Taxation: property tax deferment.
Summary
The Senior Citizens and Disabled Citizens Property Tax Postponement Law, until February 20, 2009, authorized a claimant, as defined, to file a claim with the Controller to postpone the payment of ad valorem property taxes, where household income, as defined, did not exceed specified amounts. Existing law authorized the Controller, upon approval of the claim, to either make payment directly to specified entities, or to issue the claimant a certificate of eligibility that constituted a written promise of the state to pay the amount specified on the certificate, as provided. Existing law required these payments to be made out of specified funds appropriated to the Controller, as specified, and also required repaid property tax postponement payments to be transferred, as specified, to the General Fund. Existing law, on and after February 20, 2009, prohibits a person from filing a claim for postponement, and prohibits the Controller from accepting applications for postponement, under the Senior Citizens and Disabled Citizens Property Tax Postponement Law. This bill would establish the County Deferred Property Tax Program for Senior Citizens and Disabled Citizens, authorize a county to elect to participate in the program by adopting a resolution indicating the county's intention to participate in and administer the program, and specify that the requirements of a county or county officials set forth in the bill are conditioned upon the county's passage of the above-described resolution. Under the program, a participating county would be authorized to defer a claimant's property taxes retroactively, for property taxes due on or before February 20, 2011, and prospectively, as specified. This bill would require a claimant, as defined, to use the application form of a county to initiate participation in the program. The bill would authorize the county treasurer or county tax collector to review the claimant's application for program participation, as specified, and, if the claimant is eligible, and if there are sufficient funds within the county's Property Tax Deferral Fund, which this bill would require a participating county to establish within its treasury, to (1) defer property taxes on the claimant's residential dwelling for that fiscal year, (2) issue a subvention payment to that county, in an amount equivalent to the amount of the deferred property taxes, from the county's Property Tax Deferral Fund, (3) direct the county auditor to apportion that subvention payment in the same manner as if the property taxes had been paid, and (4) provide a letter or other written notice to the claimant, noting the relevant fiscal year of participation, for use as written confirmation of participation. The bill would authorize the county treasurer of a participating county, if he or she makes a specified determination, upon the adoption of a specified resolution by that county's board of supervisors, to deposit specified funds in the county treasury for the purpose of investment of those funds in the county's Property Tax Deferral Fund. This bill would require the amount of property taxes deferred, plus any interest accrued thereon, to be secured by a judgment lien, as specified. The bill would also require the lien to be evidenced by a notice of lien, and various county officials to process and record the notice of lien, as specified. The bill would require a participating county to charge a claimant a specified adjusted rate of interest on the amount owed for the deferment of property taxes. The bill would require the amount secured by the lien to be increased to reflect the accrual of interest on the property taxes deferred, or decreased by the amount of any payment made to reduce the amount secured by the lien, as specified. The bill would provide procedures for the release of the lien if the obligation is paid in full or otherwise discharged, and would require all amounts owed by a claimant under the program to become due immediately under specified circumstances. This bill would authorize a participating county to charge an application fee to the claimant to offset the actual costs of administering the program, and would require the fee proceeds to be deposited in an account within the county's Property Tax Deferral Fund, to be used exclusively for those administrative costs. The bill would require the letter or other written confirmation of participation in the program provided by the county to be considered as evidence of program participation.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Assembly Passage
Jun 2011
Senate Passage
Aug 2011
Signed into Law
Sep 2011
Introduced Feb 18, 2011
Signed Sep 30, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Aug 31, 2011 · Assembly Jun 2, 2011
How they voted
34–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 35
Aug 31, 2011
D
Democratic23
95% Yea
R
Republican12
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
8
Committee
8
Amendments
1
Sep 30, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 1, 2011
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Aug 31, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-0-1)
senate
Jul 7, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (July 6).
upper
Jun 16, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Jun 2, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (67-0-5)
assembly
May 31, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 5.) (May 27).
lower
May 27, 2011
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 12, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Assembly Rule 97.
lower
May 3, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (May 2).
lower
Mar 17, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
lower
Feb 20, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
BB
Bob Blumenfield
DDemocratic
Co
Bill Monning
DDemocratic
Co
JW
Jared William Huffman
DDemocratic
Co
MY
Mariko Yamada
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1090
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1090. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline