Rep. Sara Jacobs

Maddy summaryHR 3604, the *Reducing Waste in National Parks Act*, requires National Park Service (NPS) units to reduce and eliminate the sale of disposable plastic products (including water bottles, bags, and food containers) where feasible, considering operational factors like cost, waste reduction, and concessioner impacts. Park officials must develop visitor education plans, implement refill stations, and weigh 13 specific factors before eliminating sales, such as infrastructure costs, revenue effects, and public health safety. The program must be evaluated every two years to measure visitor satisfaction, waste collection rates, and safety outcomes. This bill directly affects NPS operations, concessioners, and park visitors who use park facilities.

Maddy summaryThis bill prohibits the U.S. military from discriminating against service members or applicants based on gender identity. It bans policies that would deny service, involuntarily separate members, deny medically necessary healthcare, or require service in a gender different from one's identity. The law defines "gender identity" broadly to include a person's internal sense of gender, appearance, and mannerisms, regardless of sex assigned at birth. It directly affects transgender and gender-diverse individuals currently serving or seeking to serve in the Armed Forces.

This bill prohibits the President from selling, transferring, or exporting certain defense articles or services to Israel, except in specified circumstances.  Defense articles covered by the prohibition include BLU-109 bunker busting bombs, Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) assemblies, and 155mm artillery ammunition. Defense services directly related to such articles are also covered.  The President may sell, transfer, or export such defense articles or services to Israel if (1) a law is enacted specifying the purposes for which such articles or services may be used, and (2) Israel provides written assurances that the defense articles or services will be used for those specific statutory purposes and in a manner consistent with certain other laws, including international human rights laws.

Stronger Communities through Better Transit Act This bill requires the Department of Transportation (DOT) to establish a grant program to support operating projects for public transportation and related service improvements, particularly in underserved communities and areas of persistent poverty. Specifically, the bill requires DOT to allocate funding under the program for urbanized areas, states, and Indian tribes that are recipients of funds under either the Federal Transit Administration's (FTA's) Urbanized Area Formula Funding program or Formula Grants for Rural Areas program. Eligible recipients may use funding for operating costs associated with projects that improve public transportation service for transit-dependent populations and support increased transit ridership (e.g., service expansion, information technology enhancements, and workforce development). DOT must apportion the funding so that recipients receive funds that are proportional to their share of operating costs. The bill also provides for an increased federal cost share for operating assistance for projects or programs carried out in areas of persistent poverty or underserved communities. DOT must set up a multimodal access measurement interface for public agencies to aid transit agencies in determining and reporting on access to jobs and essential services. A grant recipient must (1) report specific information to the FTA for inclusion in the National Transit Database, and (2) survey transit riders and non-riding residents regarding transit service improvements. Further, the bill expands the purposes of the public transportation programs to include supporting public transportation's role in combating climate change through growing/retaining transit ridership.

Maddy summaryHJRES 96 is a congressional resolution that would block a specific proposed military sale to the United Arab Emirates. It targets defense articles and services listed in Transmittal No. 25-25 (submitted May 13, 2025), specifically F-16 aircraft components, spares, accessories, and related logistics support. The resolution would prohibit this sale under the Arms Export Control Act, requiring congressional disapproval before it could proceed. This directly affects the U.S. government (which would need to halt the sale) and the UAE (which would lose access to these defense items).

Maddy summaryHJRES 97 is a congressional resolution blocking a specific proposed military sale to the United Arab Emirates (UAE). It prohibits the sale of defense articles and services detailed in Transmittal No. 24-118, including six Chinook helicopters, missile warning systems, communications equipment, and machine guns. The resolution exercises Congress’s authority under the Arms Export Control Act to disapprove the sale before it proceeds. This directly affects the UAE government, which sought these defense items, and requires the U.S. State Department to halt the transaction. The bill does not create new policy but stops a specific foreign military sale.

Maddy summaryThis bill requires the Department of Defense to promote competition when purchasing artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and data infrastructure services by mandating competitive award processes and prioritizing multi-cloud technology. It defines covered providers as companies with at least $50 million in DoD contracts over five years and restricts how these vendors can use government-provided data, prohibiting unauthorized use for training commercial products. The legislation also establishes annual reporting requirements to Congress on market competition and innovation in the AI sector, including details on any exemptions granted for national security reasons.

Maddy summaryThis bill clarifies that the President has no constitutional authority to withhold funds Congress has appropriated. It creates new legal mechanisms allowing private citizens and state/local governments to sue the federal government for impoundments of appropriated funds. The bill strengthens the Comptroller General's oversight role by requiring executive branch cooperation in investigations of potential violations. Federal employees who knowingly violate these provisions would face personal liability and lose immunity protections. The legislation aims to reinforce Congress's constitutional authority over the budget process.

SNAP Administrator Retention Act of 2025 This bill directs the Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) to pay Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) state agencies for 100% of SNAP administrative personnel costs. The bill also requires that state SNAP agency administrators be paid at least the same amount as federal employees. (Under current law, FNS generally pays 50% of a state's administrative costs for SNAP.) Specifically, FNS must pay a state agency for 100% of all SNAP administrative personnel costs that are part of an FNS-approved state agency personnel wage plan. This must include all costs associated with hiring and training new employees, maintaining those personnel costs, and complying with wage standards. The state agency must use these funds (1) to supplement, not supplant, nonfederal funds used for existing administrative personnel costs; and (2) for existing or additional full-time positions that are above the number of positions that were held in FY2024. The bill also requires that the wage standards for SNAP state agency administrators be (1) at least the same amount as the General Schedule (GS) pay rate for federal employees; and (2) updated annually based on any increase in the GS pay rate, including locality adjustments.

Maddy summaryHR 3368, the "Born in the USA Act of 2025," prohibits federal funding for Executive Order 14160 (which aimed to restrict birthright citizenship for children born in the U.S.). The bill directly affects federal agencies that might implement the executive order by blocking their use of funds for that purpose. Its key provision is a funding ban targeting the executive order and any similar future policies, without changing citizenship law. The bill does not alter birthright citizenship rights but prevents federal resources from being used to enforce the controversial executive order. It is a procedural measure focused on funding, not a substantive policy change to citizenship rules.