Maddy summaryS 1983 would eliminate the requirement for advanced practice nurses (APNs) in New Jersey to practice under physician collaboration or supervision, allowing them to provide care independently. This directly affects APNs - over 75% of whom specialize in primary care - and aims to improve healthcare access in underserved communities, including areas with physician shortages and among racial/ethnic minorities, low-income populations, and those facing transportation barriers. The bill cites that 24 states and the District of Columbia already permit full practice authority for APNs, and during pandemic waivers (Executive Order 112), no adverse incidents occurred while APNs practiced without restrictions. It states removing these barriers could reduce healthcare access disparities by over 38 percent, aligning New Jersey with other states to address chronic shortages in primary care services.
Sponsored bills
Maddy summaryThis bill clarifies New Jersey's tax rules for telecommunications companies that held regional landline monopolies before the 1996 Telecommunications Act. It specifies that these companies (or their successors) must pay business personal property taxes on their equipment located in municipalities, but only need to have met a 51% local access requirement as of April 1, 1997 - not annually. The bill also requires winning municipalities in tax disputes to be awarded attorney fees from the telecom company. This addresses ongoing legal costs for municipalities after a 2012 court case misinterpreted the 1997 tax law.
Maddy summaryThis bill amends New Jersey's school bus safety laws to authorize using school bus monitoring systems for enforcement. It changes penalties for drivers who illegally pass stopped school buses: violations captured by these systems will result in only a $250 civil penalty (instead of potential fines or jail time), with funds directed to municipalities and school districts for safety programs. The law applies to buses transporting children or individuals with developmental disabilities when stopped to load/unload. It does not create new monitoring systems but specifies how existing systems can be used to enforce stop laws through civil penalties.
Maddy summaryS 304 would expand Medicare coverage to all New Jersey residents, regardless of age, health, or disability, by requiring the state to seek a federal waiver to replace current health programs like Medicaid with a unified New Jersey Medicare program. The bill mandates that the state apply to CMS for necessary waivers, with CMS adjusting costs and premiums based on existing Medicare and Medicaid payments. It also prohibits private insurers from offering duplicate coverage for services already provided by Medicare to ensure full participation in the new system. This would provide comprehensive health coverage to all New Jersey residents meeting the 30-day domicile requirement, including those currently uninsured or facing restrictive private insurance plans.
Maddy summaryThis bill requires New Jersey domestic violence protection orders (TROs) and related victim notices to be available in multiple languages, not just English. Specifically, it mandates that court notices and temporary restraining order templates be prepared in English, Spanish, and up to 10 additional high-demand languages spoken in the state. The Administrative Office of the Courts must create these multilingual materials to ensure victims with limited English proficiency can understand their rights and legal options. This directly affects domestic violence victims who speak languages other than English, improving access to critical legal protections.
Maddy summaryThis New Jersey bill (A-1475, now P.L.2023, c.230) requires courts to consider "coercive control" when deciding domestic violence restraining orders. Coercive control is defined as patterns of behavior that unreasonably interfere with a person’s freedom, including isolating victims from support, depriving them of basics, controlling finances, or using threats (like those based on immigration status). The bill adds this factor to the list courts must evaluate alongside other considerations like past abuse and immediate danger. It directly affects domestic violence victims and courts handling restraining order cases by ensuring non-physical control tactics are formally addressed.