MV
R California Assembly · District 29

Asm. Michael Villines

Compare
Total votes
8,395
all sessions
Attendance
90%
817 missed
Lower than 93% of chamber peers
With party
96%
of cast votes
Lower than 92% of chamber peers
Bipartisan score
2%
crosses aisle rarely
Higher than 90% of chamber peers
Sponsored
317
bills & resolutions
Higher than 88% of chamber peers
Committees
0
assignments
317 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
317
Primary
65
Co-sponsor
252
This page
317
matching current filters
Co-sponsor AB 867
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
California State University: Doctor of Nursing Practice degree pilot program.

Existing law establishes the California State University and its various campuses under the administration of the Trustees of the California State University. Existing law requires the California State University to offer undergraduate and graduate instruction through the master's degree in the liberal arts and sciences and professional education, including teacher education. This bill, until July 1, 2018, would authorize the California State University to establish a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree pilot program at 3 campuses chosen by the Board of Trustees to award the Doctor of Nursing Practice degree. The bill would distinguish the Doctor of Nursing Practice degree from the doctor of philosophy degree offered at the University of California. The bill would require the Doctor of Nursing Practice degree pilot program to be designed to enable professionals to earn the degree while working full time, train nurses for advanced practice, and prepare clinical faculty to teach in postsecondary nursing programs. The bill would require the California State University to enroll and maintain no more than 90 full-time equivalent students in the degree pilot program at all 3 campuses combined. The bill would require initial funding to come from existing budgets, without diminishing the quality of undergraduate programs or reducing enrollment therein. The bill would require the California State University, the Legislative Analyst's Office, and the Department of Finance to jointly conduct a statewide evaluation of the degree pilot program and report the results to the Legislature and the Governor on or before January 1, 2017.

Signed into law Sep 28, 2010 1 co-sponsor
Primary AB 1280
Signed into law · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Child abuse sentencing: child becoming comatose or suffering paralysis.

Existing law provides that any person who, having the care or custody of a child who is under 8 years of age, assaults the child by means of force that to a reasonable person would be likely to produce great bodily injury, resulting in the child's death, shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for 25 years to life. This bill would, in addition, make it a felony, punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for life with the possibility of parole, for a person, having the care or custody of a child who is under 8 years of age, to assault the child with force that to a reasonable person would be likely to produce great bodily injury, resulting in the child becoming comatose due to brain injury or suffering paralysis of a permanent nature, as specified. Because this bill would change the definition of a crime and increase the punishment for an existing crime, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would make its operation contingent on the enactment of AB 1844 of the 2009–10 Regular Session of the Legislature.

Signed into law Sep 27, 2010 0 co-sponsors
Primary AB 1708
Signed into law · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Insurance: surplus line brokers.

Existing law limits the ability of a surplus line broker to place any coverage with a nonadmitted insurer, as specified. In order for a nonadmitted insurer to qualify for coverage it must demonstrate financial stability, as defined. Existing law defines financial stability to include, but not be limited to, having a total of capital and surplus of at least $15,000,000 with the type of assets to be used in calculating capital and surplus being at least $15,000,000 in the form of cash, securities of a specified character, or in readily marketable securities, as defined. This bill would instead require the total capital and surplus requirement be at least $45,000,000 and the amount of assets to be used in calculating capital and surplus that consist of cash and those other specified types of securities to be at least $25,000,000. The bill would provide that if a nonadmitted insurer on the list of eligible surplus line insurers does not meet the capital and surplus requirements as of January 1, 2011, that insurer would be required to have at least $30,000,000 of capital and surplus as of December 31, 2011, and at least $45,000,000 of capital and surplus as of December 31, 2013. Existing law also defines financial stability, in the case of an Insurance Exchange created and authorized under the laws of individual states, as maintaining capital and surplus of not less than $50,000,000 in the aggregate, with the type of assets to be used in calculating capital and surplus being at least $15,000,000 in the form of cash, securities of a specified character, or in readily marketable securities. In the case of an Insurance Exchange that maintains funds for the protection of all Insurance Exchange policyholders, each individual syndicate seeking to accept surplus line placements of risks resident, located, or to be performed in this state are required to maintain minimum capital and surplus of not less than $6,400,000. Each individual syndicate is required to increase the capital and surplus required by $1,000,000 each year until it attains a capital and surplus of $15,000,000. In the case of Insurance Exchanges that do not maintain funds for the protection of all Insurance Exchange policyholders, each individual syndicate seeking to accept surplus line placement of risks resident, located, or to be performed in this state are required to meet the specified capital and surplus requirements applicable to nonadmitted insurers of at least $15,000,000 with the type of assets to be used in calculating capital and surplus being at least $15,000,000 of that in the form of cash, securities of a specified character, or in readily marketable securities. This bill would instead require the amount of assets to be used in calculating capital and surplus to be at least $25,000,000 in the form of cash, securities of a specified character, or in readily marketable securities. The bill would repeal the minimum capital and surplus requirement formula for an individual syndicate with regard to an Insurance Exchange that maintains funds for the protection of all Insurance Exchange policyholders, and would instead require each syndicate to maintain capital and surplus of not less than $45,000,000. The bill would also raise the capital and surplus requirements regarding each syndicate of Insurance Exchanges that do not maintain funds for the protection of all Insurance Exchange policyholders to $45,000,000. The bill would make conforming changes. The bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 1765.1 of the Insurance Code, proposed by AB 1837 of the 2009–10 Regular Session, to be operative only if both bills are chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2011, and this bill is chaptered last.

Signed into law Sep 27, 2010 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor AB 2098
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Riverside County Transportation Commission: transportation projects: contracts.

Existing law, until January 1, 2014, allows certain state and local transportation entities, if authorized by the California Transportation Commission, to use a design‑build process for contracting on transportation projects, as specified. This bill would authorize the Riverside County Transportation Commission, if authorized by the commission, to utilize this design-build procurement process for the State Route 91 Corridor Improvements Project on the state highway system. The bill would make the Department of Transportation responsible for the performance of construction inspection services for the project, as specified, and would require the commission to report on the progress of the project and related matters to specified legislative committees. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Signed into law Sep 24, 2010 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AB 1860
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Alcoholic beverages: places of consumption.

Existing law generally prohibits the sale or consumption of alcoholic beverages at a public schoolhouse or any grounds thereof. Existing law provides that this prohibition does not apply if the alcoholic beverage is possessed, consumed, or sold, pursuant to a license, for an event during the weekend or at other times when pupils are not on the grounds of an overnight retreat facility owned and operated by a county office of education in a county of the 18th or 20th class. This bill would expand the exception to the prohibition to allow the possession, consumption, or sale of alcoholic beverages at such a retreat facility that is owned or operated by a county office of education in a county of any class or by a school district. This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 25608 of the Business and Professions Code proposed by AB 1643 and AB 1748, to be operative only if AB 1643 and this bill, AB 1748 and this bill, or AB 1643, AB 1748, and this bill are enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2011, as specified. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Signed into law Sep 24, 2010 1 co-sponsor
Primary ACR 164
Signed into law · California Assembly · Lead sponsor
Relative to the Deputy Sheriff Joel B. Wahlenmaier Memorial Highway.

This measure would designate a specified portion of State Highway Route 168 in Fresno County as the Deputy Sheriff Joel B. Wahlenmaier Memorial Highway. The measure would also request the Department of Transportation to determine the cost of appropriate signs showing this special designation and, upon receiving donations from nonstate sources covering those costs, to erect those signs.

Signed into law Sep 14, 2010 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor ACR 152
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Vehicles: automotive aftermarket: National Car Care Month.

This measure would recognize the contributions of the automotive aftermarket to the state and consumers and its efforts to educate the motoring public about the benefits of proper vehicle maintenance. The measure also would recognize and support the designation of April as National Car Care Month and encourage all citizens to participate in activities that promote proper vehicle maintenance.

Signed into law Sep 14, 2010 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor ACR 173
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Relative to Native Plant Week.

This measure would proclaim the 3rd week of April, each year, as California Native Plant Week and would encourage community groups, schools, and citizens to undertake appropriate activities to promote the conservation, restoration, and appreciation of California's native plants.

Signed into law Sep 14, 2010 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AB 1844
Signed into law · California Assembly · Co-sponsor
Sex offenders: punishment: parole.

Under existing law, an assault with the intent to commit mayhem, rape, sodomy, oral copulation, or with the intent to commit, by force, rape, spousal rape, or sexual penetration in concert with another, is punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for 2, 4, or 6 years, except as specified. This bill would provide that an assault of a person under 18 years of age with the intent to commit rape, sodomy, oral copulation, or with the intent to commit, by force, rape, spousal rape, or sexual penetration in concert with another, would be punishable by imprisonment in state prison for 5, 7, or 9 years. Under existing law, any person who deprives or violates the personal liberty of another with the intent to effect or maintain a felony violation of specified sex crimes, extortion, or to obtain forced labor or services, is guilty of human trafficking. Existing law provides that a violation of this provision where the victim of the trafficking was under 18 years of age at the time of the commission of the offense is punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for 4, 6, or 8 years. This bill would provide that any person who commits human trafficking involving a commercial sex act where the victim of the human trafficking was under 18 years of age at the time of the commission of the offense shall be punished in addition by a fine of not more than $100,000, to be used as specified. Under existing law, rape, sodomy accomplished against the victim's will, oral copulation accomplished against the victim's will, and sexual penetration accomplished against the victim's will is punishable by imprisonment in state prison for 3, 6, or 8 years. Rape, sodomy, and oral copulation committed in concert with another is punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for 5, 7, or 9 years. This bill would provide that the punishment for these specified crimes upon a child who is under 14 years of age is punishable by imprisonment in state prison for 9, 11, or 13 years, and if committed upon a minor who is 14 years of age or older is punishable by imprisonment in state prison for 7, 9, or 11 years. This bill would provide that if these crimes are committed in concert with another person upon a child who is under 14 years of age they are punishable in state prison for 10, 12, or 14 years and if committed in concert upon a minor who is 14 years of age or older by imprisonment for 7, 9, or 11 years. By increasing the punishment for crimes, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Under existing law, a person who commits an act of rape, rape or sexual penetration in concert, sodomy, oral copulation, or sexual penetration, when the act is committed upon a child who is under 14 years of age and 7 or more years younger than the person, is guilty of aggravated sexual assault of a child. Aggravated sexual assault of a child under these circumstances is punishable by imprisonment in state prison for 15 years to life. This bill would provide that it does not preclude prosecution under this existing law. Under existing law, a person who commits any lewd or lascivious act upon a child who is under 14 years of age by use of force or fear is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment in state prison for 3, 6, or 8 years. This bill would increase the punishment for this crime to imprisonment in the state prison for 5, 8, or 10 years. By increasing the punishment for a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Under existing law, a person who commits any lewd or lascivious act upon a dependent person, as defined, by use of force or fear is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment in state prison for 3, 6, or 8 years. This bill would increase the punishment for this crime to imprisonment in the state prison for 5, 8, or 10 years. By increasing the punishment for a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law, as amended by Proposition 83 of the November 7, 2006, statewide general election, requires a person convicted of certain felonies under specified circumstances to be committed to prison for a term of years to life. This bill would provide that these felonies committed under the above-specified circumstances upon a victim who is a child under 14 years of age shall be punished by imprisonment in state prison for life without the possibility of parole if the offender is 18 years of age or older or 25 years to life if the offender is under 18 years of age. This bill would add as a circumstance the infliction of bodily harm, as defined, on a victim who is a child under 14 years of age to the list of specified circumstances that would result in this imprisonment. This bill would provide that when rape, spousal rape, rape in concert, or sexual penetration, sodomy, or oral copulation committed against the victim's will are committed under 2 of a specified list of circumstances, upon a minor 14 years of age or older, the punishment shall be imprisonment in state prison for life without the possibility of parole if the offender is 18 years of age or older or 25 years to life if the offender is under 18 years of age, or for 25 years to life if committed under one of the specified circumstances. Under existing law, a person convicted of certain felony sex offenses shall be committed to prison for a term of 15 years to life if during the commission of the felony the defendant inflicted great bodily injury on the victim. This bill would provide that any person who is convicted of certain sex offenses under specified circumstances, upon a victim who is a child under 14 years of age, shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for 25 years to life. The bill would provide a life term of imprisonment for any person convicted of a lewd or lascivious act where he or she inflicted bodily harm. Existing law makes it unlawful for a person who is required to register as a sex offender to reside within 2,000 feet of a public or private school, or park where children regularly gather. Existing law also provides that any person required to register as a sex offender who comes into any school building or upon any school ground without lawful business and written permission is guilty of a misdemeanor. This bill would make it a misdemeanor for a person who is on parole for specified sex offenses to enter any park where children regularly gather without express permission from the person's parole agent. Under existing law, a prisoner is generally released on parole for a period not exceeding 3 years, except that inmates sentenced for certain enumerated violent felonies are released on parole for a period not exceeding 5 years. Under existing law, the period of parole for an inmate who has received a life sentence for certain specified sex offenses is for a period not exceeding 10 years. This bill would require lifetime parole for habitual sex offenders, persons convicted of kidnapping a child under 14 years of age with the intent to commit a specified sexual offense, and persons convicted of other specified sex crimes, including, among others, aggravated sexual assault of a child. The bill would, unless a longer period of parole applies, impose a 10-year parole period on inmates sentenced for kidnapping with the intent to commit specified sex offenses, specified lewd or lascivious acts, and other specified sexual offenses. The bill would impose a 20-year parole period on inmates convicted and required to register as sex offenders for rape, sodomy, lewd or lascivious acts, continuous sexual abuse of a child, and other specified sex crimes, in which one or more of the victims of the offense was a child under 14 years of age, as specified. Existing law provides that petty theft is a misdemeanor, except that every person who, having been convicted of petty theft, grand theft, auto theft, burglary, carjacking, robbery, or receiving stolen property and having served time in a penal institution therefor, is subsequently convicted of petty theft, is punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or in the state prison. This bill would require that most persons be convicted 3 or more times of a qualifying offense to be subject to imprisonment in the state prison for petty theft. Persons required to register as sex offenders, or with a prior serious or violent felony conviction, who have been convicted and imprisoned for the commission of specified crimes, including, among others, petty theft, auto theft, burglary, carjacking, or robbery, would remain subject to imprisonment in the state prison with one prior qualifying offense. Existing law provides that the sex offender risk assessment tool for use with selected populations shall be known as the State-Authorized Risk Assessment Tool for Sex Offenders (SARATSO) . Existing law provides that the SARATSO for adult males required to register as sex offenders shall be the STATIC-99 risk assessment scale. Existing law requires the SARATSO Review Committee to determine whether the STATIC-99 should be supplemented with an actuarial instrument that measures dynamic risk factors or whether it should be replaced with a different risk assessment tool. This bill would provide that the STATIC-99 shall be the SARATSO static tool for adult males. The bill would require the SARATSO Review Committee, on or before January 1, 2012, to select an actuarial instrument that measures dynamic risk factors and an actuarial instrument that measures risk of future sexual violence to be administered as specified. The bill would provide that persons who administer the dynamic SARATSO and the future violence SARATSO shall be trained, as specified. The bill would make other conforming changes. Existing law provides that with respect to a person who has been convicted of specified sex crimes, the Department of Justice shall make available to the public via the department's Internet Web site certain identifying and criminal history information. This bill would require the department to also make available the person's static SARATSO score and information on an elevated risk level based on the SARATSO future violence tool. Existing law requires that persons convicted of certain sex crimes be evaluated by the county probation department and requires that if a defendant is granted probation, the court shall order the defendant to be placed in an appropriate treatment program designed to deal with child molestation or sexual offenders, if an appropriate program is available in the county. This bill would remove the requirement that the defendant be placed in an appropriate treatment program but would instead impose specified conditions, including participation in an approved sex offender management program, on persons released on formal supervised probation for an offense requiring registration as a sex offender, as specified. By imposing additional requirements on county probation departments, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would similarly require participation in an approved sex offender management program, as a condition of parole, for persons released on parole for an offense that requires registration as a sex offender, as specified. Existing law requires that, as a condition of parole, prisoners who meet specified criteria be treated by the State Department of Mental Health. Existing law requires that prior to release on parole, these prisoners be evaluated, as specified. Existing law provides that only if both independent professionals who evaluate the prisoner, as required, concur with the chief psychiatrist's certification shall treatment by the department be required. This bill would instead make these provisions applicable to the prisoner if at least one of the independent professionals concurs with the chief psychiatrist's certification. Under the Personal Income Tax Law, individual taxpayers are allowed to contribute amounts in excess of their tax liability for the support of specified funds or accounts, including, among others, the California Sexual Violence Victim Services Fund. Existing law provides for the appearance of this fund on the tax return form until January 1, 2011, unless a later enacted statute deletes or extends that date. This bill would delete the January 1, 2011, repeal date. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 290.06 of the Penal Code proposed by SB 1201 contingent on the prior enactment of that bill. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Signed into law Sep 9, 2010 1 co-sponsor
Showing 41 to 50 of 317 bills
Previous 1 … 4 5 6 … 32 Next