Photo of Greg Wallis
R California Assembly · District 47 On the 2026 ballot

Asm. Greg Wallis

Compare
Total votes
9,235
all sessions
Attendance
89%
894 missed
Lower than 85% of chamber peers
With party
95%
of cast votes
Near the chamber average
Bipartisan score
3%
crosses aisle rarely
Near the chamber average
Sponsored
870
bills & resolutions
Higher than 95% of chamber peers
Committees
11
assignments
870 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
870
Primary
81
Co-sponsor
789
This page
870
matching current filters
Co-sponsor SCR 17
Signed into law · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Relative to artificial intelligence.

This measure would affirm the California Legislature's commitment to President Biden's vision for a safe AI and the principles outlined in the "Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights" and would express the Legislature's commitment to examining and implementing those principles in its legislation and policies related to the use and deployment of automated systems.

Signed into law Aug 23, 2023 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor ACR 96
Passed · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to the 23 Asilomar AI Principles.

This measure would express the support of the Legislature for the 23 Asilomar AI Principles as guiding values for the development of artificial intelligence and of related public policy.

Passed Aug 23, 2023 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SCR 31
Signed into law · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Relative to the Katcho Achadjian Memorial Highway.

This measure would designate the portion of U.S. Route 101 in the County of San Luis Obispo, from postmile 13.173 to postmile 17.767, as the Katcho Achadjian Memorial Highway. The measure would request the Department of Transportation to determine the cost of appropriate signs showing this special designation and, upon receiving donations from nonstate sources covering that cost, to erect those signs.

Signed into law Aug 23, 2023 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor ACR 16
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to the needs of opportunity youth.

This measure would declare that the Legislature recognizes the importance of creating pathways to success for California's opportunity youth and the need to develop a statewide comprehensive plan that will reduce persistent economic inequities endured by California's opportunity youth.

Signed into law Aug 22, 2023 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AJR 3
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Affordable Housing Credit Improvement Act of 2023.

This measure would declare that the Legislature supports a reduction to the threshold for tax-exempt bond financing and joins the Treasurer in urging the passage of the federal Affordable Housing Credit Improvement Act of 2023.

Signed into law Aug 22, 2023 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor ACR 66
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to "Parks Make Life Better!®" Month.

This measure would recognize the importance of access to local parks, trails, open space, and facilities for the health, wellness, development, inspiration, and safety of all Californians and would declare the month of July 2023 as "Parks Make Life Better!®" Month.

Signed into law Aug 22, 2023 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AB 356
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
California Environmental Quality Act: aesthetic impacts.

The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. Existing law, until January 1, 2024, specifies that, except as provided, a lead agency is not required to evaluate the aesthetic effects of a project and aesthetic effects are not considered significant effects on the environment if the project involves the refurbishment, conversion, repurposing, or replacement of an existing building that meets certain requirements. This bill would extend the operation of the above provision to January 1, 2029. The bill would require the lead agency to file a notice with the Office of Planning and Research and the county clerk of the county in which the project is located if the lead agency determines that it is not required to evaluate the aesthetic effects of a project and determines to approve or carry out that project. By imposing additional duties on lead agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Signed into law Jul 27, 2023 1 co-sponsor
Showing 701 to 710 of 870 bills
Previous 1 70 71 72 87 Next