Photo of Kelly Seyarto
R California Senate · District 32 On the 2026 ballot

Sen. Kelly Seyarto

Compare
Total votes
21,358
all sessions
Attendance
91%
1,026 missed
Near the chamber average
With party
99%
of cast votes
Near the chamber average
Bipartisan score
1%
crosses aisle rarely
Near the chamber average
Sponsored
789
bills & resolutions
Higher than 92% of chamber peers
Committees
10
assignments
789 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
789
Primary
140
Co-sponsor
649
This page
789
matching current filters
Co-sponsor AJR 29
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Ports: congestion relief.

This measure would commend the Congress of the United States for enacting legislation that will alleviate and remedy the congestion of California's ports. The measure also would urge the Congress of the United States to enact further legislation to ensure that the state's importing and exporting capabilities are returned to prepandemic levels.

Signed into law Aug 30, 2022 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SCR 114
Signed into law · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Relative to Latina Equal Pay Day.

This measure would proclaim December 8, 2022, as Latina Equal Pay Day in California, in recognition of the need to eliminate the gender gap in earnings by women and to promote policies to ensure equal pay for all.

Signed into law Aug 30, 2022 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SCR 119
Signed into law · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Relative to Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Week.

This measure, among other things, would declare the last week of September 2022, and each year thereafter, as Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Week, with the purpose of expanding the acknowledgment of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta region's contributions to a higher quality of life for all Californians.

Signed into law Aug 30, 2022 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor ACR 148
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to the Long Beach International Gateway Bridge.

This measure would designate a specified portion of State Route 710 in the City of Long Beach as the Long Beach International Gateway Bridge. The measure would request the Department of Transportation to determine the cost for appropriate signs showing this special designation and, upon receiving donations from nonstate sources covering that cost, to erect those signs.

Signed into law Aug 30, 2022 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SCR 115
Signed into law · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Relative to drug abuse.

This measure would designate the month of September 2022 as Opioid, Heroin, Fentanyl, and Prescription Drug Abuse Awareness Month, as specified.

Signed into law Aug 30, 2022 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor ACR 126
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to the Katcho Achadjian Memorial Highway.

This measure would designate the portion of U.S. Route 101 in the County of San Luis Obispo, from postmile 19.812 to postmile 15.579, as the Katcho Achadjian Memorial Highway. The measure would request the Department of Transportation to determine the cost of appropriate signs showing this special designation and, upon receiving donations from nonstate sources covering that cost, to erect those signs.

Signed into law Aug 30, 2022 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AB 267
Passed · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
California Environmental Quality Act: exemption: prescribed fire, thinning, and fuel reduction projects.

The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. Existing law, until January 1, 2023, exempts from the requirements of CEQA prescribed fire, thinning, or fuel reduction projects undertaken on federal lands to reduce the risk of high-severity wildfire that have been reviewed under the federal National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as provided. Existing law requires the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, beginning December 31, 2019, and annually thereafter until January 1, 2023, to report to the relevant policy committees of the Legislature the number of times the exemption was used. This bill would extend the exemption from CEQA to January 1, 2026. The bill would additionally require that a project's significant impacts identified in an environmental impact statement prepared pursuant to the federal National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 are avoided or mitigated in order for the exemption to apply. The bill would require the lead agency, if it determines that the exemption applies and determines to approve or carry the project, to file a notice of exemption with the Office of Planning and Research and the county clerk of the county in which the project is located. If the lead agency is not the department, the bill would require the lead agency to file a notice with the department containing specified information about the project. If the lead agency is the department, the bill would require the department to maintain records containing that specified information. The bill would delete the requirement for the annual report and would instead require the department, on or before January 1, 2025, to submit a report to the Legislature containing information received or maintained by the department about the exempt projects. By extending the obligation of a lead agency to determine the applicability of the exemption and imposing additional duties on a lead agency, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Passed Aug 29, 2022 1 co-sponsor
Primary AB 1633
Signed into law · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Public postsecondary education: veterans' educational benefits: information sharing.

Under existing law, the Department of Veterans Affairs within state government has specified powers and duties relating to veterans, including those relating to education benefits. Existing law provides federal educational benefit awards for certain members and veterans of the Armed Forces of the United States. Existing law authorizes the California State University, and encourages the University of California, to report to the Department of Veterans Affairs, on an annual basis, specified information, including the total education benefits obtained by all qualified students assisted by a specified office. This bill would require the California State University, and request the University of California, to electronically transmit specified personal information regarding students whose tuition or fees, or both, are paid, or intended to be paid, using GI Bill educational benefits, as defined, to the Department of Veterans Affairs for each academic year, starting with the 2023–24 academic year, as provided. The bill would, on or before June 1, 2023, require the office of the Chancellor of the California State University, and request the office of the President of the University of California, to develop a template for informed, written consent to be used by campus financial aid offices that permits a student to opt in to having the student's personal information shared with the Department of Veterans Affairs, as provided.

Signed into law Aug 26, 2022 0 co-sponsors
Showing 361 to 370 of 789 bills
Previous 1 … 36 37 38 … 79 Next