TM
D California Senate · District 32

Sen. Tony Mendoza

Compare
Total votes
21,888
all sessions
Attendance
94%
1,014 missed
Lower than 87% of chamber peers
With party
99%
of cast votes
Near the chamber average
Bipartisan score
0%
crosses aisle rarely
Lower than 83% of chamber peers
Sponsored
730
bills & resolutions
Near the chamber average
Committees
0
assignments
730 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
730
Primary
209
Co-sponsor
521
This page
730
matching current filters
Co-sponsor ACR 75
Passed · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to Disneyland Day.

This measure would declare June 1, 2015, as Disneyland Day in recognition of the 60th anniversary of Disneyland.

Passed Sep 11, 2015 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SJR 13
Signed into law · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Voting: apportionment.

This measure would urge the Supreme Court of the United States to uphold the federal constitutional principle of "one person, one vote" and not deny California's children and immigrants equal protection under the law.

Signed into law Sep 4, 2015 1 co-sponsor
Primary SB 505
Signed into law · California Senate · Lead sponsor
Voter Bill of Rights.

Existing law sets forth requirements and entitlements with respect to the right to vote in California elections. Among the requirements for voters is United States citizenship. Existing law establishes a Voter Bill of Rights enumerating the rights of voters as established under existing law and requires the Voter Bill of Rights, worded as specified, to be made available to the public. Existing law permits the Secretary of State to develop regulations to implement and clarify the Voter Bill of Rights. This bill would eliminate the requirement that the Voter Bill of Rights be worded as specified and would instead authorize the Secretary of State to revise the wording as necessary to ensure understanding.

Signed into law Sep 1, 2015 0 co-sponsors
Primary SB 330
Passed · California Senate · Lead sponsor
Public officers: contracts: financial interest.

(1) Existing law prohibits Members of the Legislature, and state, county, district, judicial district, and city officers or employees from being financially interested in a contract, as specified, made by them in their official capacity or by any body or board of which they are members, subject to specified exceptions. Existing law identifies certain remote interests that are not subject to this prohibition and other situations in which an official is not deemed to be financially interested in a contract, including, among others, that of a parent in the earnings of his or her minor child for personal services. Existing law makes a willful violation of this prohibition a crime. This bill would, on and after January 1, 2017, instead include within the definition of remote interests that of a public officer who is an elected member of any state or local body, board, or commission, if that public officer's spouse, child, parent, sibling, or the spouse of the child, parent, or sibling, has a financial interest in any contract made by that public officer in his or her official capacity, or by any body, board, or commission of which that public officer is a member. (2) Existing law imposes a criminal penalty for every officer or person who willfully violates the prohibitions against making or being financially interested in contracts, as specified. This bill would additionally provide that a member who knows and fails to disclose his or her remote interest in a contract, as defined, or knows and willfully fails to disclose the fact of his or her remote interest in a contract, as defined, is subject to criminal penalty. By expanding these prohibitions, this bill would create a new crime, and thus, would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Passed Aug 27, 2015 0 co-sponsors
Primary SB 432
Signed into law · California Senate · Lead sponsor
Public works: aliens.

Existing law, with certain exceptions, requires the payment of not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages, for work of a similar character in the locality in which a public works project is performed, to all workers employed on a public works project. With respect to the extension of public works, existing law extends preference for employment first to California citizens, next to citizens of other states who are in California at the time of application, and next to aliens who are in California at the time of application. Existing law defines "alien" as any person who is not a born or fully naturalized citizen of the United States. Under existing law, the Department of Finance is required to ascertain and secure from state agencies tentative plans for the extension of public works that are best adapted to supply increased opportunities for advantageous public labor during periods of temporary unemployment in the state. These employment opportunities are available according to the hiring preferences described above. This bill would repeal this definition of "alien" and the provision requiring those preferences to be applied to the extension of public works employment during periods of unemployment in the state.

Signed into law Aug 10, 2015 0 co-sponsors
Primary SB 212
Signed into law · California Senate · Lead sponsor
Controlled substances: factors in aggravation.

Existing law makes it a felony, punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for 3, 5, or 7 years, to manufacture, compound, convert, produce, derive, process, or prepare by chemical extraction, or by means of chemical synthesis, any controlled substance. Existing law requires the sentencing court to consider the fact that a person under 16 years of age resided in a structure in which a violation of these provisions occurred as a factor in aggravation, except when a specified enhancement is pled and proved. This bill would specifically authorize the sentencing court to consider the fact that a violation involving methamphetamine occurred within 200 feet of an occupied residence as a factor in aggravation, except when a specified enhancement is pled and proved. The bill would also specifically authorize the sentencing court to consider the fact that a violation of this section involving the use of a volatile solvent to chemically extract concentrated cannabis occurred within 300 feet of an occupied residence as a factor in aggravation.

Signed into law Aug 7, 2015 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor SCR 58
Signed into law · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Relative to Filipino American History Month.

This measure would recognize the month of October 2015 as Filipino American History Month and the 428th anniversary of the first presence of Filipinos in the continental United States.

Signed into law Jul 14, 2015 1 co-sponsor
Showing 161 to 170 of 730 bills
Previous 1 … 16 17 18 … 73 Next