Photo of Laura Friedman
D California Assembly · District 44 · Former member

Asm. Laura Friedman

Compare
Total votes
19,331
all sessions
Attendance
93%
973 missed
Lower than 83% of chamber peers
With party
99%
of cast votes
Higher than 90% of chamber peers
Bipartisan score
0%
crosses aisle rarely
Lower than 93% of chamber peers
Sponsored
2,022
bills & resolutions
Higher than 90% of chamber peers
Committees
0
assignments
2,022 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
2,022
Primary
186
Co-sponsor
1,836
This page
2,022
matching current filters
Co-sponsor ACR 113
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to India's Independence Day.

This measure would recognize August 15, 2019, as India's Independence Day, and urge all Californians to join in celebrating India's independence.

Signed into law Sep 9, 2019 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AJR 14
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to Special Olympics.

This measure would call for continued support and recognition of the many benefits provided by Special Olympics.

Signed into law Sep 9, 2019 1 co-sponsor
Primary AB 1515
Signed into law · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Planning and zoning: community plans: review under the California Environmental Quality Act.

The Planning and Zoning Law requires each county and city to adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan for its physical development and the development of any land outside its boundaries that, in the planning agency's judgment, bears relation to its planning, as provided. After the legislative body has adopted a general plan, that law also authorizes, or if so directed by the legislative body, requires, the planning agency to prepare specific plans for the systematic implementation of the general plan for all or part of the area covered by the general plan, as provided. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA limits the review of a project under its provisions if the parcel is zoned or designated in a community plan to accommodate a particular density of development, an environmental impact report was certified for that zoning or planning action, and the project is consistent with the zoning or community plan, as specified. CEQA requires a court, if it finds that any determination, finding, or decision of a public agency has been made without compliance with CEQA, to enter an order that includes one or more specified mandates, including a mandate to void the determination, finding, or decision of the public agency. This bill, notwithstanding the above-described requirement for a court to enter an order under CEQA, would prohibit a court in an action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the acts or decisions of the local agency, including a charter city, in adopting an update to a community plan on the grounds of noncompliance with CEQA from, on the basis of that noncompliance, invalidating, reviewing, voiding, or setting aside the approval of a development project that meets certain requirements. The bill would define various terms for these purposes. The bill would specify that these provisions do not affect or alter the obligation for the approval of a development project that is consistent with an approved community plan update to comply with CEQA or, except as expressly provided, preclude or limit an action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the approval of a development project that is consistent with an approved community plan pursuant to specified law. The bill would repeal these provisions as of January 1, 2025, but would provide that the repeal of these provisions does not affect any right or immunity granted by the bill to a development project that meets specified requirements before that date. The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities.

Signed into law Sep 6, 2019 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor SB 271
Signed into law · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Employment: motion picture production workers.

Existing law provides for the payment of unemployment compensation benefits to eligible persons who are unemployed through no fault of their own. Unemployment compensation benefits are paid from the Unemployment Fund, which is continuously appropriated for this purpose. Existing law defines "employment," for purposes of determining eligibility for unemployment compensation benefits, to mean service, including service in interstate commerce, performed by an employee for wages under any contract of hire, written or oral, express or implied. Existing law provides that employment includes an individual's entire service, performed within, or both within and without this state, if the service is either (1) localized in the state, or (2) not localized in the state, some of the service is performed in the state and one of 2 requirements are met, including that the base of operations or place from which such service is directed or controlled is not in any state in which some part of the service is performed but the individual's residence is in this state. The bill would provide, for purposes of determining employment of a motion picture production worker when the service is not localized in the state but some of the service is performed in the state, that the worker's entire service qualifies as employment if their residence is in the state. Existing law provides that as individual's service is localized in a state for purposes of unemployment compensation benefits as described above, if the service is either performed entirely within the state or performed within and outside the state and the service outside the state is incidental to the service performed within the state. Existing law further provides that service is incidental for these purposes if it is temporary or transitory in nature, or only consists of isolated transactions. The bill would provide that service performed by a motion picture production worker outside the state will be considered temporary or transitory for the purposes described above if the worker is a resident of the state, is hired and dispatched from the state, and intends to return to the state to seek reemployment at the conclusion of the assignment outside the state. The bill would also provide legislative findings and declarations in support of these provisions. Because this bill would expand the number of persons who are eligible for benefits from the Unemployment Fund, which is a continuously appropriated fund, it would make an appropriation.

Signed into law Sep 5, 2019 1 co-sponsor
Primary AB 1414
Signed into law · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Urban retail water suppliers: reporting.

(1) Existing law requires the state to achieve a 20% reduction in urban per capita water use in California by December 31, 2020. Existing law requires each urban retail water supplier to develop urban water use targets and an interim urban water use target, in accordance with specified requirements. Existing law requires each urban retail water supplier, on or before October 1, 2017, and on or before October 1 of each year thereafter, to submit a completed and validated water loss audit report for the previous calendar year or previous fiscal year as prescribed by rules adopted by the Department of Water Resources. This bill would require each urban retail water supplier to submit a completed and validated water loss audit report as prescribed by the department on or before October 1 of each year until October 1, 2023, if reporting on a calendar year basis, and on or before January 1 of each year until January 1, 2024, if reporting on a fiscal year basis. The bill would require on or before January 1, 2024, and on or before January 1 of each year thereafter, each urban retail water supplier to submit a completed and validated water loss audit report for the previous calendar year or previous fiscal year as part of an existing report relating to its urban water use. (2) Existing law requires an urban retail water supplier to calculate an urban water use objective no later than November 1, 2023, and by November 1 every year thereafter, and its actual urban water use by those same dates. Existing law requires an urban retail water supplier to submit a report to the department relating to its urban water use by those dates. This bill would revise these dates to January 1, 2024, and by January 1 every year thereafter. (3) Existing law, on and after November 1, 2023, authorizes the State Water Resources Control Board to issue informational orders pertaining to water production, water use, and water conservation to an urban retail water supplier that does not meet its urban water use objective. This bill would instead authorize the board to issue an informational order pertaining to water production, water use, and water conservation to an urban retail water supplier that does not meet its urban water use objective on and after January 1, 2024. (4) Existing law, the Urban Water Management Planning Act, requires every public and private urban water supplier that directly or indirectly provides water for municipal purposes to prepare and adopt an urban water management plan. The act requires an urban water management plan to be updated on or before July 1, in years ending in 6 and 1, incorporating updated and new information from the 5 years preceding the plan update. The act requires each urban retail water supplier to adopt and submit to the department by January 1, 2024, a supplement to the adopted 2020 plan that includes a narrative describing the water demand management measures that the supplier plans to implement. The bill would recast the urban water management narrative requirement to instead require, as part of the first annual report the urban retail water supplier submits to the department, a narrative that describes the water demand management measures that the supplier plans to implement to achieve its urban water use objective by January 1, 2027. (5) The act requires an urban water supplier to conduct an annual water supply and demand assessment and submit an annual shortage assessment report to the department consistent with the supplier's water shortage contingency plan by June 1 of each year. This bill would revise that deadline to July 1 of each year.

Signed into law Sep 5, 2019 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor ACR 87
Passed · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Upholding democracy through civic education in public schools.

This measure would endorse activities in public schools that instruct pupils in upholding and sustaining American democracy, encourage, in the strongest terms, California schools to pursue certain recognized designations that reflect specified ethos and values, and encourage publicly elected officials to conduct themselves in ways that strengthen civic engagement and participation in civil society.

Passed Sep 4, 2019 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AJR 21
Passed · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to reparations for descendants of enslaved persons.

This measure would formally apologize for California's past complicity in enabling and furthering the practice of slavery and would urge the United States Congress and the President of the United States to enact House Resolution 40 to study the legacy of slavery and provide recommendations on redress for descendants of enslaved persons.

Passed Sep 4, 2019 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AJR 22
Passed · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to the 76th anniversary of the repeal of the Chinese Exclusion Act.

This measure would mark December 17, 2019, as the 76th anniversary of the repeal of the Chinese Exclusion Act to honor the contributions of all immigrants and refugees in our communities. The measure would also declare the opposition of the Legislature to executive orders and a presidential proclamation signed by President Trump relating to immigration, call upon the President to revoke those orders and that proclamation, condemn the expansion of deportations being undertaken under the current presidential administration, stand in firm opposition to the President's proposal for construction of a wall along the southern border with Mexico, and reaffirm that the state is open and welcoming to immigrants and refugees who are integral to life in our state.

Passed Sep 4, 2019 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AJR 7
Passed · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to the Green New Deal.

This measure would encourage the United States Congress to adopt climate policies, including those that might be adopted under the Green New Deal, that build upon California's programs that have reduced greenhouse gas emissions while improving air and water quality, create new green jobs, and improve disadvantaged communities and that just climate actions offer the nation an opportunity to achieve community-mindful policies that California has successfully adopted while growing its economy.

Passed Sep 4, 2019 1 co-sponsor
Showing 1,211 to 1,220 of 2,022 bills