Rep. Elijah Crane

This bill allows creditors to consider an applicant’s immigration status for certain purposes when assessing an application for an extension of credit. In particular, considering an applicant’s U.S. immigration status for the purpose of determining the creditor's rights and remedies applicable to the particular extension of credit does not constitute discrimination.

Maddy summaryHR 6813 blocks the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from finalizing, implementing, or enforcing a specific proposed rule about air emissions reporting. The bill directly targets the EPA Administrator, preventing action on the "Revisions to the Air Emissions Reporting Requirements" rule published in the Federal Register on August 9, 2023. This bill does not change current reporting rules but stops the EPA from moving forward with this particular revision. The key mechanism is a direct prohibition on the EPA's regulatory actions regarding this specific rule.

Maddy summaryThe Defense of Property Rights Act (HR 6758) would allow property owners to seek compensation in either U.S. District Court or the U.S. Court of Federal Claims when government actions - such as regulations or physical takings - deprive them of property rights without "just compensation." It repeals a law that previously forced owners to choose between courts, clarifies that "just compensation" includes full market value and business losses (with interest), and shifts the burden of proof to the government to justify regulatory actions. The bill directly affects individuals and businesses owning real estate, water rights, mineral rights, or other property protected under the Fifth Amendment, particularly when government rules significantly restrict property use or value. It sets a 6-year statute of limitations for claims and requires courts to award attorney fees to successful plaintiffs.

Maddy summaryHR 6753, the PLCAA Federal Jurisdiction Act, amends the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act to allow gun manufacturers, sellers, and trade associations to move certain lawsuits from state courts to federal courts. Specifically, if these defendants claim a case falls under the PLCAA's protections against liability for gun-related injuries, they can request the case be removed to federal district court. The federal court would then determine if the case qualifies under PLCAA and dismiss it if it does. This change directly affects gun industry defendants by shifting jurisdiction for these specific lawsuits to federal courts.

Maddy summaryHR 6734 prohibits the use of federal funds to finalize, implement, or enforce the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives' (ATF) proposed rule (2022R-17) defining "engaged in the business as a dealer in firearms." This bill directly affects the ATF by blocking funding for this specific regulatory rule, which was proposed in August 2023. The legislation does not create new requirements but prevents federal resources from being used to advance this particular ATF regulation.

Maddy summaryHR 357, the Ensuring Accountability in Agency Rulemaking Act, requires federal agencies to have rules signed by Senate-confirmed appointees (or senior appointees for initiation), aiming to increase oversight of regulatory decisions. It directly affects all federal agencies creating rules under standard procedures (covered by 5 U.S.C. § 553), ensuring higher-level accountability for rulemaking. Exceptions exist only if an agency head certifies that compliance would impede public safety/security, with required notifications to the OIRA Administrator and Federal Register publication. The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) will monitor agency compliance with these requirements.

Maddy summaryThis bill restricts warrantless surveillance of U.S. persons by amending the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. It limits who can conduct queries of U.S. person data (capping at five personnel per FBI field office), prohibits using such queries for law enforcement without proper authorization, and requires documentation of all queries. The bill creates exceptions for emergencies, consent, and cybersecurity, but prohibits using metadata results to access protected communications. It also limits how information acquired under Section 702 can be used in criminal proceedings, requiring specific approvals for such use.

Maddy summaryThis bill bans federal funding for at-home COVID-19 tests manufactured in China, imported from China, or produced by Chinese subsidiaries. It directly affects government programs purchasing these tests, such as public health initiatives or emergency response efforts. The key provision prohibits all federal spending on such tests to prevent taxpayer dollars from supporting Chinese-manufactured products. The policy change is limited to specific test origins and does not alter broader public health funding rules.

Maddy summaryHR 6573, the Protecting Military Servicemembers' Data Act of 2023, prohibits data brokers from selling, reselling, or sharing military servicemember lists to "covered nations" (as defined in federal law). It directly affects military members by preventing their personal information - contained in specialized lists created for compiling military service details - from being sold to specific foreign governments. The key mechanism bans the commercial transfer of these lists, with enforcement handled by the Federal Trade Commission and state attorneys general. The law takes effect within one year of enactment or when the FTC issues final rules, whichever comes first. This is a concrete policy change targeting data brokers' practices, not a procedural measure.

Maddy summaryThis bill prohibits all federal funding for institutions of higher education with endowment funds totaling $5 billion or more on the enactment date, affecting wealthy universities regardless of name. Exceptions allow funding for research or projects directly tied to "critical national functions," such as border security or national defense. The law uses definitions from the Higher Education Act to calculate endowments (aggregating all funds at an institution) and defines "critical national functions" based on specific security or border control needs. It applies broadly to any qualifying institution, not exclusively to the Ivy League. The prohibition takes effect 60 days after the bill becomes law.