MY
D California Assembly · District 4

Asm. Mariko Yamada

Compare
Total votes
12,405
all sessions
Attendance
95%
574 missed
Near the chamber average
With party
98%
of cast votes
Near the chamber average
Bipartisan score
1%
crosses aisle rarely
Near the chamber average
Sponsored
685
bills & resolutions
Near the chamber average
Committees
0
assignments
685 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
685
Primary
92
Co-sponsor
593
This page
685
matching current filters
Primary AB 1147
Vetoed · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Dependent children: status reports.

Existing law sets forth ways in which families of dependent minor parents may be preserved, by assisting these parents in raising their children as well as participating in school and extracurricular activities. Existing law requires a court to review the status of a dependent child no less than once every 6 months, and requires the county welfare department or social worker to file a supplemental report that addresses specified subjects, including whether the social worker has considered child protective services as a possible solution to the problems at hand, and has offered those services to qualified parents. This bill would additionally require, if the dependent child in foster care is also a parent, the supplemental report to specifically set forth the age and developmentally appropriate services that were provided to the minor parent to allow him or her to provide a permanent and safe home for the child, as specified. By imposing this additional reporting requirement on county welfare departments, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

Vetoed Oct 2, 2011 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor AB 1090
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Taxation: property tax deferment.

The Senior Citizens and Disabled Citizens Property Tax Postponement Law, until February 20, 2009, authorized a claimant, as defined, to file a claim with the Controller to postpone the payment of ad valorem property taxes, where household income, as defined, did not exceed specified amounts. Existing law authorized the Controller, upon approval of the claim, to either make payment directly to specified entities, or to issue the claimant a certificate of eligibility that constituted a written promise of the state to pay the amount specified on the certificate, as provided. Existing law required these payments to be made out of specified funds appropriated to the Controller, as specified, and also required repaid property tax postponement payments to be transferred, as specified, to the General Fund. Existing law, on and after February 20, 2009, prohibits a person from filing a claim for postponement, and prohibits the Controller from accepting applications for postponement, under the Senior Citizens and Disabled Citizens Property Tax Postponement Law. This bill would establish the County Deferred Property Tax Program for Senior Citizens and Disabled Citizens, authorize a county to elect to participate in the program by adopting a resolution indicating the county's intention to participate in and administer the program, and specify that the requirements of a county or county officials set forth in the bill are conditioned upon the county's passage of the above-described resolution. Under the program, a participating county would be authorized to defer a claimant's property taxes retroactively, for property taxes due on or before February 20, 2011, and prospectively, as specified. This bill would require a claimant, as defined, to use the application form of a county to initiate participation in the program. The bill would authorize the county treasurer or county tax collector to review the claimant's application for program participation, as specified, and, if the claimant is eligible, and if there are sufficient funds within the county's Property Tax Deferral Fund, which this bill would require a participating county to establish within its treasury, to (1) defer property taxes on the claimant's residential dwelling for that fiscal year, (2) issue a subvention payment to that county, in an amount equivalent to the amount of the deferred property taxes, from the county's Property Tax Deferral Fund, (3) direct the county auditor to apportion that subvention payment in the same manner as if the property taxes had been paid, and (4) provide a letter or other written notice to the claimant, noting the relevant fiscal year of participation, for use as written confirmation of participation. The bill would authorize the county treasurer of a participating county, if he or she makes a specified determination, upon the adoption of a specified resolution by that county's board of supervisors, to deposit specified funds in the county treasury for the purpose of investment of those funds in the county's Property Tax Deferral Fund. This bill would require the amount of property taxes deferred, plus any interest accrued thereon, to be secured by a judgment lien, as specified. The bill would also require the lien to be evidenced by a notice of lien, and various county officials to process and record the notice of lien, as specified. The bill would require a participating county to charge a claimant a specified adjusted rate of interest on the amount owed for the deferment of property taxes. The bill would require the amount secured by the lien to be increased to reflect the accrual of interest on the property taxes deferred, or decreased by the amount of any payment made to reduce the amount secured by the lien, as specified. The bill would provide procedures for the release of the lien if the obligation is paid in full or otherwise discharged, and would require all amounts owed by a claimant under the program to become due immediately under specified circumstances. This bill would authorize a participating county to charge an application fee to the claimant to offset the actual costs of administering the program, and would require the fee proceeds to be deposited in an account within the county's Property Tax Deferral Fund, to be used exclusively for those administrative costs. The bill would require the letter or other written confirmation of participation in the program provided by the county to be considered as evidence of program participation.

Signed into law Sep 30, 2011 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor ACR 82
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Domestic Violence Awareness Month.

This measure would recognize October 2011 as Domestic Violence Awareness Month and urge all Californians to take a stand against domestic violence.

Signed into law Sep 28, 2011 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AJR 15
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to California cut flowers.

This measure would urge the United States government to consider the California jobs and economic stimulus provided by the California floriculture industry when advancing free trade agreements, specifically with Colombia.

Signed into law Sep 28, 2011 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor ACR 43
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to the Armed Forces.

This measure would honor and recognize the service and sacrifice made by members of the Armed Forces and their families on the occasion of Armed Forces Day on May 21, 2011.

Signed into law Sep 28, 2011 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor ACR 74
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to Filipino Americans.

This measure would express the Legislature's apology, on behalf of the people of the state, for violations of the civil liberties and constitutional rights of Filipino Americans caused by antimiscegenation laws that precluded marriage between Filipinos and Caucasians, and its regret, on behalf of the people of the state, for the suffering and hardship endured by Filipino Americans as a result of governmental actions taken because of various policies and laws it enacted.

Signed into law Sep 28, 2011 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor ACR 67
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders communities.

This resolution would recognize the contributions of Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander communities to California, and would also recognize the importance of preserving Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander communities and their traditions.

Signed into law Sep 28, 2011 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor ACR 56
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to the American flag.

This measure would recognize the 61st anniversary of National Flag Day, honor the 51st anniversary of the flying of the current American flag, and would encourage all Californians to celebrate the occasion with appropriate activities.

Signed into law Sep 28, 2011 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AJR 18
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to Sickle Cell Awareness Month.

This measure would recognize September 2011 as Sickle Cell Awareness Month in California and would urge the President and the Congress of the United States to restore funding for sickle cell anemia centers and research and to make sickle cell anemia and other genetic hemoglobinopathies a public health priority.

Signed into law Sep 28, 2011 1 co-sponsor
Showing 401 to 410 of 685 bills
Previous 1 … 40 41 42 … 69 Next