Issue · Technology

Technology (Social Media)

Every technology bill, vote, and legislator stance in Colorado, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
5
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Manny Rutinel
83% support rate
Top opponent
Stephanie Luck
14% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving social media in Colorado

Legislators moving social media in Colorado
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Manny Rutinel
Manny Rutinel House · District 32
D
Strong +
83% 6
Alex Valdez
Alex Valdez House · District 5
D
Strong +
80% 5
Gretchen Rydin
Gretchen Rydin House · District 38
D
Support
78% 9
Naquetta Ricks
Naquetta Ricks House · District 40
D
Support
78% 9
Sean Camacho
Sean Camacho House · District 6
D
Support
78% 9
Stephanie Luck
Stephanie Luck House · District 60
R
Strong −
14% 7
LG
Lorena García House · District 35
D
Strong −
17% 6
Brandi Bradley
Brandi Bradley House · District 39
R
Oppose
29% 7
Ken DeGraaf
Ken DeGraaf House · District 22
R
Oppose
29% 7
Ron Weinberg
Ron Weinberg House · District 51
R
Oppose
29% 7
Showing 5 of 5 bills

All technology bills

signed · Colorado · House May 29, 2026

HB 1263: Conversational Artificial Intelligence Service Operator Requirements

The act defines a 'conversational artificial intelligence service' as an artificial intelligence system that is accessible to the general public and that primarily simulates human conversation and interaction through adaptive textual, visual, or aural communications.     Effective January 1, 2027, the act creates requirements and prohibitions for a person, partnership, corporation, or entity that develops and makes publicly available a conversational artificial intelligence service or offers a conversational artificial intelligence service to a consumer (operator).     An operator is required to use commercially reasonable methods or generally accepted methods to estimate the age of a consumer who has or opens an account or profile to use a conversational artificial intelligence service (account holder) and the age of other users of a conversational artificial intelligence service. If an operator knows that an account holder or user is a minor, an operator is:Required to provide certain disclosures;Prohibited from providing the minor account holder or minor user with points or rewards to encourage engagement with the conversational artificial intelligence service;Required to institute technically feasible measures to prevent the conversational artificial intelligence service from producing explicit sexual conduct, intimate digital depictions, or statements that simulate emotional dependence;Required to implement a protocol for a conversational artificial intelligence service to stop engaging in response to a user prompt regarding sexual conduct with a minor; andRequired to provide tools for the minor account holder or minor user or a parent or guardian of the minor account holder or minor user to manage the minor account holder's or minor user's privacy and account settings.     The act also requires an operator to provide a disclosure to a user that a conversational artificial intelligence service is artificial intelligence, implement a protocol for user prompts regarding suicidal ideation or self-harm, and annually report to the attorney general's office information regarding the protocol the operator is implementing. The act prohibits an operator from stating that any output data provided by a conversational artificial intelligence service is provided by, endorsed by, or equivalent to services provided by certain licensed or certified professionals.     The act clarifies that nothing in the act limits an individual's ability to access certain information and resources pursuant to the state constitution, requires an operator to disclose confidential information, or authorizes content moderation practices inconsistent with the United States constitution.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
vetoed · Colorado · House May 28, 2026

HB 1255: Social Media Duty to Report & Search Warrants

The act requires an operator of a social media platform (operator) to ensure that its social media platform provides a streamlined process to allow law enforcement agencies to contact the social media platform. The process must be available to law enforcement agencies at all times and make available a staffed hotline for the purposes of:Receiving and responding to questions about search warrants;Acknowledging the receipt of a search warrant within 8 hours after receipt; andProviding status updates on search warrant compliance to a requesting law enforcement agency.     With certain exceptions, an operator must comply with a search warrant within 24 hours if certain conditions apply. A court may reasonably extend this time if the court makes a written finding that the operator or social media platform has shown good cause for the extension and that an extension would not cause an adverse result. The act sets forth enforcement options for the attorney general and district attorneys regarding operators' compliance with search warrants.     The act requires an operator to report to a social media platform user's (user's) local law enforcement agency within 24 hours if the operator's social media platform takes any one of certain described adverse actions against a user. A violation of the reporting requirement is a violation of the 'Colorado Consumer Protection Act'.     In current law, 'social media platform' is defined as an internet-based service, website, or application that satisfies certain criteria, including having more than 100,000 active users in Colorado. The act removes this criterion.     The act makes conforming amendments as necessary to Senate Bill 26-011, as enacted in the 2026 regular legislative session, to have Senate Bill 26-011 conform with the provisions of the act.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
in committee · Colorado · House Apr 7, 2026

HB 1148: Protections for Youth on Social Media

Under the bill, a "covered business" is defined as a sole proprietorship, a partnership, a limited liability company, a corporation, an association, or another legal entity, or an affiliate of such a legal entity, that:Conducts business in the state and generates a majority of its annual revenue from online services;Makes available online gaming services, products, or features that are reasonably likely to be accessed by a user who is a minor or who the covered business labels as a minor (covered minor);Collects users' personal data or has users' personal data collected on its behalf by a processor; andSolely or jointly with others determines the purposes and means of the processing of users' personal data.     The bill states that a covered business that processes the personal data of a covered minor owes a minimum duty of care to the covered minor. The bill also requires a covered business to:Configure default privacy settings provided to a covered minor to the highest level of privacy and to include certain default settings;Provide a prominent, accessible, and responsive tool to allow a covered minor to request that the covered minor's account be unpublished or deleted and, if the business receives such a request, to honor it within 15 days; andImmediately delete all data that relates to the determination of a user's age after it is determined that the user is a covered minor.     The bill prohibits a covered business from:Providing a covered minor with a single setting that makes all of the default privacy settings less protective at once;Requesting or prompting a covered minor to make their privacy settings less protective;Collecting, selling, sharing, or retaining personal data of a covered minor that is not necessary to provide an online gaming service, product, or feature with which the covered minor is actively and knowingly engaged;Using previously collected personal data of a covered minor for any purpose other than a purpose for which the personal data was collected;Permitting an individual to monitor the online activity of a covered minor or to track the location of the covered minor without providing a conspicuous signal to the covered minor when the covered minor is being monitored or tracked;Using the personal data of a covered minor to select, recommend, or prioritize media for the covered minor unless the covered minor makes certain requests or takes certain actions warranting such conduct by the covered business; orSending push notifications to a covered minor between 12 midnight and 6 a.m.     The bill imposes additional specific requirements and prohibitions for a covered business that collects users' personal data for the purpose of conducting age assurance.     The bill requires a covered business to ensure that the purchase price for an online gaming service, product, or feature that is made available through the covered business's online gaming service, product, or feature and that is reasonably likely to be accessed by a covered minor is listed in United States dollars at the point of sale.     A covered business shall impose and collect a fee on each add-on transaction that is conducted by a covered minor through the covered business's online gaming service, product, or feature. The amount of the fee is 5% of the amount of the transaction. Money collected as such fees is credited to the state public school fund.     The bill requires a social media platform to provide certain information on its website or mobile application concerning privacy policies and the use of algorithms. A social media platform is prohibited from using an algorithmic recommendation system to sell or otherwise distribute an illicit substance to a covered minor.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced.)
signed · Colorado · House May 4, 2026

HB 1058: Protections for Minors Featured in Digital Content

The act creates new requirements and civil remedies beginning June 1, 2027, related to individuals under 18 years old (minors) who are featured in compensated content on online hosting platforms (online content).     A minor is considered to be engaged in content creation work if, over a 12-month period, the following 3 criteria are met:At least 30% of a content creator's online content produced within a 30-day period includes the minor's likeness, name, or photograph;The number of views of the online content meets the online hosting platform's compensation threshold or the content creator receives $0.10 or more per view, including compensation from sponsorships; andThe content creator receives at least $40,000 in actual compensation from the online content.     Content creators whose online content features a minor engaged in content creation work must maintain specific records, including:Proof of the minor's age;The total compensation generated; andThe total number of minutes the minor was featured in posts featuring online content.     A content creator shall compensate a minor engaged in content creation work by setting aside a portion of the gross earnings into a trust account for the minor until the minor reaches the age of majority or is declared emancipated. A court may distribute money from the trust account to the minor before the minor reaches the age of majority or is declared emancipated upon petition from the trustee and a finding that the money will only be used for specific expenses that solely benefit the minor.     An adult or an emancipated minor who was featured as a uniquely identifiable minor in a content creator's post featuring online content on or after June 1, 2027, may request that the content creator delete the post or remove the uniquely identifiable information. The content creator must comply with the request within 72 hours. If the content creator fails to comply after 30 days, the individual may sue for various types of relief, and the online hosting platform must review and take reasonable steps to remove the content unless certain exceptions apply.     The act prohibits a person from financially benefiting from knowingly producing or distributing online content of a minor with the intent to sexually gratify or elicit a sexual response in the viewer. Exceptions apply for law enforcement, reporting unlawful activity, legal proceedings, and certain actions engaged in by online hosting platforms. Online hosting platforms are required to develop and implement a risk-based strategy to help mitigate risks related to the monetization of the intentional sexualization of known minors.     A civil action may be filed on behalf of a minor for damages, including actual damages, punitive damages, and attorney fees, if a content creator fails to comply with specified provisions of the act.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)
signed · Colorado · Senate Jun 3, 2026

SB 51: Age Attestation on Computing Devices

The act requires an operating system provider that operates a publicly available internet website, software application, online service, or platform that distributes and facilitates, on a commercial basis, the download of applications from third-party developers to users of devices (covered application store) or makes a covered application store available preinstalled on an operating system to:Provide an accessible interface at account setup that requires an account holder to indicate the birth date, age, or age bracket of the user of that device in order to provide a signal regarding the user's age (age signal) to applications available in the covered application store;Provide application developers with a reasonably consistent, real-time application programming interface to request and receive an age signal; andSend only the minimum amount of information necessary to comply with the act. An operating system provider or covered application store shall not share an age signal with a third party for a purpose not required by the act.     The act requires a consumer software application that is accessed through a covered application store and that may be run or directed by a user on a device (covered application) to request an age signal with respect to a particular user when the covered application is initially launched or when a user first creates an account. A covered application that receives an age signal is deemed to have knowledge of the age range of the user to whom that age signal pertains across all platforms of the application and points of access of the application. However, if a developer has clear and convincing information that a user's age is different than the age indicated by an age signal, the developer shall use that information as the primary indicator of the user's age range.     A developer shall ensure that a covered application that receives an age signal does not:Request more information concerning a user from an operating system provider or a covered application store than is necessary to comply with the act; orCommunicate an age signal to a third party for a purpose not required by the act.     With respect to a device for which account setup was completed before July 1, 2028, the act requires an operating system provider to provide, before January 1, 2029, an accessible interface that allows an account holder to indicate the birth date or age of the user of that device for the purpose of providing an age signal regarding the user's age-bracket data to covered applications available in the operating system provider's covered application store. If a covered application last updated on or after July 1, 2027, was downloaded to a device before July 1, 2028, and the covered application has not requested an age signal with respect to the user of the device on which the covered application was downloaded, the covered application must request an age signal from the covered application store from which the covered application was downloaded with respect to that user before January 1, 2029.     A person that violates the act must pay a civil penalty of not more than $2,500 for each minor affected by each negligent violation or not more than $7,500 for each minor affected by each intentional violation. The penalty is assessed and recovered in a civil action brought by the attorney general. An operating system provider or covered application store that makes a good faith effort to comply with the act is not liable for an erroneous age signal or for conduct by a covered application that receives an age signal.(Note: This summary applies to this bill as enacted.)