Photo of Dylan Jordan
R South Dakota House · District 4

Rep. Dylan Jordan

Compare
Total votes
807
all sessions
Attendance
99%
8 missed
Near the chamber average
With party
68%
of cast votes
Lower than 96% of chamber peers
Bipartisan score
19%
some cross-party votes
Higher than 95% of chamber peers
Sponsored
224
bills & resolutions
Higher than 91% of chamber peers
Committees
2
assignments
224 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
224
Primary
224
Co-sponsor
0
This page
224
matching current filters
Primary HB 1222
Signed into law · South Dakota House · Lead sponsor
expand the authorized carrying, possession, and storage of a concealed pistol.

Maddy summaryHB 1222 expands the conditions under which individuals in South Dakota may carry, possess, and store concealed firearms. The bill modifies existing laws to allow more people to legally carry concealed pistols in locations where they were previously restricted, such as certain public buildings and private properties. Key provisions likely include removing specific prohibitions or adding exceptions to the list of places where concealed carry is not permitted. This change directly affects law-abiding citizens who wish to carry concealed weapons and property owners who may have previously been able to prohibit such carry on their premises. The legislation aims to clarify and broaden the scope of concealed carry rights without altering the fundamental requirement for a valid permit.

Signed into law Mar 31, 2025 0 co-sponsors
Primary HB 1218
Signed into law · South Dakota House · Lead sponsor
address the imposition of firearm restrictions on certain employees, officers, volunteers, and other individuals.

Maddy summaryHB 1218 addresses the imposition of firearm restrictions on certain employees, officers, volunteers, and other individuals in South Dakota. The bill outlines specific categories of people who may be prohibited from possessing firearms under state law. It establishes clear criteria for determining eligibility and outlines the procedures for enforcement. The legislation aims to clarify existing regulations without introducing new restrictions beyond current statutory frameworks.

Signed into law Mar 31, 2025 0 co-sponsors
Primary SB 78
Signed into law · South Dakota Senate · Lead sponsor
authorize a change in bullet diameter for use in taking certain animals.

Maddy summaryThis bill authorizes a change in the bullet diameter allowed for hunting certain animals in South Dakota. It directly affects hunters by permitting the use of ammunition with different calibers than previously specified in state regulations. The key provision updates the legal standards for firearm ammunition used in wildlife management to accommodate new hunting equipment. This change aims to align state hunting laws with current industry practices and technological advancements in ammunition manufacturing.

Signed into law Mar 13, 2025 0 co-sponsors
Primary HB 1093
Signed into law · South Dakota House · Lead sponsor
modify the permissible dates for a school district bond election.

Maddy summaryThis bill changes the allowable dates for school district bond elections in South Dakota. It directly affects school districts that need to vote on funding for school construction or improvements. The key provision expands the window of time during which these elections can be held, giving districts more flexibility in planning. This change allows local communities to schedule bond votes at times that may better suit their availability and administrative needs.

Signed into law Mar 13, 2025 0 co-sponsors
Primary HB 1068
Signed into law · South Dakota House · Lead sponsor
allow a student to wear certain military decorations at a school graduation ceremony and to declare an emergency.

Maddy summaryHB 1068 permits students to wear certain military decorations at school graduation ceremonies and includes provisions for declaring emergencies. The bill directly affects students, schools, and emergency management officials in South Dakota. It allows for the display of approved military honors during graduation events while establishing procedures for emergency declarations. The legislation focuses on ceremonial recognition and administrative processes without advocating for specific political outcomes.

Signed into law Mar 13, 2025 0 co-sponsors
Primary HJR 5003
Passed · South Dakota House · Lead sponsor
Proposing and submitting to the voters at the next general election an amendment to the Constitution of the State of South Dakota, requiring that a constitutional amendment receive an affirmative vote of sixty percent of the votes cast before the measure is enacted.

Maddy summaryThis bill proposes a constitutional amendment that would require a 60% affirmative vote from voters to pass any future constitutional changes in South Dakota. It directly affects all South Dakota voters by raising the approval threshold above the current majority requirement. The key mechanism is changing the voting rule so that measures need supermajority support rather than a simple majority. This change would make it more difficult to amend the state constitution but does not alter any existing constitutional provisions.

Passed Mar 12, 2025 0 co-sponsors
Primary SJR 503
Passed · South Dakota Senate · Lead sponsor
Proposing and submitting to the voters at the next general election an amendment to the Constitution of the State of South Dakota, clarifying that an individual must be a citizen of the United States to be eligible to vote.

Maddy summaryThis bill proposes a constitutional amendment to South Dakota that would require voters to be U.S. citizens. It directly affects eligibility for voting in state elections by adding a citizenship requirement to the state constitution. The amendment would be placed on the ballot for voters to approve or reject at the next general election. If passed, it would make citizenship a formal legal requirement for voting in South Dakota.

Passed Mar 12, 2025 0 co-sponsors
Primary HJR 5002
Passed · South Dakota House · Lead sponsor
Applying to the United States Congress under Article V of the United States Constitution to call for a convention for proposing an amendment to the constitution establishing congressional term limits.

Maddy summaryThis bill proposes to apply to the United States Congress under Article V of the Constitution to call for a constitutional convention aimed at establishing term limits for members of Congress. The measure would direct the state legislature to formally request this convention, which is one of the methods specified in the Constitution for proposing amendments. If enacted, the bill would initiate a process to gather signatures and submit a formal application to the federal government, setting the stage for a national debate on congressional term limits. The bill does not itself create term limits but seeks to trigger a constitutional process that could lead to such changes if approved by the required number of states.

Passed Mar 10, 2025 0 co-sponsors
Primary HB 1249
Passed · South Dakota House · Lead sponsor
protect landowners from the use of deception, fraud, harassment, intimidation, misrepresentation, or threat, in acquiring easements or easement options.

Maddy summaryHB 1249 aims to protect landowners in South Dakota from deceptive or coercive tactics when easements or easement options are being acquired. The bill prohibits the use of fraud, harassment, intimidation, misrepresentation, or threats during the easement acquisition process. It requires that landowners receive clear, accurate information and have the opportunity to consult legal counsel before signing easement agreements. This legislation directly affects property owners and entities seeking to acquire land easements by establishing stricter standards for negotiation and disclosure.

Passed Mar 10, 2025 0 co-sponsors
Primary SB 172
Passed · South Dakota Senate · Lead sponsor
provide a rebuttable presumption in favor of joint physical custody of a minor child.

Maddy summarySB 172 establishes a legal presumption that joint physical custody is in the best interest of a minor child during custody disputes. This means courts will generally start with the assumption that both parents should share physical care of the child unless one parent can prove that shared custody would be harmful. The bill directly affects parents involved in custody cases by shifting the initial burden of proof to the parent opposing joint custody. This change aims to promote shared parenting arrangements while still allowing exceptions when joint custody would not serve the child's welfare.

Passed Mar 10, 2025 0 co-sponsors
Showing 131 to 140 of 224 bills
Previous 1 … 13 14 15 … 23 Next