Senate, December 22, 2025 -- The committee on Revenue to whom was referred the petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 1973) of James B. Eldridge, James K. Hawkins and Jason M. Lewis for legislation relative to the imposition of an excise tax to provide for climate change adaptation infrastructure and affordable housing investments in the Commonwealth, report the accompanying bill (Senate, No. 2751)
Sen. Sal DiDomenico
Sponsored bills
By Mr. Eldridge, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 1973) of James B. Eldridge, James K. Hawkins and Jason M. Lewis for legislation relative to the imposition of an excise tax to provide for climate change adaptation infrastructure and affordable housing investments in the Commonwealth. Revenue.
By Mr. Payano, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 1364) of Pavel M. Payano, Vanna Howard, Michael D. Brady, James K. Hawkins and other members of the General Court for legislation to streamline state employee collective bargaining. Labor and Workforce Development.
By Mr. Moore, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 2046) of Michael O. Moore and James B. Eldridge for legislation to grant property tax exemptions to disabled veterans. Revenue.
Maddy summaryThis bill (SD 1794) changes Massachusetts workers' compensation rules for disfigurement benefits. It replaces a fixed $15,000 cap with a new formula: benefits will now equal 30 times the state's average wage on the injury date. The bill also removes the previous restriction that excluded purely scar-based disfigurement (unless on the face, neck, or hands), expanding eligibility for these claims. These changes directly affect workers injured on the job who suffer visible disfigurement covered under workers' compensation.
By Mr. Cyr, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 464) of Julian Cyr, Rodney M. Elliott, Rebecca L. Rausch, James B. Eldridge and other members of the General Court for legislation to strengthen the state home care program workforce by requiring each covered employer to enter into a labor peace agreement. Elder Affairs.
Maddy summaryThis bill strengthens protections for workers who report work-related injuries or illnesses by creating a strong presumption of retaliation if an employer takes adverse action within 90 days of such protected activity. It expands the definition of prohibited retaliation to include actions like denying employment relationships or falsely claiming injuries aren't work-related, and requires employers to post multilingual notices about worker rights. Workers who face retaliation can now seek treble damages, attorney fees, and injunctive relief through civil court. The bill also clarifies that employers must indemnify insurers for unpaid wages required by law, ensuring workers receive full compensation.
Maddy summaryThis bill creates a new legal privilege protecting confidential communications between employees and their labor unions during representation matters. It directly affects employees seeking union assistance, current union members, and labor organizations by shielding private conversations - such as those about organizing, grievances, or contract negotiations - from forced disclosure, except in limited cases like preventing serious crimes. The law establishes clear definitions for terms like "representation" and "confidential communication," and specifies that unions and employees can refuse to disclose such protected exchanges in legal proceedings. The privilege applies across all relevant Massachusetts labor laws covering public and private sector unions.
Senate, July 25 -- The committee on Aging and Independence to whom was referred the petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 470) of Patricia D. Jehlen, Michael O. Moore, Paul K. Frost, John F. Keenan and other members of the General Court for legislation to improve Massachusetts home care, report the accompanying bill (Senate, No. 2555).
Maddy summarySD 2273 sets new wage standards for direct care workers in Massachusetts human services programs. It requires that direct care staff salaries meet or exceed the 75th percentile of similar jobs in the state (per Bureau of Labor Statistics), with proportional increases for front-line staff like case managers and supervisors. The bill also changes how fringe benefits and payroll costs are calculated, benchmarking them to health/education sector costs instead of the Consumer Price Index. It applies to human services providers and state agencies contracting for these services, with a planning process beginning July 1, 2025. The law ensures these wage adjustments won’t reduce funding for existing social service programs.