Photo of Isadore Hall
D California Senate · District 35

Sen. Isadore Hall

Compare
Total votes
20,634
all sessions
Attendance
89%
1,633 missed
Higher than 80% of chamber peers
With party
99%
of cast votes
Near the chamber average
Bipartisan score
0%
crosses aisle rarely
Near the chamber average
Sponsored
771
bills & resolutions
Near the chamber average
Committees
0
assignments
771 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
771
Primary
152
Co-sponsor
619
This page
771
matching current filters
Primary AB 599
Vetoed · California House · Lead sponsor
Forensic blood alcohol testing laboratories.

Under existing law, the State Department of Public Health regulates laboratories engaged in the performance of forensic alcohol analysis tests by or for law enforcement agencies on blood, urine, tissue, or breath for the purpose of determining the concentration of ethyl alcohol in persons involved in traffic accidents or in traffic violations. Existing law requires these laboratories to comply with American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors/Laboratory Accreditation Board (ASCLD/LAB) guidelines for proficiency testing. This bill would provide that, until the effective date of specified regulatory changes, accreditation in the forensic alcohol analysis discipline or subdiscipline by the ASCLD/LAB is sufficient to comply with the proficiency testing requirements. Under existing law, the department is required to establish a review committee to review the regulations and determine revisions that will limit those regulations to those that the review committee determines are reasonably necessary to ensure the competence of the laboratories and employees to prepare, analyze, and report the results of the tests and comply with applicable laws and to submit a summary of revisions to the California Health and Human Services Agency. This bill would require the review committee to submit its report by December 31, 2010.

Vetoed Jan 14, 2010 0 co-sponsors
Primary AB 600
Vetoed · California House · Lead sponsor
Surplus state property: Compton Armory.

Existing law authorizes the Director of General Services to dispose of surplus state property, subject to specified conditions, including authorization by the Legislature. This bill would, until January 1, 2012, authorize the director, with the approval of the Adjutant General, to complete a lease to the City of Compton at fair market value, of specified state-owned property known as the Compton Armory. The bill would specify a 5-year term for the lease and would authorize renewal of the lease or other lease agreements of the Compton Armory for a total term not to exceed 25 additional years. The bill would, notwithstanding the requirement for payment of lease proceeds into the Deficit Recovery Bond Retirement Sinking Fund Subaccount, require the proceeds of the lease to be deposited into the Armory Fund pursuant to a specified provision of law. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Vetoed Jan 14, 2010 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor AB 627
Vetoed · California House · Co-sponsor
Child care: nutritional requirements.

Under existing law, the State Department of Education administers the child care food program pursuant to federal law, under which food is provided to child development programs and alternative child care programs, as defined. This bill would require the Superintendent of Public Instruction to establish a pilot program at least 12 months in duration in which licensed child care centers and child day care homes selected by the department that participate in the federal Child and Adult Care Food Program shall implement certain nutrition and physical activity standards in exchange for a higher state meal reimbursement. This bill would require the State Department of Education to design and implement the pilot program, as specified. The bill would specify that its provisions shall only be implemented if the Superintendent determines that non-General Fund funding sources are available for that purpose, as specified.

Vetoed Jan 14, 2010 1 co-sponsor
Primary AB 804
Vetoed · California House · Lead sponsor
Invasive aquatic species: mussels.

Existing law, until January 1, 2012, generally prohibits a person from possessing, importing, shipping, or transporting in the state, or from placing, planting, or causing to be placed or planted in any water within the state, dreissenid mussels, and authorizes the Director of Fish and Game or his or her designee to engage in various enforcement activities. Existing law exempts a public or private agency that operates a water supply system from those enforcement activities, if the operator of the facilities has prepared and implemented a prescribed plan to control or eradicate dreissenid mussels. Existing law provides that a person who violates or resists, delays, obstructs, or interferes with the implementation of these provisions is subject to a penalty, in an amount not to exceed $1,000, that is imposed administratively by the department. This bill would provide that an operator of water delivery and storage facilities, who has prepared, initiated, and is in compliance with a plan to control and eradicate dreissenid mussels in accordance with the above existing provisions of law, would not be subject to any civil or criminal liability for the introduction of dreissenid mussel species as a result of operations of those facilities. The bill would provide that neither the director's enforcement activities, nor the prohibition on a person possessing, importing, shipping, or transporting dreissenid mussels in the state would apply to an operator who has prepared, initiated, and is in compliance with a plan to control and eradicate dreissenid mussels, unless the department had required the operator to update its plan and the operator failed to do so.

Vetoed Jan 14, 2010 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor AB 813
Signed into law · California House · Co-sponsor
Alcoholic beverages: advertising.

Existing law generally restricts certain alcoholic beverage licensees, including manufacturers and winegrowers, from paying, crediting, or compensating a retailer for advertising in connection with the advertising and sale of alcoholic beverages. This bill would expressly authorize a beer manufacturer, holder of a winegrower's license, California winegrower's agent, distilled spirits manufacturer, holder of a distilled spirits rectifiers general license, or a distilled spirits manufacturer's agent to purchase advertising space or time from specified fully enclosed venues located in Los Angeles County, as described, under specified conditions. This bill would require a venue owner that enters into a written agreement pursuant to this authorization to obtain an annual certificate from the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. This bill would additionally require the department to, in its annual report to the Legislature, include specified information with regard to this authorization. This bill would also make a beer manufacturer, holder of a winegrower's license, winegrower's agent, distilled spirits manufacturer, holder of a distilled spirits rectifiers general license, or a distilled spirits manufacturer's agent who, through coercion or other means, induces the holder of a wholesaler's license to fulfill those contractual obligations guilty of a misdemeanor. This bill would additionally make an on-sale retail licensee, as described, who solicits or coerces a holder of a wholesaler's license to solicit a beer manufacturer, holder of a winegrower's license, winegrower's agent, distilled spirits manufacturer, holder of a distilled spirits rectifiers general license, or a distilled spirits manufacturer's agent to purchase advertising time or space guilty of a misdemeanor. The bill thus imposes a state-mandated local program by creating new crimes. This bill would make findings regarding the need for special legislation. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Signed into law Nov 5, 2009 1 co-sponsor
Primary AB 81
Signed into law · California House · Lead sponsor
Land use: City of Industry: stadium complex.

(1) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment, as defined, or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect, unless the project is exempt from the act. CEQA provides for various exemptions from its requirements. Existing law requires cities and counties to prepare, adopt, and amend general plans containing specified elements. This bill would exempt from CEQA any activity or approval, necessary or incidental to, the development, planning, design, site acquisition, subdivision, financing, leasing, construction, operation, or maintenance of a stadium complex and associated development included in the same project or approval together with any accessory roadway, utility, or other infrastructure improvement to that stadium complex and associated development, for which an application for the project or approval was submitted on or before January 31, 2009, to the City of Industry, if specified requirements are met. The bill would require the city to require the stadium complex and associated development to comply with those mitigation measures that are contained in a mitigation monitoring and reporting program that is adopted by the City of Industry in connection with the stadium complex and associated development. Because a lead agency would be required to determine the applicability of the exemption, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill also would exempt from any legal requirement concerning the content of a general plan or consistency with a general plan, and prohibit those requirements from resulting in the invalidation of, the city's approval of, and decisions regarding, specified actions taken with respect to the stadium complex and associated development included in the same project or approval and any accessory improvements to that stadium complex and associated development. The bill additionally would provide that a consistency determination is not required by the city for any decision with respect to those actions. (2) The bill would have retroactive application. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (4) The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. The Governor issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 19, 2008. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared by the Governor by proclamation issued on December 19, 2008, pursuant to the California Constitution.

Signed into law Oct 22, 2009 0 co-sponsors
Primary AB 1282
Signed into law · California House · Lead sponsor
Alcoholic beverages.

The Alcoholic Beverage Control Act prohibits any licensee from giving a premium, gift, or free goods in connection with the sale and distribution of any alcoholic beverage, except as provided. This bill would provide that, with regard to beer, a beer manufacturer, as defined, may give consumer advertising specialties to the general public that do not exceed $3 per unit original cost to the beer manufacturer who purchased it. This bill would prohibit a beer manufacturer from requiring a beer wholesaler to fund the purchase of these consumer advertising specialties. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Signed into law Oct 11, 2009 0 co-sponsors
Co-sponsor SB 546
Signed into law · California Senate · Co-sponsor
Used oil.

(1) The California Oil Recycling Enhancement Act, administered by the California Integrated Waste Management Board, among other things, defines terms and establishes the used oil recycling program, consisting of a recycling incentive system, grants or loans to local governments and nonprofit entities for specified purposes related to used lubricating oil collection and recycling and stormwater pollution from used oil and oil byproducts, development and implementation of an information and education program to promote alternatives to the illegal disposal of used oil, and a reporting, monitoring, and enforcement program to ensure that laws relating to used oil are properly carried out. A violation of the act is a crime. This bill would revise the definition of "used oil hauler" and define the term "rerefined oil," for purposes of the act, and would revise and recast the used oil recycling program, so that, among other things, it would no longer provide for loans, and it would provide for the development and implementation of an information and education program to promote methods to reduce the amounts of used oil generated, among other things. The bill would revise the purposes for which grants under the program may be made and would authorize grants additionally to be made to private entities. (2) The act generally imposes a charge on oil manufacturers, payable to the board, in the amount of $0.04 for every quart, or $0.16 for every gallon, of lubricating oil sold or transferred in the state, or imported into the state for use in the state. This bill would increase those amounts to $0.065 and $0.26, respectively through December 31, 2013, and on and after January 1, 2014, those charges would be $0.06 for every quart and $0.24 for every gallon. The charges for finished lubricant containing at least 70% rerefined base lubricant would be revised to $0.03 for every quart and to $0.12 for every gallon. (3) The act requires the board to pay a recycling incentive to every industrial generator, curbside collection program, and certified used oil collection center, for used lubricating oil if certain conditions apply, and to an electric utility, as defined, for certain used lubricating oil. Existing law requires the board to set the recycling incentive amount at not less than $0.04 per quart, and authorizes the board to set the amount at a higher amount if the board determines that a higher amount is necessary to promote recycling of used lubricating oil and sufficient funds are available in the California Used Oil Recycling Fund. This bill would revise the conditions applicable to used lubricating oil that must be met before the board is required to pay the recycling incentive, and would delete the requirement that the board pay the recycling incentive to an electric utility for certain used lubricating oil. The bill additionally would require the board on and after January 1, 2013, to pay a rerefining incentive to certain recycling facilities that produce rerefined base lubricant meeting specified requirements. The bill would require the board, to coordinate a comprehensive life cycle analysis of the used lubricating and industrial oil management process, evaluate the used oil management policies on used oil collection rates, and by January 1, 2014, report to the Legislature its findings. The bill would require the board to increase the recycling incentive to not less than $0.10 per quart, except for used oil generated by a certified used oil collection center and an industrial generator, and, on and after January 1, 2014, to set the rerefining incentive at not less than $0.02 per gallon, and would authorize the board to increase those amounts as specified if it determines that a higher amount is necessary to promote the collection and recycling of used lubricating oil or the rerefining of used lubricating oil, as applicable, and sufficient funds are available in the California Used Oil Recycling Fund. (4) The act requires the board to deposit the charges described in (2) above, civil penalties and fines paid pursuant to the act, and all other revenues received pursuant to the act, in the California Used Oil Recycling Fund, part of which is continuously appropriated to the board to pay recycling incentives, to provide a reserve for contingencies, to make specified payments for implementation of certain local used oil collection programs in a total amount equal to $10,000,000 or12 the amount remaining in the fund after specified expenditures are made, for certain grants and loans, and for reimbursement for certain disposal costs of contaminated used oil. The act authorizes money in the fund, upon appropriation by the Legislature, among other things, to be transferred to the Farm and Ranch Solid Waste Cleanup and Abatement Account in the General Fund, to pay costs associated with implementing and operating the farm and ranch solid waste cleanup and abatement grant program. This bill would authorize the continuously appropriated moneys in the fund also to be used for rerefining incentives and to evaluate the used oil management policies, thereby making an appropriation. The bill would increase the amount available for payments for implementation of local used oil collection programs to $11,000,000, or if that amount is not available, the bill would require the board to determine the amount pursuant to a specified formula, thereby making an appropriation, and would exempt the application and grant award process for these payments from a public meeting requirement, otherwise applicable to programs under the act. The bill would prohibit money in the California Used Oil Recycling Fund attributable to increasing or adjusting the charge on oil manufacturers described in (2) above from being transferred to the Farm and Ranch Solid Waste Cleanup and Abatement Account. (5) The act prohibits a used oil collection center from being eligible for the payment of recycling incentives until the board has certified the center and authorizes the board to cancel certification, after a public hearing, upon finding noncompliance with certification requirements. The act requires a center to reapply for certification every 2 years. This bill instead would require a center to reapply for certification every 4 years and would eliminate the public hearing requirement for cancellation of certification. (6) Under the act, if the board finds that a shipment of used oil from a certified used oil collection center or a curbside collection program is contaminated by hazardous material and other specified requirements are met, the board, upon application of the center or program, is required to reimburse the center or program for the additional disposal cost of the used oil, subject to eligibility requirements and payment limitations. This bill would include uncertified publicly funded used oil collection centers in small rural counties in those entities eligible to receive that reimbursement, and would modify the eligibility requirements and payment limitations. (7) The act imposes certification requirements for used oil recycling facilities. This bill would specify requirements for out-of-state used oil recycling facilities seeking incentive payments, including requirements to register with the board and make certain declarations under penalty of perjury. Because this would expand the application of a crime, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would authorize a facility registered or certified under this provision to enter into a testing and reporting agreement with the Department of Toxic Substances Control and agree to reimburse the department for its full reasonable costs associated with the agreement. The bill also would impose certification requirements on rerefiners of used oil. (8) The act imposes reporting requirements on industrial generators of used lubricating oil, used oil collection centers, and curbside collection programs, to be eligible for payment of a recycling incentive. This bill would revise those reporting requirements. (9) This bill would make other related changes to the act. (10) Because a violation of the act is a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program by, among other things, bringing rerefiners of used lubricating oil within the ambit of the act. (11) Existing law generally regulates persons who generate, receive, store, transfer, transport, treat, or recycle used oil. A violation of those requirements is a crime. This bill would generally require used oil to be tested and analyzed by a laboratory accredited by the State Department of Public Health, to ensure that it meets specified criteria, before a load of used oil is shipped to a transfer facility, recycling facility, or facility located out of the state. The bill would require the testing and analysis to be accomplished by a registered hazardous waste transporter before acceptance at a transfer or recycling facility or shipment out of state, except as otherwise specified. The bill would require the person performing the test to maintain records of the test for at least 3 years and to be subject to audit and verification by the Department of Toxic Substances Control. The bill would require the registered hazardous waste transporter who is listed as the transporter on the Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest used to ship used oil out of state to submit a report annually to the department containing information regarding shipment of used oil out of state. Because a violation of the used oil requirements would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (12) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Signed into law Oct 11, 2009 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor SB 147
Signed into law · California Senate · Co-sponsor
California State University: career technical education courses.

The Donahoe Higher Education Act sets forth, among other things, the missions and functions of California's public and independent segments of higher education and their respective institutions of higher education. Existing law establishes the California State University, under the administration of the Trustees of the California State University as one of the segments of public postsecondary education in this state. A provision of the act requires the California State University to establish model academic standards for high school courses, including career technical courses, for pupils who wish to attend the California State University. The act requires the California State University to recognize the completion of all high school career technical education courses that meet model curriculum standards established by the Superintendent of Public Instruction as satisfying the completion of a general elective course requirement for the purposes of admission to that university, if, by July 1, 2008, the university has not adopted model uniform academic standards for career technical education courses that will satisfy the completion of a general elective course requirement for the purposes of admission to the university. Existing law requires the Superintendent to coordinate the development, on a cyclical basis, of model curriculum standards for a high school career technical course of study. Existing law also requires the Superintendent to develop a career technical curriculum framework based on prescribed criteria. This bill, notwithstanding any other provision of law, on or before January 1, 2014, would require the trustees to develop and implement a procedure for allowing a student to satisfy the completion of a general elective course requirement for the purposes of admission to the university by completing a high school career technical education course that meets either (1) specified criteria that the bill would require the trustees to establish, or (2) model academic standards for high school courses adopted by the California State University pursuant to existing law. The bill would require the university to recognize the completion of all high school career technical education courses that meet model curriculum standards established by the Superintendent as satisfying the completion of a general elective course requirement for the purposes of admission to the university, if, by January 1, 2014, the university has not developed that procedure. The bill would require the trustees to adopt related requirements based on the recommendations and judgment of the Academic Senate of the California State University.

Signed into law Oct 11, 2009 1 co-sponsor
Co-sponsor AB 719
Signed into law · California House · Co-sponsor
Transitional food stamps for foster youth.

Existing law declares the duty of the state to care for and protect the children that it places into foster care. Under existing law, the State Department of Social Services has various powers and duties relating to ensuring that the needs of foster children are met. Existing law requires the State Department of Health Care Services, if, and to the extent that, all necessary federal approvals are obtained for federal financial participation, to implement a federal option to extend Medi-Cal benefits to independent foster care adolescents, as defined in federal law. Existing law provides for the federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) (formerly the Food Stamp Program) , under which each county distributes nutrition assistance benefits to eligible households. The SNAP is administered at the state level by the State Department of Social Services. This bill would require the department to propose a Transitional Food Stamps for Foster Youth demonstration project, effective July 1, 2010. The demonstration project would provide independent foster care adolescents, who are not eligible for CalWORKs or SSI benefits, with eligibility for food stamps without regard to income or resources. This bill would require the department to implement its provisions by all-county letter or similar instructions, and would prescribe additional duties of the department in connection with the transitional food stamp demonstration project, including obtaining necessary federal approvals. This bill would be implemented only to the extent that federal financial participation is available. By increasing county duties, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.

Signed into law Oct 11, 2009 1 co-sponsor
Showing 701 to 710 of 771 bills
Previous 1 70 71 72 78 Next