senate Bill No. 23 and differs from the first Senate substitute for Senate Bill No. 23 as follows: (1) Senate Substitute No. 2 refines the process that occurs if a County fails to rezone in accordance with its comprehensive plan within 12 months. Like Senate Substitute No. 1, it provides that if rezoning does not occur as required, a property owner’s application must be approved if the requested zoning classification is consistent with future land use map or map series and implementing provisions of the comprehensive plan. Senate Substitute No. 2 adds that denial can only occur if the County makes written findings that the requested zoning classification is inconsistent with the future land use map or map series or implementing provisions of the comprehensive plan, or that the application fails to satisfy procedural or submission requirements. If neither of these apply, the application must be approved within 120 days, unless the applicant agrees in writing to an extension. Previously, the application had to be approved within 90 days. (2) Senate Bill No. 23 required a minimum of 4 mandatory elements of an affordable housing plan. Senate Substitute No. 1 increased the number of required elements of the affordable housing plan from 4 to 5 by moving an element from optional to mandatory. That element was that an affordable housing plan for a jurisdiction with greater than 10,000 population must include the identification of 1 or more zoning designations that allow and are suitable for residential uses where emergency shelters, group homes, recovery homes, or other supportive housing are allowed as a permitted use without a conditional use or other discretionary permit required. Senate Substitute No. 2 removes this as a mandatory element and changes the newly optional element to read, “the amendment of land use regulations to allow transitional housing, emergency housing shelters, group homes, recovery homes, or other supportive housing as a permitted use in at least 1 residential zone.” It also removes the 10,000 population cap, making the element an option for all local jurisdictions, regardless of population size. (3) Senate Bill No. 23 and Senate Substitute No. 1 for Senate Bill No. 23 required the Director of the Delaware State Housing Authority to approve all affordable housing plans. Senate Substitute No. 2 shifts the role of Delaware State Housing Authority to a more collaborative one by requiring local jurisdictions to work with the Delaware State Housing Authority to develop its plan. (4) Senate Substitute No. 2 gives local jurisdictions credit for measures they are already taking to increase affordable housing. Any elements of affordable housing plans adopted on or after July 15, 2024, count toward meeting the requirements of the plan. This avoids duplication of efforts and recognizes the meaningful affordable housing work that many local jurisdictions are already doing. (5) Senate Substitute No. 2 recognizes that some jurisdictions are very close to completing their comprehensive plans by exempting jurisdictions from some provisions of the Affordable Housing Act if they will be adopting their next comprehensive plan before February 1, 2027. If a local jurisdiction falls into that category, it does not need to comply with the provisions of § 9222 of the Act prior to its next 5-year review of its comprehensive plan. (6) Senate Substitute No. 2 creates a new section addressing by-right residential uses and mixed-use uses with a majority residential component. The language around by-right review and approval previously included in the mandatory elements of an affordable housing plan section is replaced with a reference to the newly created section. Under that section, a residential development application or a mixed-use application with a majority residential component for a use that is permitted by-right under the zoning ordinance of a county or local jurisdiction will be reviewed through an administrative review and approval process, provided the application complies with objective standards, as defined in this Act. A local jurisdiction may still require review or approval by a planning commission, planning board, or other administrative body as long as the review is limited to determining compliance with objective standards. (7) Senate Bill No. 23 and Senate Substitute No. 1 for Senate Bill No. 23 stated that the Governor’s review and certification of comprehensive plans would focus in part on consistency with State development policies. Senate Substitute No. 2 modifies this slightly to require plans to “demonstrate consideration of State development policies.” The goal of this change is to avoid limiting local jurisdictions to simply mirroring the contents of State development policies like State Spending Strategies, while still requiring that they consider such policies in developing their comprehensive plans. (8) Senate Substitute No. 2 adds definitions for “homeownership unit,” “rental unit,” and “by-right” to Title 29. (9) Senate Bill No. 23 and Senate Substitute No. 1 referred to mixed-use developments in one of the elements that may be included in an affordable housing plan. Senate Substitute No. 2 clarifies that such mixed-use developments must have a majority residential component. (10) Senate Substitute No. 2 adds to the list of 10 (now 11) options available to local jurisdictions to meet their obligation to increase and diversify affordable housing. This new option allows a local jurisdiction to implement a strategy that is not listed among the original 10 elements, from which local jurisdictions must select 5, but that the Delaware State Housing Authority approves as meeting the goals of that section of this Act. (11) Senate Bill No. 23 and both substitutes require counties to amend their official zoning maps within 12 months of the adoption of or revision to their comprehensive plans. If a county does not do so, a rezoning application filed by a property owner must be approved if the requested zoning classification is consistent with the comprehensive plan, unless the county makes certain findings. If an application is submitted under this provision, a county must make a completeness determination within a certain time period, or the application is deemed complete. In Senate Bill No. 23 and Senate Substitute No. 1, that period was 10 days. Senate Substitute No. 2 increases it to 21 days. Like the first substitute for Senate Bill No. 23, Senate Substitute No. 2 differs from Senate Bill No. 23 as follows: (1) Both substitutes remove a provision that would have given County comprehensive plans the force of law. Current law, where only the land use map or map series component of the comprehensive plan has the force of law, remains in place. (2) Both substitutes reduce the amount of time a County has to rezone to conform land use with its comprehensive plan from 18 to 12 months. (3) Senate Bill No. 23 gave local jurisdictions 20 days to complete revisions to comprehensive plans that were returned by the Governor for further revision. Both substitutes increase that period to 45 days and add additional details regarding the revision and certification process. (4) Both substitutes reduce the requirements for the affordable housing plan under newly created Subchapter III of Chapter 92 of Title 29 to reflect the fact that local jurisdictions already include some of the information required under Senate Bill No. 23 in their comprehensive plans. (5) Senate Substitute No. 1 and Senate Substitute No. 2 both remove some of the reporting requirements included in Senate Bill 23 to simplify the process for local jurisdictions. Reporting is still mandatory, and the Delaware State Housing Authority and the Office of State Planning Coordination are still required to publish reported information on the Housing Authority website on an annual basis so that the public can see how local jurisdictions are meeting their obligations under this Act. (6) Both substitutes remove technical corrections that appeared in Senate Bill No. 23. Those corrections had been intended to make current code consistent with the standards of the Delaware Legislative Drafting Manual, but the substitutes remove them to avoid confusion over which changes are technical, and which are substantive. Under § 1 of Article IX of the Delaware Constitution, this Act requires a two-thirds majority vote because the amendments it makes to Title 22 of the Delaware Code would indirectly amend the charter of one or more incorporated municipalities.

Maddy summaryHB 500 authorizes the State of Delaware and its transportation authorities to issue bonds and allocate funds for capital projects in fiscal year 2027. The bill allows the state to sell general obligation bonds and the Delaware Transportation Authority to sell revenue bonds to finance infrastructure improvements. It also sets specific rules for how these funds can be spent and reprograms existing money within the state's transportation trust fund. This legislation directly impacts the state's budget and the funding available for transportation construction and upgrades.

This Act removes from the Town of Cheswold certain parcels of real property within the Nobles Pond development that are currently within the territorial limits of the Town of Cheswold. This Act requires a greater than majority vote for passage because § 1 of Article IX of the Delaware Constitution requires the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the members elected to each house of the General Assembly to amend a municipal charter, whether directly, by amendment to a specific municipality’s charter, or indirectly, by a general law.

This Act requires large energy use facilities to produce renewable energy within the state to power their operations to prevent a drain on the electric grid. It provides for a “ramp-up” period requiring that a large energy use facility provide a plan to the Public Service Commission to ramp up their energy production within the state each year so that by the 10th year of operations, the facility is producing 100% of its energy usage through in-state production. This Act also allows the Public Service Commission to regulate electric suppliers insofar as necessary to ensure that large energy use facilities do not negatively affect the reliability of the electric grid.

This Act creates a film production tax credit. It requires companies to obtain, at their own expense, an independent audit certifying eligible expenditures. The audit must be submitted to the Division of Small Business for approval and allocation of credits. The credit is nonrefundable, transferable, and may be carried forward for up to 5 years. The credit may be applied against personal income tax, corporate income tax, bank franchise tax, and insurance premiums tax. All credit transfers must be approved by the Division of Small Business. This Act further authorizes necessary data sharing among agencies. Applicants and transferees consent to disclosure of credit amounts by virtue of applying or receiving a transfer. This Act also grants regulatory authority to the Division of Small Business and the Secretary of State to administer the annual credit cap; prioritize and manage awards; and issue reports relating to awards and utilization with input from relevant state agencies. The Division of Small Business may create alternative audit procedures for small businesses where a full audit would be prohibitively expensive. This Act sunsets on June 30, 2031, and no applications may be submitted after that date.