Photo of Diane Dixon
R California House · District 72

Rep. Diane Dixon

Compare
Total votes
14,578
all sessions
Attendance
90%
848 missed
Near the chamber average
With party
98%
of cast votes
Near the chamber average
Bipartisan score
2%
crosses aisle rarely
Near the chamber average
Sponsored
846
bills & resolutions
Higher than 81% of chamber peers
Committees
8
assignments
846 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
846
Primary
88
Co-sponsor
758
This page
846
matching current filters
Co-sponsor HR 117
Passed · California House · Co-sponsor
Relative to Section 230 of the federal Communications Decency Act of 1996.

Maddy summaryThis House Resolution from the California Legislature calls for a federal review of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996. The bill argues that the current law, which protects online platforms from liability for third-party content, has become outdated and allows major technology companies to avoid responsibility for harmful user-generated material. It highlights that courts have used this provision to shield platforms from legal action in cases involving harassment, illegal sales, and other serious harms. The resolution contends that the law should be reformed to hold companies accountable for their design choices and content moderation practices while still encouraging them to remove objectionable material.

Passed Aug 6, 2026 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor HR 78
Passed · California House · Co-sponsor
Relative to boat people awareness.

Maddy summaryThis resolution designates July 23 to July 30, 2026, as Boat People Awareness Week and September 2026 as Boat People Awareness Month to honor Vietnamese refugees who fled Vietnam by boat after the Vietnam War. The measure does not change laws or allocate funding; instead, it establishes a period for public recognition and education about the historical plight of these refugees. It highlights the dangers faced by boat people, including piracy and storms, and acknowledges the significant Vietnamese communities that settled in California and other states. The resolution directs the Assembly Clerk to distribute copies of the document for public distribution.

Passed Aug 6, 2026 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor HR 102
Passed · California House · Co-sponsor
Relative to Filipino American History Month.

Maddy summaryThis bill designates a specific month in 2026 as Filipino American History Month to honor the contributions of Filipinos to California and the United States. It recognizes their historical presence dating back to the late 1500s and highlights their roles in agriculture, labor, military service, and community building throughout the state. The resolution serves as a commemorative acknowledgment rather than a law that changes government operations or funding.

Passed Aug 3, 2026 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor HR 120
Passed · California House · Co-sponsor
Relative to veterans.

Maddy summaryThis House resolution honors California veterans and urges the federal government to speed up the processing of disability claims. It highlights that long wait times for these benefits can cause financial hardship and delay access to necessary medical care. The bill calls on Congress and the Department of Veterans Affairs to reduce backlogs by improving staffing, increasing administrative efficiency, and modernizing their claims systems. Ultimately, it is a formal request for federal action rather than a law that changes state rules or allocates new funds.

Passed Aug 3, 2026 1 co-sponsor
Primary AB 1951
Signed into law · California House · Lead sponsor
Civil actions: filing fees: refunds.

Existing law provides that a civil action is commenced by filing a complaint by the court. Existing law provides that if a court clerk accepts for filing a complaint or other first paper, or any subsequent filing, and payment is made in an amount less than the required fee or by check that is later returned without payment, the clerk must notify the party who tendered the check that (1) the check was made out for an amount less than the required filing fee or has been returned without payment, whichever is applicable, (2) an administrative charge has been imposed to reimburse the court for the costs of processing the partial payment or returned check and for providing the specified notice, and (3) the party has 20 days from the date of mailing of the notice to pay the filing fee and administrative charge, except as specified. Existing law requires the clerk to void the filing if the party who tendered the returned check or the check in less than the required filing fee has not paid the full amount of the fee and the administrative charge within the 20-day period described above. Existing law provides that if the clerk performs a service or issues a document for which a fee is required and payment is made by check that is later returned without payment, the court may order further proceedings suspended as to the party for whom the check was tendered, and shall notify the party who tendered the check that proceedings have been suspended until receipt of payment of the required fee and the administrative charge by specified methods, but not by personal check or traveler's check. This bill would additionally apply the provisions described above to filing fees paid by credit card, electronic funds transfer, as defined, or any other means approved by the court. Existing law provides that if an electronic filing is made to the clerk by an electronic filing service provider acting as the agent of the court for purposes of collecting and remitting filing fees, and fees owed to the electronic filing service provider remain unpaid for 5 days after notice to the attorney of record, the court clerk may notify the attorney of record that the attorney of record may be sanctioned for nonpayment of fees. Existing law authorizes the court to sanction the attorney of record if fees to the electronic service provider remain unsatisfied 20 days after notice by the clerk. This bill would, if the fees to the electronic filing service provider remain unsatisfied 20 days after notice by the clerk, require the clerk to instead refund the electronic filing service provider, and to follow the procedures described above, as specified.

Signed into law Jul 16, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor SB 935
Signed into law · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Local agency design-build projects: authorization.

Existing law authorizes a local agency, as defined, with approval of its governing body, to procure design-build contracts for public works projects in excess of $1,000,000, awarding the contract either to the lowest bid or the best value. Existing law, among other requirements for the design-build procurement process, requires specified information submitted by a design-build entity to be certified under penalty of perjury. These provisions authorizing local agencies to use the design-build procurement process are repealed on January 1, 2031. This bill would repeal the above-described January 1, 2031, repeal date, thereby extending the operation of these provisions indefinitely. By indefinitely extending provisions that would otherwise be repealed on January 1, 2031, the bill would expand the crime of perjury, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Signed into law Jul 16, 2026 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor ACR 210
Signed into law · California House · Co-sponsor
Relative to a sister state relationship with the Province Gauteng in South Africa.

This measure would extend an invitation to the people and government of the Province of Gauteng in South Africa to enter into a sister state relationship with California, would encourage the strengthening of existing partnerships, and would call upon California's universities, research institutions, and public agencies to explore new memoranda of understanding with Gauteng-based counterparts in areas of mutual interest.

Signed into law Jul 15, 2026 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor ACR 168
Signed into law · California House · Co-sponsor
Relative to the California Law Revision Commission.

Existing law requires the California Law Revision Commission to study, and limits the commission to studying, topics approved by resolution of the Legislature or by statute. This measure would grant approval to the commission to continue its study of designated topics that the Legislature previously authorized or directed the commission to study and two new topics of study, as specified. The measure would require the commission, before commencing work on any project within its authorized calendar of topics, to submit a detailed description of the scope of work to the Chairs and Vice Chairs of the Assembly Committee on Judiciary and the Senate Committee on Judiciary, and any other policy committee that has jurisdiction, as specified. If a major change to the scope of work occurs during the course of the project, the measure would require the commission to submit a description of the change.

Signed into law Jul 15, 2026 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor ACR 206
Signed into law · California House · Co-sponsor
Relative to Elder and Dependent Adult Abuse Awareness Month.

Maddy summaryThis bill designates June 2026 as Elder and Dependent Adult Abuse Awareness Month. It serves as a commemorative resolution intended to raise public attention about abuse affecting older adults and dependent individuals. The measure does not create new laws or funding but rather establishes an official month-long observance. Once enacted, it becomes part of the state statutes without altering existing policies or requiring specific actions from government agencies.

Signed into law Jul 6, 2026 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SCR 187
Signed into law · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Relative to Father's Day.

Maddy summaryThis bill designates June 21, 2026, as Father's Day to honor fathers and father figures. It establishes this specific date as an official observance within the state statutes. The measure does not create a legal holiday or mandate time off from work. Instead, it serves as a formal recognition of the contributions made by fathers and father figures.

Signed into law Jul 2, 2026 1 co-sponsor
Showing 71 to 80 of 846 bills
Previous 1 7 8 9 85 Next