TH
R California Senate · District 35

Sen. Tom Harman

Compare
Total votes
25,344
all sessions
Attendance
87%
2,630 missed
Lower than 90% of chamber peers
With party
96%
of cast votes
Lower than 85% of chamber peers
Bipartisan score
4%
crosses aisle rarely
Higher than 80% of chamber peers
Sponsored
887
bills & resolutions
Near the chamber average
Committees
0
assignments
887 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
887
Primary
216
Co-sponsor
671
This page
887
matching current filters
Co-sponsor AB 206
Failed · California House · Co-sponsor
Fireworks displays: California Environmental Quality Act: California Coastal Act of 1976.

Existing law regulates fireworks and pyrotechnic displays and requires that a permit be obtained from the State Fire Marshal in certain instances. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared by contract, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project, as defined, that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment, or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. The California Coastal Act of 1976 provides for the planning and regulation of development, under a coastal development permit process, within the coastal zone. Existing law defines development for these purposes. This bill would exempt a municipal fireworks display, as defined, from the provisions of CEQA. Because a lead agency would have to determine the applicability of the exemption and to take certain specified action upon a determination of exemption, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would provide that a coastal development permit is not required for a municipal fireworks display and would specify that "development" does not include a municipal fireworks display. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

Failed Feb 1, 2012 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AB 1209
Failed · California House · Co-sponsor
Department of Veterans Affairs: veterans' services.

Existing law establishes the Department of Veterans Affairs, which is responsible for administering various programs and services for the benefit of veterans. This bill would appropriate the sum of $7,300,000 from the General Fund to the Department of Veterans Affairs to provide for specified veterans' services.

Failed Feb 1, 2012 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AB 991
Failed · California House · Co-sponsor
State government: licenses: California Licensing and Permit Center.

Existing law requires members of the public to obtain license, permits, or to register with state agencies prior to undertaking certain types of tasks. This bill would require the Governor to establish a Internet Web site, known as the California Licensing and Permit Center (CLPC) , to assist the public with licensing, permitting, and registration requirements of state agencies. This bill would require the Governor to operate, via both e-mail and telephone methods, a help center to assist applicants with licensing, permitting, and registration requirements. This bill would require state agencies that the Governor determines has licensing authority to cooperate with this program by providing accurate updated information about their licensing requirements. This bill would create the California License and Permit Fund in the State Treasury, and require state agencies that are required to participate in the CLPC to reallocate a portion of their operating budget, as specified, to pay for the operating cost of the CLPC. This bill would state that upon appropriation by the Legislature, revenues from the fund will be used only for purposes of the bill. This bill would require the CLPC to be provided to the public free of charge.

Failed Feb 1, 2012 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AB 264
Failed · California House · Co-sponsor
Transitional housing.

Under existing law, in each city and county there is a public agency known as the housing authority of the city or county. This bill would require operators of transitional housing to notify the city or county and residents within 300 feet of the property when a transitional housing facility will be established so that the city or county and residents have specified knowledge about the transitional housing facility. The bill would exempt certain domestic violence shelters from this requirement.

Failed Feb 1, 2012 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AB 1376
Failed · California House · Co-sponsor
Sales and use taxes: exemption: production of electrical energy.

The Sales and Use Tax Law imposes a tax on retailers measured by the gross receipts from the sale of tangible personal property sold at retail in this state, or on the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of tangible personal property purchased from a retailer for storage, use, or other consumption in this state. This bill would exempt from those taxes the sale of, or the storage, use, or other consumption of, tangible personal property purchased by a qualified person for use primarily for the production of electrical energy from renewable sources, as specified, and qualified tangible personal property purchased for use by a contractor for specified purposes, as provided. The Bradley-Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law authorizes counties and cities to impose local sales and use taxes in conformity with the Sales and Use Tax Law, and existing law authorizes districts, as specified, to impose transactions and use taxes in accordance with the Transactions and Use Tax Law, which conforms to the Sales and Use Tax Law. Exemptions from state sales and use taxes are incorporated into these laws. This bill would specify that this exemption does not apply to local sales and use taxes or to transactions and use taxes. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.

Failed Feb 1, 2012 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AB 1057
Failed · California House · Co-sponsor
Sales and use taxes: exemption: manufacturing.

The Sales and Use Tax Law imposes a tax on retailers measured by the gross receipts from the sale of tangible personal property sold at retail in this state, or on the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of tangible personal property purchased from a retailer for storage, use, or other consumption in this state. That law provides various exemptions from those taxes. The bill would exempt from those taxes, on and after January 1, 2014, and before January 1, 2020, the gross receipts from the sale of, and the storage, use, or other consumption of, qualified tangible personal property purchased by a qualified person for use primarily in the manufacturing process, as specified, for use in research and development, as specified, or for use in air pollution mitigation, as provided. This bill would also exempt the gross receipts from the sale of, and the storage, use, or other consumption of, qualified tangible personal property purchased for use by a contractor for specified purposes. This bill would require the Legislative Analyst's Office to complete and distribute a report to the Legislature on the effect of this exemption by January 1, 2019. The Bradley-Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law authorizes counties and cities to impose local sales and use taxes in conformity with the Sales and Use Tax Law, and existing law authorizes districts, as specified, to impose transactions and use taxes in accordance with the Transactions and Use Tax Law, which conforms to the Sales and Use Tax Law. Exemptions from state sales and use taxes are incorporated into these laws. This bill would specify that this exemption does not apply to local sales and use taxes, transactions and use taxes, and specified state taxes from which revenues are deposited into the Local Public Safety Fund, the Local Revenue Fund, or the Fiscal Recovery Fund. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.

Failed Feb 1, 2012 1 co-sponsor
Primary SB 188
In committee · California Senate · Lead sponsor
Civil actions: jurisdiction.

Existing law authorizes a court to exercise jurisdiction on any basis not inconsistent with the California or the United States Constitutions. Existing law also requires a court to stay or dismiss an action in whole or in part on any conditions that may be just when the court finds that in the interest of substantial justice an action should be heard in a forum outside of the state. This bill would make a technical, nonsubstantive change to these provisions.

In committee Jan 31, 2012 0 co-sponsors
Primary SB 187
In committee · California Senate · Lead sponsor
Family law.

Existing provisions governing family law define "state" to include, a state, the District of Columbia, or a commonwealth, a territory, or an insular possession subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. This bill would make a technical, nonsubstantive change to that definition.

In committee Jan 31, 2012 0 co-sponsors
Primary SB 254
In committee · California Senate · Lead sponsor
Marriage: putative spouses.

Existing law specifies the circumstances under which a marriage is void or voidable. Existing law requires a court, if a determination is made that a marriage is void or voidable and either party believed in good faith that the marriage was valid, to declare the party or parties to have the status of putative spouse and to divide the property that would have been community property if the marriage was valid as if it were community property. This bill would prohibit the court from making these declarations or orders unless the party or parties that believed in good faith that the marriage was valid request the court to do so.

In committee Jan 31, 2012 0 co-sponsors
Primary SB 435
In committee · California Senate · Lead sponsor
Mortgages and deeds of trust.

(1) Existing state and federal law regulate the terms and conditions of mortgages and deeds of trust. Upon the failure to satisfy specified terms of these obligations, existing state law requires that a notice of default be sent to a mortgagor or trustor indicating the property securing the loans may be foreclosed upon and that he or she has the right to cure the default and bring the account into good standing. Existing law requires this notice to include a statement indicating the name, address, and telephone number of the beneficiary or mortgagee for the purpose of finding out the amount that is due. This bill would also permit the notice to reference the authorized agent of the beneficiary or mortgagee on the notice described above. (2) Existing law regulates the sales of property pursuant to a power of sale in a mortgage or deed of trust, including prescribing the times and locations of these sales. Existing law permits these sales to be postponed, as specified, at any time prior to the completion of the sale, for any period of time not to exceed a total of 365 days from the date set forth in the notice of sale, after which time a new notice of sale must be given, as prescribed. This bill would permit these sales to be postponed, as described above, for any period of time not to exceed one year from the date set forth in the notice of sale. (3) Existing law permits a trustee under a trust deed whose duties are exclusively related to the power of sale contained in the deed to be substituted if certain conditions are met. If the substitution occurs after a notice of default has been recorded but prior to the recording of the notice of sale, existing law requires that the beneficiary or his or her authorized agent give notice of this, as specified. This bill would condition the requirement that the notice of trustee substitution be sent on the notice of default not having been rescinded.

In committee Jan 31, 2012 0 co-sponsors
Showing 61 to 70 of 887 bills
Previous 1 6 7 8 89 Next