Planning and zoning: community plans: review under the California Environmental Quality Act.
Summary
The Planning and Zoning Law requires each county and city to adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan for its physical development and the development of any land outside its boundaries that, in the planning agency's judgment, bears relation to its planning, as provided. After the legislative body has adopted a general plan, that law also authorizes, or if so directed by the legislative body, requires, the planning agency to prepare specific plans for the systematic implementation of the general plan for all or part of the area covered by the general plan, as provided. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA limits the review of a project under its provisions if the parcel is zoned or designated in a community plan to accommodate a particular density of development, an environmental impact report was certified for that zoning or planning action, and the project is consistent with the zoning or community plan, as specified. CEQA requires a court, if it finds that any determination, finding, or decision of a public agency has been made without compliance with CEQA, to enter an order that includes one or more specified mandates, including a mandate to void the determination, finding, or decision of the public agency. This bill, notwithstanding the above-described requirement for a court to enter an order under CEQA, would prohibit a court in an action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the acts or decisions of the local agency, including a charter city, in adopting an update to a community plan on the grounds of noncompliance with CEQA from, on the basis of that noncompliance, invalidating, reviewing, voiding, or setting aside the approval of a development project that meets certain requirements. The bill would define various terms for these purposes. The bill would specify that these provisions do not affect or alter the obligation for the approval of a development project that is consistent with an approved community plan update to comply with CEQA or, except as expressly provided, preclude or limit an action to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the approval of a development project that is consistent with an approved community plan pursuant to specified law. The bill would repeal these provisions as of January 1, 2025, but would provide that the repeal of these provisions does not affect any right or immunity granted by the bill to a development project that meets specified requirements before that date. The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2019
Committee Review
Jun 2019
Assembly Passage
May 2019
Senate Passage
Aug 2019
Signed into Law
Sep 2019
Introduced Feb 22, 2019
Signed Sep 6, 2019
Floor votes · Senate Aug 22, 2019 · Assembly May 6, 2019
How they voted
37–0
Passed
Total votes 37
Aug 22, 2019
D
Democratic28
100% Yea
R
Republican9
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
10
Committee
6
Amendments
5
Sep 6, 2019
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 26, 2019
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 2837.).
lower
Aug 22, 2019
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 24 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 22, 2019
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 2239.).
upper
Jun 26, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 25).
upper
Jun 10, 2019
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 5).
upper
May 16, 2019
Committee
Referred to Coms. on GOV. & F. and JUD.
upper
May 6, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 73. Noes 1. Page 1520.)
lower
May 1, 2019
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
Apr 30, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 1.) (April 29).
lower
Apr 25, 2019
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (April 24). Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Apr 1, 2019
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Mar 28, 2019
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and NAT. RES.
lower
Feb 23, 2019
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
lower
Feb 22, 2019
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Laura Friedman
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1515
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1515. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline