Criminal Justice (Courts)

in committee · Oklahoma · Senate Feb 4, 2025

SB 899: Protection from Domestic Abuse Act; modifying provisions related to protective orders. Effective date.

SB 899 modifies Oklahoma's Protection from Domestic Abuse Act by requiring non-family victims (e.g., neighbors or coworkers) to file a police report with law enforcement before submitting a protective order petition to court. It also allows electronic service of orders across county lines and mandates courts to consider a defendant's criminal history when issuing orders. The bill changes penalty rules for violating protective orders but maintains existing provisions allowing courts to waive fees for victims who cannot afford them. These changes directly affect individuals seeking protection from domestic abuse who are not family members or in dating relationships with the abuser.

Topics ✗ Criminal JusticeOpposes Criminal JusticeRequires police report for non-family domestic abuse victims before filing protective orders, creating barrier to court access and weakening victim protection within criminal justice framework.85% confidence

Sub-Topics Courts Domestic Violence Law Enforcement

Track

in committee · Oklahoma · Senate Feb 3, 2026

SB 1321: Searches and seizures; prohibiting certain court orders; providing exceptions; requiring notice; specifying factors for determining punitive damages. Effective date.

SB 1321 prohibits Oklahoma government entities from seeking or using "reverse-keyword" court orders (requiring disclosure of people who searched specific terms online) or "reverse-location" court orders (requiring location data of unspecified devices). It also bans government requests for such data without a court order, with strict penalties for violations. Individuals whose data is improperly collected can sue for $1,000 per violation or actual damages, plus punitive damages based on factors like the number of people affected and whether constitutional rights were targeted. The bill makes illegally obtained data inadmissible in court and allows victims to recover attorney fees. It takes effect November 1, 2026.

Topics ✓ Criminal JusticeSupports Criminal JusticeProhibits government data requests without court orders, protects privacy rights, and enables civil suits - aligns with criminal justice reform principles of limiting overreach and safeguarding civil liberties.95% confidence ✓ TechnologySupports TechnologyProhibits government surveillance of online searches/location data, strengthens privacy protections with civil remedies for violations.95% confidence

Sub-Topics Courts Tags Civil Liberties

Track

died · Oklahoma · House Feb 5, 2025

HB 1109: Truancy; prohibiting detention for failure to attend school; waiver of certain fines; requiring written notice for certain absences; requiring school districts to create and adopt progressive truancy intervention plans; prohibiting suspension; permitting report of absences to court under certain circumstances; effective date; emergency.

HB 1109 prohibits detaining students for school absences and bans suspensions for truancy. It requires school districts to create progressive intervention plans (with three tiers) and send written notices to families for absences, replacing punitive measures. The bill also limits court involvement by allowing reports of absences only under specific circumstances and prevents placing students in institutional facilities solely for truancy. These changes directly affect students, schools, and juvenile courts in Oklahoma, shifting focus from punishment to support systems for attendance issues.

Topics ✓ Criminal JusticeSupports Criminal JusticeProhibits truancy detention/suspension, replaces punitive measures with intervention plans, reducing criminalization of student absences and limiting court involvement in non-criminal matters.95% confidence ✓ EducationSupports EducationReplaces punitive truancy measures (detention, suspension) with supportive intervention plans, enhancing student access and engagement in K-12 education.95% confidence

Sub-Topics Courts Juvenile Justice

Track

in committee · Oklahoma · Senate Feb 4, 2025

SB 973: Debt collection; prohibiting certain contract with private debt collectors. Effective date.

SB 973 prohibits Oklahoma courts and state entities from contracting with private debt collectors to collect criminal fines, fees, costs, or restitution owed by individuals. This directly affects courts, state agencies handling collections, and private debt collection companies that previously managed these payments. The bill’s key provision, added to Oklahoma law, bans such contracts without altering existing court cost structures for criminal cases. It repeals related sections of law (19 O.S. §§ 514.4-514.5) that governed court cost compliance programs. The law aims to keep collection of criminal justice debts within public systems, not private contractors.

Topics ✓ Criminal JusticeSupports Criminal JusticeBans private debt collectors for criminal fines, reducing exploitation of vulnerable defendants and preventing debt cycles that increase recidivism.90% confidence

Sub-Topics Courts Victims' Rights

Track

in committee · Oklahoma · House Feb 4, 2025

HB 1913: Criminal procedure; prohibiting reverse-location or reverse-keyword court orders; codification; effective date.

HB 1913 prohibits Oklahoma state government entities from seeking or obtaining location or search history data through "reverse-location" or "reverse-keyword" court orders or requests. It bans government agencies from issuing such orders, requiring courts to reject them, and making any data collected this way inadmissible in court. Individuals affected can receive written notice of violations and sue for $1,000 per violation, plus attorney fees, with punitive damages possible for repeated or targeted violations. The law applies to all Oklahoma state and local government actions and takes effect November 1, 2025.

Topics ✓ Criminal JusticeSupports Criminal JusticeProhibits government data collection via reverse-location orders, protecting civil rights and privacy in criminal justice procedures.95% confidence ✓ TechnologySupports TechnologyProhibits government access to location/search data via reverse orders, strengthening data privacy protections.95% confidence

Sub-Topics Courts

Track

in committee · Oklahoma · Senate Feb 4, 2025

SB 154: Restitution; requiring court to prioritize order for restitution to victims. Effective date.

SB 154 requires Oklahoma courts to prioritize ordering restitution payments to crime victims when sentencing defendants convicted of crimes (excluding death penalty cases). The bill amends sentencing guidelines to explicitly state that courts "shall prioritize an order for payments of restitution to the victim to the extent feasible" before considering other sentencing options like community service or fines. It directly affects courts, victims seeking compensation, and defendants required to pay restitution. The key change is a procedural shift in sentencing priorities, ensuring restitution is addressed early in the process without altering existing restitution rates or amounts.

Topics ✓ Criminal JusticeSupports Criminal JusticeRequires courts to prioritize victim restitution payments in sentencing, aligning with victim protection and criminal justice reform principles.90% confidence

Sub-Topics Courts Sentencing Victims' Rights

Track

in committee · Oklahoma · House Feb 4, 2025

HB 2058: Protective orders and fees; clarifying those authorized to seek relief under the Protection from Domestic Abuse Act; effective date.

HB 2058 clarifies who can seek protective orders under Oklahoma's Protection from Domestic Abuse Act, expanding eligibility to include victims of domestic abuse, stalking, harassment, rape, and other specified crimes, as well as minors or adults acting on behalf of household members. The bill prohibits charging filing fees, service fees, or attorney fees to the person seeking a protective order, regardless of whether the order is granted. It also adds provisions allowing courts to order defendants to make no contact with animals owned by the household and to issue emergency protective orders without requiring prior criminal complaints for certain victims. The bill modifies court fee structures for defendants convicted of crimes but focuses primarily on removing financial barriers for victims seeking protection.

Topics ✓ Criminal JusticeSupports Criminal JusticeRemoves financial barriers for victims seeking protective orders, expands eligibility to include abuse survivors, and ensures access to justice under criminal justice system - aligns with victim protection and access reform indicators.90% confidence

Sub-Topics Courts Domestic Violence

Track

in committee · Oklahoma · Senate Feb 4, 2025

SB 1055: Expungement of records; providing automatic expungements for certain misdemeanor convictions. Effective date.

SB 1055 automatically seals criminal records for certain misdemeanor convictions in Oklahoma after specific waiting periods. It applies to individuals convicted of nonviolent misdemeanors with no subsequent felony convictions, requiring at least 5-10 years to pass since conviction or sentence completion, depending on the offense. The bill creates a "clean slate" process where eligible cases are automatically sealed three years after the law takes effect (subject to funding), without needing court petitions. It excludes violent offenses, sex offenses, and cases involving pending charges. This policy change directly affects Oklahomans with qualifying misdemeanor histories seeking to clear their records.

Topics ✓ Criminal JusticeSupports Criminal JusticeAutomatically seals nonviolent misdemeanor records, enabling 'clean slate' access to employment/housing, reducing recidivism barriers per reform goals.95% confidence

Sub-Topics Courts

Track

died · Oklahoma · House Feb 12, 2025

HB 2016: Evidence; artificial intelligence expert testimony; effective date.

HB 2016 amends Oklahoma evidence law to establish specific standards for admitting and challenging artificial intelligence system outputs as testimony in court. It requires the party introducing AI-generated evidence (the "proponent") to demonstrate it meets four criteria: it helps the court understand evidence, uses reliable data, applies sound methods, and reflects consistent reliability. The bill also treats AI outputs similarly to human hearsay statements, allowing parties to challenge their accuracy using evidence like inconsistent prior outputs. This law applies directly to courts, lawyers, and parties in legal cases using AI systems, effective November 1, 2025.

Topics ✓ Criminal JusticeSupports Criminal JusticeEstablishes reliable standards for AI evidence in court, ensuring fairness and protecting defendant rights by requiring demonstrable reliability and preventing misuse of AI outputs in criminal proceedings.85% confidence

Sub-Topics Courts Tags Artificial Intelligence

Track

in committee · Oklahoma · Senate Feb 4, 2025

SB 967: Criminal procedure; requiring certain pretrial release hearing; modifying certain bail procedures. Effective date.

SB 967 requires Oklahoma courts to hold a pretrial release hearing immediately after an arrest for most charges. It mandates that defendants receive specific rights at this hearing, including the right to consult with counsel, review evidence, and present their own evidence. The bill shifts bail decisions toward non-monetary conditions (like supervision or electronic monitoring) unless the court finds no such conditions can ensure court appearance or community safety, and creates a presumption of inability to pay bond for those receiving government assistance. Additionally, it requires courts to provide defendants with written and oral notice of court dates, along with phone/text reminders the business day before hearings. This bill directly affects defendants facing pretrial detention decisions in Oklahoma courts.

Topics ✓ Criminal JusticeSupports Criminal JusticeMandates pretrial rights, shifts bail to non-monetary conditions, reduces cash bail reliance - aligns with criminal justice reform goals of protecting defendant rights and reducing incarceration.95% confidence

Sub-Topics Courts

Track