Photo of Devon Mathis
R California Assembly · District 33

Asm. Devon Mathis

Contact Email
Compare
Total votes
23,116
all sessions
Attendance
85%
2,834 missed
Near the chamber average
With party
97%
of cast votes
Near the chamber average
Bipartisan score
2%
crosses aisle rarely
Near the chamber average
Sponsored
2,082
bills & resolutions
Higher than 76% of chamber peers
Committees
0
assignments
2,082 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
2,082
Primary
225
Co-sponsor
1,857
This page
2,082
matching current filters
Co-sponsor AB 1865
Vetoed · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Guide, signal, and service dogs: injury or death.

Under existing law, it is an infraction or a misdemeanor for any person to permit any dog that is owned, harbored, or controlled by him or her to cause injury to, or the death of, any guide, signal, or service dog, as defined, while the guide, signal, or service dog is in discharge of its duties. Existing law makes any person who intentionally causes injury to, or the death of, any guide, signal, or service dog, as defined, while the dog is in discharge of its duties, guilty of a misdemeanor. Under existing law, if a defendant is convicted of either of these crimes, the defendant is required to make restitution to the person with a disability who has custody or ownership of the dog for any veterinary bills and replacement costs of the dog if it is disabled or killed, or other reasonable costs deemed appropriate by the court. Existing law provides for the compensation of victims of certain crimes by the California Victim Compensation Board from the Restitution Fund, a continuously appropriated fund, for specified losses suffered as a result of those crimes. Existing law authorizes the person with a disability in either of the above crimes to apply for compensation by the board for veterinary bills and replacement costs if the dog is disabled or killed, or other reasonable costs, as specified, in an amount not to exceed $10,000. This bill would delete, from both crimes, the requirement that the guide, signal, or service dog be in discharge of its duties when the injury or death occurs and would make these crimes applicable to the injury or death of dogs that are enrolled in a training school or program for guide, signal, or service dogs, as specified. The bill would require the defendant, convicted of either crime, to also make restitution to the person for medical or medical-related expenses, or for loss of wages or income, incurred by the person as a direct result of the crime. The bill would authorize the disabled person to apply for compensation from the California Victim Compensation Board and would authorize the board to pay compensation for medical and medical-related expenses, and loss of wages or income incurred by the person with a disability as a direct result of a violation of those criminal provisions, in an amount not to exceed $10,000. By expanding the authorization for the use of moneys in the continuously appropriated Restitution Fund, this bill would make an appropriation. Because this bill would expand the scope and penalties of existing crimes, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 13955 of the Government Code proposed by Senate Bill 1494 to be operative only if this bill and SB 1494 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 13957 of the Government Code proposed by SB 1005, AB 900, and AB 1939 to be operative only if this bill and any or all of those bills are enacted and this bill is enacted last.

Vetoed Sep 27, 2018 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AB 1933
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund: recycling infrastructure projects.

The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 designates the State Air Resources Board as the state agency charged with monitoring and regulating sources of emissions of greenhouse gases. The act authorizes the state board to include the use of market-based compliance mechanisms. Existing law requires all moneys, except for fines and penalties, collected by the state board as a part of the market-based compliance mechanism to be deposited in the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund. Existing law requires the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, with additional moneys from the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund that may be appropriated to the department, to administer a grant program to provide financial assistance, in the form of grants, incentive payments, contracts, or other funding mechanisms, to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases by promoting the in-state development of infrastructure, food waste prevention, or other projects to reduce organic waste or to process organic and other recyclable materials into new value-added products. Existing law specifies eligible uses that qualify for in-state infrastructure projects or other projects that reduce emissions of greenhouse gases as part of these funding mechanisms. Existing law specifies eligible infrastructure projects that reduce emissions of greenhouse gases. This bill would additionally specify as an eligible use for in-state infrastructure projects or other projects that reduce emissions of greenhouse gases activities that expand and improve waste diversion and recycling, including the recovery of food for human consumption and food waste prevention. The bill would additionally specify that eligible infrastructure projects that reduce emissions of greenhouse gases include the expansion of facilities for the processing of recyclable materials and projects to improve the quality of recycled materials.

Signed into law Sep 27, 2018 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SB 1125
Vetoed · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Federally qualified health center and rural health clinic services.

Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid program provisions. Existing law provides that federally qualified health center (FQHC) services and rural health clinic (RHC) services, as defined, are covered benefits under the Medi-Cal program, to be reimbursed, to the extent that federal financial participation is obtained, to providers on a per-visit basis. "Visit" is defined as a face-to-face encounter between a patient of an FQHC or RHC and specified health care professionals, including a physician. Under existing law, "physician," for these purposes, includes, but is not limited to, a physician and surgeon, an osteopath, and a podiatrist. This bill would authorize reimbursement for a maximum of 2 visits taking place on the same day at a single location if after the first visit the patient suffers illness or injury requiring additional diagnosis or treatment, or if the patient has a medical visit and a mental health visit or a dental visit, as defined. The bill would authorize an FQHC or RHC that currently includes the cost of a medical visit and a mental health visit that take place on the same day at a single location as a single visit for purposes of establishing the FQHC's or RHC's rate to apply for an adjustment to its per-visit rate, and after the department has approved that rate adjustment, to bill a medical visit and a mental health visit that take place on the same day at a single location as separate visits, in accordance with the bill. Implementation of these provisions would be contingent upon an appropriation in the annual Budget Act and the availability of federal financial participation. This bill would also make an FQHC or RHC visit to a licensed acupuncturist reimbursable on a per-visit basis. The bill would require the department, by January 1, 2020, to submit a state plan amendment to the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to reflect certain changes described in the bill, and to seek necessary federal approvals. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 14132.100 of the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by AB 2428 to be operative only if this bill and AB 2428 are enacted and this bill is enacted last.

Vetoed Sep 27, 2018 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SB 1007
Signed into law · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Sales and use taxes: exemption: military and veteran medical facilities.

Existing state sales and use tax laws impose a tax on retailers measured by the gross receipts from the sale of tangible personal property sold at retail in this state, or on the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of tangible personal property purchased from a retailer for storage, use, or other consumption in this state. The Sales and Use Tax Law provides various exemptions from those taxes, including an exemption for the sale of, or the storage, use, or other consumption of, meals and food products that are furnished or served by any nonprofit veteran's organization for purposes of fundraising, as specified. This bill, on and after January 1, 2019, and before January 1, 2025, would exempt from these taxes the gross receipts from the sale of, and the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of, building materials and supplies purchased by a qualified person for use by that qualified person in the construction of specified military and veteran medical facilities. The Bradley-Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law authorizes cities and counties to impose local sales and use taxes in conformity with the Sales and Use Tax Law, and existing laws authorize districts, as specified, to impose transactions and use taxes in accordance with the Transactions and Use Tax Law, which generally conforms to the Sales and Use Tax Law. Amendments to the Sales and Use Tax Law are automatically incorporated into the local tax laws. Existing law requires the state to reimburse cities and counties for revenue losses caused by the enactment of sales and use tax exemptions. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding these provisions, no appropriation is made and the state shall not reimburse cities and counties for sales and use tax revenues lost by them pursuant to this bill. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.

Signed into law Sep 26, 2018 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SB 1109
Signed into law · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Controlled substances: Schedule II drugs: opioids.

(1) The Medical Practice Act provides for the licensure and regulation of physicians and surgeons by the Medical Board of California. Under that act, the board is required to adopt and administer standards for the continuing education of physicians and surgeons. Existing law requires a physician and surgeon to complete a mandatory continuing education course in the subjects of pain management and the treatment of terminally ill and dying patients. That act requires the board to give its highest priority to considering a course in pain management among its continuing education requirements for licensees, and requires the board to periodically develop and disseminate information and educational material on pain management techniques and procedures to licensees and general acute care hospitals. This bill would require, for physicians and surgeons licensed on or after January 1, 2019, the mandatory continuing education course to also include the subject of the risks of addiction associated with the use of Schedule II drugs. The bill would require the board to give its highest priority to considering a course in the risks of addiction associated with the use of Schedule II drugs among its continuing education requirements for physicians and surgeons and would require the board to periodically develop and disseminate information and educational material on the risks of addiction associated with the use of Schedule II drugs to physicians and surgeons and general acute care hospitals. (2) The Nursing Practice Act provides for the licensure and regulation of the practice of nursing by the Board of Registered Nursing and makes a violation of its provisions a crime. Existing law authorizes a certified nurse-midwife to furnish or order drugs or devices under specified circumstances, including board certification that the certified nurse-midwife has completed a course in pharmacology, as specified. This bill would require the pharmacology course to include the risks of addiction and neonatal abstinence syndrome associated with the use of opioids. Existing law also authorizes a nurse practitioner to furnish or order drugs or devices under specified circumstances, including board certification that the nurse practitioner has completed a course in pharmacology, as specified. Existing law requires nurse practitioners who are authorized to furnish Schedule II controlled substances to complete a mandatory continuing education course in Schedule II controlled substances. This bill would require the mandatory continuing education course to include the risks of addiction associated with their use. By expanding the scope of a crime under the Nursing Practice Act, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) The Physician Assistant Practice Act provides for licensure and regulation of physician assistants by the Physician Assistant Board and authorizes a physician assistant to perform medical services as set forth by regulations when those services are rendered under the supervision of a licensed physician and surgeon, as specified. The act prohibits a physician assistant from administering, providing, or issuing a drug order to a patient for Schedule II through Schedule V controlled substances without advance approval by a supervising physician and surgeon for that particular patient unless the physician assistant has completed an education course that meets specific standards. This bill would require that course to include the risks of addiction associated with the use of Schedule II controlled substances. (4) The Pharmacy Law provides for the licensure and regulation of pharmacists, pharmacy technicians, and pharmacies by the California State Board of Pharmacy. Existing law requires the board to promulgate regulations that require a standardized, patient-centered, prescription drug label on all prescription medicine dispensed to patients in California. The act makes a violation of its provisions a crime. This bill would require a pharmacy or practitioner dispensing an opioid to a patient for outpatient use to prominently display on the label or container a notice that warns of the risk of overdose and addiction, as specified. Because a violation of that requirement would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (5) The Dental Practice Act provides for the licensure and regulation of persons engaged in the practice of dentistry by the Dental Board of California, which is within the Department of Consumer Affairs. The act authorizes the board, as a condition of license renewal, to require licentiates to successfully complete a portion of required continuing education hours in specific areas, including patient care, health and safety, and law and ethics. This bill would include the risks of addiction associated with the use of Schedule II drugs in those specific areas of continuing education. (6) Existing law, the Osteopathic Act, establishes the Osteopathic Medical Board of California, which issues certificates to, and regulates, osteopathic physicians and surgeons. Existing law requires the board to require each licensed osteopathic physician and surgeon to complete a minimum of 100 hours of American Osteopathic Association continuing education hours during each 2-year cycle, of which 40 hours must be completed in American Osteopathic Association Category 1 continuing education hours as a condition for renewal of an active license. This bill would additionally require licensed osteopathic physician and surgeons to complete a course on the risks of addiction associated with the use of Schedule II drugs. (7) The Optometry Practice Act provides for the licensure and regulation of the practice of optometry by the State Board of Optometry. The act requires an optometrist certified to use therapeutic pharmaceutical agents to complete a total of 50 hours of continuing education every 2 years in order to renew his or her certificate. Existing law requires 35 of the 50 hours of continuing education to be on the diagnosis, treatment, and management of ocular disease in any combination of specified areas, including pain medication. This bill would expand the areas of continuing education to include risks of addiction associated with the use of Schedule II drugs. (8) The California Uniform Controlled Substances Act classifies opioids as Schedule II controlled substances and places restrictions on the prescription of those drugs, including prohibiting refills and specifying the requirements of a prescription for these drugs. The act makes a violation of its provisions a crime. This bill would require a prescriber to discuss specified information with the minor, the minor's parent or guardian, or other adult authorized to consent to the minor's medical treatment before directly dispensing or issuing for a minor the first prescription in a single course of treatment for a controlled substance containing an opioid. This bill would provide that a violation of these requirements is not a criminal offense. (9) Existing law requires a school district, charter school, or private school that elects to offer an athletic program to take specified actions if an athlete is suspected to have sustained a concussion and to obtain a signed concussion and head injury information sheet from the athlete and athlete's parent or guardian before the athlete initiates practice or competition. This bill would require a youth sports organization, as defined, that elects to offer an athletic program to annually give a specified Opioid Factsheet for Patients to each athlete, and would require each athlete and his or her parent to sign a document acknowledging receipt of that factsheet, as specified. (10) Existing law requires a youth sports organization, as defined, that elects to offer an athletic program to, among other things, annually give a concussion and head injury information sheet to each athlete and requires that the sheet be signed, as specified. This bill would also require a youth sports organization that elects to offer an athletic program to annually give a specified Opioid Factsheet for Patients to each athlete, and would require each athlete and his or her parent to sign a document verifying receipt of that factsheet, as specified. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 1645 of the Business and Professions Code proposed by SB 1491 to be operative only if this bill and SB 1491 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Signed into law Sep 22, 2018 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AB 3179
Vetoed · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
State agencies: bilingual services.

The Dymally-Alatorre Bilingual Services Act, among other things, generally requires every state agency, as defined, directly involved in certain activities involving contact with a substantial number of non-English-speaking people, and every local agency, as defined, serving a substantial number of non-English-speaking people, to employ a sufficient number of qualified bilingual persons in public contact positions. For specified provisions of the act, the act defines a "substantial number of non-English-speaking people" as members of a group who either do not speak English, or who are unable to effectively communicate in English because it is not their native language, and who comprise 5% or more of the people served by the statewide or any local office or facility of a state agency. This bill would modify the definition of "substantial number of non-English-speaking people" to reduce that percentage from 5% to 3%.

Vetoed Sep 22, 2018 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AB 1873
Vetoed · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Driver's licenses: veteran designation.

Existing law requires the Department of Motor Vehicles to issue a driver's license to an applicant when the department determines that the applicant is lawfully entitled to a license. Existing law allows an in-person applicant for a driver's license or identification card to request the word "VETERAN" be printed on the face of the driver's license or identification card, subject to certain requirements, including, among others, verification of veteran status, as specified, and payment of a $5 fee, which the department is authorized to increase by regulation, in an amount not to exceed $15, as specified. Commencing July 1, 2019, existing law prohibits a fee from being charged for that request if made by (1) a person who has been determined to have a current income level that meets the eligibility requirements for specified assistance programs, or (2) a person who can verify his or her status as a homeless person, in accordance with specified provisions. This bill would make those fee provisions inoperative on July 1, 2019, and repeal them on January 1, 2020, as specified, thereby authorizing an applicant whose veteran status has been verified, as prescribed, to make a veteran designation request, and requiring the department to make that designation on the applicant's driver's license or identification card, without additional charge. The bill also would make conforming changes. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 12811 of the Vehicle Code proposed by SB 987 to be operative only if this bill and SB 987 are enacted and this bill is enacted last.

Vetoed Sep 21, 2018 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SB 965
Signed into law · California Senate · Co-sponsor
California Cattle Council.

Existing law, the California Beef Council Law, establishes the California Beef Council, comprised of 20 members and 20 alternate members appointed by the Secretary of Food and Agriculture to perform various advisory and other duties relating to the California beef industry. The California Beef Council Law establishes a $1 fee per head on each sale of cattle and calves to administer the California Beef Council Law, and requires the fee to be collected from the seller by the operator of the stockyard, live auction market, slaughterhouse, or feedlot, or from the seller along with brand inspection fees by the Bureau of Livestock Identification. Existing law also provides that the fee from the sale of calves exempt from brand inspection that is not collected in the manner specified above is required to be collected from the seller by the purchaser, for payment to the secretary. This bill would instead require the fee from the sale of cattle or calves exempt from a brand inspection that is not collected from the seller in the manner specified above to be charged and collected from the seller in a manner determined by the Department of Food and Agriculture. This bill would also establish the California Cattle Council Law (the law) , for purposes that include to formulate and effectuate research relating to all types of California cattle production. The bill would create the California Cattle Council, which would be comprised of 11 members and 11 alternate members appointed by the secretary, as provided. The bill would provide for reimbursement of necessary traveling and other expenses incurred by council members in the performance of their duties. The bill would set forth the powers and duties of the council. The bill would provide for an assessment of $1 per head to be paid on each sale of cattle and calves to carry out the law's provisions. The bill would authorize the council to expend those funds for purposes of implementing the bill, thereby making an appropriation. The bill would require the secretary to conduct a referendum of producers on implementation of the law's provisions and would make operation of the law's provisions, except as specified, contingent upon approval of the referendum by a majority of producers who participate in the referendum, or, if an initial referendum fails, on approval of a 2nd referendum. If the law is approved, the bill would require the secretary, 5 years after approval, and each 5 years thereafter, to hold a public hearing to determine whether the operation of the law should be continued, and, if the secretary finds that a substantial question exists on that subject, to hold a reapproval referendum. The bill would also authorize the secretary to determine that it is no longer in the best interest of the state to continue the existence of the council and the programs established and maintained pursuant to the law, would require the secretary to call a vote of the producers to determine if the council should be terminated, and would provide for suspension of the law if a majority of producers do not vote in favor of continuing the law's operation. The bill would require any person who fails to pay, collect, or remit any fees due to be liable for administrative costs incurred by the department in enforcing these provisions. The bill would authorize the secretary, within 3 years from the date of discovery of the alleged violation, to hold a person who fails to pay, collect, or remit fees due civilly liable in an amount not to exceed $100 for each head of cattle or calves that is sold by the person. The bill would authorize a person to contest a determination of delinquent assessments or other violation and request an informal hearing presided over and conducted by a hearing officer designated by the department, as specified. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.

Signed into law Sep 14, 2018 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AB 1790
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Valley Fever Education, Early Diagnosis, and Treatment Act.

Existing law requires the State Department of Public Health to establish a list of reportable communicable and noncommunicable diseases and conditions and specify the timeliness requirements related to the reporting of each disease and condition. Existing law requires the department to develop information about various communicable diseases, including hepatitis C and meningococcal disease, and to make the information available to the public. Existing law also supports research into the development of a vaccine to protect against valley fever (coccidioidomycosis) . This bill would establish the Valley Fever Education, Early Diagnosis, and Treatment Act. This bill would, among other things, require the department to conduct a valley fever awareness campaign to communicate with local health jurisdictions, providers, and the public about valley fever, as described. The bill would authorize the department to award grants or enter into contracts to perform activities related to the awareness campaign, as specified. Those provisions would become inoperative on January 1, 2021.

Signed into law Sep 11, 2018 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SCR 148
Signed into law · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Relative to California Invasive Species Awareness Week.

This measure would declare June 2, 2018, to June 9, 2018, inclusive, as the California Invasive Species Awareness Week and would encourage all Californians to participate in activities that raise awareness of invasive species issues.

Signed into law Sep 11, 2018 1 co-sponsor
Showing 1,271 to 1,280 of 2,082 bills