Maddy summaryHB 2634 establishes a study committee to examine health insurance costs for Arizona educators and their families. The committee, composed of representatives from school districts, teachers' organizations, health insurers, and school boards, will analyze current insurance plans and costs for both school districts and employees. It must recommend affordable ways to provide high-quality health coverage for educators and their dependents, then submit a report to state leaders by November 2027. The committee will dissolve on October 31, 2028. This is a procedural bill focused on research, not immediate policy changes.
Rep. Cesar Aguilar
Sponsored bills
Maddy summaryHB 2581 establishes a state-run health care claims consumer assistance program within Arizona's Department of Insurance to help individuals enrolled in or seeking health insurance plans. The program assists consumers with filing complaints, appeals, and resolving disputed claims against health insurers. Key provisions require insurers to pay double the amount of any wrongfully denied or underpaid claim (including attorney fees) and face civil penalties of at least $25,000 per violation for repeated denials. Insurers must report denial data to the department, and the department must publish annual public reports detailing claim denials, wrongful denials, and enforcement actions by insurer.
Maddy summaryArizona's HB 2466 requires most Arizona employers to provide employees with specific break and pay protections. It mandates a 30-minute unpaid meal break after 5 hours of work (and an additional break after 12 hours), a paid 10-minute rest break every 4 hours, and extra pay rates: 1.5 times the regular wage for hours worked beyond 8 but not exceeding 12 in a day or for the first 8 hours on the seventh consecutive workday, and double the regular wage for hours beyond 12 in a day or beyond 8 hours on the seventh consecutive workday. The law applies to employers with annual sales of $100,000 or more or those engaged in interstate commerce, aligning with federal labor standards. This directly affects hourly workers and employers across Arizona who fall under these thresholds.
Maddy summaryHB 2468 authorizes placing a Rotary International peace pole monument in a designated area of Arizona's governmental mall. The bill requires Rotary International to cover all costs for fundraising, design, and construction - state funds cannot be used, and the government cannot facilitate fundraising. It also specifies the monument authorization expires on September 30, 2029. This is a procedural bill focused on monument placement with clear funding restrictions and a sunset date.
Maddy summaryHB 2649 repeals Section 1-219 of Arizona Revised Statutes, which previously defined certain rights and privileges related to unborn children. The bill removes this specific statutory language from Arizona law but does not create new rights or alter existing legal protections for individuals. This is a procedural change to the state code, directly affecting the legal text of the repealed statute. The bill does not impose new requirements or change how laws apply to people.
Maddy summaryHB 2684 requires Arizona employers to implement heat and cold safety programs for workers. For heat (80°F+), it mandates written plans covering hydration (1 quart of water per hour), 10-minute cool-down breaks every 2 hours (more frequently during extreme heat), thermometer monitoring, shade access, and acclimatization for new workers. For cold (60°F-), it requires similar written programs with warm areas, cold-prevention training, and reduced exposure schedules. The bill directly affects all Arizona employers with indoor or outdoor workplaces, including construction, agriculture, and vehicle-based jobs (requiring vehicle AC below 80°F).
Maddy summaryHB 2299 requires Arizona businesses to include all mandatory fees in advertised prices and clearly explain refund processes on receipts. It prohibits digital shelf labels (like remote-updating price tags) and limits price increases to 10% during a governor-declared state of emergency. Businesses violating these rules face civil penalties up to $5,000, with the Attorney General empowered to enforce compliance. The law directly affects retailers and service providers selling goods or services in Arizona, focusing on transparent pricing and preventing sudden cost hikes during emergencies.
Maddy summaryHB 2475 prohibits Arizona law enforcement officers from wearing face coverings that conceal their face while on duty, directly affecting all police departments, sheriff's offices, and state law enforcement agencies. It requires each agency to create and publicly post a policy restricting face coverings to specific exceptions: active undercover work (with authorization), tactical operations requiring protective gear, or special weapons teams during active duties. The bill explicitly excludes clear masks, medical masks, safety gear for hazardous conditions, and motorcycle helmets from the prohibition. This law aims to increase officer visibility and public trust during routine interactions.
Maddy summaryHB 2645 prohibits price gouging on "essential off-patent or generic drugs" in Arizona, which are defined as common, non-patented medications meeting specific criteria (e.g., expired patents, listed by WHO or HHS as essential for serious conditions). It directly affects drug manufacturers and distributors, requiring them to justify price increases of 50% or more within a year - triggered if costs exceed $80 for a 30-day supply or full treatment - by submitting detailed cost breakdowns to the Attorney General. The law allows the Attorney General to investigate, demand corrective actions (like refunding consumers), and impose civil penalties up to $10,000 per violation. It specifically targets drugs used in Arizona’s state medical assistance program (Medicaid), aiming to prevent unjustified price hikes that limit patient access.
Maddy summaryHB 2712 requires Arizona courts to create public reports for every eviction case where a landlord wins. The reports must include the location (city/county), the reason for the eviction, and be made publicly accessible. This bill directly affects courts (which must compile the reports) and the public (which gains access to this data). It does not change eviction laws or tenant/landlord rights, only adding a reporting requirement for eviction judgments.