California Environmental Quality Act: exemption: prescribed fire, thinning, and fuel reduction projects.
Summary
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. Existing law, until January 1, 2023, exempts from the requirements of CEQA prescribed fire, thinning, or fuel reduction projects undertaken on federal lands to reduce the risk of high-severity wildfire that have been reviewed under the federal National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as provided. Existing law requires the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, beginning December 31, 2019, and annually thereafter until January 1, 2023, to report to the relevant policy committees of the Legislature the number of times the exemption was used. This bill would extend the exemption from CEQA to January 1, 2026. The bill would additionally require that a project's significant impacts identified in an environmental impact statement prepared pursuant to the federal National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 are avoided or mitigated in order for the exemption to apply. The bill would require the lead agency, if it determines that the exemption applies and determines to approve or carry the project, to file a notice of exemption with the Office of Planning and Research and the county clerk of the county in which the project is located. If the lead agency is not the department, the bill would require the lead agency to file a notice with the department containing specified information about the project. If the lead agency is the department, the bill would require the department to maintain records containing that specified information. The bill would delete the requirement for the annual report and would instead require the department, on or before January 1, 2025, to submit a report to the Legislature containing information received or maintained by the department about the exempt projects. By extending the obligation of a lead agency to determine the applicability of the exemption and imposing additional duties on a lead agency, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2021
Committee Review
Aug 2022
Assembly Passage
Apr 2021
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 15, 2021
Last action Aug 29, 2022
Floor votes · Assembly Apr 29, 2021
How they voted
62–2
Passed · 14 other
Total votes 78
Apr 29, 2021
D
Democratic58
72% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican19
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
8
Committee
10
Amendments
4
Aug 11, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 11).
upper
Aug 2, 2022
Committee
In committee: Referred to suspense file.
upper
Jun 30, 2022
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 29, 2022
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 29).
upper
Jun 1, 2022
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on E.Q. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 1). Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Jun 21, 2021
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 2, 2021
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
upper
May 12, 2021
Committee
Referred to Coms. on N.R. & W. and E.Q.
upper
Apr 29, 2021
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 62. Noes 2. Page 1244.)
lower
Apr 14, 2021
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (April 14).
lower
Mar 25, 2021
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 1.) (March 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 17, 2021
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Mar 16, 2021
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
lower
Jan 28, 2021
Committee
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Jan 16, 2021
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 15.
lower
1 primary · 5 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 267
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 267. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline