Current law states that an employer shall not interfere with an agricultural worker's reasonable access to key service providers (KSP) at any location when the worker is not performing compensable work and with respect to health-care providers at any time. The act exempts an employer's property from this provision; except that the act prohibits an employer from interfering with a worker's access to KSP through remote channels on the employer's property. The act also removes language referring to health-care providers. Current law states that the division of labor standards and statistics (division) may adopt rules regarding additional times that an employer may not interfere with a worker's reasonable access to KSP. The act clarifies that such rules must apply only to locations other than the employer's property. Lastly, the act states the division shall not adopt rules that: Infringe upon an employer's private property rights; or Conflict with the common law rights of an individual to access private property in a time of emergency.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Sponsored bills
Beginning on or before July 1, 2027, the act requires a county department of human or social services (county department) to determine whether a child or youth who is in foster care and who has a deceased parent (child or youth) may be eligible to receive survivor benefits administered by the United States railroad retirement board, social security administration, or veterans benefits administration (federal survivor benefits). The county department must make an initial eligibility determination within 90 days after assuming legal custody of or authority over the child or youth. Under current law, certain federal agencies appoint a representative payee or fiduciary (representative payee) to receive and manage federal benefits on behalf of a child or youth in foster care. If a child or youth may be eligible for federal survivor benefits and the county department is the most appropriate representative payee, the act requires the county department to apply for federal survivor benefits on behalf of the child or youth. If the county department determines that the child or youth may be eligible for federal survivor benefits but that the county department is not the most appropriate representative payee, the county department shall provide information to the prospective representative payee that the county department has identified about how to apply for federal survivor benefits on behalf of the child or youth and how to become the child's or youth's representative payee. Under current law, a county department serving as a representative payee may use federal benefits to offset the cost of providing basic care and services to a child or youth in foster care. The act prohibits this offset practice with respect to federal survivor benefits. Instead, the act directs a county department serving as a representative payee to establish an account for the federal survivor benefits (account). A county department serving as a representative payee must save money in the account for the needs of the individual child or youth. Once the child or youth leaves foster care, the county department is required to release funds in the account to the child or youth. The act sets forth various accounting and notice requirements related to federal survivor benefits and requires the department of human services (department), in consultation with interested stakeholders, to adopt rules providing guidance for county departments. The guidance extends to procedures for identifying a representative payee, county department responsibilities when federal survivor benefits are denied or when a child or youth leaves foster care, and policies governing the establishment and maintenance of an account for federal survivor benefit funds. The department must provide technical assistance to a county department about how to conserve federal survivor benefit funds in the best interests of an individual child or youth. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
The act prevents a pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) from prohibiting a rural independent pharmacy from using a private courier or a delivery service to deliver a prescription drug to a patient. A PBM is required to reimburse a rural independent pharmacy for a prescription drug in an amount not less than the national average drug acquisition cost for the dispensed prescription drug ingredients, plus pay a dispensing fee. When a PBM conducts an audit of a rural independent pharmacy and the audit results in a recoupment of more than $1,000 or a penalty of more than $1,000, the PBM must: Electronically notify the rural independent pharmacy of the rural independent pharmacy's rights to appeal at least 30 days before the recoupment of funds; If the rural independent pharmacy does not respond to the electronic notification within 30 days after the electronic notification, again electronically notify the rural independent pharmacy of the rural independent pharmacy's rights to appeal at least 30 days before the recoupment of funds; and If the rural independent pharmacy does not respond to the second electronic notification within 30 days after the second electronic notification, serve process on the rural independent pharmacy notifying of the rural independent pharmacy's rights to appeal at least 30 days before the recoupment of funds. The act allows a rural independent pharmacy to operate without being under the direct charge of a pharmacist if the initial interpretation and final evaluation of the prescription is done by a state-licensed pharmacist in person or remotely. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
The act permits the state, a county, a city and county, a school district, or a municipality to, with approval from a school district's board of education, install and utilize automated vehicle identification systems (system) on the school district's school buses to detect a driver of a vehicle that overtakes a stopped school bus with actuated visual signal lights in violation of current law. A school district that installs and utilizes a system for this purpose must enter into a memorandum of understanding with one or more law enforcement agencies. If a system detects a violation, the state, a county, a city and county, or a municipality may impose a civil penalty of up to $300. The act creates a rebuttable presumption that when an image produced by a system includes an electronic indicator signifying that a school bus's visual signal lights are actuated, the visual signal lights are presumed to be actuated and operational and the school bus is presumed to be stopped to receive or discharge school children. The act mandates that the fines collected through the use of the system must not be used as the basis for the compensation to the system manufacturer or vendor and that the compensation must not be based exclusively upon the number of citations issued or revenue generated by the system.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Under current law, there are 2 total program formulas to finance public schools. Absent the satisfaction of a statutorily specified condition, the first formula is scheduled to stop determining total program after the 2024-25 budget year (expiring formula), and the second formula is scheduled to determine total program beginning in the 2030-31 budget year (new formula). For the 2025-26 budget year through the 2029-30 budget year (transition period), total program is scheduled to be determined by using figures that were calculated under both the expiring formula and the new formula. The act: Extends the transition period by one year, so that it is from the 2025-26 budget year through the 2030-31 budget year; and Postpones the exclusive use of the new formula to determine total program until the 2031-32 budget year. The act changes how each school district's and institute charter school's annual total program is determined during the transition period. For the 2025-26 and 2026-27 budget years, each school district's and institute charter school's annual total program is the greater of the school district's or institute charter school's total program for the 2024-25 budget year or the amount calculated under the expiring formula plus an amount equal to 15% in 2025-26 and 30% in 2026-27 of the difference between the amounts calculated under the new formula and the expiring formula. For the 2027-28 budget year through the 2030-31 budget year, each school district's and institute charter school's annual total program is the greater of the district's or institute charter school's calculation under the expiring formula plus 1% of that calculation, or: For the 2027-28 budget year, the amount calculated under the expiring formula plus an amount equal to 45% of the difference between the amounts calculated under the new formula and the expiring formula; For the 2028-29 budget year, the amount calculated under the expiring formula plus an amount equal to 60% of the difference between the amounts calculated under the new formula and the expiring formula; For the 2029-30 budget year, the amount calculated under the expiring formula plus an amount equal to 75% of the difference between the amounts calculated under the new formula and the expiring formula; and For the 2030-31 budget year, the amount calculated under the expiring formula plus an amount equal to 90% of the difference between the amounts calculated under the new formula and the expiring formula. Under current law, there are specified conditions that apply to the transition period. If the joint budget committee determines that a specified condition occurs in a budget year during the transition period, then for the next budget year and each budget year thereafter, the transition is suspended, and each school district's total program is determined pursuant to the calculation and determination required for the budget year when the condition occurred. For one of the existing conditions, the act specifies that an income tax deposit to the state education fund that was made to correct an error does not count toward determining whether the condition has been satisfied. A school district's funded pupil count is a figure that is used as a part of determining a school district's total program. Under the expiring formula, a school district's funded pupil count is calculated by determining the greater of the school district's pupil enrollment for the applicable budget year or the average of the school district's pupil enrollment for the applicable budget year and the immediately preceding 4 budget years. Under current law, the new formula calculates a school district's funded pupil count by determining the greater of the school district's pupil enrollment for the applicable budget year or the average of the school district's pupil enrollment for the applicable budget year and the immediately preceding 3 budget years. The act changes the new formula so that: For the 2025-26 budget year, a school district's funded pupil count is calculated by determining the greater of the school district's pupil enrollment for the applicable budget year or the average of the school district's pupil enrollment for the applicable budget year and the immediately preceding 3 budget years; and For the 2026-27 budget year and each budget year thereafter, a school district's funded pupil count is calculated by determining the greater of the school district's pupil enrollment for the applicable budget year or the average of the district's pupil enrollment for the applicable budget year and the immediately preceding 2 budget years. However: If a statutorily specified condition is satisfied, and consequently for the 2026-27 budget year, a district's total program is not determined as scheduled under the transition period, then for the 2026-27 budget year, and each budget year thereafter, funded pupil count will continue to be determined by the greater of the school district's pupil enrollment for the applicable budget year or the average of the school district's pupil enrollment for the applicable budget year and the immediately preceding 3 budget years; and If, for the 2027-28 budget year, the state education fund balance is projected to be less than $200 million, then the general assembly is required to implement a smoothing factor or the funded pupil count will be determined by the greater of the school district's pupil enrollment for the applicable budget year or the average of the school district's pupil enrollment for the applicable budget year and the immediately preceding budget year for the 2027-28 budget year and each budget year thereafter. The act expiring formula is changed so that, starting in the 2027-28 budget year, the funded pupil count used in the expiring formula is the same funded pupil count that is used in the new formula to determine a district's total program during the transition period. The total program for the 2025-26 budget year is determined using the formula changes in the act. The act: Increases the statewide base per pupil funding for the 2025-26 budget year by $195.42 to account for inflation; Sets a new statewide base per pupil funding amount for the 2025-26 budget year at $8,691.80; and Sets the total program funding for the 2025-26 budget year for all school districts and institute charter schools to at least $10,036,070,748 or $10,031,606,090, depending upon whether Senate Bill 25-315 becomes law. Under current law, a new at-risk measure is required to be implemented in the 2025-26 budget year. The act repeals this requirement and requires the department of education (department) to collect data necessary to identify individual student census block groups to account for students who are at-risk of below-average academic performance and education outcomes because of socioeconomic disadvantages or poverty, but who may not qualify for free or reduced price lunch. Under current law, as a part of the charter contract, a district charter school and the school district, or the institute charter school and state charter school institute (institute), must agree on funding and services provided by the school district or institute to the charter school, subject to parameters. The act: Suspends the use of these provisions after the 2025-26 budget year; Repeals charter school at-risk supplemental aid after the 2026-27 budget year, following its gradual phase out during the 2025-26 and 2026-27 budget years; Creates incremental funding for charter schools for the 2025-26 budget year; and Requires the general assembly to consult with charter school representatives to ensure that charter schools are aligned with the implementation of the new formula. The act raises the limit from $750 million to $1 billion for the amount of money that the general assembly may appropriate to restore any or all qualified charter school debt reserve funds to their qualified charter school debt service fund requirements. Under current law, $41 million of interest and income earned on money in the public school fund is credited to certain purposes, and any remaining interest and income may be credited as specified by the general assembly or remain in the public school fund. The act requires that any remaining interest and income is credited to the public school capital construction assistance fund. The total annual amount of revenue credited to the public school capital construction fund is capped at $150 million, adjusted for inflation; except that money received from public school fund interest and income does not apply toward the cap. Any amount above the cap is credited to the state public school fund instead. The act creates the kids matter account within the state education fund. Beginning July 1, 2026, the state treasurer must deposit in the account all state revenues collected from an existing tax on 0.00065% on federal taxable income, as modified by law, of every individual, estate, trust, and corporation. The money in the account must only be used for district total program funding and total state funding for all categorical programs. Under current law, the department is required to contract with an entity to develop and implement a public information campaign to emphasize the importance of learning to read by third grade and highlight local education providers that are achieving high percentages of third-grade students who demonstrate reading competency. The act repeals the requirement that the department contract with an entity to develop and implement the information campaign. The act authorizes the department to use any unexpended money that was appropriated for the out-of-school time program grant program and is remaining at the end of the 2024-25 or 2025-26 state fiscal years in the 2025-26 or 2026-27 state fiscal years without further appropriation. The act creates and implements certain parameters for multifunction school activity buses. For the 2025-26 state fiscal year, the act: Appropriates $7,009,989 to the department from the state education fund for at-risk supplemental aid; Appropriates $7.6 million to the department from the public school capital construction assistance fund for public school capital construction assistance board cash grants; Appropriates $25 million to the department from the public school capital construction assistance fund for public school capital construction assistance board lease payments; and Adjusts the 2025-26 long bill by decreasing the cash funds appropriation from the state education fund for the state share of district's total program by $15,775,837; decreasing the cash funds appropriation from the state education fund for at-risk per pupil additional funding by $5 million; and decreasing the cash funds appropriation from the public school capital construction assistance fund for public school capital construction assistance board cash grants by $45,648,087.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
Current law requires that, before an individual is permitted to act as a transportation network company (TNC) driver through the use of a TNC's digital network, the individual shall obtain a criminal history record check. The act requires that the TNC procure a privately administered criminal history record check for the individual before the individual is permitted to act as a driver , at least once every 6 months after the initial criminal history record check, and if a person files a complaint against a driver with the TNC or the public utilities commission (commission) regarding specified allegations. The TNC shall pay the costs of the criminal history record checks. A TNC shall initiate a review of a driver for deactivation if the TNC is notified through a complaint filed with the TNC or the commission or is contacted by the commission, the office of the attorney general, a district attorney's office, or a law enforcement agency regarding certain allegations against the driver. If the TNC determines that the allegation is more than likely to have occurred through a review of the available evidence, the TNC shall deactivate the driver from the TNC's digital platform in accordance with the TNC's deactivation and suspension policy. A driver who has been deactivated may challenge the deactivation through the TNC's deactivation and suspension policy. A TNC's resolution of a driver's challenge to a deactivation must include a written statement that the TNC sends to the driver and the party that filed a complaint. The act requires the commission to create a process by rule for sharing information between TNCs regarding deactivation of riders and drivers. If a person files a complaint against a TNC or a driver, the TNC shall respond to a subpoena or search warrant for information related to the complaint from a court, the office of the attorney general, a district attorney's office, the commission, or a law enforcement agency no later than 2 business days after the request is made. In addition to enforcement by the commission, the act authorizes the attorney general or a person injured or harmed by an alleged violation of the act that results in injury or harm to a minor to initiate a civil proceeding in a district court against a TNC, a driver, or a rider that violates the act. A person injured or harmed by an alleged violation of the act committed by a TNC, a driver, or a rider that results in death, sexual assault, kidnapping, or personal injury to an individual who is not a minor may initiate a civil proceeding in a district court against the TNC, the driver, or the rider. A TNC shall ensure that a driver or rider may opt in to audio and video recording of each prearranged ride in accordance with rules adopted by the commission. On or before November 1, 2025, the commission shall also adopt rules regarding: The requirements, procedures, and the deadline for implementation of audio and video recording policies; Access to, storage of, and encryption of audio and video recording, including measures to promote victim-survivor privacy and choice; Transferring audio and video recording and related data between a TNC and the driver or rider; Notification by a TNC company to a driver and rider that a prearranged ride is continuously audio and video recorded; Education provided by a TNC to a driver and rider regarding the safety benefits of audio and video recording of a prearranged ride; Technology failures related to audio and video recording, including rules that hold harmless a TNC for a technological failure outside of the control of the TNC if the TNC is otherwise acting in good faith to conduct audio and video recording of a prearranged ride; and Ensuring that a driver does not suffer an undue burden from purchasing technology to enable audio and video recording. The act requires a TNC to maintain clear policies prohibiting drivers or riders from offering, selling, or providing food or beverage to another driver or rider. A provision in a contract between a TNC and a rider is declared void as against public policy if the provision attempts or purports to waive specified rights. The act requires a TNC to develop policies to: Prevent imposter accounts, account sharing, and account renting; Prevent sexual assault, physical assault, and homicide against or committed by the TNC's drivers; Prohibit the transportation of an unaccompanied youth unless the youth is part of a duly authorized family account; Allow a driver to refuse a prearranged ride to an individual who is not authorized to use the account requesting the prearranged ride; Establish procedures for deactivation of a driver if the TNC is notified of a specified allegation against a driver; Notify and train drivers and riders of any updates to TNC safety policies; Prohibit drivers from offering or selling food or beverage to riders; Require drivers to report information regarding a conviction of or a plea of guilty or nolo contendere to specified offenses; and Prevent crimes committed against drivers by riders. A TNC is prohibited from: Altering the rating a rider assigned to a driver or the rating a driver assigned to a rider on a TNC's digital platform; Assigning an automatic or default driver rating that the rider did not assign; or Assigning an automatic or default rider rating that the driver did not assign. A TNC may delete ratings or reviews that are motivated by bias or fraud. A TNC shall not consider negative ratings or reviews that are motivated by bias or fraud in a review of a driver for deactivation or an internal deactivation reconsideration. A TNC is prohibited from collecting biometric data or biometric identifiers from a driver or rider without first obtaining the consent of the driver or rider. If a TNC collects biometric data or biometric identifiers from a driver or rider, the TNC shall comply with specified provisions of the "Colorado Privacy Act" regarding biometric data and biometric identifiers. A TNC that violates the act may be assessed a civil penalty as determined by the commission by rule. The act requires that, on or before February 1, 2026, and on or before February 1 each year thereafter, a TNC shall submit to the commission, the attorney general, and each member of the general assembly, specified data related to incidents involving safety and discrimination. VETOED by Governor 5/16/2025(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
The act clarifies when a teacher may conclude that an early elementary school student has a significant reading deficiency requiring remediation through a specialized approach to instruction (READ plan) based on a body of evidence that includes information in addition to the student's scores on a reading assessment. Current law requires certain parental communications in connection with a student's READ plan. The act requires the addition of specific information regarding characteristics of dyslexia, if applicable, to the parental communications. Beginning no later than the 2027-28 school year, a local education provider must either develop its own screening process for identifying early elementary school students with characteristics of dyslexia or implement a universal dyslexia screener that conforms to certain new requirements. A local education provider that implements a screener may include the screener in an interim reading assessment or administer the screener separately from the interim assessment. Either way, the screener must accurately and reliably identify students at risk of reading difficulties. If an interim reading assessment includes a screener, the assessment must meet standards for validity and reliability, encourage data-driven instructional decision making, and promote efficient administration and effective follow-up. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
The act directs the Colorado disability opportunity office to develop a comprehensive community integration plan (plan) for implementing its obligation to provide qualified individuals with disabilities with opportunities to live, work, and be served in the least restrictive settings possible. The act requires the plan to include specified elements and that the plan must be reviewed and updated every 3 years. The act establishes that public and governmental entities (entities) shall administer services, programs, and activities in the most integrated setting that is appropriate to the needs of individuals with disabilities. The act establishes when entities are required to provide home- and community-based services (services) to qualified individuals with disabilities. If an entity cuts services, the act requires the entity to assess whether the service cut increases the risk of institutionalization for qualified individuals with a disability receiving services. An entity is not required to comply with the provisions of the act if it can establish that doing so would require a fundamental alteration of its program. The act does not create a new private right of action for entities that fail to comply with it and does not create a standard different than federal law. The bill appropriates $658,410 from the disability support fund to the department of labor and employment for the Colorado disability opportunity office to implement the act. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
The act allows, but does not require, an eligible patient to request from a manufacturer the manufacturer's individualized investigational drug, biological product, or device, which is a drug, biological product, or device that is unique and produced exclusively for use by an individual patient based on the patient's own genetic profile. The manufacturer must be operating within an institution that operates under federal rules for the protection of human subjects. An eligible patient is an individual who has: A life-threatening or severely debilitating illness, as attested to by the patient's treating physician; Considered all other treatment options currently approved by the United States food and drug administration; Received a recommendation from the patient's treating physician; Given written, informed consent for the use of the individualized investigational drug, biological product, or device; and Documentation from the treating physician that the individual meets the definition of "eligible patient". The act authorizes, but does not require, a manufacturer to make the individualized investigational drug, biological product, or device available to an eligible patient at no charge, but the manufacturer may require payment to cover the cost. If any harm is caused to the eligible patient resulting from the use of the individualized investigational drug, biological product, or device, a private right of action cannot be brought against the manufacturer or against any other individual or entity involved in the care of the eligible patient with regard to the eligible patient's use of the individualized investigational drug, biological product, or device, so long as the manufacturer, individual, or entity complied with the law and exercised reasonable care. The act prohibits disciplinary action against a health-care provider's license based on the health-care provider's recommendations regarding the use of the individualized investigational drug, biological product, or device. The act does not affect a health-care insurer's obligation under current law relating to coverage for an insured's participation in a clinical trial. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
The act amends the "Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Act" and the "Colorado Land Reclamation Act for the Extraction of Construction Materials" to: Contemplate the expedited issuance of reclamation-only permits to persons desiring to conduct reclamation-only operations after September 1, 2025, on less than 5 acres; and Update restrictions and requirements concerning the posting and forfeiture of financial warranties relating to mine reclamation projects. The act prohibits the office of mined land reclamation from issuing a reclamation-only permit to a mining operation at which: Toxic or acidic chemicals used in extractive metallurgical processing are present on site; Acid- or toxic-forming materials will be exposed or disturbed as a result of mining operations; or Uranium is developed or extracted, either by in situ leach mining or by conventional underground or open mining techniques. The act also enacts the "Interstate Mining Compact" and ratifies Colorado's membership in the associated Interstate Mining Commission. (Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)