Pretrial release and detention: pretrial services.
Summary
(1) Existing law, as proposed by SB 10 of the 2017–18 Regular Session, commencing October 1, 2019, requires persons arrested and detained to be subject to a pretrial risk assessment conducted by Pretrial Assessment Services, defined as an entity, division, or program that is assigned the responsibility to assess the risk level of persons charged with the commission of a crime, report the results of the risk determination to the court, and make recommendations for conditions of release of individuals pending adjudication of their criminal case. SB 10 requires the courts to establish pretrial assessment services and authorizes those services to be performed by court employees or through a contract with a local public agency, as specified. SB 10 provides that if no local agency will agree to perform the pretrial assessments, and if the court elects not to perform the assessments, the court may contract with a new local pretrial assessment services agency established specifically to perform the role. SB 10 requires pretrial assessment services to be performed by public employees. This bill, notwithstanding the requirement that pretrial assessment services be performed by public employees, would authorize, until January 1, 2023, a qualified local public agency in the City and County of San Francisco to contract with the existing not-for-profit entity that is performing pretrial services in the city and county to provide continuity and sufficient time to transition the entity's employees into public employment. (2) SB 10 authorizes Pretrial Assessment Services to release a person assessed as being a low risk, as defined, on his or her own recognizance, and additionally requires superior courts to adopt rules authorizing Pretrial Assessment Services to release persons assessed as being a medium risk, as defined, on his or her own recognizance. However, SB 10 prohibits Pretrial Assessment Services from releasing persons who meet specified conditions, including, among others, tier 2 sex offenders subject to registration for a minimum of 20 years and tier 3 sex offenders subject to lifetime registration. This bill would provide that if SB 10 of the 2017–18 Regular Session becomes operative, the release prohibitions described above would be expanded to additionally include persons convicted of sex crimes and certain other offenses subject to the Sex Offender Registration Act, as specified. By increasing the length of time certain persons remain in county jails, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2018
Committee Review
Aug 2018
Senate Passage
May 2018
Assembly Passage
Aug 2018
Signed into Law
Sep 2018
Introduced Feb 12, 2018
Signed Sep 30, 2018
Floor votes · Senate Aug 29, 2018 · Assembly Aug 28, 2018
How they voted
35–0
Passed
Total votes 35
Aug 29, 2018
D
Democratic24
100% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
36
Key actions
10
Committee
10
Amendments
2
Sep 30, 2018
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 29, 2018
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (35-0)
senate
Aug 29, 2018
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 38. Noes 1. Page 5957.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 28, 2018
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-1-3)
assembly
Aug 28, 2018
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 27, 2018
Committee
Action rescinded whereby the bill was re-referred to Com. on PUB. S. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
upper
Aug 24, 2018
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Aug 23, 2018
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended.
lower
Aug 8, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 8).
lower
Jun 27, 2018
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 7, 2018
Lower · Passed
June 12 hearing postponed by committee.
lower
May 10, 2018
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
lower
Apr 30, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
upper
Apr 18, 2018
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 4719.) (April 18). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 22, 2018
Committee
Referred to Com. on EQ.
upper
Feb 12, 2018
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 13 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Robert M. Hertzberg
DDemocratic
Co
Al Muratsuchi
DDemocratic
Co
Autumn R. Burke
DDemocratic
Co
Cecilia Aguiar-Curry
DDemocratic
Co
David Chiu
DDemocratic
Co
Eduardo Garcia
DDemocratic
Co
Evan Low
DDemocratic
Co
Henry Stern
DDemocratic
Co
Jacqui Irwin
DDemocratic
Co
Jim Frazier
DDemocratic
Co
Phil Ting
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1054
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1054. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline