Public officers: contracts: financial interest.
Summary
(1) Existing law prohibits Members of the Legislature, and state, county, district, judicial district, and city officers or employees from being financially interested in a contract, as specified, made by them in their official capacity or by any body or board of which they are members, subject to specified exceptions. Existing law identifies certain remote interests that are not subject to this prohibition and other situations in which an official is not deemed to be financially interested in a contract, including, among others, that of a parent in the earnings of his or her minor child for personal services. Existing law makes a willful violation of this prohibition a crime. This bill would, on and after January 1, 2017, instead include within the definition of remote interests that of a public officer who is an elected member of any state or local body, board, or commission, if that public officer's spouse, child, parent, sibling, or the spouse of the child, parent, or sibling, has a financial interest in any contract made by that public officer in his or her official capacity, or by any body, board, or commission of which that public officer is a member. (2) Existing law imposes a criminal penalty for every officer or person who willfully violates the prohibitions against making or being financially interested in contracts, as specified. This bill would additionally provide that a member who knows and fails to disclose his or her remote interest in a contract, as defined, or knows and willfully fails to disclose the fact of his or her remote interest in a contract, as defined, is subject to criminal penalty. By expanding these prohibitions, this bill would create a new crime, and thus, would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2015
Committee Review
Aug 2015
Senate Passage
Jun 2015
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 23, 2015
Last action Aug 27, 2015
Floor votes · Senate Jun 2, 2015
How they voted
35–0
Passed
Total votes 35
Jun 2, 2015
D
Democratic24
100% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
7
Committee
11
Amendments
1
Aug 27, 2015
Lower · Passed
August 27 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
lower
Aug 18, 2015
Committee
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Aug 17, 2015
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (July 15).
lower
Jul 15, 2015
Lower · Passed
Reconsideration of the favorable vote granted on the motion to hold in committee for interim study.
lower
Jul 15, 2015
Lower · Passed
July 15 hearing: Held in committee for interim study.
lower
Jul 15, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (July 15). Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Jul 7, 2015
Committee
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E. & R.
lower
Jun 15, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on E. & R.
lower
Jun 2, 2015
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (35-0)
senate
Jun 1, 2015
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
May 28, 2015
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 1152.) (May 28).
upper
Apr 15, 2015
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 618.) (April 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 5, 2015
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Feb 23, 2015
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
TM
Tony Mendoza
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 330
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 330. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline