Photo of Tom Lackey
R California Assembly · District 34

Asm. Tom Lackey

Compare
Total votes
27,091
all sessions
Attendance
91%
2,122 missed
Lower than 96% of chamber peers
With party
97%
of cast votes
Near the chamber average
Bipartisan score
2%
crosses aisle rarely
Near the chamber average
Sponsored
2,638
bills & resolutions
Near the chamber average
Committees
11
assignments
2,638 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
2,638
Primary
235
Co-sponsor
2,403
This page
2,638
matching current filters
Primary AB 3213
In committee · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Alcoholic beverages: tied-house restrictions.

Existing law, the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act, which is administered by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, regulates the application, issuance, and suspension of alcoholic beverage licenses. Existing law, known as tied-house restrictions, generally prohibit a manufacturer, winegrower, manufacturer's agent, rectifier, California winegrower's agent, distiller, bottler, importer, and wholesaler, and any officer, director, or agent of any of those licensees, from giving or lending money or a thing of value to a person operating, owning, or maintaining premises where alcoholic beverages are sold. Existing law creates various exceptions to tied-house restrictions, including permitting a licensee, or their authorized agent or agents or representative or representatives, to perform services for off-sale licensees at or on the licensed premises of the off-sale retail licensee where the licensee sells alcoholic beverages with the retail licensee's permission including, among other things, stacking or arranging cases of the brand or brands of alcoholic beverages owned or sold by the licensee performing the service in the storeroom or warehouse where the off-sale retail licensee stores the brand or brands. This bill would make nonsubstantive changes to the provisions described above relating to the exception to tied-house restrictions for specified services performed by a licensee for off-sale licensees.

In committee Feb 17, 2024 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor SJR 11
In committee · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Relative to Armenian hostages.

This measure would call on the Biden Administration to urge Azerbaijan to immediately return all Armenian hostages, to impose Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act violations on Azerbaijan, to suspend all United States military and economic assistance to Azerbaijan, and to work with the international community to ensure the protection and preservation of Armenian cultural heritage sites. The measure would also support House Resolution 861, which calls on Azerbaijan to immediately release all prisoners of war and captured civilians.

In committee Feb 13, 2024 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SCR 94
Signed into law · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Relative to Data Privacy Week.

This measure would designate, in perpetuity, the 4th week of January as Data Privacy Week and the last Sunday of January as Data Privacy Day.

Signed into law Feb 13, 2024 1 co-sponsor
Primary AB 1435
Vetoed · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Department of the California Highway Patrol: officers: age limit.

Existing law establishes the maximum age limit for a person who may qualify for examination to the position of entry level peace officer of the Department of the California Highway Patrol at 35 years of age. This bill would, until January 1, 2027, raise that maximum age limit to 40 years.

Vetoed Feb 12, 2024 0 co-sponsors
Primary AB 1202
Vetoed · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Medi-Cal: health care services data: children and pregnant or postpartum persons.

Existing law establishes the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services and under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services through various health care delivery systems, including managed care pursuant to Medi-Cal managed care plan contracts. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid program provisions. Existing law establishes, until January 1, 2026, certain time or distance and appointment time standards for specified Medi-Cal managed care covered services, consistent with federal regulations relating to network adequacy standards, to ensure that those services are available and accessible to enrollees of Medi-Cal managed care plans in a timely manner, as specified. Existing law sets forth various limits on the number of miles or minutes from the enrollee's place of residence, depending on the type of service or specialty and, in some cases, on the county. This bill would require the department, no later than January 1, 2025, to prepare and submit a report to the Legislature that includes certain information, including an analysis of the adequacy of each Medi-Cal managed care plan's network for pediatric primary care, including the number and geographic distribution of providers and the plan's compliance with the above-described time or distance and appointment time standards. Under the bill, the report would also include data, disaggregated as specified, on the number of children and pregnant or postpartum persons who are Medi-Cal beneficiaries receiving certain health care services during the 2021–22, 2022–23, and 2023–24 fiscal years. The report would also include additional information regarding the department's efforts to improve access to pediatric preventive care, as specified. The bill would require that the report be made publicly available through its posting on the department's internet website. The bill would repeal these reporting provisions on January 1, 2029.

Vetoed Feb 12, 2024 0 co-sponsors
Primary AB 1368
Failed · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Sexual assault forensic evidence: testing.

Existing law requires law enforcement agencies to either submit sexual assault forensic evidence received on or after January 1, 2016, to a crime lab within 20 days after it is booked into evidence or to ensure that a rapid turnaround deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) program is in place, as specified. Existing law also requires a crime lab that receives sexual assault forensic evidence on or after January 1, 2016, to either process the evidence, create DNA profiles when able, and upload qualifying DNA profiles into the Combined DNA Index System, as specified, or transmit the sexual assault forensic evidence to another crime lab as soon as practically possible, but no later than 30 days after receiving the evidence, for processing of the evidence for the presence of DNA. This bill would require a law enforcement agency, for any sexual assault forensic evidence connected to a reported crime received by the law enforcement agency prior to January 1, 2016, to submit that evidence to the crime lab on or before January 31, 2025. The bill would additionally require a crime lab, for any sexual assault evidence kit received by a law enforcement agency prior to January 1, 2016, and submitted to the crime lab on or after January 1, 2024, to process that evidence kit no later than January 31, 2026. Because the bill would impose a higher level of service on local law enforcement agencies in processing that evidence, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.

Failed Feb 1, 2024 0 co-sponsors
Showing 611 to 620 of 2,638 bills
Previous 1 … 61 62 63 … 264 Next