SB 326 Delaware Senate · 153rd General Assembly (2025-2026)

AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 26 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION.

Summary
This bill builds on the customer protections created in Senate Bill 60 in 2025, as follows: 1. Increases transparency in rates and communications by public utilities. 2. Requires regular management audits of certain public utilities and regulatory accounting reviews with each rate case proceeding. 3. Provides greater consistency in the data used by public utilities in rate case proceedings. 4. Limits how much utilities can collect in interim rates before the Commission has ruled on a rate increase request. 5. Prohibits public utilities from recovering certain expenses from ratepayers. 6. Requires the Commission to provide rationale for its decisions in accepting settlement agreements. 7. Puts limits on Delmarva Power’s infrastructure spending, which is a major driver of rate increases. Delmarva Power is operating its electric distribution system at a level far in excess of reliability standards set by the Commission. In support of its parent company’s strategic goal to increase earnings by increasing rate base, Delmarva Power’s annual capital spending leads to frequent rate increase requests to the Commission. Part of Delmarva Power’s capital spending includes “non-mandatory projects,” which by definition are projects that are not required to maintain system reliability. This bill limits the amount of non-mandatory capital expenses the company may recover from ratepayers in rates and is indexed to the company’s rate base, i.e. the value of all its capital assets. Limiting non-mandatory cost recovery will in no way impact Delmarva Power’s ability to restore service after storms nor impact its vegetation management (tree trimming) program.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
May 2026
Committee Review
Jun 2026
Senate Passage
Jun 2026
House Passage
Jun 2026
Signed into Law
Jul 2026
Introduced May 18, 2026 Signed Jul 13, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison

What changed between versions

SA 1 to SB 326 Bill Text · 11 edits
MAJOR
The transition from Senate Amendment No. 1 to the final enacted text of SB 326 represents a shift from a narrow amendment (which proposed phasing in a dollar-based capital spending cap and adding a Commission override) to a comprehensive bill with multiple new regulatory provisions. The final bill rejected all three changes proposed in SA 1: it kept the 'prior to' timing for rate summary tables, omitted the 'unless otherwise ordered by the Commission' carve-out, and replaced the phased dollar cap with a flat 5% of rate base limit on non-mandatory capital spending recovery.
Scope change
The bill's scope expanded significantly from SA 1's narrow focus on the capital spending cap timing and a small wording change to a comprehensive package covering rate transparency, management audits, plain language standards, rate base methodology, accounting reviews, interim rate limits, cost recovery prohibitions, and Commission decision-making requirements. The capital spending cap itself narrowed in scope by removing the Commission override that SA 1 would have added.
FISCAL

The capital spending cap in Section 1008 was changed from SA 1's phased approach (a fixed $70,000,000 annual limit for 2026-2027, then 5% of rate base from 2028) to a straight 5% of rate base cap with no phase-in period. This makes the cap effective immediately and ties it to the company's asset value rather than a fixed dollar amount.

Section 306(a)(1) adds a phased interim rate mechanism: if the Commission has not decided within 7 months of filing, the utility may place 50% of the proposed increase into effect under bond, and 75% after 12 months. Section 306(c) allows a utility to put a rate into effect under bond 90 days after filing if the increase does not exceed 15% of annual gross intrastate operating revenues or $2,500,000 annually, whichever is less.

Section 316(b)(6) prohibits utilities with more than 25,000 customers from recovering attorney fees and external expert/consultant costs for distribution rate case proceedings that exceed the combined amount spent by Commission staff and the Division of the Public Advocate on similar fees.

SCOPE

SA 1 proposed adding 'Unless otherwise ordered by the Commission' before the capital spending cap, which would have given the Commission discretion to waive the limit. The final bill omits this language, making the 5% cap mandatory with no stated Commission override.

TIMELINE

The rate summary table filing requirement in Section 301(f)(5) retains 'at least 30 days prior to the effective date' language. SA 1 had proposed changing this to 'after,' which was not adopted in the final bill.

REQUIREMENT

Section 207(b) requires management audits of Commission-regulated electric distribution companies at least once every five years, with findings made public and provided to Commission Staff and the Division of the Public Advocate. Audit costs are explicitly non-recoverable in customer rates.

Section 301(f) establishes a Rate Transparency requirement: utilities must prepare, file, post on their website, and include in customer bills a Rate Summary Table itemizing every rate component (base rate, transmission, supply, riders, surcharges, adjustments) for each customer class.

Section 301A creates a Plain Language Standard requiring public utilities, Commission Staff, and the Division of the Public Advocate to use clear language in all public-facing communications and Commission submissions, avoiding technical terms where possible.

DEFINITION

Section 302(a) mandates that the Commission use the 'average year rate base method' for electric and natural gas distribution companies when determining rate base, providing greater consistency across rate cases.

ENFORCEMENT

Section 304(c) authorizes a regulatory accounting review of transactions on a utility's books during any base rate change filing, including transactions with affiliated companies. The review can begin immediately upon filing and results must be shared with all parties. A utility is exempt if a prior review already covered the same test year.

Section 512(d) requires all Commission Orders to contain adequate support and rationale for conclusions, including specific facts and factors, and an explanation of major elements when accepting or denying settlement agreements.

Floor votes · Senate Jun 16, 2026 · House Jun 30, 2026

How they voted

201
Passed
Total votes 21
Jun 16, 2026
D Democratic15
15 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican6
5 Yea 1 Nay
83% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
11
Key actions
6
Committee
2
Amendments
4
Jul 13, 2026
Signed into law
Signed by Governor
executive
Jun 30, 2026
Lower · Passed
Passed By House. Votes: 30 YES 11 NO
lower
Jun 30, 2026
Introduced
Amendment HA 1 to SB 326 - Stricken in House
lower
Jun 30, 2026
Lower · Passed
Reported Out of Committee (Natural Resources & Energy) in House with 8 On Its Merits
lower
Jun 29, 2026
Introduced
Amendment HA 1 to SB 326 - Introduced and Placed With Bill
upper
Jun 17, 2026
Introduced
Assigned to Natural Resources & Energy Committee in House
lower
Jun 16, 2026
Upper · Passed
Passed By Senate. Votes: 20 YES 1 NO
upper
Jun 16, 2026
Upper · Passed
Amendment SA 1 to SB 326 - Passed By Senate. Votes: 20 YES 1 NOT VOTING
upper
Jun 9, 2026
Upper · Passed
Reported Out of Committee (Environment, Energy & Transportation) in Senate with 1 Favorable, 4 On Its Merits
upper
Jun 8, 2026
Introduced
Amendment SA 1 to SB 326 - Introduced and Placed With Bill
upper
May 18, 2026
Introduced
Introduced and Assigned to Environment, Energy & Transportation Committee in Senate
upper
10 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors