Asm. Cecilia Aguiar-Curry

(1) Existing law, as proposed by SB 10 of the 2017–18 Regular Session, commencing October 1, 2019, requires persons arrested and detained to be subject to a pretrial risk assessment conducted by Pretrial Assessment Services, defined as an entity, division, or program that is assigned the responsibility to assess the risk level of persons charged with the commission of a crime, report the results of the risk determination to the court, and make recommendations for conditions of release of individuals pending adjudication of their criminal case. SB 10 requires the courts to establish pretrial assessment services and authorizes those services to be performed by court employees or through a contract with a local public agency, as specified. SB 10 provides that if no local agency will agree to perform the pretrial assessments, and if the court elects not to perform the assessments, the court may contract with a new local pretrial assessment services agency established specifically to perform the role. SB 10 requires pretrial assessment services to be performed by public employees. This bill, notwithstanding the requirement that pretrial assessment services be performed by public employees, would authorize, until January 1, 2023, a qualified local public agency in the City and County of San Francisco to contract with the existing not-for-profit entity that is performing pretrial services in the city and county to provide continuity and sufficient time to transition the entity's employees into public employment. (2) SB 10 authorizes Pretrial Assessment Services to release a person assessed as being a low risk, as defined, on his or her own recognizance, and additionally requires superior courts to adopt rules authorizing Pretrial Assessment Services to release persons assessed as being a medium risk, as defined, on his or her own recognizance. However, SB 10 prohibits Pretrial Assessment Services from releasing persons who meet specified conditions, including, among others, tier 2 sex offenders subject to registration for a minimum of 20 years and tier 3 sex offenders subject to lifetime registration. This bill would provide that if SB 10 of the 2017–18 Regular Session becomes operative, the release prohibitions described above would be expanded to additionally include persons convicted of sex crimes and certain other offenses subject to the Sex Offender Registration Act, as specified. By increasing the length of time certain persons remain in county jails, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Existing law requires the Department of Housing and Community Development, through its Office of Migrant Services, to assist in the development, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, or operation of migrant farm labor centers, as provided. Existing law authorizes the Director of Housing and Community Development to contract with specified local public and private entities, including school districts and housing authorities, for the procurement or construction of housing or shelter and to obtain specified services for migratory agricultural workers. This bill would require the department to allow in an operating contract the entity operating the contract to have flexibility in its opening date if needed to adjust for variable seasonal or climate changes and if certain requirements are met. The bill would authorize the department to enter into multiyear operating contracts with entities, and provide funding annually by making an amendment to that contract, as specified. Existing law authorizes any entity operating a migrant farm labor center to establish a reserve account comprised of the excess funds provided through the annual operating contract received from the department if the department certifies there is no need to address reasonable general maintenance requirements or repairs, rehabilitation, and replacement needs of the requesting migrant farm labor center which affect the immediate health and safety of residents, as specified. Existing law prohibits the cumulative balance of the reserve account from exceeding 10% of the annual operating funds annually committed to the entity by the department. This bill would instead require any entity operating a migrant farm labor center to establish a capital reserve account under the same conditions, as specified. The bill would permit the cumulative balance of the reserve account to exceed 10% of the annual operating funds annually committed to the entity by the department if authorized by the department, and would require the cumulative balance of the reserve account to be reported annually to the department.

Existing law authorizes a court to grant pretrial diversion, for a period no longer than 2 years, to a defendant suffering from a mental disorder, on an accusatory pleading alleging the commission of a misdemeanor or felony offense, in order to allow the defendant to undergo mental health treatment. Existing law conditions eligibility on, among other criteria, a court finding that the defendant's mental disorder played a significant role in the commission of the charged offense. Existing law requires, if the defendant has performed satisfactorily in diversion, that the court dismiss the defendant's criminal charges, with a record filed with the Department of Justice indicating the disposition of the case diverted, that the arrest is deemed never to have occurred, and requires the court to order access to the record of the arrest restricted, except as specified. This bill would make defendants ineligible for the diversion program for certain offenses, including murder, voluntary manslaughter, and rape. The bill would authorize a court to require the defendant to make a prima facie showing that the defendant will meet the minimum requirements of eligibility for diversion and that the defendant and the offense are suitable for diversion, as specified. The bill would also require the court, upon request, to conduct a hearing to determine whether restitution is owed to any victim as a result of the diverted offense and, if owed, to order its payment during the period of diversion. The bill would provide that a defendant's inability to pay restitution due to indigence or mental disorder would not be grounds for denial of diversion or a finding that the defendant has failed to comply with the terms of diversion. The bill would also make technical changes.

(1) Existing law, the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of 2000, provides the authority and procedures for the initiation, conduct, and completion of changes of organization and reorganization of cities and districts. The act specifies the factors that a local agency formation commission is required to consider in the review of a proposal for a change of organization or reorganization, including, among other things, per capita assessed valuation and the proposal's consistency with city or county general and specific plans. This bill would instead require the commission to consider the assessed valuation rather than per capita assessed valuation. The bill would additionally require the commission to consider information contained in a local hazard mitigation plan, information contained in a safety element of a general plan, and any maps that identify land as a very high fire hazard zone or maps that identify land determined to be in a state responsibility area if it is determined that such information is relevant to the area that is the subject of the proposal. By adding to the duties of local agency formation commissions in reviewing a change of organization or reorganization, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law, the Planning and Zoning Law, requires each county and city to adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan for the physical development of the county or city, and certain land outside its boundaries, that includes, among other specified mandatory elements, a housing element. That law, for the 4th and subsequent revisions of the housing element, requires the Department of Housing and Community Development to determine the existing and projected need for housing for each region, as provided, and requires the appropriate council of governments or for cities and counties without a council of governments, the department, to adopt a final regional housing need plan allocating a share of the regional housing need to each city, county, or city and county. Existing law requires the department to meet and consult with the council of governments regarding the assumptions and methodology to be used by the department to determine the region's housing needs and requires the council of governments to provide data assumptions, including specified information regarding housing availability within the region. This bill would require that the information provided by the council of governments include the loss of units during a state of emergency, as defined, that was declared by the Governor pursuant to the California Emergency Services Act, during the planning period immediately preceding the relevant revision of the housing element that have not been rebuilt or replaced at the time of the data request. Existing law requires the council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, to develop a proposed methodology for distributing the existing and projected regional housing need to cities, counties, and cities and counties within the region or subregion, as applicable, that is consistent with specified objectives. Existing law, to the extent that sufficient data is available as provided, requires each council of governments, or delegate subregion as applicable, to include specified factors to develop the methodology that allocates regional housing needs. This bill would require that these factors include the loss of units during a state of emergency, as defined, that was declared by the Governor pursuant to the California Emergency Services Act during the planning period immediately preceding the relevant revision of the housing element that have yet to be rebuilt or replaced at the time of the analysis. By adding to the duties of councils of governments and delegate subregions in determining the regional housing need allocation, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) Under existing law, whenever a release, spill, escape, or entry of waste occurs, as specified, and the Director of Health Care Services or the local health officer makes specified determinations as to that waste, the director is authorized to declare a health emergency and the local health officer is authorized to declare a local health emergency in the jurisdiction or any area thereof affected by the threat to the public health. Existing law prohibits a local health emergency declared by a local health officer in excess of 7 days unless the board of supervisors or city council, as applicable, ratifies the local health emergency. Existing law requires the board of supervisors or city council, as applicable, to review the need for continuing the local health emergency at least every 14 days and requires the board of supervisors or city council to terminate the local health emergency at the earliest possible date that conditions warrant. This bill would extend the periodic review of a local health emergency by a board of supervisors or city council from every 14 days to every 30 days. (4) This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 65584.01 of the Government Code proposed by AB 1771 and SB 828 to be operative only if this bill and either or both AB 1771 and SB 828 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 65584.04 of the Government Code proposed by AB 1771 and SB 828 to be operative only if this bill and either or both AB 1771 and SB 828 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. (5) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Existing law establishes the State Department of Public Health and sets forth its powers and duties, including, but not limited to, duties relating to the licensing and regulation of health facilities, as defined. This bill would prescribe timelines for the department to approve a written application submitted by a general acute care hospital or an acute psychiatric hospital to, among other things, modify, add, or expand a service or program. The bill would require the department to complete its evaluation and approve or deny an application within 100 days of receipt of the application. The bill would require the department to approve a written application to expand a service that is currently being provided within 30 business days of receipt of the completed application, unless the hospital is out of compliance with existing laws governing the service to be expanded. Under the bill, an approved expanded service would remain licensed for not more than 18 months, unless the department approves the license for a longer period. The bill would require the department to develop a centralized applications advice program to assist hospitals in identifying and completing the correct paperwork and other requirements necessary to modify, add, or expand a service or program. The bill would require the department, on or before December 31, 2019, to develop an automated application system to process applications. Under the bill, the resources necessary to implement the application process would be made available, upon appropriation, from the Internal Departmental Quality Improvement Account.

Existing law authorizes a court, if the court finds that a person has a developmental disability, and is a danger to himself, herself, or to others, to make an order that the person be committed to the State Department of Developmental Services for suitable treatment and habilitation services, as specified. This bill would authorize a court to order, until June 30, 2021, the commitment of an individual who meets specified criteria for admission due to an acute crisis, as defined, to a separate and distinct unit of Canyon Springs Community Facility. The bill would make other conforming changes. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 6500 of the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by SB 1494 to be operative only if this bill and SB 1494 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Existing federal law, the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988, provides for the negotiation and execution of tribal-state gaming compacts for the purpose of authorizing certain types of gaming on Indian lands within a state. The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to negotiate and conclude those compacts, subject to ratification by the Legislature. Existing law expressly ratifies a number of tribal-state gaming compacts, and amendments to tribal-state gaming compacts, between the State of California and specified Indian tribes. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project, as defined, that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment, as defined, or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. This bill would ratify the tribal-state gaming compact entered into between the State of California and the Big Valley Band of Pomo Indians of the Big Valley Rancheria, California, executed on August 16, 2018. The bill would provide that, in deference to tribal sovereignty, certain actions are not projects for the purposes of CEQA. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

(1) Existing law, known commonly as the Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) program, authorizes a public agency, by making specified findings, to authorize public agency officials and property owners to enter into voluntary contractual assessments to finance the installation of distributed generation renewable energy sources or energy or water efficiency improvements that are permanently fixed to real property. Existing law, the California Financing Law (CFL) , requires a program administrator who administers a PACE program on behalf of, and with the written consent of, a public agency to comply with specified requirements relating to the PACE program, including requiring, commencing on January 1, 2019, a program administrator to be licensed by the Commissioner of Business Oversight under the California Financing Law. The CFL, commencing on January 1, 2019, requires a program administrator to establish and maintain a process for the enrollment, and for the cancellation of that enrollment, of a PACE solicitor and a PACE solicitor agent. The CFL defines the term "PACE solicitor" and "PACE solicitor agent" to not include specified persons. This bill would clarify that the term "PACE solicitor" and "PACE solicitor agent" does not include a person who only solicits a property owner to enter into an assessment contract with a person who is not considered a program administrator within the meaning of the CFL. The bill would prohibit a person from engaging in the business of a PACE solicitor unless that person is enrolled with a program administrator. The bill would also require the program administrator to maintain the processes described above in a manner that is acceptable to the commissioner. (2) The CFL requires a program administrator who administers a PACE program on behalf of, and with the written consent of, a public agency to comply with specified requirements relating to the PACE program, including requiring a program administrator to ensure criteria related to the assessment contract are satisfied before the contract is approved for recordation, including ensuring that the property owner has not been a party to any bankruptcy proceedings within the last 7 years and that the property owner is current on all mortgage debt on the subject property and has had no more than one late payment during the 12 months immediately preceding the application date, as provided. This bill would, instead, prohibit a program administrator from executing an assessment contract, and would prohibit any work from commencing under a home improvement contract that is financed by that assessment contract and would prohibit that home improvement contract from being executed, unless the program administrator ensures that certain criteria related to that assessment contract are satisfied. The bill would revise the two criteria described above to require the program administrator to ensure that the property owner has not been a party to any bankruptcy proceeding within the last 4 years and to require the program administrator to ensure that the property owner is current on all mortgage debt on the subject property and has had no more than one late payment during the 6 months immediately preceding the application date. (3) The CFL prohibits a program administrator from approving an assessment contract for funding and recording by a public agency unless the program administrator makes a reasonable good faith determination that the property owner has a reasonable ability to pay the PACE assessment, and requires that determination to include specified factors, including household income. Existing law requires a public agency that administers a voluntary contractual assessment program under the PACE program to, with respect to each real property subject to an assessment, record a document that contains specified information related to the assessment, including, the names of all current owners of the real property subject to the assessment. This bill would, instead, prohibit a program administrator from executing an assessment contract, and would prohibit any work from commencing under a home improvement contract that is financed by that assessment contract and would prohibit that home improvement contract from being executed, unless the program administrator makes a reasonable good faith determination that the property owner has a reasonable ability to pay the PACE assessment. The bill would authorize a program administrator when conducting this determination to utilize the income of a property owner's legal spouse through marriage or domestic partnership who is not on title to the property, provided that person consents, in writing, to that effect. The bill would also provide that if the property owner's legal spouse through marriage or domestic partner is used to determine the property owner's income in that manner, then the public agency that administers the PACE assessment is required to include that person's name in the document recorded related to that assessment described above. (4) The CFL requires the program administrator to be responsible for the difference between the determination of the property owner, who is obligated on the underlying home improvement contract, ability to pay the annual PACE obligations and the actual amount financed for the property owner, provided certain requirements are met. This bill would require the program administrator in that instance to provide to the property owner a written disclosure of the methodology that the program administrator used to determine whether there was a difference between the property owner's ability to pay the annual PACE obligation and the actual amount financed for the property owner. The bill would also provide that this requirement only applies to an assessment contract executed between April 1, 2018, and January 1, 2019. (5) The CFL requires a program administrator to submit to the commissioner information beneficial to evaluating various aspects of the PACE program to be included in a specified annual report, and requires the commissioner to file an annual report with the department as a public record that is a composite of the annual reports and any comments on that report that the commissioner determines to be in the public interest. The CFL requires a program administrator to report annually to the commissioner all PACE assessments that were funded and recorded. This bill would require the commissioner to include information on all PACE assessments that were funded and recorded into the annual composite report described above. (6) This bill would make other clarifying changes to the provisions of the CFL relating to program administrators, PACE solicitors, and PACE solicitor agents. (7) Existing law requires a program administrator to provide an oral confirmation of the key terms of an assessment contract with the property owner on the call, or his or her authorized representative, and to retain a copy of a recording of that confirmation for a period of 5 years after the recording is made. Existing law requires that oral confirmation to contain specified information. This bill would also require the program administrator to include in the oral conformation that it is the responsibility of the property owner to contact the property owner's home insurance provider to determine whether the efficiency improvement to be financed by the PACE assessment is covered by the property owner's insurance plan.