This measure would recognize the 10th anniversary of the September 11, 2001 attacks as a day of solemn commemoration.
This measure would commemorate the 100-year anniversary of California's initiative process.
This measure would resolve that the month of April be designated as Sexual Assault Awareness Month, would recognize April 27, 2011, as Denim Day California, and would encourage everyone to wear jeans on that day to help communicate the message that there is no excuse for, and never an invitation to, rape or sexual assault.
Existing law provides for the Alternative Protest Pilot Project, which provides for alternative protest procedures in connection with state agency acquisition of goods and services, including the acquisition of information technology goods and services, and requires the Department of General Services to administer the project until December 31, 2011. This bill would delete the sunset date on the above provision, thereby extending that provision indefinitely.
Existing law, the Williamson Act, authorizes a city or county to enter into 10-year contracts with owners of land devoted to agricultural use, whereby the owners agree to continue using the property for that purpose, and the city or county agrees to value the land accordingly for purposes of property taxation. Existing law sets forth procedures for reimbursing cities and counties for property tax revenues not received as a result of these contracts. This bill would, beginning January 1, 2011, and until January 1, 2016, authorize a county, in any fiscal year in which payments authorized for reimbursement to a county for lost revenue are less than12 of the participating county's actual foregone general fund property tax revenue, to revise the term for newly renewed and new contracts and require the assessor to value the property, as specified, based on the revised contract term. The bill would provide that a landowner may choose to nonrenew and begin the cancellation process. The bill would also provide that any increased revenues generated by properties under a new contract shall be paid to the county. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
This measure would declare June 2011 as Scleroderma Awareness Month.
The Administrative Procedure Act governs the procedure for the adoption, amendment, or repeal of regulations by state agencies and for the review of those regulatory actions by the Office of Administrative Law. The act requires that an agency identify, in the notice of proposed action for a regulation, an estimate, prepared in accordance with instructions adopted by the Department of Finance, of the cost or savings to a state agency. Existing law designates the state board as the state agency with authority over the regulation of air pollution from motor vehicles. This bill would additionally require the state board to estimate the cost or savings to the state in revenues that are lost or gained as a result of a regulation adopted or amended by the state board imposing requirements relating to diesel-fueled heavy-duty on-road or off-road motor vehicles that would make equipment obsolete, where that equipment would otherwise have a remaining depreciable life. The bill would require the Franchise Tax Board to provide to the state board, and update every 5 years, the average tax rate to be applied to the amount of the estimated accelerated deduction due to reduced asset life attributable to the regulation for an increase in business depreciation.
This measure would designate the week of April 18 to 24, 2011, as "California Week of Remembrance for the Armenian Genocide of 1915–1923," and would memorialize the Congress and the President of the United States to observe the California Week of Remembrance for the Armenian Genocide by participating in the Armenian Genocide Commemorative Project.
Existing law, with certain exceptions, establishes 8 hours as a day's work and a 40-hour workweek, and requires payment of prescribed overtime compensation for additional hours worked. Existing law authorizes the adoption by 23 of employees in a work unit of alternative workweek schedules providing for workdays no longer than 10 hours within a 40-hour workweek. This bill would permit an individual nonexempt employee to request an employee-selected flexible work schedule providing for workdays up to 10 hours per day within a 40-hour workweek, and would allow an employer to implement this schedule without the obligation to pay overtime compensation for those additional hours in a workday. The bill would require the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement in the Department of Industrial Relations to enforce this provision and adopt regulations.
The California Constitution requires the Legislature to divide the state into districts, each containing a court of appeal with one or more divisions. Under existing statutory law, the state is divided into 6 court of appeal districts. The 4th Appellate District consists of the Counties of Inyo, San Bernardino, Riverside, Orange, San Diego, and Imperial, which consists of 3 divisions. One division consists of 10 judges and holds its regular session in San Diego, a 2nd division consists of 7 judges and holds its regular sessions in the San Bernardino/Riverside area, and a 3rd division consists of 8 judges and holds its regular sessions in Orange County. This bill would reorganize the court of appeal districts into 7 districts by removing the Counties of San Bernardino, Inyo, and Riverside from the 4th Appellate District and creating a 7th Appellate District consisting of those districts. The 7th Appellate District would consist of one division of 7 judges and would hold its regular sessions in the San Bernardino/Riverside area, and the 4th Appellate District would thereafter consist of 2 divisions that would hold regular sessions in the Counties of San Diego and Orange. Existing law provides that upon the creation of a new court of appeal district or division, the Governor shall appoint judges to serve on that court, and specifies the procedures to be followed for the election of the judges. This bill would specify that those provisions would not apply to the creation of the 7th Appellate District, and that the existing justices of the division of the 4th Appellate District that would be reorganized as the 7th Appellate District would serve as the judges of the new district. The bill would specify that the terms of office of those judges would not be affected by the reorganization, and would also specify that no action by the Commission on Judicial Appointments would be necessary. The bill would specify that the judge serving as the currently presiding judge in the division of the 4th Appellate District that would create the new court of appeal district would serve as the administrative presiding judge of the new district.
