Sen. Mallory McMorrow

Maddy summarySB 385 amends Michigan's Administrative Procedures Act to exclude specific environmental cleanup standards from the definition of a "rule." It adds a new exclusion (item t) for "cleanup criteria and target detection limits" developed by the Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy under environmental protection laws. This means these standards will not be subject to formal rule-making procedures like public hearings or comment periods. The bill directly affects how the environmental agency establishes and implements cleanup standards for contaminated sites.

Maddy summarySB 287 amends Michigan law to protect the validity of marriages performed by certain officials (like county clerks, judges, or authorized religious leaders) even if the officiant later lacks full authority. It ensures such marriages aren’t voided if both people believed they were legally married at the time. This directly affects couples who married under these circumstances, preventing future legal challenges based on officiant authority. The bill is contingent on companion bill SB 285 also passing, as noted in the enacting section.

Maddy summarySB 286 amends Michigan's marriage licensing law (1887 PA 128) to clarify requirements for obtaining marriage licenses and for officiants. It specifies that all couples, including non-residents, must obtain a license from the county clerk where the marriage will occur, and requires officiants to properly complete marriage certificates with all required details. The bill increases penalties for officiants who perform marriages without a valid license, raising the fine from $100 to $500 or up to 90 days in jail. This bill is contingent on the passage of companion bill SB 285 and passed the Senate on June 10, 2025.

Maddy summarySB 285 amends Michigan law to allow state legislators to officiate weddings, adding them to the list of authorized marriage officiants alongside judges, mayors, and religious ministers. This change directly affects couples marrying in Michigan by expanding their options for who can perform the ceremony. The bill does not alter existing fee structures for mayors or county clerks, which remain tied to local government budgets. The change requires approval of companion bill SB 286 to take effect.

Maddy summarySB 392 amends Michigan's Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act to require cleanup of contaminated sites to meet residential and safe drinking water standards, unless technically infeasible. It directly affects property owners, developers, and environmental remediation companies responsible for cleaning up hazardous substance releases at contaminated sites. The bill mandates that cleanup efforts must restore affected aquifers to drinking water standards where possible, stop contamination spread, and comply with state/federal environmental laws. Exceptions allowing less stringent cleanup are only permitted if the Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy documents technical infeasibility and confirms the alternative approach still protects public health and the environment. This bill updates existing cleanup standards (sections 20118, 20120a, and related sections) to strengthen residential and water quality protections.

Maddy summarySB 391 updates Michigan's environmental cleanup rules by establishing clearer standards for determining natural background levels of hazardous substances in soil. It defines "background concentration" as naturally occurring levels in soil, allowing property owners to demonstrate contamination is not due to human activity using specific soil surveys or studies. The bill directly affects developers, property owners, and environmental agencies involved in site cleanups by reducing unnecessary cleanup requirements when contamination matches natural background levels. Key provisions include adding new definitions (like "background concentration" and "baseline environmental assessment") and revising cleanup criteria to align with state soil surveys, making it easier to distinguish natural soil levels from pollution requiring remediation.

Maddy summaryThis Senate Resolution (SR 54) designates June 2025 as "Gun Violence Awareness Month" to honor victims of gun violence, including references to tragedies like Michigan State University and Oxford High School. It encourages citizens to participate in the "Wear Orange" movement - symbolizing the national gun violence prevention effort - and supports community efforts to prevent gun violence. As a commemorative resolution, it has no legal effect and does not create new policies or directly affect specific groups. The resolution was introduced and adopted by the Senate on June 3, 2025.

Maddy summarySB 343, the "Reporting of Law Enforcement Officer Misconduct Privacy Act," protects the privacy of people who file complaints about police misconduct. It requires law enforcement agencies, prosecutors, and others handling such complaints to keep the complainant's identity confidential unless the person requests disclosure, gives written permission, or disclosure is required by court order, criminal proceedings, or internal investigations. The law prohibits unauthorized disclosure of identifying information and imposes a $500 civil fine for violations. It directly affects individuals reporting misconduct and all entities receiving or investigating such complaints.

Maddy summarySB 337 amends Michigan's penal code to prohibit law enforcement officers from tampering with evidence or intimidating witnesses. It specifically bans altering, destroying, or concealing body-worn camera footage, and prevents officers from retaliating against people who report crimes or from influencing witness statements. Violations can result in misdemeanor or felony charges, with penalties including up to 10 years in prison for serious offenses involving threats or violence. The law directly affects law enforcement officers by imposing new criminal penalties for misconduct related to evidence handling and witness protection.

Maddy summarySB 342 amends Michigan's 2006 law on law enforcement disclosures by clarifying the definition of "involuntary statement." It specifies that a statement by a law enforcement officer is *not* considered involuntary if the officer knowingly and intentionally provided false or misleading information about a material fact. This change directly affects how courts evaluate police testimony regarding material facts, ensuring intentional falsehoods are excluded from the "involuntary statement" exception. The bill modifies Section 1 of 2006 PA 563 (MCL 15.391), with no new requirements or penalties added.