California Environmental Quality Act: aesthetic impacts.
Summary
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. Existing law, until January 1, 2024, specifies that, except as provided, a lead agency is not required to evaluate the aesthetic effects of a project and aesthetic effects are not considered significant effects on the environment if the project involves the refurbishment, conversion, repurposing, or replacement of an existing building that meets certain requirements. This bill would extend the operation of the above provision to January 1, 2029. The bill would require the lead agency to file a notice with the Office of Planning and Research and the county clerk of the county in which the project is located if the lead agency determines that it is not required to evaluate the aesthetic effects of a project and determines to approve or carry out that project. By imposing additional duties on lead agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2023
Committee Review
Jul 2023
Assembly Passage
May 2023
Senate Passage
Jul 2023
Signed into Law
Jul 2023
Introduced Jan 31, 2023
Signed Jul 27, 2023
Floor votes · Senate Jul 13, 2023 · Assembly May 4, 2023
How they voted
37–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 40
Jul 13, 2023
D
Democratic31
93% Yea
R
Republican9
88% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
11
Committee
11
Amendments
3
Jul 27, 2023
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jul 13, 2023
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Jul 13, 2023
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 2036.).
upper
Jul 3, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to Consent Calendar.
upper
Jun 22, 2023
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 7, 2023
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 7). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 17, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
May 4, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 1461.)
lower
Apr 26, 2023
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (April 26).
lower
Apr 19, 2023
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 18, 2023
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 17, 2023
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 10).
lower
Mar 14, 2023
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 8, 2023
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Mar 7, 2023
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
lower
Feb 9, 2023
Committee
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Feb 1, 2023
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 3.
lower
1 primary · 7 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 356
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 356. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline