Issue · Environment

Environment

Every environment bill, vote, and legislator stance in Oklahoma, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
6
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Brenda Stanley
88% support rate
Top opponent
Dusty Deevers
19% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving environment in Oklahoma

Legislators moving environment in Oklahoma
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Brenda Stanley
Brenda Stanley Senate · District 42
R
Strong +
88% 62
Darcy Jech
Darcy Jech Senate · District 26
R
Strong +
87% 65
Lonnie Paxton
Lonnie Paxton Senate · District 23
R
Strong +
86% 53
Aaron Reinhardt
Aaron Reinhardt Senate · District 37
R
Strong +
85% 65
Avery Frix
Avery Frix Senate · District 9
R
Strong +
84% 77
Dusty Deevers
Dusty Deevers Senate · District 32
R
Strong −
19% 69
Rick West
Rick West House · District 3
R
Strong −
20% 91
Jim Shaw
Jim Shaw House · District 32
R
Strong −
20% 76
Tom Gann
Tom Gann House · District 8
R
Oppose
21% 69
Lisa Standridge
Lisa Standridge Senate · District 15
R
Oppose
22% 61
Showing 6 of 6 bills

All environment bills

failed · Oklahoma · Senate May 14, 2026

SB 2: Wind energy; providing setback requirements for certain affected counties; waiver; referral of question to eligible voters; zoning; construction; exemptions; database.

SB 2 establishes new setback requirements for wind energy facilities in Oklahoma, effective November 1, 2025. It requires wind turbines to be at least one-quarter nautical mile from homes and neighboring property (previously 1.5 miles from schools/hospitals), and mandates that projects near military installations must obtain a Federal Aviation Administration "Determination of No Hazard" and resolve Department of Defense impacts before construction. Developers who fail to comply face daily penalties of up to $1,500 per violation. The bill directly affects wind energy developers, landowners, and communities near proposed sites, with specific rules for military compatibility and dispute resolution.
signed · Oklahoma · House May 12, 2026

HB 4428: Public finance; terms; Board of Trustees; votes; proxy proposal; pecuniary factors; exception; report; publish; effective date.

HB 4428 requires Oklahoma's pension benefit plans (like state retirement funds) to vote on shareholder proposals solely based on financial impact, banning consideration of environmental, social, or political goals. It mandates that pension boards base all voting decisions on "pecuniary factors" (financial risk/return) to maximize shareholder value, and prohibits proxy advisors from providing recommendations that include non-financial considerations. Boards must annually report all votes, including their decision, management's stance, and any proxy advisor's recommendation, publishing the report online by March 1 each year. The law applies to all state pension systems and takes effect November 1, 2026.
signed · Oklahoma · Senate May 6, 2026

SB 1976: Oil and gas; authorizing certain operators to make voluntary election. Emergency.

This bill changes Oklahoma's requirements for oil and gas operators to provide financial guarantees (surety) for well plugging and environmental compliance. It phases out "Category A" surety (based on $50,000 net worth) for new operators starting November 2025, while current operators may keep it but can voluntarily switch to "Category B" surety (like letters of credit or bonds). Category B amounts scale with the number of wells operated, starting at $25,000 for 1-10 wells (rising to $50,000 by 2028) and higher for larger operations, with a maximum of $150,000. Operators with fines or poor compliance records must use Category B, and the Commission can require higher amounts based on performance.
signed · Oklahoma · Senate Apr 22, 2026

SB 1439: Oil and gas; prohibiting covered civil liability actions. Effective date.

SB 1439 blocks lawsuits against fossil fuel companies (including producers, sellers, and trade associations) that claim climate change or greenhouse gas emissions caused harm when their products functioned as designed. The bill prohibits any civil action seeking relief related to climate change, alleged climate effects, or emissions - covering common claims like fraud or failure to warn - but excludes cases involving violations of environmental or worker protection laws. It applies to all fossil fuels (oil, natural gas, coal, etc.) and requires courts to dismiss ongoing climate-related lawsuits immediately upon the bill's effective date. This law creates a new legal barrier for climate change litigation while preserving access to courts for environmental law enforcement.
passed · Oklahoma · Senate Apr 14, 2026

SB 1928: Water and water rights; prohibiting certain groundwater use; authorizing certain groundwater permit; removing certain meter use requirement; authorizing certain allocation; developing certain voluntary groundwater use measurement program; requiring certain certification; clarifying certain application. Effective date.

SB 1928 modifies Oklahoma's water rights law by removing mandatory metering requirements for most wells while introducing a new five-year flexible groundwater allocation system. It applies to existing and new groundwater permit holders in designated basins, requiring annual usage reports and fees to maintain their allocation. The bill allows permit holders to temporarily exceed their annual usage limit by up to 200% in any single year, as long as their total usage over five years stays within the basin's overall limit. Domestic wells are explicitly excluded from these provisions. The changes take effect January 1, 2027.
in committee · Oklahoma · Senate Mar 12, 2026

SB 1471: Municipal powers; authorizing certain fee related to solid waste management systems. Effective date.

SB 1471 authorizes Oklahoma cities and towns to levy targeted fees on retail delivery, single-use products, and plastic containers to fund solid waste management. These fees must be narrowly tailored to actual waste generation costs and can be charged per transaction or delivery. Revenue from these fees is restricted to specific waste management uses, including collection, recycling, litter cleanup, public education, and reducing environmental harm from waste. The bill also modifies plastic container labeling rules to clarify that local governments cannot broadly restrict plastic use, but may implement narrowly focused waste-reduction fees.