SB 684 creates a 25% tax credit for North Carolina corporations that make charitable donations of at least $1,000 to permanent funds held by qualifying community foundations. The credit, capped at $50,000 per corporation annually and limited to a total $12.5 million statewide each year, directly affects corporations making qualifying donations and community foundations meeting specific criteria (like serving local communities and having community-led governance). The bill requires foundations to maintain permanent funds for community development and mandates annual reporting on the program’s impact. The tax credit expires for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2029.
HB 544 creates a 40% state tax credit for businesses that spend at least $10 million rehabilitating eligible historic corporate campuses in North Carolina. To qualify, properties must be certified historic sites (listed on the National Register and locally designated), formerly served as corporate headquarters, occupy at least 20 acres, have an 80% vacancy rate for two years, and meet preservation requirements. The credit applies to rehabilitation costs incurred on or after January 1, 2026, and is tied to federal credit eligibility. This policy directly affects businesses planning major renovations of qualifying historic corporate properties.
HB 554 makes technical adjustments to North Carolina's tax code to align with federal rules and expand tax parity for peer-to-peer car rentals. It modifies how S corporation losses are deducted, restricts certain net operating loss deductions (like capital gains carryforwards), and updates estate/trust tax calculations. The bill specifically adds peer-to-peer car rental services to the alternate highway use tax, requiring them to pay the same tax as traditional rental companies. These changes affect individual taxpayers, S corporations, estates, trusts, and peer-to-peer car rental businesses, with most provisions effective for tax years beginning in 2025.
HB 630 restores a sales tax refund program for North Carolina's public school districts. It allows local school administrative units to receive annual refunds for sales tax paid on direct purchases of tangible property and services (like supplies or equipment), excluding items such as electricity, telecom, or food. The refund amount is capped at $13.3 million per year for all districts combined. The bill takes effect July 1, 2025, and adjusts state funding to reflect the restored refund program.
SB 584 authorizes counties to use specific sales tax revenue to fund local public transportation systems - including buses, light rail, bike lanes, and transit facilities - while requiring these funds to supplement (not replace) existing transportation budgets. It defines "public transportation system" broadly to include infrastructure like bus lanes, shared-ride services, and integrated fare systems. The bill also creates a new metropolitan public transportation authority for counties with over 1 million residents that border another state and operate light rail systems, giving them regional planning powers under specific rules. This authority would manage funding and coordination for transportation projects within its jurisdiction.
SB 233, titled "Make Corporations Pay What They Owe," would repeal a specific provision (Section 42.2) from a 2021 law (S.L. 2021-180) that was phasing out North Carolina's corporate income tax. This bill does not create new taxes but stops the planned reduction of corporate tax rates, meaning corporations would continue paying the current rate instead of a lower rate scheduled to take effect. It directly affects corporations subject to North Carolina's corporate income tax, as the repeal prevents the phaseout from proceeding. The bill is purely procedural, with no additional provisions or mechanisms beyond this repeal.
SB 695, titled "Incent Development Finance District Funding," was introduced in 2025 but withdrawn from committee on April 28, 2025, without advancing further. The bill's title suggests it aimed to establish incentives for funding Development Finance Districts (DFDs), which are designated areas where local governments use special tax mechanisms to finance public improvements. However, no specific policy provisions or affected entities are described in the provided context, as the bill was withdrawn before committee action. Since it did not pass committee or receive a full legislative vote, no concrete policy changes were enacted.
HB 348 extends the period for carrying forward deferred property taxes on agricultural, horticultural, and forest land from three to six years. It creates local grant programs for counties and cities, using the excess tax funds generated by this change, to provide financial support to qualifying farmers for farm sustainability. The bill also requires cities to obtain county commission approval before annexing land classified under present-use value taxation. These provisions directly affect farmers who qualify for present-use value property taxation and local governments managing tax funds and annexation decisions.
