Rep. Cesar Aguilar

Maddy summaryHB 2212 requires court approval for contracts involving unemancipated minors performing artistic or creative services (such as acting, music, or writing) in Arizona, effective January 1, 2026. It mandates that employers set aside 15% of a minor’s gross earnings into a trust account, with a parent or guardian typically serving as trustee, and requires annual financial accounting. The bill directly affects minors in entertainment careers, their parents/guardians (as fiduciaries), and employers hiring them for artistic roles. Key provisions include employer deposit deadlines (15 business days), trust oversight responsibilities, and court authority to modify trust terms upon request. This policy change ensures earnings from artistic work are protected in a trust, separate from other family finances.

Maddy summaryHB 2466 clarifies that candidate committees in Arizona may legally use campaign funds to cover direct caregiving expenses for a candidate’s child or other dependent they personally care for, such as childcare costs. This specifically affects candidates with caregiving responsibilities who use committee funds for these essential needs. The bill amends Arizona’s campaign finance law (ARS § 16-921) to explicitly list caregiver expenses as an exempt expenditure, aligning with existing rules. The legislature states this is a clarifying change, not a substantive policy shift. It does not expand exemptions beyond this specific provision.

Maddy summaryHB 2356 regulates contracts for private companies to operate Arizona's adult correctional facilities. It requires private contractors to demonstrate experience, offer cost savings compared to state-operated facilities, and provide services meeting or exceeding state quality standards across 10 specific areas (like security, health services, and inmate programs). The bill mandates biennial service comparisons and five-year cost reviews to ensure private contracts deliver equivalent or better value, and allows the state to cancel contracts after the first year with 90 days' notice. It also prohibits contractors from handling inmate release decisions or disciplinary actions and removes sovereign immunity for contractors in legal disputes.

Maddy summaryHB 2355 sets an end date for Arizona's Board of Massage Therapy, terminating the board on July 1, 2035. The bill also specifies that related laws (Title 32, Chapter 42 and this section) will be repealed on January 1, 2036. This directly affects licensed massage therapists and the board itself, as it ends the board's authority to regulate the profession after 2035. The legislation is procedural, not creating new rules, but formally ending the board's existence with a clear sunset date. The bill applies retroactively from July 1, 2025, for administrative purposes.

Maddy summaryHB 2294 amends Arizona law to allow outpatient treatment centers sharing ownership with a hospital and staffed by licensed providers to avoid state licensure, provided they do not charge a "facility fee." A facility fee is defined as any separate charge beyond professional fees for building costs, electronic records, billing, or administrative expenses. Centers must notify the health department of their exemption status, but the exemption does not apply if they keep patients overnight, provide abortion services, or offer pain management. This directly affects outpatient treatment centers seeking to operate without full licensure under these specific conditions.

Maddy summaryHB 2351 modifies Arizona health boards' public website disclosures for professional complaints and disciplinary actions. It prohibits dismissed complaints and nondisciplinary actions (like letters of concern) from appearing on public websites, while requiring disciplinary records to remain online for up to five years. The bill mandates that health boards display a notice on their websites directing the public to request additional records - such as dismissed complaints or nondisciplinary actions - directly from the board, in compliance with public records laws.

Maddy summaryHB 2283 limits price increases for essential goods and services during declared emergencies in Arizona. It prohibits businesses from raising prices more than 10% above pre-emergency levels for building materials, food, emergency supplies, gasoline, medical items, repair services, hotel rooms, or transportation services during a state/local emergency and for 30 days after. Sellers may justify higher prices if directly tied to increased costs from suppliers or labor, but must provide proof. Violations carry civil penalties up to $10,000 per incident and allow affected consumers to seek triple damages plus legal fees.

Maddy summaryHB 2497 establishes a study committee to examine health insurance costs for Arizona school district employees and their dependents. The committee, composed of appointed members including health insurance representatives, school district officials, teachers, and school board members, will analyze current insurance plans and costs. It must recommend affordable ways to maintain high-quality health coverage for educators and their families. The committee must submit its findings and recommendations to state leaders by November 1, 2026, and will be dissolved after October 31, 2027.

Maddy summaryHB 2460 amends Arizona's children's health insurance program (CHIP) eligibility rules by adjusting income thresholds for children under 19. It sets the following income limits relative to the federal poverty level: 200% for 1999-2023, 225% (with CMS approval) for 2023-2025, and 300% starting October 1, 2025. The bill directly affects low-income Arizona families with children under 19 whose household income meets these revised thresholds. It does not change program benefits or structure, only the income eligibility percentages. The amendment is part of defining program terms in Arizona Revised Statutes Section 36-2981.

Maddy summaryHB 2538 prohibits Arizona landlords from discriminating against tenants based on their income source, such as government benefits (e.g., Section 8 vouchers, Social Security, veterans' benefits) or private assistance. It requires landlords to count rent vouchers or subsidies toward income requirements when evaluating tenants and bans them from refusing rentals, evicting, or charging more because of a tenant’s income source. The law also prevents landlords from advertising preferences against tenants using such assistance. Violations are treated as unlawful under existing housing laws, with enforcement by the attorney general. This directly affects renters using public assistance and landlords managing rental properties.