Rep. Matthew M. Rosendale, Sr.

Maddy summaryHR 1891 sets a strict funding cap of $3,209,000 for the Office of the Law Revision Counsel within the U.S. House of Representatives for fiscal year 2024. This bill directly limits the available funds for the office's operations, salaries, and expenses, overriding any other funding provisions that might allow higher spending. The key mechanism is a hard spending ceiling that must be adhered to by the House's budget process. It does not affect other House offices or external entities, focusing solely on this specific internal legislative support office.

Maddy summaryHR 1890 sets a spending cap of $2,026,000 for the Office of the Parliamentarian in the U.S. House of Representatives for fiscal year 2024. This bill directly affects the office's budget by limiting its available funds for salaries and operations during that fiscal year. The provision prevents the office from exceeding this specific amount, regardless of other funding authorizations. It is a procedural budgetary measure with no broader policy changes.

Maddy summaryThis bill sets a funding cap of $1,502,000 for the House of Representatives' Office of General Counsel during fiscal year 2024. It directly affects the internal operations of this specific House office by restricting its budget authority. The key provision is a strict limit on available funds, preventing the office from exceeding this amount for salaries and expenses. As a procedural budget restriction, it does not change laws or impact constituents.

Maddy summaryHR 1888 sets a spending limit for the House of Representatives' Office of Inspector General (OIG) for fiscal year 2024. It prohibits the OIG from using more than $5,019,000 for its salaries and expenses during that year, overriding any other funding provisions. This bill directly affects the OIG's budget, restricting its available funds to the specified maximum amount. The provision is a straightforward fiscal constraint with no additional mechanisms or broader policy changes.

This bill specifies that no FY2024 funding is authorized to be appropriated or made available for salaries and expenses of the House Office of the Whistleblower Ombudsman.

This bill specifies that no FY2024 funding is authorized to be appropriated or made available for salaries and expenses of the House Office of Diversity and Inclusion.

Maddy summaryHR 1885 caps funding for the House of Representatives' administrative operations by limiting the Office of the Chief Administrative Officer's budget to $148,058,000 for fiscal year 2024. This bill directly affects the House's internal administrative functions by restricting available funds for salaries and expenses. The key provision is a statutory spending limit that overrides other funding authorizations, ensuring the office cannot exceed this specific dollar amount.

Maddy summaryThis bill sets a $18.773 million spending cap for the House of Representatives' Salaries and Expenses account specifically for the Office of the Sergeant at Arms during fiscal year 2024. It directly affects the Sergeant at Arms' office by limiting its available funding to this exact amount, regardless of other funding authorizations. The provision is a procedural budget constraint that prevents the office from exceeding this ceiling for its operations and personnel costs. This is a straightforward fiscal limit with no additional policy provisions or changes to the office's responsibilities.

Maddy summaryThis procedural bill sets a spending cap of $28,305,000 for the House of Representatives' Salaries and Expenses of the Office of the Clerk during fiscal year 2024. It directly affects the internal budget of the Clerk's office, which handles administrative and record-keeping functions for the House. The bill explicitly limits available funds for this specific office without altering broader legislative processes or public policy. (Procedural bill summary per user guidelines.)

Maddy summaryThis bill sets a strict funding limit for the House Appropriations Committee in fiscal year 2024, capping its available funds at $23,112,971. It directly affects the committee's budget operations by preventing any spending above this amount. As a procedural measure, it does not alter policy or impact constituents, but rather establishes a specific financial constraint on the committee's resources for the fiscal year.