DH
R California Senate · District 36

Sen. Dennis Hollingsworth

Compare
Total votes
18,528
all sessions
Attendance
93%
1,214 missed
Near the chamber average
With party
94%
of cast votes
Near the chamber average
Bipartisan score
5%
crosses aisle rarely
Near the chamber average
Sponsored
594
bills & resolutions
Higher than 94% of chamber peers
Committees
0
assignments
594 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
594
Primary
189
Co-sponsor
405
This page
594
matching current filters
Co-sponsor SJR 11
died · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Guantanamo Bay: detention facility.

This bill would urge the President of the United States and the Congress to employ necessary measures to ensure that no terrorist or suspected terrorist detained at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba is permitted to enter California in custody or otherwise.

died Nov 30, 2010 1 co-sponsor
Primary SB 983
Failed · California Senate · Lead sponsor
Insurance: rates.

Existing law requires the rates and premiums for an automobile insurance policy to be determined by application of specified factors. This bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to those provisions.

Failed Nov 30, 2010 0 co-sponsors
Primary SB 989
Failed · California Senate · Lead sponsor
Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004.

Existing law, the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004, allows aggrieved employees to bring civil actions to recover penalties for violations of the Labor Code if the Labor and Workforce Development Agency or its departments, divisions, commissions, boards, agencies, or employees do not do so. The penalties collected in these actions are distributed 75% to the agency to be continuously appropriated for purposes of enforcement and education and 25% to the aggrieved employee, except that if the person does not employ one or more persons, 100% of the penalties are distributed to the agency by continuous appropriation. This bill would require an employee requesting court approval of the settlement of a civil action brought under the act to serve a copy of the court's final approval order and settlement agreement to the agency within 20 days after the order is made and the settlement is final. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Failed Nov 30, 2010 0 co-sponsors
Primary SB 22
Signed into law · California Senate · Lead sponsor
State employees: benefits: retirement.

(1) The Public Employees' Retirement Law (PERL) provides a comprehensive set of rights and benefits based upon age, service credit, and final compensation. Existing law defines final compensation variously for different member classifications and bargaining units and, in this regard, defines final compensation for a state member for the purpose of calculating retirement benefits as the highest annual average compensation earnable by the member during a designated 12-month or 36-month period, depending upon the bargaining unit and classification of that employee. Currently the final compensation for members hired on or after July 1, 2006, who are represented by State Bargaining Units 12, 16, 18, and 19, and for members hired on and after October 31, 2010, who are represented by State Bargaining Units 5 and 8 means the final compensation earnable by the member during a designated 36-month period. This bill would provide that final compensation for a person who becomes a state member, as specified, on or after January 15, 2011, and who is represented by State Bargaining Unit 6, 7, or 9, or who is an excluded employee, legislative employee, judicial branch employee, or an employee of California State University, means the highest annual average compensation earnable by the member during a designated 36-month period. (2) PERL establishes various retirement formulas that apply to specified membership categories. Under PERL, state miscellaneous members are generally subject to a retirement formula commonly known as 2% at 55, which, if the member retires at 55 years of age, yields a benefit equal to 2% of the member's final compensation multiplied by the member's years of service credit, as specified. Under PERL, state miscellaneous members represented by specified bargaining units who are first employed on and after September 1, 2010, are subject to a 2% at 60 retirement formula. Under PERL, patrol members and specified state peace officer/firefighter members are subject to a 3% at 50 retirement formula, with the exception of patrol members and firefighters who are members of State Bargaining Units 5 and 8, first employed on and after October 31, 2010, who are subject to a 3% at 55 retirement formula. Under PERL, safety members employed by the state and the California State University are generally subject to a 2.5% at age 55 retirement formula. This bill would provide that all state miscellaneous members, who are first employed on and after January 15, 2011, are subject to a 2% at 60 retirement formula, but would provide that the change would not apply if there is a current memorandum of understanding that provides a different formula only for the period that the memorandum of understanding is in effect. The bill would provide that peace officer/firefighter members of State Bargaining Units 6 and 7 and state, legislative, judicial branch, and California State University peace officers who are first employed on and after January 15, 2011, are subject to a 2.5% at 55 retirement formula, but would provide that the change would not apply if there is a current memorandum of understanding that provides a different formula only for the period that the memorandum of understanding is in effect. This bill would provide that safety members who are first employed by the state and the California State University on and after January 15, 2011, are subject to a 2% at age 55 retirement formula, but would provide that the change would not apply if there is a current memorandum of understanding that provides a different formula only for the period that the memorandum of understanding is in effect.

Signed into law Oct 20, 2010 0 co-sponsors
Primary SB 867
Signed into law · California Senate · Lead sponsor
Public employee benefits: contribution rates: reports.

The Public Employees' Retirement Law (PERL) provides a defined benefit to members of the Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) based on age at retirement, service credit, and final compensation, as those terms are defined. The management and control of PERL is vested in the board of administration of PERL, including the calculation of the contribution rates for specified state employees and state employers. Existing law provides that a statute that imposes a requirement that a state agency submit a periodic report to the Legislature is inoperative on a date 4 years after the date the first report is due. This bill would require the board of administration of PERL, notwithstanding that requirement, to submit a report to the Legislature, the Governor, and the Treasurer describing the investment return assumptions, discount rates, and amortization periods utilized by the board in the calculations of the contribution rates and to include recalculations of those rates based on specified adjustments of the investment return assumptions, amortization periods, and discount rates utilized by the board any time it calculates the contribution rates. This bill would require the Treasurer, within 30 days following receipt of the report, to provide each house of the Legislature, at a publicly noticed floor session, with an explanation of the role played by the investment return assumption and amortization period in the calculation of the contribution rates and the consequences for future state budgets if the investment return assumptions are not realized, to report whether the board's amortization period exceeds the estimated average remaining service periods of employees covered by the contributions, and to express his or her opinion of the reasonableness of the board's calculation of the contribution rates. This bill would, notwithstanding the 4-year reporting limitations, also require the board, at any time it forecasts contribution rates, to submit a report to the Legislature with a revised calculation of the forecasted contribution rates utilizing a specified investment rate assumption. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Signed into law Oct 20, 2010 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor SB 4
Failed · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Income tax credit: qualified principal residence.

The Personal Income Tax Law authorizes various credits against the taxes imposed by that law, including a credit against those taxes in an amount equal to the lesser of 5% of the purchase price of a qualified principal residence, as defined, or $10,000, for purchases made between March 1, 2009, and before March 1, 2010, subject to specified restrictions. This bill would authorize a credit against those taxes in an amount equal to the lesser of 5% of the purchase price of a qualified principal residence, as defined, or $10,000, for purchases made between May 1, 2010, and on or before December 31, 2010, or on or after December 31, 2010, and before August 1, 2011, subject to specified restrictions, including the submission of a certification to the Franchise Tax Board by either the taxpayer or seller, made under the penalty of perjury, that the residence has either never been occupied or that the taxpayer is a first-time home buyer. By expanding the definition of an existing crime, this bill imposes a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.

Failed Oct 8, 2010 1 co-sponsor
Primary SB 848
Failed · California Senate · Lead sponsor
Transient occupancy taxes.

Existing law authorizes the legislative body of a city or county to impose an excise tax for the privilege of occupying a room or other living space in a hotel, inn, tourist home or house, motel, or other lodging, as provided. This bill would provide that the tax imposed shall apply solely to rent received by the operator of a lodging establishment for transient accommodations and the rent received by the operator from a travel agent or intermediary subject to the tax shall be the wholesale rate contracted for the room for that date, as specified. The bill would provide that no tax shall be imposed on any amount charged or retained by a travel agent or intermediary for travel booking services. The bill would also specify that a property owner or authorized agent shall not be liable for transient occupancy taxes imposed if that tax is not collected, as specified. The bill would make a finding that this language is declaratory of existing law. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Failed Oct 8, 2010 0 co-sponsors
Primary SB 5
Failed · California Senate · Lead sponsor
Sales and use taxes: exclusion: trade-in motor vehicle.

The Sales and Use Tax Law imposes a tax on retailers measured by the gross receipts from the sale of tangible personal property sold at retail in this state, or on the storage, use, or other consumption of tangible personal property purchased from a retailer for the storage, use, or other consumption in this state measured by sales price. That law defines the terms "gross receipts" and "sales price." This bill would exclude from the terms "gross receipts" and "sales price" the value of a motor vehicle traded in for a new motor vehicle, including a new motorcycle, if the value of the trade-in motor vehicle is separately stated on the new motor vehicle invoice or bill of sale or similar document provided to the purchaser. The Bradley-Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law authorizes counties and cities to impose local sales and use taxes in conformity with the Sales and Use Tax Law, and existing law authorizes districts to impose transactions and use taxes in accordance with the Transactions and Use Tax Law, which conforms to the Sales and Use Tax Law. Amendments to the Sales and Use Tax Law are incorporated into these laws. Section 2230 of the Revenue and Taxation Code provides that the state will reimburse counties and cities for revenue losses caused by the enactment of sales and use tax exemptions. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding Section 2230 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, no appropriation is made and the state shall not reimburse local agencies for sales and use tax revenues lost by them pursuant to this bill. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy, but its operative date would depend on its effective date. Counties and cities are authorized to impose local sales and use taxes in conformity with state sales and use taxes. Exemptions from state sales and use taxes enacted by the Legislature are automatically incorporated into the local taxes. Section 2230 of the Revenue and Taxation Code provides that the state will reimburse counties and cities for revenue losses caused by the enactment of sales and use tax exemptions. This bill would provide that no appropriation is made and the state shall not reimburse local agencies for sales and use tax revenues lost by them pursuant to this bill.

Failed Oct 8, 2010 0 co-sponsors
Primary SB 871
Failed · California Senate · Lead sponsor
State employees: benefits: retirement.

(1) The Public Employees' Retirement Law (PERL) provides a comprehensive set of rights and benefits based upon age, service credit, and final compensation. Existing law defines final compensation variously for different member classifications and bargaining units and, in this regard, defines final compensation for a state member for the purpose of calculating retirement benefits as the highest annual average compensation earnable by the member during a designated 12-month or 36-month period, depending upon the bargaining unit and classification of that employee. Currently the final compensati on for members hired on or after July 1, 2006, who are represented by State Bargaining Units 12, 16, 18, and 19, and for members hired on and after October 31, 2010, who are represented by State Bargaining Units 5 and 8 means the final compensation earnable by the member during a designated 36-month period. This bill would provide that final compensation for a person who becomes a state member, as specified, on or after November 10, 2010, and who is represented by State Bargaining Unit 6, 7, or 9, or who is an excluded employee, legislative employee, judicial branch employee, or an employee of California State University, means the highest annual average compensation earnable by the member during a designated 36-month period. (2) PERL establishes various retirement formulas that apply to specified membership categories. Under PERL, state miscellaneous members are generally subject to a retirement formula commonly known as 2% at 55, which, if the member retires at 55 years of age, yields a benefit equal to 2% of the member's final compensation multiplied by the member's years of service credit, as specified. Under PERL, state miscellaneous members represented by specified bargaining units who are first employed on after September 1, 2010, are subject to a 2% at 60 retirement formula. Under PERL, patrol members and specified state peace officer/firefighter members are subject to a 3% at 50 retirement formula, with the exception of patrol members and firefighters who are members of State Bargaining Units 5 and 8, first employed on and after October 31, 2010, who are subject to a 3% at 55 retirement formula. Under PERL, safety members employed by the state and the California State University are generally subject to a 2.5% at age 55 retirement formula. This bill would provide that all state miscellaneous members, who are first employed on and after November 10, 2010, are subject to a 2% at 60 retirement formula, but would provide that the change would not apply if there is a current memorandum of understanding that provides a different formula only for the period that the memorandum of understanding is in effect. The bill would provide that peace officer/firefighter members of State Bargaining Units 6 and 7 and state, legislative, judicial branch, and California State University peace officers who are first employed on and after November 10, 2010, are subject to a 2.5% at 55 retirement formula, but would provide that the change would not apply if there is a current memorandum of understanding that provides a different formula only for the period that the memorandum of understanding is in effect. This bill would provide that safety members who are first employed by the state and the California State University on and after November 10, 2010, are subject to a 2% at age 55 retirement formula, but would provide that the change would not apply if there is a current memorandum of understanding that provides a different formula only for the period that the memorandum of understanding is in effect. (3) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Failed Oct 8, 2010 0 co-sponsors
Primary SB 6
Failed · California Senate · Lead sponsor
Tax amnesty: penalty.

Existing law imposes a penalty on a taxpayer subject to the Corporation Tax Law with a specified understatement of tax, as defined, in an amount equal to 20% of that understatement, except as specified. This bill would delete the provisions imposing that penalty.

Failed Oct 8, 2010 0 co-sponsors
Showing 21 to 30 of 594 bills
Previous 1 … 2 3 4 … 60 Next