This measure would commemorate the American Legion for 100 years of service to the United States.
This measure would proclaim October 6, 2019, through October 12, 2019, as Latex Allergy Awareness Week in California.
This measure would declare June 6, 2019, as Secure Your Load Day in California.
The federal Nutria Eradication and Control Act of 2003 authorizes the Secretary of the Interior, subject to the availability of appropriations, to provide financial assistance to the State of Maryland and the State of Louisiana for a program to implement measures to eradicate or control nutria and restore marshland damaged by nutria. Under the federal act, the federal share of the costs of the program is prohibited from exceeding 75% of the total costs of the program. This measure would urge the United States Congress to reauthorize and specifically add California to the Nutria Eradication and Control Act of 2003 and to authorize an appropriation of $4,000,000 to help the state implement a nutria eradication program.
This measure would urge the United States Department of Health and Human Services to rescind the new Title X regulations that will impede access to essential, time-sensitive health care for low-income individuals across California and the nation.
The California Constitution establishes the Public Utilities Commission and authorizes the commission to exercise ratemaking and rulemaking authority over all public utilities, as defined, subject to control by the Legislature. The Public Utilities Act authorizes the commission to supervise and regulate every public utility, including electrical corporations, and to do all things that are necessary and convenient in the exercise of such power and jurisdiction. Existing law authorizes the commission to fix the rates and charges for every public utility and requires that those rates and charges be just and reasonable. Existing law authorizes the commission, in a proceeding on an application by an electrical corporation to recover costs and expenses arising from a catastrophic wildfire occurring on or after January 1, 2019, to allow cost recovery if the costs and expenses are just and reasonable, after consideration of the conduct of the utility, including consideration of specified factors. This bill would establish the California Wildfire Safety Advisory Board consisting of 7 members appointed by the Governor, Speaker of the Assembly, and Senate Committee on Rules, as provided, who would serve 4-year staggered terms. The bill would require the board, among other actions, to advise and make recommendations related to wildfire safety to the Wildfire Safety Division or, on and after July 1, 2021, the Office of Energy Infrastructure Safety, as established pursuant to AB 111 or SB 111 of the 2019–20 Regular Session. This bill would require the commission and the Office of Energy Infrastructure Safety to enter into a memorandum of understanding with the commission to cooperatively develop consistent approaches and share data related to electric infrastructure safety, and to share results from various safety activities, including relevant inspections and regulatory development. This bill would require the commission, when determining an application by an electrical corporation to recover costs and expenses arising from a covered wildfire, as defined, to allow cost recovery if the costs and expenses are determined just and reasonable based on reasonable conduct by the electrical corporation. The bill would require the commission to find that an electrical corporation's conduct was reasonable if that conduct, related to the ignition, was consistent with actions that a reasonable utility would have undertaken in good faith under similar circumstances, at the relevant point in time, and based on the information available to the electrical corporation at the time, as provided. The bill would provide that an electrical corporation bears the burden to demonstrate, based on a preponderance of the evidence, that its conduct was reasonable, unless it has a valid safety certification for the time period in which the covered wildfire that is the subject of the application ignited. If the electrical corporation has that valid safety certification, the bill would provide that the electrical corporation's conduct would be deemed reasonable unless a party to the proceeding creates a serious doubt as to the reasonableness of the electrical corporation's conduct. Once serious doubt has been raised, the electrical corporation would have the burden of dispelling the doubt and proving the conduct to have been reasonable. If the commission finds that an electrical corporation has requested recovery of costs for which the commission had previously authorized cost recovery, the bill would authorize the commission to assess a penalty in an amount up to 3 times the penalty authorized by law for certain utility-related violations. Existing law authorizes an electrical corporation to file an application requesting the commission to issue a financing order to authorize the recovery of costs and expenses related to a catastrophic wildfire through the issuance of bonds by the electrical corporation that are secured by a rate component, as provided. This bill would additionally authorize an electrical corporation to file an application requesting the commission to issue a financing order to authorize the recovery of costs and expenses related to catastrophic wildfires under specified conditions through the issuance of bonds by the electrical corporation that are secured by a rate component. This bill would establish the Wildfire Fund to pay eligible claims arising from a covered wildfire, as provided. The bill would continuously appropriate moneys in the fund to the Wildfire Fund Administrator for that purpose, thereby making an appropriation. The bill would require the commission to initiate a rulemaking proceeding to consider using its existing authority to require certain electrical corporations to collect a nonbypassable charge from its ratepayers to support the Wildfire Fund, and would require the commission to direct each electrical corporation to collect that charge if the commission determines that the imposition of the charge is just and reasonable and that it is an appropriate exercise of its authority, as specified. The bill would specify the funding sources for the fund, which include, among other sources, contributions from electrical corporations and revenues generated from the charge. The Public Utilities Act contains procedural requirements that are applicable to all commission hearings, investigations, and proceedings and provides that the technical rules of evidence are not applicable to those hearings, investigations, and proceedings, which are governed by the rules of practice and procedure adopted by the commission. This bill would require the commission to determine whether a proceeding is a catastrophic wildfire proceeding, defined as a proceeding to determine whether an electrical corporation's costs and expenses relating to a covered wildfire, as defined, are just and reasonable, as specified, and would establish procedures and standards applicable to catastrophic wildfire proceedings, as specified. Existing law requires each electrical corporation to annually prepare and submit a wildfire mitigation plan to the commission for review and approval. Existing law requires the commission to consider whether the cost of implementing an electrical corporation's plan is just and reasonable in the electrical corporation's general rate case. This bill would require the plan, in calendar year 2020 and thereafter, to cover at least a 3-year period. The bill would authorize the division to allow the annual submissions to be updates to the plan but would require the submission of a comprehensive wildfire mitigation plan at least once every 3 years. The bill would authorize the electrical corporation to recover the cost of implementing the plan in its general rate case, or to elect to recover the cost of implementation as accounted in a memorandum account at the conclusion of the time period covered by the plan, subject to a specified limit for a large electrical corporation. The bill would require the chief executive officer of an electrical corporation, in the electrical corporation's general rate case application, to certify that the electrical corporation has not received authorization from the commission to recover those costs in a previous proceeding. The bill would require the executive director of the commission to issue a safety certification to an electrical corporation if it meets certain requirements. Existing law requires each local publicly owned electric utility and electrical cooperative, by January 1, 2020, and annually thereafter, to prepare a wildfire mitigation plan. This bill would require, after January 1, 2020, that each local publicly owned electric utility or electrical cooperative submit, by July 1 of each year, its plan to the California Wildfire Safety Advisory Board for review and commission. The bill would require the California Wildfire Safety Advisory Board to provide comments and an advisory opinion to each local publicly owned electric utility or electrical cooperative regarding the content and sufficiency of its plan and to make recommendations on how to mitigate wildfire risks. The bill would require each local publicly owned electric utility to comprehensively revise its plan at least once every 3 years. Existing law prohibits a person or corporation from merging, acquiring, or controlling, either directly or indirectly, any public utility organized and doing business in this state without first securing authorization to do so from the Public Utilities Commission. Existing law, in the context of a change of control of an electrical corporation or gas corporation, requires a successor employer to retain all covered employees, as defined, for at least 180 days immediately following the effective date of a change of control. Existing law prohibits the successor employer from reducing the total compensation of a covered employee during that period. Existing law prohibits, for 2 years after the 180-day period, a successor employer from reducing the total number of employees who would have been covered employees for succession purposes below the total number of those employees who were protected during that 180-day period, unless approved by the commission. Existing law prohibits the commission from authorizing a successor employer to reduce the number of those employees unless the successor employer makes a specified showing. This bill would add to the definition of "change of control" for purposes of the bill: (1) the sale of all or a material portion of the assets of the electrical corporation or gas corporation, its parent company, or its holding company, or any merger, consolidation, or acquisition of the electrical corporation or gas corporation, its parent company, or its holding company with, by, or into another corporation, entity, or person, (2) the voluntary or involuntary change in ownership in assets of an electrical or gas corporation to ownership by a public entity, or (3) in the case of a combined electrical and gas corporation, the change in ownership of all or a substantial portion of either the gas or electric line of business of the combined corporation. The bill would require the posting of the required notice in a conspicuous place in a manner that is readily viewed by covered employees. The bill would require the successor employer, for 3 years after the 180-days covered employee retention period, to provide to employees who would have qualified as covered employees during the 90-day period immediately before a change of control no less than the wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment provided before the change of control, including any previously negotiated increase in wages, and to maintain no less than the total number of employees who would have qualified as covered employees during that 90-day period, except with commission approval based on proof of certain criteria. The bill would prohibit a person or corporation from merging, acquiring, or controlling, including a change in control as revised by this bill, either directly or indirectly, any public utility organized and doing business in this state without first securing authorization from the commission. Existing law, until January 1, 2003, authorizes the Department of Water Resources to enter into contracts for the purchase of electric power. Existing law authorizes the department to sell power to retail end use customers and local publicly owned electric utilities under certain circumstances. Existing law authorizes the department to issue revenue bonds and entitles the department to recover, as a revenue requirement, amounts necessary to enable it to finance the bonds and purchase electric power pursuant to these provisions. This bill would authorize the department to issue revenue bonds, on and after either the date on which the department legally defeases all of its remaining bonds under the provisions described above or the date on which it pays those obligations in full at maturity, whichever is earlier. The bill would entitle the department to recover, as a revenue requirement, amounts necessary to enable it to finance those bonds. The bill would require the bond proceeds and revenues received by the department to be deposited in the Department of Water Resources Charge Fund, which the bill would establish. The bill would continuously appropriate the moneys in the Department of Water Resources Charge Fund to the department for specified purposes, including transfers to the Wildfire Fund and repayment of the bonds. Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act, or any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. Because certain of the above provisions would be codified in the act and would require action by the commission, a violation of which would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. The bill would transfer $9,000,000 from the General Fund to the Department of Water Resources Charge Fund, thereby making an appropriation. This bill would become operative only if Assembly Bill 111 or Senate Bill 111 is enacted during the 2019–20 Regular Session and becomes effective before January 1, 2020. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Existing law designates certain portions of authorized state highway routes as part of the state scenic highway system, if certain scenic highway standards are implemented. Existing law requires the Department of Transportation to designate a state highway within the scenic highway system as an official state scenic highway if the department determines that a corridor protection program has been implemented, as specified. This bill would designate State Route 128 as a route in the state scenic highway system.
The existing Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District Act creates the Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District and grants to the district various powers relating to the treatment and disposal of sewage. The existing act provides for the election of a board of directors for the district and administrative procedures for the operation of the district. Violation of regulations adopted by the board is a misdemeanor. This bill would make various administrative changes to the act, including removing the requirement that the district appoint a clerk and changing the posting requirements for regulations. Existing law requires all county officers to be liable upon their several official bonds for the faithful discharge of the duties imposed by the act. This bill would instead authorize the board of the district to require any of its employees or officers to be bonded. The bill would require the district to pay the cost of the bonds. Existing law prohibits the district from accepting or contracting for the disposal of sewage emanating from outside the district, except sewage from a public building or buildings of a public utility. Existing law authorizes the district to accept and contract for the disposal of sewage emanating from outside the district if those buildings are connected to the district's sewage treatment system on March 1, 2002. This bill would remove the authorization to accept sewage from buildings of a public utility. The bill would authorize the district, upon the request of a landowner, to accept and contract for the disposal of sewage that will emanate or that will be emanating from any building within the Middle Green Valley Specific Plan, if approved as specified. The bill would also authorize the district to accept organic materials, as defined, originating from within or outside the district as the board determines to be in the best interests of the district. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
This measure would designate a specified portion of Interstate 5 in the County of Colusa as the Officer Natalie Corona Memorial Highway. The measure would also request the Department of Transportation to determine the cost of appropriate signs showing this special designation and the badge of the Davis Police Department and, upon receiving donations from nonstate sources covering that cost, to erect those signs.
This measure would urge Congress to swiftly enact House Resolution 8, the Bipartisan Background Checks Act of 2019, to require background checks for all firearm sales.
