Under the California Hospice Licensure Act of 1990, the State Department of Public Health licenses and regulates persons or agencies that provide hospice, which is a type of interdisciplinary health care that includes palliative care to individuals experiencing the last phases of life due to the existence of a terminal disease and supportive care to the primary caregivers and family of the hospice patient. A violation of the act is a misdemeanor. The act authorizes, until January 1, 2022, a licensee under the act to provide any of the authorized interdisciplinary hospice services, including palliative care, to a patient who has a serious illness. This bill would extend the authority under these provisions until January 1, 2027. Existing law requires a licensee, on or before January 1, 2019, January 1, 2020, and January 1, 2021, to provide the department with designated information for the period of time the licensee provided palliative care, on a form prescribed by the department. This bill would extend this requirement to each April 30, beginning April 30, 2022, until April 30, 2025. The bill would instead require the licensee to provide the department with information for the period of time in the prior calendar year during which the licensee was approved to provide palliative care, and would require the information to be reported through the department's online reporting portal, as specified, rather than on a form prescribed by the department. Existing law requires the department, on or before June 1, 2021, to convene a stakeholder meeting to discuss the results of the information collected from licensees pursuant to these provisions. This bill would instead require the department to convene the stakeholder meeting on or before January 15, 2026. By extending the operation of provisions of law creating a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Sponsored bills
Existing law authorizes the State Department of Public Health to take measures, such as ordering isolation, quarantine, and disinfection of persons and places, to study and prevent the spread of a communicable disease. Existing law requires a local health officer to take similar measures in the territory under their jurisdiction to prevent the spread of disease. Under existing law, these measures can be issued to be effective immediately and have the force and effect of law. This bill would require, when the State Department of Public Health issues a statewide order or mandatory guidance, or when a local health officer issues an order, related to preventing the spread of COVID-19, as defined, or protecting public health against a threat of COVID-19, that they publish on their internet website the order or guidance and the date that the order or guidance takes effect. The bill would also require the department or local health officer to create an opportunity for local communities, businesses, nonprofit organizations, individuals, and others to sign up for an email distribution list relative to changes to the order or guidance. By creating new duties for local health officers, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would make these provisions operative while an order or mandatory guidance issued by the department or a local health officer is in effect, as provided. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Existing law, the Real Estate Law, defines real estate brokers and salespersons and provides for their licensure and regulation, the administration of which is committed to the Real Estate Commissioner. Existing law, as of July 1, 2018, removed the Bureau of Real Estate from the Department of Consumer Affairs and instead made it a department within the Business, Consumer Services, and Housing Agency and renamed the bureau to the Department of Real Estate. This bill would make conforming and nonsubstantive changes. Existing law subjects the powers and duties of the department, under specified provisions of law, to review by the appropriate policy committees of the Legislature, performed as if those provisions were scheduled to be repealed as of January 1, 2022. This bill would extend that date to January 1, 2026. Existing law authorizes a person who has passed the applicable license examination, as provided, to apply for a real estate broker license or real estate salesperson license under the Real Estate Law by submitting an application in writing to the commissioner. Existing law authorizes the commissioner to prescribe the format and content of a license application. This bill would require the commissioner to inquire in every application for licensure under the Real Estate Law if the individual applying for licensure is, or previously was, a member of the Armed Forces of the United States, as defined. The bill would require the commissioner to expedite, and authorize the commissioner to assist, the initial licensure process for an applicant who supplies satisfactory evidence to the department that the applicant has served as an active duty member of the Armed Forces of the United States and was honorably discharged. The bill would also require the commissioner to expedite the licensure process for an applicant who (1) supplies evidence satisfactory to the commissioner that the applicant is married to, or in a domestic partnership or other legal union with, an active duty member of the Armed Forces of the United States who is assigned to a duty station in this state and (2) holds a current license in another state, district, or territory of the United States in the profession or vocation for which the applicant seeks a license from the commissioner. Existing law authorizes the commissioner to suspend, revoke, delay renewal of, or deny the issuance of a license for various acts or failures to act. Those acts include an applicant or licensee having acted or conducted themselves in a manner that would have warranted the denial of their application for a real estate license, or either had a license denied or had a license issued by another agency of this state, another state, or the federal government revoked, surrendered, or suspended for acts that, if done by a real estate licensee, would be grounds for the suspension or revocation of a California real estate license, if the action of denial, revocation, surrender, or suspension by the other agency or entity was taken only after giving the licensee or applicant prescribed due process protections and only upon an express finding of a violation of law by the agency or entity. This bill would add receiving an order of debarment by another agency or entity as a basis for suspension, revocation, delay of renewal, or denial of a license by the commissioner. Existing law requires real estate licensees to comply with continuing education requirements adopted by the commissioner as a prerequisite to the renewal of real estate licenses on and after January 1, 1981. Existing law exempts from those continuing education requirements a real estate licensee who submits proof satisfactory to the commissioner that the licensee has been a real estate licensee in good standing for 30 continuous years in this state and is 70 years of age or older. The bill defines "real estate licensee in good standing" for this purpose to mean one who holds an active license that has not been suspended, revoked, or restricted as a result of disciplinary action. This bill would require additionally for good standing that a licensee has not surrendered a license while under investigation or while subject to a disciplinary action, or received an order of debarment. Existing law, the Real Estate Appraisers' Licensing and Certification Law, creates a Bureau of Real Estate Appraisers within the Department of Consumer Affairs to administer and enforce that law. Existing law subjects the powers and duties of the bureau to review by the appropriate policy committees of the Legislature, performed as if that law were scheduled to be repealed as of January 1, 2022. This bill would extend that date to January 1, 2026. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 10151 of the Business and Professions Code proposed by SB 263 to be operative only if this bill and SB 263 are enacted and this bill is enacted last.
Existing property tax law, pursuant to the authorization of the California Constitution, provides a disabled veterans' property tax exemption for the principal place of residence of a veteran, the veteran's spouse, or the veteran and veteran's spouse jointly, and the unmarried surviving spouse of a veteran, as provided, if the veteran is blind in both eyes, has lost the use of 2 or more limbs, or is totally disabled as a result of injury or disease incurred in military service, or if the veteran has, as a result of a service-connected injury or disease, died while on active duty in military service. Existing property tax law requires any person claiming the disabled veterans' property tax exemption to file a claim, which is required to be filed under penalty of perjury, with the assessor giving any information required by the State Board of Equalization, as provided. This bill would authorize (1) the executor, administrator, or personal legal representative of the claimant's estate or (2) the trustee of the deceased claimant's trust assets to file a claim with the assessor in the manner described above. By expanding the duties of local government officials relating to claims for the disabled veterans' property tax exemptions, and by expanding the crime of perjury, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
(1) Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of various professions and vocations by boards within the Department of Consumer Affairs. Existing law generally authorizes a board to charge fees for the reasonable regulatory cost of administering the regulatory program for the profession or vocation. Existing law establishes the Professions and Vocations Fund in the State Treasury, which consists of specified special funds and accounts, some of which are continuously appropriated. Existing law provides for the issuance of temporary licenses in certain fields where the applicant, among other requirements, has a license to practice within that field in another jurisdiction, as specified. Existing law requires a board within the department to expedite the licensure process for an applicant who holds a current license in another jurisdiction in the same profession or vocation and who supplies satisfactory evidence of being married to, or in a domestic partnership or other legal union with, an active duty member of the Armed Forces of the United States who is assigned to a duty station in California under official active duty military orders. This bill, on and after July 1, 2022, would require a board to waive the licensure application fee and the initial or original license fee for an applicant who meets these expedited licensing requirements. (2) Existing law, the Dental Practice Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of dentists and dental auxiliaries, including registered dental assistants in extended functions, by the Dental Board of California within the Department of Consumer Affairs. Existing law requires a person who applies to the board for a license as a registered dental assistant in extended functions on and after January 1, 2010, to successfully complete a clinical or practical examination administered by the board. Existing law authorizes a registered dental assistant in extended functions who was licensed before January 1, 2010, to perform certain additional duties only if they pass the clinical or practical examination. This bill would delete the clinical or practical examination requirement for registered dental assistants in extended functions and make related technical amendments. The Dental Practice Act authorizes a dentist to administer or order the administration of minimal sedation on pediatric patients under 13 years of age if the dentist possesses specified licensing credentials, including holding a pediatric minimal sedation permit, and follows certain procedures. Existing law requires a dentist who desires to administer or order the administration of minimal sedation to apply to the board, as specified, and to submit an application fee. This bill would specify that the application fee for a pediatric minimal sedation permit cannot exceed $1,000, and the renewal fee cannot exceed $600. The Dental Practice Act requires the board to approve foreign dental schools based on specified standards. The act requires a foreign dental school seeking approval to submit an application to the board, including, among other things, a finding that the educational program of the foreign dental school is equivalent to that of similar accredited institutions in the United States and adequately prepares its students for the practice of dentistry. The act requires an approved institution to submit a renewal application every 7 years and to pay a specified renewal fee. The act prohibits the board from accepting new applications for approval of foreign dental schools by January 1, 2020, and requires foreign dental schools seeking approval after this date to complete the international consultative and accreditation process with the Commission on Dental Accreditation of the American Dental Association (CODA) or a comparable accrediting body approved by the board. The act also requires previously approved foreign dental schools to complete the CODA or comparable accreditation by January 1, 2024, to remain approved. This bill would provide, notwithstanding this latter approval requirement, that a foreign dental school that was renewed by the board prior to January 1, 2020, through a date between January 1, 2024, and June 30, 2026, maintains that approval through that date. The bill would further provide that, upon the expiration of that board approval, the foreign dental school is required to comply with the CODA or comparable accreditation process. The bill would also provide that graduates of a foreign dental school whose program was approved by the board prior to January 1, 2020, through any date before January 1, 2024, and who enrolled in the program prior to January 1, 2020, are eligible for licensure. The Dental Practice Act also provides for the licensure and regulation of dental hygienists by the Dental Hygiene Board of California. Existing law regulates the appointment of members to the board and authorizes the board to appoint an executive officer. Existing law repeals those provisions on January 1, 2023, at which time the board is subject to review by the appropriate policy committees of the Legislature. This bill would extend the repeal date of the board and related appointment provisions to January 1, 2024. (3) Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of landscape architects by the California Architects Board and the Landscape Architects Technical Committee of the California Architects Board within the Department of Consumer Affairs. This bill would authorize the board to obtain and review criminal offender record information and would require an applicant, as a condition of licensure, to furnish to the Department of Justice a full set of fingerprints for the purpose of conducting a criminal history record check and criminal offender record information search. The bill would require the Department of Justice to transmit fingerprint images and related information to the Federal Bureau of Investigation for the purposes of the background check, and would require the Department of Justice to provide a state or federal response to the board. The bill would require the applicant to pay the reasonable regulatory costs for furnishing the fingerprints and conducting the searches, and would require the applicant to certify, under penalty of perjury, whether the applicant's fingerprints have been furnished to the Department of Justice. By expanding the crime of perjury, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (4) Existing law, the Contractors State License Law, provides for the licensure and regulation of contractors by the Contractors State License Board within the Department of Consumer Affairs. Existing law authorizes the issuance of contractors' licenses to individual owners, partnerships, corporations, and limited liability companies, and authorizes those persons and entities to qualify for a license if specified conditions are met. Existing law requires an applicant or licensee to file or have on file with the board a contractor's bond in the sum of $15,000, as provided. Existing law requires an applicant or licensee who is not a proprietor, a general partner, or a joint licensee to additionally file or have on file with the board a qualifying individual's bond in the sum of $12,500, unless an exception is met. Existing law additionally authorizes the board to set fees by regulation, including various application, examination scheduling, and license and registration fees, according to a prescribed schedule. Existing law requires the fees received under this law to be deposited in the Contractors License Fund, a fund that is partially continuously appropriated for the purposes of the law. This bill, beginning January 1, 2023, would instead require an applicant or licensee to file or have on file with the board a contractor's bond in the sum of $25,000, and would, if applicable, require a qualifying individual's bond in the sum of $25,000. This bill would revise and recast the board's authority to set fees by regulation and would increase various fee amounts. In connection with initial license fees and renewal fees for active and inactive licenses, the bill would differentiate between an individual owner as opposed to a partnership, corporation, limited liability company, or joint venture, and would authorize higher fees for the latter categories of licensees. The bill would additionally authorize the board to set fees for the processing and issuance of a duplicate copy of any certificate of licensure, to change the business name of a license, and for a dishonored check, as specified. Because the increased and new fees would be deposited into the Contractors License Fund, a continuously appropriated fund, the bill would make an appropriation. (5) Existing law provides authority for an enforcement agency to enter and inspect any buildings or premises whenever necessary to secure compliance with or prevent a violation of the building standards published in the California Building Standards Code and other rules and regulations that the enforcement agency has the power to enforce. Existing law requires an inspection of exterior elevated elements and associated waterproofing elements, as defined, including decks and balconies, for buildings with 3 or more multifamily dwelling units by a licensed architect, licensed civil or structural engineer, a building contractor holding specified licenses, or an individual certified as a building inspector or building official, as specified. Existing law prohibits a contractor performing the inspection from bidding on the repair work. This bill would eliminate the prohibition against a contractor performing the inspection from bidding on the repair work. By altering the enforcement duties for local enforcement entities, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (6) Existing law, the Private Security Services Act, establishes the Bureau of Security and Investigative Services within the Department of Consumer Affairs to license and regulate persons employed by any lawful business as security guards or patrolpersons. Existing law prohibits a person required to be registered as a security guard from engaging in specified conduct, including, but not limited to, carrying or using a firearm unless they possess a valid and current firearms permit. Existing law requires the applicant for a firearms permit to complete specified requirements, including an assessment that evaluates whether the applicant possesses appropriate judgment, restraint, and self-control for the purposes of carrying and using a firearm during the course of the applicant's security guard duties. Existing law requires the results of the assessment be provided to the bureau within 30 days. Existing law requires the bureau to automatically revoke a firearm permit upon notification from the Department of Justice that the holder of the firearm permit is prohibited from possessing, receiving, or purchasing a firearm under state or federal law. Existing law additionally requires the bureau to seek an emergency order against the holder of the firearms permit if a specified event occurs, including that the permitholder was arrested for assault or battery, or the permitholder has been determined incapable of exercising appropriate judgment, restraint, and self-control, among other events, and the bureau determines that the holder of the firearm permit presents an undue hazard to public safety that may result in substantial injury to another. This bill would specify that a security guard is required to complete the assessment to be issued a firearms permit prior to carrying a firearm. The bill would require an applicant who is a registered security guard to have met the requirement of being found capable of exercising appropriate judgment, restraint, and self-control, for purposes of carrying and using a firearm during the course of their duties, within the 6 months preceding the date the application is submitted to the bureau. The bill would prohibit an applicant who fails the assessment from completing another assessment any earlier than 180 days after the results of the previous assessment are provided to the bureau. This bill would instead authorize the bureau to revoke a firearm permit upon notification from the Department of Justice that the holder of the firearm permit is prohibited from possessing, receiving, or purchasing a firearm under state or federal law, and would instead authorize the bureau to seek an emergency order against a permitholder if a specified event occurs. The bill would remove from the list of specified events the determination that a permitholder is incapable of exercising appropriate judgment, restraint, and self-control. (7) Existing law, the Acupuncture Licensure Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of acupuncturists by the Acupuncture Board and authorizes the board to appoint an executive officer. Existing law repeals those provisions on January 1, 2023, at which time the board is subject to review by the appropriate policy committees of the Legislature. This bill would extend the operation of the board and the authority to appoint an executive officer to January 1, 2024. (8) Existing law, the Professional Fiduciaries Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of professional fiduciaries by the Professional Fiduciaries Bureau. Existing law repeals the bureau on January 1, 2023, at which time the bureau is subject to review by the appropriate policy committees of the Legislature. This bill would extend the operation of the bureau to January 1, 2024. (9) Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of the practice of structural pest control by the Structural Pest Control Board, and authorizes the board to appoint a registrar to be the executive officer of the board. Existing law repeals those provisions on January 1, 2023, at which time the board is subject to review by the appropriate policy committees of the Legislature. This bill would extend the operation of the board and the authority to appoint an executive officer to January 1, 2024. (10) Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of, among others, electronic and appliance repair dealers, upholstered furniture retailers, and household movers by the Bureau of Household Goods and Services. Existing law subjects the bureau to review by the appropriate policy committees of the Legislature and requires that review to be performed as if the provisions of law regulating the above-mentioned professions and vocations were scheduled to be repealed on January 1, 2023. This bill would extend the above-described date to January 1, 2024. (11) Existing law, the Automotive Repair Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of automotive repair dealers by the Bureau of Automotive Repair. Existing law subjects the bureau to review by the appropriate policy committees of the Legislature, as specified, and requires that review to be performed as if the act were scheduled to be repealed on January 1, 2023. This bill would extend the above-described date to January 1, 2024. (12) Existing law, the Tax Preparation Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of tax preparers by the California Tax Education Council. Existing law subjects the act to review by the appropriate policy committees of the Legislature and repeals the act on January 1, 2023. This bill would extend the operation of the act to January 1, 2024. (13) Existing law, the California Private Postsecondary Education Act of 2009, provides for the regulation of private postsecondary educational institutions by the Bureau for Private Postsecondary Education in the Department of Consumer Affairs. The act requires an institution to enroll each student solely by means of executing an enrollment agreement, and requires an ability-to-benefit student, before enrolling, to take and achieve a passing score on an independently administered examination, as specified. The act is repealed by its own provisions on January 1, 2022. This bill would repeal the provisions related to the ability-to-benefit students and ability-to-benefit testing. (14) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. (15) This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 7583.23 of the Business and Professions Code proposed by AB 1096 to be operative only if this bill and AB 1096 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. The bill would also incorporate additional changes to Section 9882 of the Business and Professions Code proposed by AB 471 to be operative only if this bill and AB 471 are enacted and this bill is enacted last.
Existing law governs the execution, revocation, and effectiveness of a revocable transfer on death (TOD) deed, defined as an instrument that makes a donative transfer of property to a named beneficiary, as defined, that operates on the transferor's death, and remains revocable until the transferor's death. Existing law establishes statutory forms for executing and revoking a revocable TOD deed that include provisions and instructions for the forms to be notarized by the transferor and recorded with the county recorder. Existing law requires that subsequent pages of the form to execute a revocable TOD deed include statutory "common questions" regarding the use of that form. Existing law requires that, in order to be effective, a revocable TOD deed be recorded on or before 60 days after the date it was executed. Existing law makes these provisions inoperative on January 1, 2022. This bill would revise and recast those provisions, and instead make them operative until January 1, 2032. Among other things, the bill would redefine and newly define terms for these purposes, including, but not limited to, "beneficiary," "real property," "subscribing witness," and "unsecured debts." The bill would make changes to how and when a revocable TOD deed becomes effective or revoked, and would instead require the deed or revocation to be signed by the transferor, acknowledged by the transferor before a notary public, dated, and signed by 2 witnesses, as specified. The bill would add additional provisions to the statutory forms for executing and revoking a revocable TOD deed to conform to these changes, and would add additional information to the statutory "common questions" pages. The bill would require, after the death of a transferor, that the beneficiary serve notice on the transferor's heirs, and would create a new statutory notice form for these purposes. Under specified circumstances, the bill would authorize a court in which a transferor's estate is being administered to apply the doctrine of cy pres to reform a revocable TOD deed that was made by the transferor for a charitable purpose. The bill would also provide that an error or ambiguity in describing property or designating a beneficiary would not invalidate a revocable TOD deed if the transferor's intention can be determined by a court. The bill would establish new processes for, and add provisions relating to, among other things, the enforceability of unrecorded interests, the personal liability of a beneficiary, calculating a beneficiary's share of liability, the return of property to an estate by a beneficiary, and contesting the validity of a transfer or revocation, as specified. The bill would specify that the provisions relating to contesting a TOD deed do not limit the application of other law that imposes a penalty or provides a remedy for the creation of a revocable TOD deed by means of fraud, undue influence, menace, or duress. The bill would specify that these changes do not apply to TOD deeds or revocation forms that were signed before January 1, 2022. The bill would require the California Law Revision Commission to study the effect of these provisions, as specified, and report its findings and recommendations to the Legislature on or before January 1, 2031. Existing law prohibits a deed or grant conveying any interest in or easement upon real estate to a political corporation or governmental agency for public purposes from being accepted for recordation without the consent of the grantee evidenced by a certificate or resolution of acceptance attached to or printed on the deed or grant pursuant to a specified form. This bill would make these provisions inapplicable to a revocable TOD deed, and instead specify that title does not transfer under a revocable TOD deed until the political corporation or governmental agency records a resolution of acceptance or certificate of consent in a form substantially similar to the form described above.
The Trial Jury Selection and Management Act generally authorizes a party in a criminal or civil case to challenge a prospective juror from becoming a trial juror, either by objecting to the prospective juror for cause, on the basis of a general disqualification or implied or actual bias, or through the use of a limited number of peremptory challenges. Under the act, in criminal cases, if the offense charged is punishable with death, or with imprisonment in the state prison for life, the defendant and the state are each entitled to 20 peremptory challenges. If the offense charged is punishable with a maximum term of imprisonment of 90 days or less, the defendant and the state are each entitled to 6 peremptory challenges, with a modification of that amount if 2 or more defendants are jointly tried. In a criminal trial for any other offense, the defendant and the state are each entitled to 10 peremptory challenges, with a modification of that amount if 2 or more defendants are jointly tried. The act requires the court to exclude any juror challenged peremptorily. Beginning on January 1, 2022, in a criminal case, the act authorizes a party or the trial court to object to the improper use of a peremptory challenge, as specified, and further authorizes those objections in civil cases beginning on January 1, 2026. This bill would eliminate peremptory challenges to prospective jurors in criminal cases. The bill would make conforming changes to related provisions, including, among others, repealing the authorization to object to the improper use of a peremptory challenge in a criminal case beginning on January 1, 2022. The bill also would make technical changes.
This measure would commemorate the 100th Anniversary of the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier at Arlington National Cemetery.
This measure would proclaim September 20, 2021, as Latino Veterans Day.