Rep. Penelope Tsernoglou

Maddy summaryThis bill's title incorrectly references water supply, but the actual text amends Michigan's law restricting disclosure of law enforcement statements (2006 PA 563). It defines "involuntary statement" as information compelled by a law enforcement agency through threats of job loss or sanctions. The bill would protect such compelled statements from disclosure, applying to officers employed by state police, county agencies, cities, universities, and other specified entities. This directly affects law enforcement officers and agencies by limiting how their compelled statements can be used in legal proceedings.

Maddy summaryHB 4354 amends Michigan's Law Enforcement Standards Act by updating the definition of "adjudication of guilt" to include specific scenarios like probation under certain statutes or assignment as a youthful trainee. This change directly affects law enforcement agencies, standards commissions, and officers when determining eligibility for employment or certification under state law. The bill modifies Section 2 of the act (MCL 28.602) to clarify that convictions, pleas, or related court orders - such as those involving probation or youth diversion programs - count as "adjudication of guilt." It does not create new policies but ensures consistent application of existing standards. The amendment focuses on precise legal definitions, not water supply systems as inaccurately noted in the title.

Maddy summaryHB 4352 is a technical amendment to Michigan's 1955 water supply authority law (MCL 124.281 et seq.), modifying specific sections of the statute to update administrative procedures. It directly affects municipal water systems operating under this law by adjusting how they function as "municipal authorities." The bill does not create new policies or funding but revises existing legal language for clarity and alignment. As a procedural update, it requires no new approvals beyond standard legislative review.

Maddy summaryHB 5051 amends Michigan's law to allow trained law enforcement officers and firefighters to administer epinephrine auto-injectors to individuals experiencing severe allergic reactions (anaphylaxis), even without a prescription or prior allergy diagnosis. It requires responders to complete training on proper administration and permits eligible entities (like police departments or fire stations) to purchase and distribute epinephrine devices to their staff. The bill provides legal immunity from civil liability for entities and responders acting in good faith, unless their conduct involves gross negligence or willful misconduct. This directly affects first responders who may use the devices during emergencies and individuals suffering acute allergic reactions.

Maddy summaryHB 5053 requires medical control authorities to ensure all emergency medical services (EMS) agencies and personnel provide epinephrine or auto-injectors and are trained to recognize anaphylaxis, administer epinephrine, and properly dispose of devices. This directly affects EMS providers who deliver prehospital care across Michigan, mandating specific equipment availability and training protocols. The bill amends existing public health code requirements to strengthen emergency response capabilities for severe allergic reactions, with no changes to opioid antagonist or defibrillator requirements.

Maddy summaryHB 5049 requires Michigan public schools to ensure trained staff can administer epinephrine auto-injectors during allergic emergencies. Schools with 10+ staff must have at least two trained employees (or one for smaller schools), and all schools must maintain at least two epinephrine auto-injectors. The bill mandates school policies for safe administration (by nurses or trained staff), reporting of all epinephrine uses to the state, and allows school districts to seek state reimbursement for unfunded costs. It directly affects all public K-12 schools in Michigan and students with severe allergies. The bill is tied to five companion bills (HB 5050-5054) that must also pass.

Maddy summaryHB 5054 modifies Michigan's school code to clarify protections for school staff administering epinephrine auto-injectors during emergencies and to streamline student access to necessary medical devices. It ensures school employees (including non-nurses) aren’t liable for civil damages or criminal charges when administering epinephrine in good faith during life-threatening situations, except for gross negligence. The bill also allows students with asthma or severe allergies to possess and use prescribed inhalers or epinephrine devices at school, on transportation, or at school events, provided they have written medical approval and an emergency care plan on file. These changes directly affect school staff, students with medical conditions requiring epinephrine or inhalers, and school administrators managing health protocols.

Maddy summaryHB 5050 allows schools, camps, sports leagues, and similar organizations to stock and administer EpiPen-like epinephrine auto-injectors for severe allergic reactions. It permits trained staff (not just nurses) to use these devices in emergencies without needing a specific prescription for the individual, provided they believe someone is experiencing anaphylaxis. The bill requires staff to complete initial and biennial training on recognizing allergic reactions, storing, and using epinephrine devices. It also provides legal protection for organizations and trained individuals who follow these guidelines in good faith.

Maddy summaryHB 5052 allows children with severe allergies to carry and use epinephrine auto-injectors (like EpiPens) at children's camps under specific conditions. It directly affects minors with anaphylaxis, their parents/guardians, and camp staff. The bill requires written approval from a child's physician and parent/guardian, a camp director's verification of these approvals, and a written emergency care plan developed by a physician. It also provides legal immunity for camps that follow these protocols when allowing or denying use of the medication.

Maddy summaryHB 5432 is a supplemental appropriations bill that allocates additional state funding for multiple departments, agencies, and the legislative branch for the 2025-2026 fiscal year. It provides specific monetary amounts to cover budget gaps or new needs identified during the fiscal year, with conditions on how the funds may be spent. This bill directly affects state government operations by ensuring funding continuity for essential services and programs across various agencies. As a procedural funding measure, it does not change policy but adjusts financial resources for existing government functions.